Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Asymptotics of Harish-Chandra transform and infinitesimal freeness

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The 1/N correction to the empirical spectral measure of a unitarily invariant random matrix is determined by an explicit moment formula from the two leading terms of its averaged Harish-Chandra transform.

desk verdict The general theorems are a genuine extension of the BG toolbox and the proofs hold up; the applications lean on asserted analytic inputs and at least one omitted computation, so referee time is justified but the examples need checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09290 v1 pith:ZCJO7TOY submitted 2024-12-12 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Alexey Bufetov , Panagiotis Zografos This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60B2046L54
keywords Harish-ChandratransforminfinitesimalfreeprobabilitycumulantsSchurgeneratingfunctionsquantizedconvolutionBBPphasetransitionrandommatrixasymptoticsempiricalmeasure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies what the Harish-Chandra transform—the unitary-group average of $\exp(\operatorname{Tr}(AUBU^*))$—can reveal about the eigenvalues of a large random Hermitian matrix $A$. Its central result is a general theorem: if the logarithm of the averaged transform has a two-term asymptotic expansion with leading function $\Psi$ and $1/N$ correction $\Phi$, then the average empirical measure of $N^{-1}A$ has a computable first-order correction whose $k$-th moment is an explicit polynomial in derivatives of $\Psi'$ and $\Phi'$. This connects the second term of the Harish-Chandra expansion to infinitesimal free cumulants, turning analytic information about the transform into distributional information about eigenvalue outliers. The same mechanism is developed for Schur generating functions, giving a quantized version of infinitesimal free probability with explicit outlier formulas, and it is iterated to second- and higher-order $1/N$ corrections.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the averaged Harish-Chandra transform $f_N(x_1,\ldots,x_N)=\mathbb{E}\int_{U(N)}e^{\operatorname{Tr}(AUBU^*)}\,dU$ together with the differential operator $D_kf=(\prod_{i<j}(x_i-x_j))^{-1}\sum_i\partial_i^k\big(\prod_{i<j}(x_i-x_j)f\big)$, for which $D_kf_N|_{x=0}=\mathbb{E}[\operatorname{Tr}(A^k)]$. Writing $f_N=\exp(N\cdot\frac1N\log f_N)$, the chain rule and a symmetrization lemma show that, after taking $x_i=i\varepsilon\to0$, only certain derivatives of $\frac1N\log f_N$ survive; assumption (79) then converts those derivatives into derivatives of $\Psi$ and $\Phi$, producing formula (81). The discrete analogue uses the operator $(u_i\partial_i)^k$ on Schur generating functions around $u_i=1$, which yields the quantized infinitesimal cumulants.

What would settle it

Take the explicit model $A=N\cdot\mathrm{GUE}+N\theta E_{11}$ with fixed $\theta$, as in Example 4, compute the limit $N\big(N^{-(k+1)}\mathbb{E}[\sum_i\lambda_i^k]-\mu_k\big)$ for $k=1,2,3$ by exact diagonalization, and compare with formula (96); any mismatch would falsify Theorem 12, while agreement at several $k$ would support the claimed correction mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 12: under uniform convergence of $N\big(\frac{1}{N}\log \mathbb{E}[\mathrm{HC}(x_1,\ldots,x_r,0^{N-r};\lambda_1(A),\ldots,\lambda_N(A))]-\sum_{i=1}^r\Psi(x_i)\big)\to\sum_{i=1}^r\Phi(x_i)$ in a complex neighborhood of $0^r$ for every fixed $r$, the $1/N$ correction of the averaged empirical measure of $N^{-1}A$ has moments $\mu'_k=\sum_{m=0}^{k-1}\frac{k!}{m!(m+1)!(k-m-1)!}\frac{d^m}{dx^m}\big((\Psi'(x))^{k-m-1}\Phi'(x)\big)\big|_{x=0}$. The leading moments are the same expression with $\Phi$ absent, and $\Psi'$ is the $R$-transform of the limiting measure, so $\Phi'$ supplies the infinitesimal free cumulants. With the replacement $\Phi'(x)\mapsto \Phi'(x)-\frac{1}{2x}$ and evaluation at $x=1$, the same theorem holds for Schur generating functions, and iterating the machinery yields explicit second- and higher-order formulas.

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain of explicit correction formulas rests on one analytic input that the paper does not prove: the averaged Harish-Chandra transform (or Schur generating function) must have the stated two-term asymptotic expansion uniformly near the zero vector (or, in the discrete case, near the all-ones vector) for every fixed number of nonzero arguments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any ensemble whose log-averaged Harish-Chandra transform satisfies (79), the full first-order correction to the empirical spectral measure is computable from $\Psi'$ and $\Phi'$ without knowing the transform otherwise.
  • The correction moments coincide with infinitesimal free cumulants $\kappa'_n=\Phi^{(n)}(0)/(n-1)!$, so the theorem places finite-rank perturbations of unitarily invariant ensembles inside infinitesimal free probability.
  • In the Schur generating function setting, the analogous theorem gives quantized infinitesimal cumulants and predicts outliers at threshold values; concretely, it yields a discrete BBP phase transition in representation-theoretic models and in a perturbed Aztec diamond tiling model.
  • Under the stronger $N^2$-scale expansion with an additional function $T$, the $1/N^2$ correction is explicit and splits into a second-order infinitesimal freeness term plus a model-specific term, with similar formulas for all higher orders on the $N^{n\varepsilon}$ scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the moment formula is effectively a Taylor-coefficient machine: models whose log Harish-Chandra transform is analytic in the scaling parameter can be fed directly into the Stieltjes-transform reduction of Remark 5, giving explicit signed densities for corrections without moment-by-moment computation.
  • Editorial inference: if the authors' belief that all odd terms in the $1/N$ expansion vanish is correct, then this class of models has a parity gap in its correction expansion; checking the third $1/N^3$ term in a concrete ensemble would test that belief directly.
  • Editorial inference: the quantized infinitesimal cumulants introduced for Schur generating functions should linearize the $1/N$ correction to tensor-product operations in the same way the quantized $R$-transform linearizes the leading-order quantized free convolution; this is testable by expanding characters of tensor products of large $U(N)$ representations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general asymptotic calculus for averaged Harish-Chandra transforms and Schur generating functions. Its main results are conditional theorems: if the logarithm of the averaged transform admits a prescribed multi-term expansion in a complex neighborhood of the origin (or of 1^r), uniformly in r, then the moments of the averaged empirical measure have explicit expansions, with correction terms expressed through derivatives of the functions Ψ and Φ. Theorem 12 gives the first-order correction, Theorem 14 its Schur-generating analog, Theorems 16 and 17 extend to second and higher order corrections, and Theorem 11 covers an intermediate scaling regime. The paper also connects the correction formulas to infinitesimal free cumulants, introduces quantized infinitesimal cumulants, and applies the results to finite-rank perturbations of random matrices and to a perturbed Aztec diamond tiling model, where it exhibits BBP-type phase transitions.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, they provide a useful general toolbox: a parameter-free formula for the 1/N correction of averaged empirical measures from two-term Harish-Chandra asymptotics, a quantized analog for Schur generating functions, and explicit higher-order corrections. The proofs are detailed and largely self-contained, built on differential operators and symmetrization arguments, and the connections to infinitesimal freeness are explicit and concrete. The paper also gives credit to prior work and reproduces known results such as Shlyakhtenko's correction measure for finite-rank perturbations, which lends credibility to the method. The advertised applications, including the Aztec-diamond outlier effect, are potentially significant if the underlying asymptotic assumptions are fully justified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, eq. (96) and Examples 4–5] The application to finite-rank perturbations assumes that for B = A + Σ_i N θ_i E_{i,i} the averaged Harish-Chandra transform satisfies the two-term asymptotic (79) with the required uniformity in a complex neighborhood of 0^r. The paper proves that (79) implies the moment formula (80), and Lemma 6 provides the asymptotic for the deterministic rank-one term, but it never verifies the combined condition (79) for the average over A. In particular, the uniformity in a complex neighborhood of 0^r is not established, and the possible non-commutativity of taking logarithms and averaging is not addressed. Since the BBP-type formulas (96) in Examples 4 and 5 rest on this unproved input, the advertised phase transition for finite-rank perturbations is not fully derived. The authors should either prove the required expansion for B from the standing assumptions on A or state as a separate lemma the precise analytic conditions under which (96) holds.
  2. [Example 7, eq. (123)] The explicit correction measure for the Aztec-diamond perturbation is stated after 'somewhat lengthy computations (we omit them for brevity)'. This is one of the two new applications advertised in the introduction, and formula (123) contains several nontrivial ingredients: a delta measure with a critical threshold, a sign change at α = (A+1)^2/(2(A^2+1)), and a rational density inside the arctic circle. Because the computation is omitted, the claim (17)–(19) is not verifiable from the manuscript. The authors should include the computation, or at least a detailed outline sufficient for an expert to reproduce it independently.
  3. [Theorem 17, eq. (141)] The statement of Theorem 17 is not well-formed as written. In the Harish-Chandra transform on the left-hand side of (141), the second argument is written as (λ_1(A), ..., λ_n(A)); it should be the full N-tuple of eigenvalues, presumably λ_1(A), ..., λ_N(A). Also, the inner sum over i is written as running from i = 0 to r, but the terms Ψ_j(x_i) are evaluated at the r variables, so the sum should run from i = 1 to r. The condition on ε should also be clarified: the proof and the intended scaling require 0 < ε < n^{-1}, and the printed '0 < ε < n−1' is ambiguous. These are notational typos, but they affect a central theorem statement and must be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (7) and eq. (54)] There are stray '− −' artifacts in the displayed evaluation notation, e.g., '((Ψ′(x))^{n−m}) − − x=0'; these should read '|_{x=0}' for clarity.
  2. [Example 3, eq. (94)] The limit condition 'M,N→∞, M−λN→0' should presumably be 'M/N → λ'; as written, the condition involving M−λN is dimensionally inconsistent with the notation.
  3. [Example 7, paragraph after eq. (123)] The variable y in (123) is not explicitly defined; the introduction formula (19) uses t, and the geometric discussion later introduces y˜ = α y. The authors should define the coordinate y used in the correction measure.
  4. [Example 7] There is a typo 'normaizing constant' in the description of the perturbed Aztec diamond measure; it should be 'normalizing constant'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central theorems are explicit conditional implications from stated log-Harish-Chandra asymptotics to moment formulas, with derivations performed inside the paper; the only self-citations are prior tools, not the target claims.

full rationale

The paper's main results (Theorems 8, 12, 14, 16 and 17) are conditional implications: from a uniform asymptotic expansion of (1/N) log E[HC(...)] or (1/N) log S^{U(N)}_rho(...), the authors derive explicit formulas for the leading moments and their 1/N, 1/N^2, or 1/N^{n epsilon} corrections. These formulas are obtained by applying the differential operators D_k and D^{U(N)}_k, using Proposition 1/Proposition 2, Lemma 3, and chain-rule computations, and they are not assumed in the hypotheses. For example, Theorem 12 assumes the two-term expansion (79) of the log Harish-Chandra transform and proves formula (81) for mu'_k; the proof algebraically identifies the N-correction of the D_k evaluation, including the nontrivial verification that the M_{1,N} term vanishes. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and the examples compute the needed Psi, Phi from explicit generating functions and then extract correction measures by contour integrals, so the concrete claims are not forced by the theorems' inputs. The paper does cite prior work by an overlapping author, notably [BG] for the base Law of Large Numbers in the Schur-function setting (Theorem 13), and [OV] for Lemma 6 on finite-rank perturbations; these are acknowledged external tools rather than the paper's new claims, and the matrix-side version Theorem 8 is in fact reproved with technical improvements. Example 7 omits lengthy computations and Theorem 15's proof is introduced by saying the authors were unable to prove a discrete analog directly and therefore reprove Theorem 14 via a deformed Schur generating function; these are gaps in exposition or derivation detail, not circular reductions. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own hypothesis by construction, so the appropriate finding is low, essentially non-circular despite minor reliance on self-citations as prior scaffolding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The proofs rely on standard tools (Harish-Chandra integral formula, Weyl character formula, non-crossing partition calculus, R-transform theory) and on the stated asymptotic assumptions about the generating functions. No fitted parameters appear; model parameters in examples are inputs, not free parameters. The only new object, quantized infinitesimal free cumulants, is defined from the deformed Schur generating function and yields explicit, checkable outlier predictions.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Harish-Chandra/Itzykson-Zuber integral equals a determinant ratio (eq. 34)
    Used in Proposition 1 to show D_k acts like multiplication by sum of λ_i^k; foundational for all moment formulas.
  • standard math Weyl character (rational Schur function) formula for U(N) (eq. 100)
    Used in Section 6 to define Schur generating functions and derive quantized results.
  • standard math Moment-cumulant relations over non-crossing partitions (Speicher)
    Used in Lemmas 4, 5, 7, 18 to identify Ψ', Φ', T' with free and infinitesimal cumulants.
  • standard math Voiculescu's theorem on asymptotic free independence of Haar unitarily invariant matrices
    Provides the interpretative background; the paper's Theorem 6 is cited as background.
  • domain assumption Uniform asymptotic expansion of the log Harish-Chandra/Schur generating function in a complex neighborhood
    This is the input condition of every main theorem (e.g., eqs. (40), (79), (125), (141)); all conclusions are conditional on it.
  • domain assumption Random matrix model with Haar-distributed eigenvector integration in the Harish-Chandra transform (eq. (1))
    Defines the object of study; examples such as ergodic unitarily invariant matrices satisfy the multiplicative structure.
  • domain assumption Smoothness (or analyticity) of Ψ, Φ, T in a neighborhood of 0 or 1
    Required for the derivatives and symmetrization limits (Lemmas 2 and 3) that produce the explicit moment formulas.
invented entities (1)
  • Quantized infinitesimal free cumulants independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a moment-cumulant description of the 1/N correction in quantized free probability (Schur generating function setup), leading to explicit correction measures and outliers.
    The cumulants are defined via deformation of Schur generating functions in Theorem 15 and produce concrete, testable predictions such as the outlier location in the perturbed Aztec diamond (Example 7) and the discrete BBP transition (Example 6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotics of Harish-Chandra transform and infinitesimal freeness." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZCJO7TOY

@misc{pith2026241209290,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotics of Harish-Chandra transform and infinitesimal freeness},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZCJO7TOY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09290}
}
read the original abstract

In the last ten years a technique of Schur generating functions and Harish-Chandra transforms was developed for the study of the asymptotic behavior of discrete particle systems and random matrices. In the current paper we extend this toolbox in several directions. We establish general results which allow to access not only the Law of Large Numbers, but also next terms of the asymptotic expansion of averaged empirical measures. In particular, this allows to obtain an analog of a discrete Baik-Ben Arous-Peche phase transition. A connection with infinitesimal free probability is shown and a quantized version of infinitesimal free probability is introduced. Also, we establish the Law of Large Numbers for several new regimes of growth of a Harish-Chandra transform.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09290 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Uniformly random domino tilings of Aztec diamond with a perturbation of weight 10 along the up-right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The density from (122) for (γ = 9,α = 2) and (γ = 9,α = 4), respectively. It is visible that for α = 2 the correction measure created by a perturbation is positive at the right of its support and negative at the left. For α = 4, the outlier is created, thus the correction measure is negative inside the support of its continuous part. Using the Cauchy formula and doing similar computations as in Example 4, we obtain … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Domino Tilings of the Aztec Diamond in Random Environment and Schur Generating Functions

    math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For Aztec diamond tilings with i.i.d. one-periodic edge weights, height function fluctuations are, in the critical regime, GFF plus independent Brownian motion, and in the fixed-variance regime, Brownian motion alone ...

  2. $q$-deformed Perelomov-Popov measures and quantized free probability

    math.PR 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A q-deformed family of Perelomov-Popov measures is introduced and its large-N limits, free cumulants, 1/N corrections, and Markov-Krein relations are computed for all q in [-1,1].

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Aggarwal, Arctic boundaries of the ice model on three-bundle domains

    A. Aggarwal, Arctic boundaries of the ice model on three-bundle domains. Inventiones mathematicae, 220(2), 611, (2019). arXiv:1812.03847

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    G. W. Anderson, A. Guionnet, and O. Zeitouni, An introduction to random matrices, Cambridge University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Finite-rank perturbations of random band matrices via infinitesimal free probability

    B. Au, Finite-rank perturbations of random band matrices via infinitesimal free probability, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 74 (2021), no. 9, 1855--1895, arXiv:1906.10268

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, S. Peche. Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices, Ann. Probab. 33(5): 1643-1697 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Belinschi, D

    S.T. Belinschi, D. Shlyakhtenko. Free probability of type B: analytic aspects and applications, American Journal of Mathematics 134 (2012), 193-234

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Non-crossing cumulants of type B

    P.Biane, F. Goodman, A. Nica, Non-crossing cumulants of type B, Transactions of the AMS, Vol. 355, N. 6, 2263--2303, arXiv:math/0206167

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [7]

    Biane, Representations of Symmetric Groups and Free Probability, Advances in Mathematics, 138, no.\ 1, (1998), 126--181

    P. Biane, Representations of Symmetric Groups and Free Probability, Advances in Mathematics, 138, no.\ 1, (1998), 126--181

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Biane, Approximate factorization and concentration for characters of symmetric groups, International Mathematics Research Notices, 2001, no.\ 4, (2001), 179--192

    P. Biane, Approximate factorization and concentration for characters of symmetric groups, International Mathematics Research Notices, 2001, no.\ 4, (2001), 179--192

    work page 2001

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Borodin, A

    A. Borodin, A. Bufetov, G. Olshanski, Limit shapes for growing extreme characters of U( ) . Ann.\ Appl.\ Probab., 25, no.\ 4 (2015), 2339--2381. arXiv:1311.5697

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Borot, S

    G. Borot, S. Charbonnier, E. Garcia-Failde, F. Leix, S. Shadrin. Functional relations for higher order free cumulants, arXiv:2112.12184

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Boutillier, Z

    C. Boutillier, Z. Li, Limit shape and height fluctuations of random perfect matchings on square-hexagon lattices, arXiv:1709.09801

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bufetov, V

    A. Bufetov, V. Gorin. Representations of classical Lie groups and quantized free convolution, Geom. Funct. Anal., Vol. 25 (2015) 763-814. arXiv:1311.5780

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bufetov, V

    A. Bufetov, V. Gorin. Fluctuations of particle systems determined by Schur generating functions, Advances in Mathematics 338, no.\ 7 (2018), 702--781. arXiv:1604.01110

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Bufetov, V

    A. Bufetov, V. Gorin. Fourier transform on high-dimensional unitary groups with applications to random tilings, Duke Math. J. 168(13): 2559-2649 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Bufetov, A

    A. Bufetov, A. Knizel, Asymptotics of random domino tilings of rectangular Aztec diamonds, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Probab. Statist. 54, no.\ 3 (2018), 1250--1290. arXiv:1604.01491

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chhita, K

    S. Chhita, K. Johansson, B. Young, Asymptotic domino statistics in the Aztec diamond, Annals of Applied Probability, 25, no.\ 3 (2015), 1232--1278. arXiv:1212.5414

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H. Cohn, R. Kenyon, J. Propp, A variational principle for domino tilings, Journal of the AMS 14 (2001), 297--346. arXiv:math/0008220

    2001 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Collins, J

    B. Collins, J. Novak, P. \' S niady, Semiclassical asymptotics of GL_N( C) tensor products and quantum random matrices, Sel. Math. New Ser. (2018) 24: 2571. arXiv:1611.01892

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Colomo and A

    F. Colomo and A. Sportiello, Arctic Curves of the Six-Vertex Model on Generic Domains: The Tangent Method, J. Stat. Phys. 164, 1488-1523, 2016. arXiv:1605.01388

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Di Francesco, E

    P. Di Francesco, E. Guitter. Arctic curves for paths with arbitrary starting points: a tangent method approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 355201 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Di Francesco, E

    P. Di Francesco, E. Guitter. The Arctic curve for Aztec rectangles with defects via the Tangent Method, J Stat Phys 176, 639-678, (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Edrei, On the generation function of a doubly infinite, totally positive sequence

    A. Edrei, On the generation function of a doubly infinite, totally positive sequence. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 74, (1953), 367--383

    1953

  15. [23]

    Fevrier, Higher Order Infinitesimal Freeness, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, Vol

    M. Fevrier, Higher Order Infinitesimal Freeness, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, Vol. 61, No. 1 (2012), pp. 249-295 (47 pages)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Fevrier, A

    M. Fevrier, A. Nica. Infinitesimal non-crossing cumulants and free probability of type B, Journal of Functional Analysis 258(9):2983-3023

  17. [25]

    Gorin, G

    V. Gorin, G. Panova, Asymptotics of symmetric polynomials with applications to statistical mechanics and representation theory, Annals of Probability, 43, no.\ 6, (2015) 3052--3132. arXiv:1301.0634

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gorin, Y

    V. Gorin, Y. Sun. Gaussian fluctuations for products of random matrices. American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 144 no. 2, 2022, p. 287-393

    2022

  19. [27]

    Guionnet, M

    A. Guionnet, M. Ma\" da, A Fourier view on the R-transform and related asymptotics of spherical integrals, Journal of Functional Analysis, 222 (2005), no. 2, 435--490. arXiv:math/0406121

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Fourier transforms on a semisimple Lie algebra

    Harish-Chandra. Fourier transforms on a semisimple Lie algebra. I. Amer. J. Math. 79 (1957), 193-257

    1957

  21. [29]

    Huang, Law of large numbers and central limit theorems through Jack generating functions, Advances in Mathematics, Vol

    J. Huang, Law of large numbers and central limit theorems through Jack generating functions, Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 380, 2021, 107545

    2021

  22. [30]

    Jockusch, J

    W. Jockusch, J. Propp, P. Shor. Random Domino Tilings and the Arctic Circle Theorem, arXiv:math/9801068

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Johansson, The arctic circle boundary and the Airy process

    K. Johansson, The arctic circle boundary and the Airy process. Annals of Probability, 33:1--30, 2005

    2005

  24. [32]

    Kemmeter, B

    J. Kemmeter, B. Debin, P. Ruelle. Arctic curves of the 6V model with partial DWBC and double Aztec rectangles, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 55, 305004

  25. [33]

    Kenyon, A

    R. Kenyon, A. Okounkov, Limit shapes and the complex Burgers equation, Acta Math (2007) 199: 263. arXiv:math-ph/0507007

    2007 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Matsumoto, J

    S. Matsumoto, J. Novak, A Moment Method for Invariant Ensembles, Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci. 25 (2018) 60-71

    2018

  27. [35]

    Mingo, Non-crossing Annular Pairings and The Infinitesimal Distribution of the GOE, J

    J. Mingo, Non-crossing Annular Pairings and The Infinitesimal Distribution of the GOE, J. London Math. Soc., 100: 987--1012, arXiv:1808.02100

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nica and R

    A. Nica and R. Speicher, Lectures on the Combinatorics of Free Probability, Cambridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  29. [37]

    Olshanski, A

    G. Olshanski, A. Vershik, Ergodic unitarily invariant measures of infinite Hermitian matrices, Contemp. Mathematical Physics (R. R. A. Minlos, M. A. Shubin, and A. M. Vershik, eds.), Amer. Math. 175, 137-175, A. M. S., Providence

  30. [38]

    F. Parraud, Asymptotic expansion of smooth functions in polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid GUE matrices, Communications in Mathematical Physics (2023), 399(1), 249--294, arXiv:2011.04146

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Petrov, Asymptotics of Random Lozenge Tilings via Gelfand-Tsetlin Schemes

    L. Petrov, Asymptotics of Random Lozenge Tilings via Gelfand-Tsetlin Schemes. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 160, no.\ 3 (2014), 429--487. arXiv:1202.3901

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Pickrell

    D. Pickrell. Mackey analysis of infinite classical motion groups, Pacific J. Math. 150 (1991), 139–166

    1991

  33. [41]

    P. Ruelle. Double tangent method for two-periodic Aztec diamonds, J. Stat. Mech. (2022), 123103

    2022

  34. [42]

    Russkikh

    M. Russkikh. Dimers in piecewise Temperley domains. arXiv:1611.07884

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Shlyakhtenko

    D. Shlyakhtenko. Free probability of type B and asymptotics of finite-rank perturbations of random matrices, Indiana University Mathematics Journal 67 (2018), 971-991

    2018

  36. [44]

    Sniady, Gaussian fluctuations of characters of symmetric groups and of Young diagrams

    P. Sniady, Gaussian fluctuations of characters of symmetric groups and of Young diagrams. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 136, no.\ 2 (2006), 263--297

    2006

  37. [45]

    Speicher

    R. Speicher. Multiplicative functions on the lattice of non-crossing partitions and free convolution, Mathematische Annalen 298 (1994), 611-628

    1994

  38. [46]

    Voiculescu, Addition of certain non-commuting random variables, J

    D. Voiculescu, Addition of certain non-commuting random variables, J. Funct. Anal., 66 (1986), 323-346

    1986

  39. [47]

    Voiculescu, Limit laws for random matrices and free products, Invent

    D. Voiculescu, Limit laws for random matrices and free products, Invent. Math., 104 (1991), 201-220

    1991

  40. [48]

    Voiculescu, Representations factorielles de type II_1 de U( )

    D. Voiculescu, Representations factorielles de type II_1 de U( ) . J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 55, (1976), 1--20

    1976

  41. [49]

    Weyl, The Classical Groups: Their Invariants and Representations

    H. Weyl, The Classical Groups: Their Invariants and Representations. Princeton, University Press, 1939

    1939

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.