Boltzmann Sampling by Diabatic Quantum Annealing

Gilhan Kim; Hyukjoon Kwon; Ju-yeon Gyhm; Yongjoo Baek

arxiv: 2409.18126 · v4 · submitted 2024-09-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Boltzmann Sampling by Diabatic Quantum Annealing

Ju-yeon Gyhm , Gilhan Kim , Hyukjoon Kwon , Yongjoo Baek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

keywords Boltzmann samplingdiabatic quantum annealingIsing modelSherrington-Kirkpatrick modelquantum annealingeffective temperatureunitary evolution

0 comments

The pith

Diabatic quantum annealing samples Boltzmann distributions unitarily with temperature set by the annealing rate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes diabatic quantum annealing as a purely unitary alternative to conventional quantum annealing for generating Boltzmann samples. In this method the speed of the annealing schedule directly sets an effective temperature that governs the sampled distribution. The authors demonstrate the approach on the ferromagnetic Ising model and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model, obtaining rapid and accurate results in the high-temperature regime. Boltzmann sampling appears in many machine-learning and statistical-mechanics algorithms, so a controllable, noise-free implementation would remove a common source of uncertainty in those pipelines.

Core claim

Diabatic quantum annealing serves as a controllable Boltzmann sampler in which the effective temperature is determined by the annealing rate. Using the ferromagnetic Ising model and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model as test cases, this unitary process achieves rapid and accurate sampling in the high-temperature regime.

What carries the argument

Diabatic quantum annealing, a fast unitary evolution in which non-adiabatic transitions produce an effective thermal distribution whose temperature is fixed by the annealing rate.

If this is right

Sampling proceeds without coupling to an environment, removing one source of temperature uncertainty.
The effective temperature becomes a tunable parameter set directly by the schedule speed.
Rapid and accurate sampling is obtained for ferromagnetic and spin-glass Ising instances when temperature is high.
The method supplies an alternative route to Boltzmann sampling that avoids the decoherence and calibration issues of open-system annealers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The rate-to-temperature mapping could be calibrated once for a given hardware and then reused across many instances without per-instance fitting.
Because the evolution remains unitary, the sampler might be embeddable inside larger coherent quantum algorithms that require repeated sampling steps.
Extending the same schedule-speed control to low-temperature or frustrated regimes would require checking whether the distribution remains Boltzmann or acquires systematic deviations.

Load-bearing premise

The annealing rate produces a distribution that exactly matches the Boltzmann distribution at an effective temperature fixed solely by that rate, at least for the tested models in the high-temperature regime.

What would settle it

For a two-spin Ising system, perform diabatic annealing at a chosen rate, collect the empirical state probabilities over many runs, and test whether they equal the Boltzmann weights exp(-E/kT) with T predicted from the rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.18126 by Gilhan Kim, Hyukjoon Kwon, Ju-yeon Gyhm, Yongjoo Baek.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence of the Boltzmann statistics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Colored solid lines represent the theoretical values of the observables, their correspoding dashed lines represents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The results from 2-d Ising model. (a) The Kullback-Leibler divergence between theoretical distribution and DQA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Boltzmann sampling is a central component of many computational frameworks, including numerous algorithms in machine learning. Although quantum annealers have been investigated as potential fast Boltzmann samplers, their dependence on environmental noise makes precise control of the effective temperature difficult, introducing uncertainty into the sampling process. As an alternative, we propose diabatic quantum annealing -- a faster, purely unitary process -- as a controllable Boltzmann sampler in which the effective temperature is determined by the annealing rate. Using the ferromagnetic Ising model and the Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model as test cases, we demonstrate that this method achieves rapid and accurate sampling in the high-temperature regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper frames diabatic annealing speed as a direct knob for effective temperature in unitary Boltzmann sampling on Ising and SK models, but the abstract supplies no numbers or mapping to back the accuracy claim.

read the letter

The core idea is to replace noise-driven thermalization in quantum annealers with a faster unitary diabatic schedule whose speed sets the final occupation probabilities to match a Boltzmann distribution at some T_eff. They test this on the ferromagnetic Ising model and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model and state that it works in the high-temperature regime. That framing is not just a minor tweak on existing annealing literature; it treats the non-adiabatic transitions themselves as the sampling mechanism rather than an error to be avoided. If the numerics hold, it gives a controllable, bath-independent route that could be useful for high-T sampling tasks in statistical mechanics or certain ML models. The abstract is honest about the high-T limit, which keeps the claim proportionate. The main weakness is that the provided text gives no quantitative match, no error bars, and no explicit derivation linking schedule speed to T_eff. Without those, it is impossible to tell whether the distributions actually follow the claimed form or whether extra post-processing is involved. The full manuscript presumably contains the plots and methods, but on the basis of what is here the central mapping remains unverified. This work is aimed at people already running or simulating quantum annealers for sampling problems. A reader who needs a new unitary knob for high-T Boltzmann draws could get something out of it once the data are checked. It is coherent enough on its own terms to go to referees rather than desk reject; the limited scope and the need for concrete validation are exactly what review should sort out.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes diabatic quantum annealing as a faster, purely unitary alternative to noise-dependent quantum annealing for Boltzmann sampling. In this approach the effective temperature is set by the annealing rate rather than by coupling to a thermal bath. The authors test the method on the ferromagnetic Ising model and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model and claim that it produces rapid and accurate sampling in the high-temperature regime.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work would supply a controllable, noise-independent route to Boltzmann sampling that could be useful for high-temperature regimes in statistical mechanics and machine-learning applications. The choice of standard test models permits direct comparison with known equilibrium distributions, which is a positive feature.

major comments (1)

The abstract asserts that the method 'achieves rapid and accurate sampling' yet supplies neither quantitative error metrics, overlap measures with the target Boltzmann distribution, nor an explicit derivation relating annealing rate to effective temperature. This information is load-bearing for the claim that the annealing rate directly and controllably sets T_eff.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our central claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The abstract asserts that the method 'achieves rapid and accurate sampling' yet supplies neither quantitative error metrics, overlap measures with the target Boltzmann distribution, nor an explicit derivation relating annealing rate to effective temperature. This information is load-bearing for the claim that the annealing rate directly and controllably sets T_eff.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from more explicit support for the accuracy claim and that an explicit derivation strengthens the controllability argument. In the revised manuscript we will (i) augment the abstract with a brief statement of the quantitative metrics used, (ii) add a dedicated subsection deriving the effective temperature from the Landau-Zener transition probabilities under linear annealing, showing T_eff ∝ 1/√v where v is the annealing rate, and (iii) report total-variation distance and KL divergence between the empirical distribution obtained from diabatic annealing and the exact Boltzmann distribution for both the ferromagnetic Ising and SK instances across the high-temperature regime. These additions will be placed in the main text and will not alter the reported results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central proposal is that diabatic quantum annealing, as a purely unitary schedule, produces a Boltzmann distribution whose effective temperature is set by the annealing rate, with numerical demonstrations confined to the ferromagnetic Ising and Sherrington-Kirkpatrick models in the high-temperature regime. No load-bearing equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are exhibited in the provided text that would reduce this temperature-control claim to a self-definition or to a prediction forced by construction from the inputs. The method is presented as an independent alternative to noise-dependent approaches, and the limited-scope demonstrations do not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported from prior author work in a circular manner. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method is framed as relying on standard unitary quantum evolution and known models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5632 in / 1054 out tokens · 21192 ms · 2026-05-23T20:53:13.774136+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Information-Geometric Decomposition of Generalization Error in Unsupervised Learning
stat.ML 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

The KL generalization error in unsupervised learning decomposes exactly into model error, data bias, and variance for e-flat models, with closed-form results for ε-PCA on isotropic Gaussians showing optimal rank at th...
Multi-Mode Quantum Annealing for Generative Representation Learning with Boltzmann Priors
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A multi-mode quantum annealing approach enables VAEs with Boltzmann priors, showing faster training and better generation than Gaussian-prior VAEs on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CelebA plus improved out-of-distribution ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

[1]

G. E. Hinton and T. J. Sejnowski, Optimal perceptual inference, in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , Vol. 448 (Citeseer,

work page
[2]

Smolensky, Information processing in dynamical sys- tems: Foundations of harmony theory, in Parallel Dis- tributed Processing: Volume 1: Foundations , edited by D

P. Smolensky, Information processing in dynamical sys- tems: Foundations of harmony theory, in Parallel Dis- tributed Processing: Volume 1: Foundations , edited by D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (MIT Press, Cam- bridge, 1986)

work page 1986
[3]

G. E. Hinton, Training Products of Experts by Minimiz- ing Contrastive Divergence, Neural Comput. 14, 1771 (2002)

work page 2002
[4]

G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero, and Y.-W. Teh, A Fast Learn- ing Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets, Neural Comput. 18, 1527 (2006)

work page 2006
[5]

M. E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999)

work page 1999
[6]

Kirkpatrick, C

S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimiza- tion by Simulated Annealing, Science 220, 671 (1983)

work page 1983
[7]

R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Replica Monte Carlo Simulation of Spin-Glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2607 (1986)

work page 1986
[8]

Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J

F. Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 15, 3241 (1982)

work page 1982
[9]

Kadowaki and H

T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model, Phys. Rev. E58, 5355 (1998)

work page 1998
[10]

Brooke, D

J. Brooke, D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aep- pli, Quantum Annealing of a Disordered Magnet, Science 284, 779 (1999)

work page 1999
[11]

Farhi, J

E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lund- gren, and D. Preda, A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP- Complete Problem, Science 292, 472 (2001)

work page 2001
[12]

Rajak, S

A. Rajak, S. Suzuki, A. Dutta, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Quantum annealing: an overview, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 381, 20210417 (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechan- ics, J

T. Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechan- ics, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 5, 435 (1950)

work page 1950
[14]

D-Wave Quantum Inc., High-coherence fluxonium as a probe of D-Wave’s QPU environment, D-Wave Whitepa- per Series (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

Sandt and R

R. Sandt and R. Spatschek, Efficient low temperature Monte Carlo sampling using quantum annealing, Sci. Rep. 13, 6754 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

Scriva, E

G. Scriva, E. Costa, B. McNaughton, and S. Pilati, Accel- erating equilibrium spin-glass simulations using quantum annealers via generative deep learning, SciPost Phys. 15, 018 (2023)

work page 2023
[17]

Arai and T

S. Arai and T. Kadowaki, Quantum Annealing Enhanced Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (2025), arXiv:2502.08060 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Z. Bian, F. Chudak, W. G. Macready, and G. Rose, The Ising model: teaching an old problem new tricks, D-Wave Systems (2010)

work page 2010
[19]

Perdomo-Ortiz, B

A. Perdomo-Ortiz, B. O’Gorman, J. Fluegemann, R. Biswas, and V. N. Smelyanskiy, Determination and correction of persistent biases in quantum annealers, Sci. Rep. 6, 18628 (2016)

work page 2016
[20]

Benedetti, J

M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-G´ omez, R. Biswas, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Estimation of effective temperatures in quantum annealers for sampling applications: A case study with possible applications in deep learning, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022308 (2016)

work page 2016
[21]

M. H. Amin, Searching for quantum speedup in qua- sistatic quantum annealers, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052323 (2015)

work page 2015
[22]

S. H. Adachi and M. P. Henderson, Application of quan- tum annealing to training of deep neural networks (2015), arXiv:1510.06356 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[23]

J. E. Dorband, A Boltzmann Machine Implementation for the D-Wave, in 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations (2015) pp. 703–707

work page 2015
[24]

M. H. Amin, E. Andriyash, J. Rolfe, B. Kulchytskyy, and R. Melko, Quantum Boltzmann Machine, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021050 (2018)

work page 2018
[25]

J. Liu, F. M. Spedalieri, K.-T. Yao, T. E. Potok, C. Schuman, S. Young, R. Patton, G. S. Rose, and G. Chamka, Adiabatic Quantum Computation Applied to Deep Learning Networks, Entropy 20, 380 (2018)

work page 2018
[26]

R. Y. Li, T. Albash, and D. A. Lidar, Limitations of error corrected quantum annealing in improving the per- formance of Boltzmann machines, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 045010 (2020)

work page 2020
[27]

Caldeira, J

J. Caldeira, J. Job, S. H. Adachi, B. Nord, and G. N. Perdue, Restricted Boltzmann Machines for galaxy mor- phology classification with a quantum annealer (2020), arXiv:1911.06259 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[28]

Krzysztof, S

K. Krzysztof, S. Mateusz, S. Marek, and R. Rafa l, Apply- ing a quantum annealing based restricted Boltzmann ma- chine for MNIST handwritten digit classification, CMST 27, 99 (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

Denil and N

M. Denil and N. de Freitas, Toward the Implementation of a Quantum RBM (2011)

work page 2011
[30]

Dumoulin, I

V. Dumoulin, I. Goodfellow, A. Courville, and Y. Ben- gio, On the Challenges of Physical Implementations of RBMs, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence 28, 1199 (2014)

work page 2014
[31]

Benedetti, J

M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-G´ omez, R. Biswas, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Quantum-Assisted Learning of Hardware-Embedded Probabilistic Graphical Models, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041052 (2017)

work page 2017
[32]

Sleeman, J

J. Sleeman, J. Dorband, and M. Halem, A hybrid quan- tum enabled RBM advantage: convolutional autoen- coders for quantum image compression and generative learning, in Quantum information science, sensing, and computation XII , Vol. 11391 (SPIE, 2020) pp. 23–38

work page 2020
[33]

Dixit, R

V. Dixit, R. Selvarajan, T. Aldwairi, Y. Koshka, M. A. Novotny, T. S. Humble, M. A. Alam, and S. Kais, Train- ing a Quantum Annealing Based Restricted Boltzmann Machine on Cybersecurity Data, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence 6, 417 8 (2022)

work page 2022
[34]

Moro and E

L. Moro and E. Prati, Anomaly detection speed-up by quantum restricted Boltzmann machines, Commun. Phys. 6, 269 (2023)

work page 2023
[35]

Crawford, A

D. Crawford, A. Levit, N. Ghadermarzy, J. S. Oberoi, and P. Ronagh, Reinforcement learning using quantum Boltzmann machines, Quant. Inf. Comput. 18, 0051 (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

D-Wave Quantum Inc., Errors and Error Correction, https://docs.dwavequantum.com/en/latest/quantum_ research/errors.html (Accessed: June 5, 2025)

work page 2025
[37]

Pochart, P

T. Pochart, P. Jacquot, and J. Mikael, On the challenges of using D-Wave computers to sample Boltzmann Ran- dom Variables, in 2022 IEEE 19th international con- ference on software architecture companion (ICSA-C) (IEEE, 2022) pp. 137–140

work page 2022
[38]

Raymond, S

J. Raymond, S. Yarkoni, and E. Andriyash, Global Warming: Temperature Estimation in Annealers, Front. ICT 3, 10.3389/fict.2016.00023 (2016)

work page doi:10.3389/fict.2016.00023 2016
[39]

Marshall, E

J. Marshall, E. G. Rieffel, and I. Hen, Thermalization, Freeze-out, and Noise: Deciphering Experimental Quan- tum Annealers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 064025 (2017)

work page 2017
[40]

Marshall, D

J. Marshall, D. Venturelli, I. Hen, and E. G. Rieffel, Power of Pausing: Advancing Understanding of Ther- malization in Experimental Quantum Annealers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044083 (2019)

work page 2019
[41]

Vuffray, C

M. Vuffray, C. Coffrin, Y. A. Kharkov, and A. Y. Lokhov, Programmable quantum annealers as noisy Gibbs sam- plers, PRX Quantum 3, 020317 (2022)

work page 2022
[42]

Nelson, M

J. Nelson, M. Vuffray, A. Y. Lokhov, T. Albash, and C. Coffrin, High-Quality Thermal Gibbs Sampling with Quantum Annealing Hardware, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 044046 (2022)

work page 2022
[43]

D-Wave Quantum Inc., Per-QPU Solver Properties and Schedules, https://docs.dwavequantum.com/ en/latest/quantum_research/solver_properties_ specific.html (Accessed: June 5, 2025)

work page 2025

[1] [1]

G. E. Hinton and T. J. Sejnowski, Optimal perceptual inference, in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , Vol. 448 (Citeseer,

work page

[2] [2]

Smolensky, Information processing in dynamical sys- tems: Foundations of harmony theory, in Parallel Dis- tributed Processing: Volume 1: Foundations , edited by D

P. Smolensky, Information processing in dynamical sys- tems: Foundations of harmony theory, in Parallel Dis- tributed Processing: Volume 1: Foundations , edited by D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (MIT Press, Cam- bridge, 1986)

work page 1986

[3] [3]

G. E. Hinton, Training Products of Experts by Minimiz- ing Contrastive Divergence, Neural Comput. 14, 1771 (2002)

work page 2002

[4] [4]

G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero, and Y.-W. Teh, A Fast Learn- ing Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets, Neural Comput. 18, 1527 (2006)

work page 2006

[5] [5]

M. E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999)

work page 1999

[6] [6]

Kirkpatrick, C

S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimiza- tion by Simulated Annealing, Science 220, 671 (1983)

work page 1983

[7] [7]

R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Replica Monte Carlo Simulation of Spin-Glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2607 (1986)

work page 1986

[8] [8]

Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J

F. Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 15, 3241 (1982)

work page 1982

[9] [9]

Kadowaki and H

T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model, Phys. Rev. E58, 5355 (1998)

work page 1998

[10] [10]

Brooke, D

J. Brooke, D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aep- pli, Quantum Annealing of a Disordered Magnet, Science 284, 779 (1999)

work page 1999

[11] [11]

Farhi, J

E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lund- gren, and D. Preda, A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP- Complete Problem, Science 292, 472 (2001)

work page 2001

[12] [12]

Rajak, S

A. Rajak, S. Suzuki, A. Dutta, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Quantum annealing: an overview, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 381, 20210417 (2023)

work page 2023

[13] [13]

Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechan- ics, J

T. Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechan- ics, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 5, 435 (1950)

work page 1950

[14] [14]

D-Wave Quantum Inc., High-coherence fluxonium as a probe of D-Wave’s QPU environment, D-Wave Whitepa- per Series (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [15]

Sandt and R

R. Sandt and R. Spatschek, Efficient low temperature Monte Carlo sampling using quantum annealing, Sci. Rep. 13, 6754 (2023)

work page 2023

[16] [16]

Scriva, E

G. Scriva, E. Costa, B. McNaughton, and S. Pilati, Accel- erating equilibrium spin-glass simulations using quantum annealers via generative deep learning, SciPost Phys. 15, 018 (2023)

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Arai and T

S. Arai and T. Kadowaki, Quantum Annealing Enhanced Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (2025), arXiv:2502.08060 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025

[18] [18]

Z. Bian, F. Chudak, W. G. Macready, and G. Rose, The Ising model: teaching an old problem new tricks, D-Wave Systems (2010)

work page 2010

[19] [19]

Perdomo-Ortiz, B

A. Perdomo-Ortiz, B. O’Gorman, J. Fluegemann, R. Biswas, and V. N. Smelyanskiy, Determination and correction of persistent biases in quantum annealers, Sci. Rep. 6, 18628 (2016)

work page 2016

[20] [20]

Benedetti, J

M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-G´ omez, R. Biswas, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Estimation of effective temperatures in quantum annealers for sampling applications: A case study with possible applications in deep learning, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022308 (2016)

work page 2016

[21] [21]

M. H. Amin, Searching for quantum speedup in qua- sistatic quantum annealers, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052323 (2015)

work page 2015

[22] [22]

S. H. Adachi and M. P. Henderson, Application of quan- tum annealing to training of deep neural networks (2015), arXiv:1510.06356 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[23] [23]

J. E. Dorband, A Boltzmann Machine Implementation for the D-Wave, in 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations (2015) pp. 703–707

work page 2015

[24] [24]

M. H. Amin, E. Andriyash, J. Rolfe, B. Kulchytskyy, and R. Melko, Quantum Boltzmann Machine, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021050 (2018)

work page 2018

[25] [25]

J. Liu, F. M. Spedalieri, K.-T. Yao, T. E. Potok, C. Schuman, S. Young, R. Patton, G. S. Rose, and G. Chamka, Adiabatic Quantum Computation Applied to Deep Learning Networks, Entropy 20, 380 (2018)

work page 2018

[26] [26]

R. Y. Li, T. Albash, and D. A. Lidar, Limitations of error corrected quantum annealing in improving the per- formance of Boltzmann machines, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 045010 (2020)

work page 2020

[27] [27]

Caldeira, J

J. Caldeira, J. Job, S. H. Adachi, B. Nord, and G. N. Perdue, Restricted Boltzmann Machines for galaxy mor- phology classification with a quantum annealer (2020), arXiv:1911.06259 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2020

[28] [28]

Krzysztof, S

K. Krzysztof, S. Mateusz, S. Marek, and R. Rafa l, Apply- ing a quantum annealing based restricted Boltzmann ma- chine for MNIST handwritten digit classification, CMST 27, 99 (2021)

work page 2021

[29] [29]

Denil and N

M. Denil and N. de Freitas, Toward the Implementation of a Quantum RBM (2011)

work page 2011

[30] [30]

Dumoulin, I

V. Dumoulin, I. Goodfellow, A. Courville, and Y. Ben- gio, On the Challenges of Physical Implementations of RBMs, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence 28, 1199 (2014)

work page 2014

[31] [31]

Benedetti, J

M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-G´ omez, R. Biswas, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Quantum-Assisted Learning of Hardware-Embedded Probabilistic Graphical Models, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041052 (2017)

work page 2017

[32] [32]

Sleeman, J

J. Sleeman, J. Dorband, and M. Halem, A hybrid quan- tum enabled RBM advantage: convolutional autoen- coders for quantum image compression and generative learning, in Quantum information science, sensing, and computation XII , Vol. 11391 (SPIE, 2020) pp. 23–38

work page 2020

[33] [33]

Dixit, R

V. Dixit, R. Selvarajan, T. Aldwairi, Y. Koshka, M. A. Novotny, T. S. Humble, M. A. Alam, and S. Kais, Train- ing a Quantum Annealing Based Restricted Boltzmann Machine on Cybersecurity Data, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence 6, 417 8 (2022)

work page 2022

[34] [34]

Moro and E

L. Moro and E. Prati, Anomaly detection speed-up by quantum restricted Boltzmann machines, Commun. Phys. 6, 269 (2023)

work page 2023

[35] [35]

Crawford, A

D. Crawford, A. Levit, N. Ghadermarzy, J. S. Oberoi, and P. Ronagh, Reinforcement learning using quantum Boltzmann machines, Quant. Inf. Comput. 18, 0051 (2018)

work page 2018

[36] [36]

D-Wave Quantum Inc., Errors and Error Correction, https://docs.dwavequantum.com/en/latest/quantum_ research/errors.html (Accessed: June 5, 2025)

work page 2025

[37] [37]

Pochart, P

T. Pochart, P. Jacquot, and J. Mikael, On the challenges of using D-Wave computers to sample Boltzmann Ran- dom Variables, in 2022 IEEE 19th international con- ference on software architecture companion (ICSA-C) (IEEE, 2022) pp. 137–140

work page 2022

[38] [38]

Raymond, S

J. Raymond, S. Yarkoni, and E. Andriyash, Global Warming: Temperature Estimation in Annealers, Front. ICT 3, 10.3389/fict.2016.00023 (2016)

work page doi:10.3389/fict.2016.00023 2016

[39] [39]

Marshall, E

J. Marshall, E. G. Rieffel, and I. Hen, Thermalization, Freeze-out, and Noise: Deciphering Experimental Quan- tum Annealers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 064025 (2017)

work page 2017

[40] [40]

Marshall, D

J. Marshall, D. Venturelli, I. Hen, and E. G. Rieffel, Power of Pausing: Advancing Understanding of Ther- malization in Experimental Quantum Annealers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044083 (2019)

work page 2019

[41] [41]

Vuffray, C

M. Vuffray, C. Coffrin, Y. A. Kharkov, and A. Y. Lokhov, Programmable quantum annealers as noisy Gibbs sam- plers, PRX Quantum 3, 020317 (2022)

work page 2022

[42] [42]

Nelson, M

J. Nelson, M. Vuffray, A. Y. Lokhov, T. Albash, and C. Coffrin, High-Quality Thermal Gibbs Sampling with Quantum Annealing Hardware, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 044046 (2022)

work page 2022

[43] [43]

D-Wave Quantum Inc., Per-QPU Solver Properties and Schedules, https://docs.dwavequantum.com/ en/latest/quantum_research/solver_properties_ specific.html (Accessed: June 5, 2025)

work page 2025