pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.07145 · v3 · submitted 2024-12-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Chiral finite-momentum superconductivity in the tetralayer graphene

Qiong Qin , Congjun Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords chiral p-wave superconductivitytetralayer graphenefinite-momentum pairingrandom-phase approximationdensity-density interactionsrhombohedral stackingsuperconducting phasesvalley and spin polarized pairing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Density-density interactions drive chiral p-wave pairing and finite-momentum superconductivity in tetralayer graphene.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the pairing mechanism in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene arising from density-density interactions treated in the random-phase approximation. It establishes that chiral p-wave pairing between electrons with the same spin and valley index dominates at low densities. This approach also predicts the range of superconductivity in agreement with experimental findings. The distinct superconducting regions are characterized by their momentum and spin properties, with some showing finite-momentum character and phase fluctuations.

Core claim

Motivated by experimental discovery of superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, the random-phase approximation applied to density-density interactions highlights the dominance of the chiral p-wave pairing between electrons with the same spin and valley index at low densities, while predicting the superconducting range in agreement with experimental findings. SC1 and SC2 exhibit chiral finite-momentum superconductivity with pronounced phase fluctuations, whereas SC4 displays zero-momentum spin-singlet superconductivity.

What carries the argument

Random-phase approximation on density-density interactions, used to determine the dominant pairing symmetry and momentum character.

If this is right

  • Chiral finite-momentum superconductivity with pronounced phase fluctuations occurs in the SC1 and SC2 regions.
  • Zero-momentum spin-singlet superconductivity is found in the SC4 region.
  • The superconducting density range is predicted to match experimental observations.
  • The same spin and valley index pairing dominates at low densities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If phase fluctuations are strong in SC1 and SC2, they may suppress the transition temperature below mean-field estimates.
  • Similar calculations could be applied to other rhombohedral multilayer graphenes to check for finite-momentum pairing.
  • The finite-momentum nature suggests possible spatial modulation in the order parameter that could be probed by scanning tunneling microscopy.

Load-bearing premise

That the random-phase approximation applied solely to density-density interactions is sufficient to identify the dominant pairing channel and its finite-momentum character without other interaction channels or corrections beyond RPA.

What would settle it

Finding that the dominant pairing at low densities is not the chiral p-wave same-spin channel, or that the superconducting regions do not show finite-momentum character, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07145 by Congjun Wu, Qiong Qin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Momentum dependence of the static charge sus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Momentum dependence of the pairing gap ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Temperature dependence of the superfluid density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by the recent experimental discovery of superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, we investigate the pairing mechanism arising from the density-density interactions within the random-phase approximation. This approach successfully highlights the dominance of the chiral $p$-wave pairing between electrons with the same spin and valley index at low densities, while also predicting the superconducting range in agreement with experimental findings. Furthermore, we examine the characteristics of distinct superconducting regions: SC1 and SC2 exhibit chiral finite-momentum superconductivity with pronounced phase fluctuations, whereas SC4 displays zero-momentum spin-singlet superconductivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the random-phase approximation (RPA) to density-density interactions in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene. It claims that this approach identifies the dominance of chiral p-wave pairing between electrons of the same spin and valley index at low densities, reproduces the experimental superconducting density range, and distinguishes SC1/SC2 (chiral finite-momentum pairing with strong phase fluctuations) from SC4 (zero-momentum spin-singlet pairing).

Significance. If the central RPA result holds, the work would supply a microscopic rationale for the observed superconductivity, emphasize finite-momentum chiral pairing, and provide a concrete way to differentiate the experimentally reported SC regions by their momentum structure and fluctuation properties.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (approach description)] The central claim that RPA restricted to density-density interactions is sufficient to establish dominance of same-spin/valley chiral p-wave pairing (and its finite-momentum character in SC1/SC2 versus zero-momentum spin-singlet in SC4) rests on the untested assumption that intervalley scattering, exchange, and Hund-like terms remain subdominant; the abstract states the approach 'highlights the dominance' but supplies no explicit comparison of eigenvalues across channels or check that omitted terms do not reorder the leading instability.
  2. [Abstract (RPA application)] RPA neglects vertex corrections and self-energy feedback that can shift the momentum structure or eigenvalue of the pairing kernel; without a quantitative estimate of these corrections (or a statement of why they are negligible in this multivalley, spinful band structure), the finite-momentum character asserted for SC1/SC2 cannot be regarded as robust.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'pronounced phase fluctuations' in SC1 and SC2 without indicating how these are quantified (e.g., via phase stiffness or Ginzburg-Landau parameters).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (approach description)] The central claim that RPA restricted to density-density interactions is sufficient to establish dominance of same-spin/valley chiral p-wave pairing (and its finite-momentum character in SC1/SC2 versus zero-momentum spin-singlet in SC4) rests on the untested assumption that intervalley scattering, exchange, and Hund-like terms remain subdominant; the abstract states the approach 'highlights the dominance' but supplies no explicit comparison of eigenvalues across channels or check that omitted terms do not reorder the leading instability.

    Authors: The manuscript restricts the interaction to the density-density channel because it is the dominant term obtained from projecting the long-range Coulomb interaction onto the low-energy bands of tetralayer graphene. Within this controlled approximation the RPA pairing kernel yields the chiral p-wave (same spin and valley) as the leading eigenvalue at low density. To make this explicit we will add, in the revised manuscript, a direct comparison of the largest eigenvalues obtained in the same-spin/valley, opposite-spin, and intervalley channels, confirming that the reported instability remains dominant inside the model we solve. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract (RPA application)] RPA neglects vertex corrections and self-energy feedback that can shift the momentum structure or eigenvalue of the pairing kernel; without a quantitative estimate of these corrections (or a statement of why they are negligible in this multivalley, spinful band structure), the finite-momentum character asserted for SC1/SC2 cannot be regarded as robust.

    Authors: We agree that RPA omits vertex corrections and self-energy renormalization, both of which could in principle modify the momentum structure of the instability. The finite-momentum pairing we obtain is a direct consequence of the Fermi-surface nesting present in the tetralayer band structure at the densities of interest. We will expand the discussion section to explain why these corrections are expected to be parametrically small in the weak-coupling, low-density regime relevant to the experiment, while noting that a fully quantitative assessment lies beyond the present RPA treatment. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A quantitative, non-perturbative estimate of vertex corrections and self-energy feedback for the full multivalley, spinful band structure would require methods (e.g., functional RG or diagrammatic Monte Carlo) that are computationally prohibitive at present and outside the scope of this work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: RPA computation from density-density interactions to pairing channels is forward and self-contained

full rationale

The paper applies the random-phase approximation directly to density-density interactions to compute the leading pairing instability, identifying chiral p-wave dominance at low densities and the momentum character of different SC regions. This constitutes a standard forward calculation from microscopic interactions to the eigenvalue spectrum of the pairing kernel; no parameters are fitted to the target superconducting range or pairing symmetry, and no self-citation chain or definitional loop is invoked to force the result. The abstract and described method contain no reduction of the claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim rests on the unexamined validity of RPA for this interaction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5617 in / 1029 out tokens · 48519 ms · 2026-05-23T07:53:37.042138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing superconductivity with tunneling spectroscopy in rhombohedral graphene

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A microscopic tunneling approach is developed showing that scanning tunneling spectroscopy can distinguish commensurate and incommensurate single-q pairing states and a three-q moiré superconductor in rhombohedral gra...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature 598, 434 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Chen et al., Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

    G. Chen et al., Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Z. Hao, A. M. Zimmerman, P. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, D. H. Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, and P. Kim, Electric field–tunable superconductivity in alternating-twist magic-angle trilayer graphene, Scienc e 371, 1133 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconducti v- ity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature 590, 249 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Y. Cao, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Pauli-limit violation and re-entrant su per- conductivity in moir´ e graphene, Nature 595, 526 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Li et al., Tunable superconductivity in electron- and hole-doped bernal bilayer graphene, Nature 631, 300 (2024)

    C. Li et al., Tunable superconductivity in electron- and hole-doped bernal bilayer graphene, Nature 631, 300 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe 2, Nature (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Guo et al., Superconductivity in 5.0 ° twisted bilayer WSe2, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

    Y. Guo et al., Superconductivity in 5.0 ° twisted bilayer WSe2, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Choi et al., Superconductivity and quantized anoma- lous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 639, 342 (2025)

    Y. Choi et al., Superconductivity and quantized anoma- lous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 639, 342 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Han et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity i n rhombohedral graphene, Nature 643, 654 (2025)

    T. Han et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity i n rhombohedral graphene, Nature 643, 654 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Y.-Z. Chou, J. Zhu, and S. Das Sarma, Intravalley spin- polarized superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174523 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Geier, M

    M. Geier, M. Davydova, and L. Fu, Chiral and topo- logical superconductivity in isospin polarized multilaye r graphene, arXiv: 2409.13829

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    M. Kim, A. Timmel, L. Ju, and X.-G. Wen, Topological chiral superconductivity beyond pairing in a Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014508 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Chiral superconductivity from parent Chern band and its non-Abelian generalization

    Y.-Q. Wang, Z.-Q. Gao, and H. Yang, Chiral supercon- ductivity from parent Chern band and its non-Abelian generalization, arXiv:2410.05384

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Y.-Z. Chou, F. Wu, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Acoustic-phonon-mediated superconductivity in rhombo- hedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 187001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Ghazaryan, T

    A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, M. Serbyn, and E. Berg, Unconventional superconductivity in systems with annu- lar Fermi surfaces: Application to rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 247001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    W. Qin, C. Huang, T. Wolf, N. Wei, I. Blinov, and A. H. MacDonald, Functional renormalization group study of superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 146001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, New mechanism for su- perconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524 (1965)

    work page 1965

  20. [21]

    Hazra, N

    T. Hazra, N. Verma, and M. Randeria, Bounds on the superconducting transition temperature: Applications to twisted bilayer graphene and cold atoms, Phys. Rev. X 9, 31049 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    D. R. Nelson and J. M. Kosterlitz, Universal jump in the superfluid density of two-dimensional superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1201 (1977)

    work page 1977

  22. [23]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024515 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [24]

    Kitamura, T

    T. Kitamura, T. Yamashita, J. Ishizuka, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Superconductivity in monolayer FeSe enhanced by quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023232 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [25]

    Wu, Competing orders in one-dimensional spin-3/2 fermionic systems, Phys

    C. Wu, Competing orders in one-dimensional spin-3/2 fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 266404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [26]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Charge-4 e super- conductivity from pair-density-wave order in certain high - temperature superconductors, Nat. Phys. 5, 830 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [27]

    C. Wu, J. Hu, and S. C. Zhang, Quintet pairing and non- Abelian vortex string in spin-3/2 cold atomic systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 311 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [28]

    Zeng, L.-H

    M. Zeng, L.-H. Hu, H.-Y. Hu, Y.-Z. You, and C. Wu, High-order time-reversal symmetry breaking normal state, Sci. China Physics, Mech. Astron. 67, 237411 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  28. [29]

    Y.-B. Liu, J. Zhou, C. Wu, and F. Yang, Charge-4 e su- perconductivity and chiral metal in 45 ◦ -twisted bilayer cuprates and related bilayers, Nat. Commun. 14, 7926 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [30]

    Maccari, J

    I. Maccari, J. Carlstr¨ om, and E. Babaev, Possible time - reversal-symmetry-breaking fermionic quadrupling con- densate in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 64501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [31]

    Qin, J.-J

    Q. Qin, J.-J. Dong, Y. Sheng, D. Huang, and Y.-F. Yang, Superconducting fluctuations and charge-4 e plaque- tte state at strong coupling, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054506 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [32]

    Qin and Y

    Q. Qin and Y. Yang, Intrinsic Constraint on Tc for Un- conventional Superconductivity, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 13 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [33]

    S. K. Jian, Y. Huang, and H. Yao, Charge-4 e supercon- ductivity from nematic superconductors in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 227001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [34]

    R. M. Fernandes and L. Fu, Charge-4 e superconductiv- ity from multicomponent nematic pairing: Application to twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 47001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [35]

    Z. Pan, C. Lu, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Frustrated supercon- ductivity and sextetting order, Sci. China Physics, Mech. Astron. 67, 287412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, A. Wang, J. Shen, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Charge-4 e and charge-6 e flux quantization and higher charge superconductivity in Kagome superconductor ring devices, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [37]

    Grinenko et al., State with spontaneously broken tim e- reversal symmetry above the superconducting phase tran- sition, Nat

    V. Grinenko et al., State with spontaneously broken tim e- reversal symmetry above the superconducting phase tran- sition, Nat. Phys. 17, 1254 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [38]

    Yang and Y.-H

    H. Yang and Y.-H. Zhang, Topological incommen- surate Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov superconducto r and Bogoliubov Fermi surface in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 112, L020506 (2025). 7 Supplemental Material I. Energy Dispersion The non-interacting part of the Hamiltonian is given by H0 = ∑ ksτ Ψ † kτ shkτ Ψ kτ s, (S1) wheres denotes th...

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young , Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature 598, 434 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    Y.-Z. Chou, F. Wu, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Acoustic-ph onon-mediated superconductivity in rhombohedral trilaye r graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 187001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    Ghazaryan, T

    A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, M. Serbyn, and E. Berg, Unconven tional superconductivity in systems with annular Fermi sur faces: Application to rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 247001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [42]

    W. Qin, C. Huang, T. Wolf, N. Wei, I. Blinov, and A. H. MacDo nald, Functional renormalization group study of supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Le tt. 130, 146001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    Han et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 643, 654 (2025)

    T. Han et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature 643, 654 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [44]

    Guerci, D

    D. Guerci, D. Kaplan, J. Ingham, J. H. Pixley, and A. J. Mil lis, Topological superconductivity from repulsive intera ctions in twisted WSe 2, arXiv:2408.16075 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024