REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-ToM: Evaluating Multilingual Theory of Mind Capabilities in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to the cognitive ability to infer and attribute mental states to oneself and others. As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated for social and cognitive capabilities, it remains unclear to what extent these models demonstrate ToM across diverse languages and cultural contexts. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive study of multilingual ToM capabilities aimed at addressing this gap. Our approach includes two key components: (1) We translate existing ToM datasets into multiple languages, effectively creating a multilingual ToM dataset and (2) We enrich these translations with culturally specific elements to reflect the social and cognitive scenarios relevant to diverse populations. We conduct extensive evaluations of six state-of-the-art LLMs to measure their ToM performance across both the translated and culturally adapted datasets. The results highlight the influence of linguistic and cultural diversity on the models' ability to exhibit ToM, and questions their social reasoning capabilities. This work lays the groundwork for future research into enhancing LLMs' cross-cultural social cognition and contributes to the development of more culturally aware and socially intelligent AI systems. All our data and code are publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models
XToM translates three English theory-of-mind benchmarks into Chinese, German, French, and Japanese with human quality control, and shows LLMs' belief reasoning is weaker and less consistent across languages than their...
-
A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology
A six-stage workflow scales validity requirements to research ambition so that LLM-based psychological claims rest on demonstrated measurement quality rather than prompt artifacts.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.