pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.13140 · v1 · pith:KN6T2VMWnew · submitted 2024-12-17 · 💻 cs.CV

Label Errors in the Tobacco3482 Dataset

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords datasetlabelbenchmarkfindissuesmistakesmodelproblems
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Tobacco3482 is a widely used document classification benchmark dataset. However, our manual inspection of the entire dataset uncovers widespread ontological issues, especially large amounts of annotation label problems in the dataset. We establish data label guidelines and find that 11.7% of the dataset is improperly annotated and should either have an unknown label or a corrected label, and 16.7% of samples in the dataset have multiple valid labels. We then analyze the mistakes of a top-performing model and find that 35% of the model's mistakes can be directly attributed to these label issues, highlighting the inherent problems with using a noisily labeled dataset as a benchmark. Supplementary material, including dataset annotations and code, is available at https://github.com/gordon-lim/tobacco3482-mistakes/.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revising RVL-CDIP: Quantifying Errors and Test-Train Overlap

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RVL-CDIP contains 12% label errors and 35% train-test duplicates; correcting labels improves OOD generalization while deduplication reduces in-distribution accuracy.