Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Predicting Liquidity Coverage Ratio with Gated Recurrent Units: A Deep Learning Model for Risk Management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19211 v1 pith:5JRAJY4L submitted 2024-10-24 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords financialliquiditymodelriskinstitutionscoveragedeepgated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the global economic integration and the high interconnection of financial markets, financial institutions are facing unprecedented challenges, especially liquidity risk. This paper proposes a liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) prediction model based on the gated recurrent unit (GRU) network to help financial institutions manage their liquidity risk more effectively. By utilizing the GRU network in deep learning technology, the model can automatically learn complex patterns from historical data and accurately predict LCR for a period of time in the future. The experimental results show that compared with traditional methods, the GRU model proposed in this study shows significant advantages in mean absolute error (MAE), proving its higher accuracy and robustness. This not only provides financial institutions with a more reliable liquidity risk management tool but also provides support for regulators to formulate more scientific and reasonable policies, which helps to improve the stability of the entire financial system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-Supervised Learning in Deep Networks: A Pathway to Robust Few-Shot Classification

    cs.CV 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A report claiming 95.12% few-shot accuracy on Mini-ImageNet from a self-supervised ResNet-101 pipeline, with insufficient experimental evidence.

  2. An Automated Data Mining Framework Using Autoencoders for Feature Extraction and Dimensionality Reduction

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    An autoencoder is compared with five dimensionality reduction methods on one UCI dataset and reported to have the best reconstruction error, without error bars or released code.

  3. Enhancing Few-Shot Learning with Integrated Data and GAN Model Approaches

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    MhERGAN couples MCMC-corrected GAN ensembles with MHLoss fine-tuning for few-shot learning, but the reported gains are small and under-validated.

  4. Adaptive Cache Management for Complex Storage Systems Using CNN-LSTM-Based Spatiotemporal Prediction

    cs.DC 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A CNN-LSTM model is claimed to predict storage cache demand better than six baselines, but the only numerical evidence is a single table without validation details.

  5. A Combined Encoder and Transformer Approach for Coherent and High-Quality Text Generation

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A proposed BERT-plus-GPT-4 hybrid is claimed to beat GPT-3, T5, BART, Transformer-XL, and CTRL on perplexity and BLEU, but the experiments are not reproducible.

Pith tools