Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

FMBench: Benchmarking Fairness in Multimodal Large Language Models on Medical Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01089 v1 pith:WQF6VELZ submitted 2024-10-01 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords demographicfairnessmllmsacrossfmbenchmedicalmodelsperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly improved medical task performance, such as Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Report Generation (RG). However, the fairness of these models across diverse demographic groups remains underexplored, despite its importance in healthcare. This oversight is partly due to the lack of demographic diversity in existing medical multimodal datasets, which complicates the evaluation of fairness. In response, we propose FMBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the fairness of MLLMs performance across diverse demographic attributes. FMBench has the following key features: 1: It includes four demographic attributes: race, ethnicity, language, and gender, across two tasks, VQA and RG, under zero-shot settings. 2: Our VQA task is free-form, enhancing real-world applicability and mitigating the biases associated with predefined choices. 3: We utilize both lexical metrics and LLM-based metrics, aligned with clinical evaluations, to assess models not only for linguistic accuracy but also from a clinical perspective. Furthermore, we introduce a new metric, Fairness-Aware Performance (FAP), to evaluate how fairly MLLMs perform across various demographic attributes. We thoroughly evaluate the performance and fairness of eight state-of-the-art open-source MLLMs, including both general and medical MLLMs, ranging from 7B to 26B parameters on the proposed benchmark. We aim for FMBench to assist the research community in refining model evaluation and driving future advancements in the field. All data and code will be released upon acceptance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tool-using chest X-ray agents show demographic disparities in tool usage, routing, and reasoning that are not visible from end-to-end accuracy alone.

  2. M3CoTBench: Benchmark Chain-of-Thought of MLLMs in Medical Image Understanding

    eess.IV 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A medical-image benchmark that scores the step-by-step reasoning chains of multimodal LLMs shows current models explain poorly and chain-of-thought prompting frequently reduces diagnostic accuracy.

  3. MultiFair: Multimodal Balanced Fairness-Aware Medical Classification with Dual-Level Gradient Modulation

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MultiFair couples modality-balancing gradient modulation with group-AUC-based fairness scaling and reports improved balanced accuracy on two glaucoma datasets.

Pith tools