Immersed but not embedded homology classes

Diarmuid Crowley; Mark Grant

Immersed but not embedded homology classes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.15359 v2 pith:3N2GUMJR submitted 2024-12-19 math.GT

Immersed but not embedded homology classes

Diarmuid Crowley , Mark Grant This is my paper

classification math.GT

keywords exampleshomologyclassesimmersionsansweringclasscloseddocumented

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

We provide the first documented examples of immersions of closed oriented manifolds which are not homologous to embeddings, thus answering a question posed by Zhenhua Liu. In these examples we show that for any representing self-transverse immersion the double points must represent a non-trivial homology class in the source manifold. We also provide examples of Steenrod representable integral homology classes which are not represented by immersions.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Bosonic SPT and invertible phases and its relation to Steenrod's problem
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

Bosonic beyond-cohomology SPT phases are governed by a mod-3 Steenrod-power differential, and a new 6+1-dimensional Z3×Z3 Dijkgraaf-Witten phase is nontrivial on simplicial complexes but trivial on manifolds.