REVIEW 2 cited by
Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner's Guide
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner's Guide
read the original abstract
Difference-in-differences (DiD) is arguably the most popular quasi-experimental research design. Its canonical form, with two groups and two periods, is well-understood. However, empirical practices can be ad hoc when researchers go beyond that simple case. This article provides an organizing framework for discussing different types of DiD designs and their associated DiD estimators. It discusses covariates, weights, handling multiple periods, and staggered treatments. The organizational framework, however, applies to other extensions of DiD methods as well.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Piece-wise linear isotonic regression
A bilevel optimization framework smooths isotonic regression outputs into continuous piece-wise linear monotonic functions to recover marginal properties in both convex and non-convex cases.
-
Compositional difference-in-differences
A difference-in-differences estimator for categorical outcomes that identifies counterfactual category counts and shares under proportional-growth parallel trends, with applications to early voting and RGGI.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.