Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Perfectly to a Tee: Understanding User Perceptions of Personalized LLM-Enhanced Narrative Interventions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16732 v4 pith:DURNPOSD submitted 2024-09-25 cs.HC

Perfectly to a Tee: Understanding User Perceptions of Personalized LLM-Enhanced Narrative Interventions

classification cs.HC
keywords storiesadultshuman-writtenindividualsinterventionsllm-enhancedllmsones
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Stories about overcoming personal struggles can effectively illustrate the application of psychological theories in real life, yet they may fail to resonate with individuals' experiences. In this work, we employ large language models (LLMs) to create tailored narratives that acknowledge and address unique challenging thoughts and situations faced by individuals. Our study, involving 346 young adults across two settings, demonstrates that personalized LLM-enhanced stories were perceived to be better than human-written ones in conveying key takeaways, promoting reflection, and reducing belief in negative thoughts. These stories were not only seen as more relatable but also similarly authentic to human-written ones, highlighting the potential of LLMs in helping young adults manage their struggles. The findings of this work provide crucial design considerations for future narrative-based digital mental health interventions, such as the need to maintain relatability without veering into implausibility and refining the wording and tone of AI-enhanced content.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Identifying Implicit Bias in LLM-based Chat AI Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities

    cs.CY 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Across 25,000 stories from five LLMs, an LLM judge rated stories mentioning intellectual disabilities as more infantile, paternalistic, dependent, and inspirational than stories without the label.