pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2502.13101 · v4 · submitted 2025-02-18 · 💻 cs.CY

Recognition: unknown

AI and the Transformation of Accountability and Discretion in Urban Governance

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords discretiongovernanceaccountabilityacrossalgorithmicaccesscitizenconceptual
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper offers a conceptual analysis of the transformative role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in urban governance, focusing on how AI can reshape the relationship between bureaucratic discretion and accountability. Drawing on public administration theory and algorithmic governance research, the study argues that AI does not simply restrict or enhance discretion but redistributes it across institutional levels, professional roles, and citizen interactions. While primarily conceptual, this paper uses illustrative cases to show that AI can strengthen managerial oversight, improve service delivery consistency, and expand citizen access to information. These changes affect different forms of accountability: political, professional, and participatory, while introducing new risks, such as data bias, algorithmic opacity, and fragmented responsibility across actors. In response, the paper introduces the concept of accountable discretion and proposes guiding principles, each linked to actionable measures: equal AI access, adaptive administrative structures, robust data governance, proactive human-led decision-making, and citizen-engaged oversight. This study contributes to the AI governance literature by moving beyond narrow concerns with perceived discretion at the street level, highlighting instead how AI transforms rule-based discretion across governance systems. It also reframes the trade-off between discretion and accountability as a dynamic and evolving relationship shaped by algorithmic systems and institutional practices.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Governing What the EU AI Act Excludes: Accountability for Autonomous AI Agents in Smart City Critical Infrastructure

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The EU AI Act narrows accountability for multi-agent AI in critical infrastructure by excluding safety components from key explanation and impact assessment rights, and the paper proposes AgentGov-SC, a three-layer ar...