pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2502.04425 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Tensor-Programmable Quantum Circuits for Solving Differential Equations

Pia Siegl , Greta Sophie Reese , Tomohiro Hashizume , Nis-Luca van H\"ulst , Dieter Jaksch
Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords equationsdifferentialquantumclassicalpartialschemeabsorbingadvantages
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present a quantum solver for partial differential equations based on a flexible matrix product operator representation. Utilizing mid-circuit measurements and a state-dependent norm correction, this scheme overcomes the restriction of unitary operators. Hence, it allows for the direct implementation of a broad class of differential equations governing the dynamics of classical and quantum systems. The capabilities of the framework are demonstrated for linear and non-linear partial differential equations using the example of the linearized Euler equations with absorbing boundaries and the nonlinear Burgers' equation. For a turbulence data set, we demonstrate potential advantages of the quantum tensor scheme over its classical counterparts.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Entanglement is Half the Story: Post-Selection vs. Partial Traces

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A hybrid tensor network framework interpolates between classical and quantum models via controllable post-selection, with a trainable hyperparameter that complements bond dimension to enhance quantum machine learning.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advanced Imaging of Matter

    to be maintained. Furthermore, we have assumed that both the classical and the quantum tensor network algorithm involve a comparable scaling of the number of training steps with system size. Importantly, both approaches provide the fidelityFas convergence mea- sure which allows to adapt the training hyperparameters during the training procedure and improv...

    work page 2029

  2. [2]

    Black and M

    F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and cor- porate liabilities, J. Political Econ.81, 637 (1973)

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    S. T. Lee and H.-W. Sun, Fourth-order compact scheme with local mesh refinement for option pricing in jump- diffusion model, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ.28, 1079 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    X. Bian, C. Kim, and G. E. Karniadakis, 111 years of brownian motion, Soft Matter12, 6331 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    X. Wu, Y. Zhang, and S. Mao, Learning the physics- consistent material behavior from measurable data via pde-constrained optimization, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.437, 117748 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Courant, K

    R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy, On the par- tial difference equations of mathematical physics, IBM J. Res. Dev.11, 215 (1967)

    work page 1967

  7. [7]

    J. H. Ferziger and M. Peri´ c,Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Wu, Recent advances in the application of computa- tional fluid dynamics in the development of rotary blood pumps, Med

    P. Wu, Recent advances in the application of computa- tional fluid dynamics in the development of rotary blood pumps, Med. Nov. Technol. Devices16, 100177 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    J. P. Slotnick, A. Khodadoust, J. J. Alonso, D. L. Darmo- fal, W. Gropp, E. A. Lurie, and D. J. Mavriplis, Cfd vi- sion 2030 study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences (2014)

    work page 2030

  10. [10]

    F. R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J.32, 1598 (1994)

    work page 1994

  11. [11]

    Wilcox, Turbulence modeling for cfd, DCW industries, La Canada (1998)

    D. Wilcox, Turbulence modeling for cfd, DCW industries, La Canada (1998)

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    S. B. Pope,Turbulent Flows(Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    Sagaut,Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: an introduction(Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2005)

    P. Sagaut,Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: an introduction(Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Germano, U

    M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. H. Cabot, A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model, Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn.3, 1760 (1991)

    work page 1991

  15. [15]

    Long and Y

    G.-L. Long and Y. Sun, Efficient scheme for initializing a quantum register with an arbitrary superposed state, Phys. Rev. A64, 014303 (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Gourianov, M

    N. Gourianov, M. Lubasch, S. Dolgov, Q. Y. van den Berg, H. Babaee, P. Givi, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, A quantum-inspired approach to exploit turbulence struc- tures, Nat. Comput. Sci.2, 30 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Jaksch, P

    D. Jaksch, P. Givi, A. J. Daley, and T. Rung, Variational quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics, AIAA J.61, 1885 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    P. Givi, A. J. Daley, D. Mavriplis, and M. Malik, Quan- tum speedup for aeroscience and engineering, AIAA J. 58, 3715 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Quantum al- gorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Variable time amplitude amplification and a faster quan- tum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations,

    A. Ambainis, Variable time amplitude amplification and a faster quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations (2010), arXiv:1010.4458

    work page arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    A. M. Childs, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma, Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponen- tially improved dependence on precision, SIAM J. Com- put.46, 1920 (2017)

    work page 1920

  22. [22]

    Penuel, A

    J. Penuel, A. Katabarwa, P. D. Johnson, C. Farquhar, Y. Cao, and M. C. Garrett, Feasibility of accelerat- ing incompressible computational fluid dynamics simu- lations with fault-tolerant quantum computers (2024), arXiv:2406.06323

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Quantum algorithm for nonlinear differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.06571, 2020

    S. Lloyd, G. D. Palma, C. Gokler, B. Kiani, Z.-W. Liu, M. Marvian, F. Tennie, and T. Palmer, Quan- tum algorithm for nonlinear differential equations (2020), arXiv:2011.06571

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Brearley and S

    P. Brearley and S. Laizet, Quantum algorithm for solv- ing the advection equation using hamiltonian simulation, Phys. Rev. A110, 012430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    P. Over, S. Bengoechea, P. Brearley, S. Laizet, and T. Rung, Quantum algorithm for the advection- diffusion equation with optimal success probability (2024), arXiv:2410.07909

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Peruzzo, J

    A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nat. Commun.5(2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Kandala, A

    A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Hardware- efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Nature549, 242 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Cerezo, K

    M. Cerezo, K. Sharma, A. Arrasmith, and P. Coles, Vari- ational quantum state eigensolver, Npj Quantum Inf.8, 113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    G. Q. AI and Collaborators, Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Nature638, 920–926 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    B. W. Reichardt, D. Aasen, R. Chao, A. Chernogu- zov, W. van Dam, J. P. Gaebler, D. Gresh, D. Luc- chetti, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, A. Paet- znick, A. Paz, P. E. Siegfried, M. P. da Silva, K. M. Svore, Z. Wang, and M. Zanner, Demonstration of quan- tum computation and error correction with a tesseract code (2024), arXiv:2409.04628

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    van Dam, H

    W. van Dam, H. Liu, G. H. Low, A. Paetznick, A. Paz, M. Silva, A. Sundaram, K. Svore, and M. Troyer, End- to-end quantum simulation of a chemical system (2024), arXiv:2409.05835

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Quera computing releases a groundbreaking roadmap for advanced error-corrected quantum computers, pio- neering the next frontier in quantum innovation,https: //www.quera.com/press-releases/quera-computing- releases-a-groundbreaking-roadmap-for-advanced- error-corrected-quantum-computers-pioneering- the-next-frontier-in-quantum-innovation-0, vis- ited on 2...

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Ibm technology atlas quantum roadmap,https:// www.ibm.com/roadmaps/quantum.pdf, visited on 2024-10- 10. 10

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Lubasch, J

    M. Lubasch, J. Joo, P. Moinier, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems, Phys. Rev. A101, 010301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Schilling, F

    M. Schilling, F. Preti, M. M. M¨ uller, T. Calarco, and F. Motzoi, Exponentiation of parametric hamiltonians via unitary interpolation, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043278 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    W. J. Huggins, J. Lee, U. Baek, B. O’Gorman, and K. B. Whaley, A non-orthogonal variational quantum eigen- solver, New J. Phys.22, 073009 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    M. Umer, E. Mastorakis, S. Evangelou, and D. G. An- gelakis, Probing the limits of variational quantum algo- rithms for nonlinear ground states on real quantum hard- ware: The effects of noise, Phys. Rev. A111, 012626 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    A. J. Pool, A. D. Somoza, C. Mc Keever, M. Lubasch, and B. Horstmann, Nonlinear dynamics as a ground-state so- lution on quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033257 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Y. Shao, F. Wei, S. Cheng, and Z. Liu, Simulating noisy variational quantum algorithms: A polynomial approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 120603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Rosenberg, P

    E. Rosenberg, P. Ginsparg, and P. L. McMahon, Exper- imental error mitigation using linear rescaling for varia- tional quantum eigensolving with up to 20 qubits, Quan- tum Science and Technology7, 015024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Jaderberg, A

    B. Jaderberg, A. Agarwal, K. Leonhardt, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, Minimum hardware requirements for hy- brid quantum–classical dmft, Quantum Sci. Technol.5, 034015 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Jaderberg, A

    B. Jaderberg, A. Eisfeld, D. Jaksch, and S. Mostame, Recompilation-enhanced simulation of electron–phonon dynamics on ibm quantum computers, New J. Phys.24, 093017 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. van den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zaletel, K. Temme, and A. Kandala, Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance, Nature618, 500 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    I. V. Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.33, 2295 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann

    R. Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys.349, 117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    I. V. Oseledets, Constructive representation of functions in low-rank tensor formats, Constructive Approximation 37, 1 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Ye and N

    E. Ye and N. F. G. Loureiro, Quantum-inspired method for solving the vlasov-poisson equations, Phys. Rev. E 106, 035208 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Kiffner and D

    M. Kiffner and D. Jaksch, Tensor network reduced or- der models for wall-bounded flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids8, 124101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Kornev, S

    E. Kornev, S. Dolgov, K. Pinto, M. Pflitsch, M. Perelshtein, and A. Melnikov, Numerical solution of the incompressible navier-stokes equations for chemical mixers via quantum-inspired tensor train finite element method (2023), arXiv:2305.10784

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Ye and N

    E. Ye and N. F. Loureiro, Quantized tensor networks for solving the Vlasov–Maxwell equations, J. Plasma Phys. 90, 805900301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    R. D. Peddinti, S. Pisoni, A. Marini, P. Lott, H. Argen- tieri, E. Tiunov, and L. Aolita, Quantum-inspired frame- work for computational fluid dynamics, Commun. Phys. 7, 135 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    H¨ olscher, P

    L. H¨ olscher, P. Rao, L. M¨ uller, J. Klepsch, A. Luckow, T. Stollenwerk, and F. K. Wilhelm, Quantum-inspired fluid simulation of two-dimensional turbulence with gpu acceleration, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Gourianov, P

    N. Gourianov, P. Givi, D. Jaksch, and S. B. Pope, Tensor networks enable the calculation of turbulence probability distributions, Sci. Adv.11, eads5990 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Schachenmayer, B

    J. Schachenmayer, B. P. Lanyon, C. F. Roos, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth in quench dynamics with variable range interactions, Phys. Rev. X3, 031015 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, inProceedings of the Twenty-Eighth An- nual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’96 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1996) p. 212–219

    work page 1996

  56. [56]

    Ran, Encoding of matrix product states into quan- tum circuits of one- and two-qubit gates, Phys

    S.-J. Ran, Encoding of matrix product states into quan- tum circuits of one- and two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032310 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    D. Malz, G. Styliaris, Z.-Y. Wei, and J. I. Cirac, Prepa- ration of matrix product states with log-depth quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 040404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    K. C. Smith, A. Khan, B. K. Clark, S. Girvin, and T.- C. Wei, Constant-depth preparation of matrix product states with adaptive quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 5, 030344 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Nibbi and C

    M. Nibbi and C. B. Mendl, Block encoding of matrix product operators, Phys. Rev. A110, 042427 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Termanova, A

    A. Termanova, A. Melnikov, E. Mamenchikov, N. Be- lokonev, S. Dolgov, A. Berezutskii, R. Ellerbrock, C. Mansell, and M. Perelshtein, Tensor quantum pro- gramming, New J. Phys.26, 123019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Goldack, Y

    M. Goldack, Y. Atia, O. Alberton, and K. Jansen, Com- puting statistical properties of velocity fields on current quantum hardware (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Uchida, K

    F. Uchida, K. Miyamoto, S. Yamazaki, K. Fujisawa, and N. Yoshida, Quantum simulation of burgers turbulence: Nonlinear transformation and direct evaluation of statis- tical quantities (2024), arXiv:2412.17206 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    J. D. Jesus et al., in preparation (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Sarma, T

    A. Sarma, T. W. Watts, M. Moosa, Y. Liu, and P. L. McMahon, Quantum variational solving of nonlinear and multidimensional partial differential equations, Phys. Rev. A109, 062616 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    P. Over, S. Bengoechea, T. Rung, F. Clerici, L. Scan- durra, E. de Villiers, and D. Jaksch, Boundary treatment for variational quantum simulations of partial differential equations on quantum computers, Comput. Fluids288, 106508 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Schuld and F

    M. Schuld and F. Petruccione, Representing data on a quantum computer, inMachine Learning with Quantum Computers(Springer International Publishing, Cham,

    work page

  67. [67]

    Ben-Dov, D

    M. Ben-Dov, D. Shnaiderov, A. Makmal, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Approximate encoding of quantum states using shallow circuits, npj Quantum Information10, 65 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    V. A. Kazeev and B. N. Khoromskij, Low-rank explicit qtt representation of the laplace operator and its inverse, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.33, 742 (2012)

    work page 2012

  69. [69]

    I. V. Oseledets, Approximation of 2 d ×2 d matrices using tensor decomposition, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.31, 2130 (2010). 11

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    H. Zhao, M. Bukov, M. Heyl, and R. Moessner, Making trotterization adaptive and energy-self-correcting for nisq devices and beyond, PRX Quantum4, 030319 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    R. Puig, M. Drudis, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, Varia- tional quantum simulation: A case study for understand- ing warm starts, PRX Quantum6, 010317 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Mitarai, M

    K. Mitarai, M. Negoro, M. Kitagawa, and K. Fujii, Quan- tum circuit learning, Phys. Rev. A98, 032309 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Schuld, V

    M. Schuld, V. Bergholm, C. Gogolin, J. Izaac, and N. Kil- loran, Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hard- ware, Phys. Rev. A99, 032331 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Spall,An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization(Johns Hopkins apl technical digest, 1998) p

    J. Spall,An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization(Johns Hopkins apl technical digest, 1998) p. 482–492

    work page 1998

  75. [75]

    A. J. Chorin, J. E. Marsden, and A. Leonard, A mathe- matical introduction to fluid mechanics (1979)

    work page 1979

  76. [76]

    Peric and M

    R. Peric and M. Abdel-Maksoud, Reliable damping of free surface waves in numerical simulations, Sh. Technol. Res.63(2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    F. H. Harlow and J. E. Welch, Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface, Phys. Fluids8, 2182 (1965)

    work page 1965

  78. [78]

    Nielsen and I

    M. Nielsen and I. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cam- bridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  79. [79]

    Haghshenas, J

    R. Haghshenas, J. Gray, A. C. Potter, and G. K.-L. Chan, Variational power of quantum circuit tensor networks, Phys. Rev. X12, 011047 (2022)

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    D. Wang, O. Higgott, and S. Brierley, Accelerated varia- tional quantum eigensolver, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140504 (2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.