Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Metric Learning for Tag Recommendation: Tackling Data Sparsity and Cold Start Issues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.06374 v1 pith:7ZX57X5A submitted 2024-11-10 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords learningrecommendationmetricdataaccuracyalgorithmcoldcollaborative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid growth of digital information, personalized recommendation systems have become an indispensable part of Internet services, especially in the fields of e-commerce, social media, and online entertainment. However, traditional collaborative filtering and content-based recommendation methods have limitations in dealing with data sparsity and cold start problems, especially in the face of largescale heterogeneous data, which makes it difficult to meet user expectations. This paper proposes a new label recommendation algorithm based on metric learning, which aims to overcome the challenges of traditional recommendation systems by learning effective distance or similarity metrics to capture the subtle differences between user preferences and item features. Experimental results show that the algorithm outperforms baseline methods including local response metric learning (LRML), collaborative metric learning (CML), and adaptive tensor factorization (ATF) based on adversarial learning on multiple evaluation metrics. In particular, it performs particularly well in the accuracy of the first few recommended items, while maintaining high robustness and maintaining high recommendation accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Collaborative Optimization in Financial Data Mining Through Deep Learning and ResNeXt

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A ResNeXt-based multi-task learning model reportedly outperforms LSTM, Transformer, MCCNN, and DSN on S&P 500 classification and regression, but the experiments lack error bars, code, and leakage controls.

  2. Computer Vision-Driven Gesture Recognition: Toward Natural and Intuitive Human-Computer

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A CNN-LSTM gesture recognizer with a decorative 3D skeleton visualization that reports unverifiable accuracy and speed numbers.

  3. Machine Learning Techniques for Pattern Recognition in High-Dimensional Data Mining

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    An SVM-based frequent pattern mining method is claimed to outperform FP-Growth, FP-Tree, decision trees, and random forests, but the paper provides no reproducible experimental support.

  4. AI-Driven Health Monitoring of Distributed Computing Architecture: Insights from XGBoost and SHAP

    cs.DC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    An XGBoost model with SHAP explanations is applied to edge node health classification, but the weak reported accuracy and missing experimental details do not support the paper's claims.

  5. Accurate Medical Named Entity Recognition Through Specialized NLP Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper reports BioBERT as the best among five models on MIMIC-III NER, but the experimental description is too sparse to verify the numbers.

  6. Optimizing Multi-Task Learning for Enhanced Performance in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A multi-task GPT-4 model is said to beat single-task GPT-4, GPT-3, BERT, and Bi-LSTM on classification and summarization, but the experimental evidence is not reported.

  7. Advanced Risk Prediction and Stability Assessment of Banks Using Time Series Transformer Models

    q-fin.RM 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A standard Time Series Transformer is compared with five baselines on the UCI Bank Marketing dataset and reported as best for bank stability prediction, but the dataset contains no bank stability index.

Pith tools