Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the polar of Schneider's difference body

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06191 v4 pith:F7WFQCM7 submitted 2025-03-08 math.MG math.FA

On the polar of Schneider's difference body

classification math.MG math.FA
keywords bodyschneidervolumeconjectureconvexdifferenceellipsoidsinequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

In 1970, Schneider introduced the $m$th-order extension of the difference body $DK$ of a convex body $K\subset\mathbb R^n$, the convex body $D^m(K)$ in $\mathbb R^{nm}$. He conjectured that its volume is minimized for ellipsoids when the volume of $K$ is fixed. In this work, we solve a dual version of this problem: we show that the volume of the polar body of $D^m(K)$ is maximized precisely by ellipsoids. For $m=1$ this recovers the symmetric case of the celebrated Blaschke-Santal\'o inequality. We also show that Schneider's conjecture cannot be tackled using standard symmetrization techniques, contrary to this new inequality. As an application for our results, we prove Schneider's conjecture asymptotically \'a la Bourgain-Milman. We also consider a functional version.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Godbersen's conjecture and the $L_p$-Rogers-Shephard inequality

    math.MG 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Godbersen's 1938 conjecture is proved: V(K[k],−K[n−k]) ≤ C(n,k) vol(K) for all convex bodies, with equality characterizations, and it yields the sharp L_p Rogers–Shephard inequality.