Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

HEDS 3.0: The Human Evaluation Data Sheet Version 3.0

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.07940 v1 pith:3442FEYV submitted 2024-12-10 cs.HC cs.CL

Anya Belz , Craig Thomson This is my paper
classification cs.HCcs.CL
keywords hedsdataevaluationhumandatasheetsheetversionavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents version 3.0 of the Human Evaluation Datasheet (HEDS). This update is the result of our experience using HEDS in the context of numerous recent human evaluation experiments, including reproduction studies, and of feedback received. Our main overall goal was to improve clarity, and to enable users to complete the datasheet more consistently and comparably. The HEDS 3.0 package consists of the digital data sheet, documentation, and code for exporting completed data sheets as latex files, all available from the HEDS GitHub.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Position: Evaluation Scores Are Perishable Knowledge Claims

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Evaluation scores should be treated as perishable knowledge claims with explicit formality, scope, and validity windows; weakest-link (min) aggregation is the proposed conservative endpoint for combining them.

Pith tools