REVIEW 4 cited by
Are Longer Prompts Always Better? Prompt Selection in Large Language Models for Recommendation Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In large language models (LLM)-based recommendation systems (LLM-RSs), accurately predicting user preferences by leveraging the general knowledge of LLMs is possible without requiring extensive training data. By converting recommendation tasks into natural language inputs called prompts, LLM-RSs can efficiently solve issues that have been difficult to address due to data scarcity but are crucial in applications such as cold-start and cross-domain problems. However, when applying this in practice, selecting the prompt that matches tasks and data is essential. Although numerous prompts have been proposed in LLM-RSs and representing the target user in prompts significantly impacts recommendation accuracy, there are still no clear guidelines for selecting specific prompts. In this paper, we categorize and analyze prompts from previous research to establish practical prompt selection guidelines. Through 450 experiments with 90 prompts and five real-world datasets, we examined the relationship between prompts and dataset characteristics in recommendation accuracy. We found that no single prompt consistently outperforms others; thus, selecting prompts on the basis of dataset characteristics is crucial. Here, we propose a prompt selection method that achieves higher accuracy with minimal validation data. Because increasing the number of prompts to explore raises costs, we also introduce a cost-efficient strategy using high-performance and cost-efficient LLMs, significantly reducing exploration costs while maintaining high prediction accuracy. Our work offers valuable insights into the prompt selection, advancing accurate and efficient LLM-RSs.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
AutoData: A Multi-Agent System for Open Web Data Collection
AutoData, a multi-agent system with a hypergraph message cache, automates web dataset collection from a sentence instruction and outperforms general agent baselines on the new Instruct2DS benchmark.
-
CTG-Insight: A Multi-Agent Interpretable LLM Framework for Cardiotocography Analysis and Classification
CTG-Insight reports 96.4% accuracy on a 50-sample subset of the NeuroFetalNet test set, but the comparison against deep learning baselines is uneven and the system code and exact prompts are not released.
-
Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets
Claims two forms of Polymarket arbitrage and $40 million extracted profit, but the body text provided is an unrelated plasma physics paper.
-
Fine-tuning on simulated data outperforms prompting for agent tone of voice
Fine-tuning a 1B-parameter LLM on as few as 100 synthetically generated, readability-filtered samples achieved conversational tone more reliably than a verbose system prompt.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.