REVIEW 3 cited by
Star formation from low to high mass: A comparative view
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Star formation from low to high mass: A comparative view
read the original abstract
Star formation has often been studied by separating the low- and high-mass regimes with an approximate boundary at 8M_sun. While some of the outcomes of the star-formation process are different between the two regimes, it is less clear whether the physical processes leading to these outcomes are that different at all. Here, we systematically compare low- and high-mass star formation by reviewing the most important processes and quantities from an observational and theoretical point of view. We identify three regimes where processes are either similar, quantitatively or qualitatively different between low- and high-mass star formation. Similar characteristics can be identified for the turbulent gas properties and density structures of the star-forming regions. Many of the observational characteristics also do not depend that strongly on the environment. Quantitative differences can be found for outflow, infall and accretion rates as well as mean column and volume densities. Also the multiplicity significantly rises from low- to high-mass stars. The importance of the magnetic field for the formation processes appears still less well constrained. Qualitative differences between low- and high-mass star formation relate mainly to the radiative and ionizing feedback that occurs almost exclusively in regions forming high-mass stars. Nevertheless, accretion apparently can continue via disk structures in ionized accretion flows. Finally, we discuss to what extent a unified picture of star formation over all masses is possible and which issues need to be addressed in the future.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Challenges in probing turbulent and magnetic support in cores: the W43-MM1 protocluster case study
Simplified virial analyses of W43-MM1 cores overestimate non-thermal support because linewidths include organized motions of 1–3 km/s and surface terms are omitted, producing unexpectedly high stability fractions.
-
How Should We Understand the Core Mass Function? A memo of the CMF2IMF conference at ESO Garching
High-mass CMF slopes depend strongly on minimum fitting mass; early-stage cores (ASHES) appear steeper, consistent with an evolving high-mass end.
-
Star Formation at the Periphery of a Molecular Superbubble: The Case of G12.79+0.43
Observational study of G12.79+0.43 identifies YSOs and HII regions powered by B-type stars and associates the complex with the rim of a molecular superbubble of diameter ~50 pc and expansion age ~0.3 Myr without estab...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.