REVIEW 2 cited by
COSINE-100 Full Dataset Challenges the Annual Modulation Signal of DAMA/LIBRA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
COSINE-100 Full Dataset Challenges the Annual Modulation Signal of DAMA/LIBRA
read the original abstract
For over 25 years, the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration has claimed to observe an annual modulation signal, suggesting the existence of dark matter interactions. However, no experiment employing different target materials has observed a dark matter signal consistent with their result. To address this puzzle, the COSINE-100 collaboration conducted a model-independent test using sodium iodide crystal detectors, the same target material as DAMA/LIBRA. Analyzing data collected over 6.4 years by the effective mass of 61.3 kg, with improved energy calibration and time-dependent background modeling, we found no evidence of an annual modulation signal, challenging the DAMA/LIBRA result with a confidence level greater than 3$\sigma$. This finding represents a substantial step toward resolving the long-standing debate surrounding DAMA/LIBRA's dark matter claim, indicating that the observed modulation is unlikely to be caused by dark matter interactions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Search for Annual Modulation in Combined ANAIS 112 and COSINE 100 Data using Bayesian Model Comparison
Bayesian model comparison of combined ANAIS-112/COSINE-100 residuals finds no meaningful support for an annual cosine modulation (ln Bayes factor < 1.2).
-
Shifting the neutrino fog: studying the Isospin-violating Dark Matter case
Isospin-violating dark matter shifts the neutrino fog: in xenon, a Z-portal model (f_n/f_p ≈ -22) lowers the discovery limit while the Scotogenic model (f_n/f_p = 0) raises it.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.