pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.05424 · v3 · pith:KRNONQKUnew · submitted 2025-05-08 · 🧮 math.OC

An efficient second-order cone programming approach for dynamic optimal transport on staggered grid discretization

Liang Chen , Youyicun Lin , Yuxuan Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords dynamic optimal transportsecond-order cone programmingstaggered gridproximal augmented Lagrangiannumerical methodquadratic cost
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dynamic optimal transport on staggered grids reduces to a linear second-order cone program that skips interpolation entirely.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that discretized dynamic optimal transport problems with quadratic cost can be rewritten exactly as linear second-order cone programs. This reformulation removes the need for interpolation matrices that otherwise force repeated solutions of cubic equations and linear systems. The resulting SOCP is then solved with an inexact decomposition-based proximal augmented Lagrangian method that is computationally cheap. Experiments indicate the approach runs faster than existing packages while remaining robust on problems with non-negative measures. The authors also release an open-source implementation.

Core claim

By properly reformulating discretized DOT problems into a linear SOCP, the proposed method eliminates the interpolation matrices and thus avoids solving a series of cubic equations and linear systems induced by interpolation, then solves the problems efficiently by a computationally highly economical implementation of an inexact decomposition-based proximal augmented Lagrangian method.

What carries the argument

Linear second-order cone programming reformulation of the staggered-grid dynamic optimal transport problem.

If this is right

  • The method removes the dominant computational bottleneck from interpolation at each time step.
  • An open-source package makes the solver immediately available for other researchers.
  • The approach shows robustness when input measures are non-negative.
  • Numerical tests indicate significantly lower runtimes than state-of-the-art packages on various DOT instances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reformulation idea might apply to other grid-based optimal transport problems that currently rely on interpolation.
  • Because the SOCP is linear, off-the-shelf conic solvers could replace the custom proximal method in future work.
  • The absence of interpolation matrices could simplify theoretical error analysis for the overall discretization.

Load-bearing premise

The staggered-grid discretization admits an exact linear second-order cone representation without introducing approximation error beyond the grid itself.

What would settle it

Run the SOCP solver and a standard interpolation-based solver on the same staggered-grid DOT instance with a known analytic solution; if the SOCP version is not faster while matching accuracy to grid tolerance, the claimed advantage fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05424 by Liang Chen, Youyicun Lin, Yuxuan Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The upper row features images from the Classic Images category, and the bottom row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measures in Example 5.7 and numerical results Transportation through points with large κ(x) is more expensive; thus, the optimal trajectory tends to avoid such points. Following the analysis of [50, Proposition 5.18], one can prove that the objective function of (32) admits an equivalent form given by sup a,b n Z Ω a(t, x) dρ + Z Ω b(t, x) · dm | (a, b) ∈ Pκ o , where Pκ := n (a, b) ∈ C(Ω) × C(Ω)D | a + ∥b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Densities in Example 5.8 and Example 5.9 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Time (s) 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Errors inPALM DR DRc PD PDc (a) Example 5.8 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Time (s) 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Errors inPALM DR DRc PD PDc (b) Example 5.9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical results on comparing the efficiency for Example [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper proposes an efficient numerical method based on second-order cone programming (SOCP) to solve dynamic optimal transport (DOT) problems with quadratic cost on staggered grid discretization. By properly reformulating discretized DOT problems into a linear SOCP, the proposed method eliminates the interpolation matrices and thus avoids solving a series of cubic equations and linear systems induced by interpolation. Then, by taking advantage of the SOCP reformulation, we can solve them efficiently by a computationally highly economical implementation of an inexact decomposition-based proximal augmented Lagrangian method. Moreover, we have made the proposed approach an open-source software package. Numerical experiments on various DOT problems suggest that the proposed approach performs significantly more efficiently than state-of-the-art software packages. In addition, it exhibits prominent robustness to problems with non-negative measures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an efficient second-order cone programming (SOCP) approach for solving dynamic optimal transport (DOT) problems discretized on staggered grids with quadratic cost. The key idea is to reformulate the discretized problem into a linear SOCP that eliminates the need for interpolation matrices, thereby avoiding the solution of cubic equations and linear systems. The resulting SOCP is solved using an inexact decomposition-based proximal augmented Lagrangian method, and the method is implemented in an open-source package. Numerical experiments demonstrate improved efficiency and robustness compared to existing methods.

Significance. If the central reformulation is exact, this paper contributes a valuable computational tool for dynamic optimal transport by providing an exact SOCP representation that leverages efficient conic solvers. The open-source implementation and demonstrations of robustness to non-negative measures are strengths that support practical adoption. This could advance the field by offering a more scalable alternative to methods relying on interpolation.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] Clarify the exact form of the rotated quadratic cone used for the cost term and ensure all variables are defined consistently with the staggered grid discretization.
  2. The abstract claims 'linear SOCP' which may be confusing as SOCP typically refers to problems with second-order cone constraints; consider rephrasing to 'SOCP with linear objective' if appropriate.
  3. [Numerical experiments] Provide more details on the grid sizes used and the specific DOT problems tested to allow better assessment of scalability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive evaluation of our manuscript. The referee's summary accurately captures the core contribution of our SOCP reformulation for dynamic optimal transport on staggered grids, the elimination of interpolation steps, and the use of the proximal augmented Lagrangian solver. We are pleased that the significance section highlights the exact reformulation, open-source implementation, and robustness to non-negative measures. We will prepare a revised version addressing any minor points.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct algebraic reformulation of staggered-grid DOT into SOCP is self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is a direct algebraic reformulation of the discretized dynamic optimal transport problem on a staggered grid into a linear second-order cone program. Momentum variables are placed on faces with the per-face cone constraint ||m||^2 <= t * rho, which is algebraically equivalent to the discrete objective and enforces m=0 when rho=0 by construction of the finite-volume scheme. This choice of discretization eliminates interpolation matrices without additional approximation beyond the grid itself, and the subsequent inexact proximal augmented Lagrangian solver is a standard algorithmic template applied to the resulting SOCP. No load-bearing step reduces to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or self-definitional equivalence; the derivation remains independent and externally verifiable against the underlying discrete continuity equation and quadratic cost.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the algebraic equivalence between the staggered-grid DOT discretization and a linear SOCP; this equivalence is asserted but not derived in the provided abstract. No free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The staggered-grid discretization of the continuity and momentum equations for quadratic-cost dynamic optimal transport can be expressed exactly as linear second-order cone constraints.
    This equivalence is the load-bearing step that removes interpolation matrices; it is invoked when the authors state the reformulation is proper and exact.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5663 in / 1269 out tokens · 24349 ms · 2026-05-22T15:42:51.234831+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A semi-smooth Newton method for the nonlinear conic problem with generalized simplicial cones

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A semi-smooth Newton method is developed for nonlinear conic programs over generalized simplicial cones, with local quadratic convergence proven via conic projection equations and strong semi-smoothness of the project...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alizadeh, F., Goldfarb, D.: Second order cone programming. Math. Program.95, 3–51 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Aref, H., Balachandar, S.: A First Course in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2(1), 183–202 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Benamou, J.-D., Brenier, Y.: A computational fluid mechanics solution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem. Numer. Math.84(3), 375–393 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Benamou, J.-D., Carlier, G.: Augmented Lagrangian methods for transport optimization, mean field games and degenerate elliptic equations. J. Optim. Theory Appl.167, 1–26 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    In: Gradient flows: from theory to application, ESAIM ProcS.54, 1–17 (2016)

    Benamou, J.-D., Carlier, G., Laborde, M.: An augmented Lagrangian approach to Wasserstein gradient flows and applications. In: Gradient flows: from theory to application, ESAIM ProcS.54, 1–17 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Carrillo, J.A., Craig, K., Wang, L., Wei, C.Z.: Primal dual methods for Wasserstein gradient flows. Found. Comput. Math.22, 389–443 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Chambolle, A., Pock, T.: A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging. J. Math. Imaging Vis.40, 120–145 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Chen, L., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: A note on the convergence of ADMM for linearly constrained convex optimization problems. Comput. Optim. Appl.66, 327–343 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Chen, L., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: An efficient inexact symmetric Gauss-Seidel based majorized ADMM for high-dimensional convex composite conic programming. Math. Program.161(1): 237–270 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Chen, L., Li, X.D., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: On the equivalence of inexact proximal ALM and ADMM for a class of convex composite programming. Math. Program.185, 111–161 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Chen, L., Yang, L.X., Zhu, J.Y.: A survey on some recent advances in linear and nonlin- ear second-order cone programming, J. Oper. Res. Soc. China (2025),https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40305-025-00643-7

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Chizat, L., Peyr´ e, G., Schmitzer, B., Vialard, F.-X.: Unbalanced optimal transport: Dynamic and Kantorovich formulations. J. Func. Anal.274(11), 3090–3123 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    In Splitting Methods in Communication, Imaging, Science, and Engineering, Glowinski, R., Osher, S.J., Yin, W., eds., Springer, pp

    Davis, D., Yin, W.: Convergence rate analysis of several splitting schemes. In Splitting Methods in Communication, Imaging, Science, and Engineering, Glowinski, R., Osher, S.J., Yin, W., eds., Springer, pp. 115–163 (2016) 26

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Fazel, M., Pong, T.K., Sun, D.F., Tseng, P.: Hankel matrix rank minimization with applications to system identification and realization. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.34(3), 946–977 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    In: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp

    Flamary, R., F´ evotte, C., Courty, N., Emiya, V.: Optimal spectral transportation with application to music transcription. In: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 703–711 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Fukushima, M., Luo, Z.Q., Tseng, P.: Smoothing functions for second-order cone complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim.12(2), 436–460 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Gabay, D., Mercier, B.: A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation. Comput. Math. Appl.2(1), 17–40 (1976)

    work page 1976

  19. [19]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)

    Galichon, A.: Optimal Transport Methods in Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Revue fran¸ caise d’atomatique, Informatique Recherche Op´ erationelle

    Glowinski, R., Marroco, A.: Sur l’approximation, par ´ el´ ements finis d’ordre un, et la r´ esolution, par p´ enalisation-dualit´ e d’une classe de probl` emes de Dirichlet non lin´ eaires. Revue fran¸ caise d’atomatique, Informatique Recherche Op´ erationelle. Analyse Num´ erique9(2), 41–76 (1975)

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    ESAIM: Control Optim

    Graber, P.J., Cardaliaguet, P.: Mean field games systems of first order. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var.21(3), 690–722 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2013)

    Golub, G., Van Loan, C.: Matrix Computations, 4th edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Hestenes, M.: Multiplier and gradient methods. J. Optim. Theory Appl.4(5), 303–320 (1969)

    work page 1969

  24. [24]

    ACM Trans

    Hou, D., Liang, L., Toh, K.-C.: A sparse smoothing Newton method for solving discrete optimal transport problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw.50(3) (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Kantorovich, L.V.: On the transfer of masses (in Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk37(2), 227–229 (1942)

    work page 1942

  26. [26]

    Uspekhi Mat

    Kantorovich, L.V.: On a problem of Monge. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk3, 225–226 (1948)

    work page 1948

  27. [27]

    Kondratyev, S., Monsaingeon, L., Voronikov, D.: A new optimal transport distance on the space of finite Radon measures. Adv. Differential Equ.21(11), 1117–1164 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Lam, X.Y., Marron, J.S., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: Fast algorithms for large-scale generalized distance weighted discrimination. J. Comput. Graph. Statist.27(2), 368–379 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    ACM Trans

    Lavenant, H., Claici, S., Chine, E., Solomon, J.: Dynamical optimal transport on discrete surface. ACM Trans. Graph.37(6), 1–16 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Lavenant, H.: Unconditional convergence for discretizations of dynamical optimal transport. Math. Comput.90, 739–786 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Li, G., Chen, Y.X., Huang, Y., Chi, Y.J., Poor, H.V., Chen, Y.X.: Fast computation of optimal transport via entropy-regularized extragradient methods. SIAM J. Optim.35(2), 1330–1363 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Li, X.D., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: A Schur complement based semi-proximal ADMM for convex quadratic conic programming and extensions. Math. Program.155, 333–373 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Li, X.D., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: A block symmetric Gauss-Seidel decomposition theorem for convex composite quadratic programming and its application. Math. Program.175, 395–418 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Liang, L., Sun, D.F., Toh, K.-C.: An inexact augmented Lagrangian method for second-order cone programming with applications. SIAM J. Optim.31(3), 1748–1773 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Liero, M., Mielke, A., Savar´ e, G.: Optimal entropy-transport problems and a new Hellinger- Kantorovich distance between positive measures. Invent. Math.211(3), 969–1117 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Liu, J.L., Yin, W.T., Li, W.C., Chow, Y.T.: Multilevel optimal transport: a fast approximation of Wasserstein-1 distances. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.43(1), A193–A220 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    (2021), arXiv: 2102.02992

    Liu, S., Ma, S.J., Chen, Y.X., Zha, H.Y., Zhou, H.M.: Learning high dimensional Wasserstein geodesics. (2021), arXiv: 2102.02992

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Liu, Y.L., Xu, Y.B., Yin, W.T.: Acceleration of primal-dual methods by preconditioning and simple subproblem procedures. J. Sci. Comput.86(2), 1–34 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    McCann R.: A convexity principle for interacting gases. Adv. Math.128(1), 153–179 (1997)

    work page 1997

  40. [40]

    M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des Sciences, Paris (1781)

    Monge, G.: M´ emoire sur la th´ eorie des d´ eblais et des remblais. M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des Sciences, Paris (1781)

    work page

  41. [41]

    Monteiro, R.D., Svaiter, B.F.: Iteration-complexity of block-decomposition algorithms and the alter- nating direction method of multipliers. SIAM J. Optim.23(1), 475–507 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    ESAIM-Math

    Natale, A., Todeschi, G.: Computation of optimal transport with finite volume. ESAIM-Math. Model. Num.55, 1847–1871 (2021) 27

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Papadakis, N., Peyr´ e, G., Oudet, E.: Optimal transport with proximal splitting. SIAM J. Imaging Sci.7(1), 212–238 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Papadakis, N., Rabin, J.: Convex histogram-based joint image segmentation with regularized optimal transport cost. J. Math. Imaging Vis.59(2), 161–186 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Peyr´ e, G., Cuturi, M.: Computational optimal transport: with applications to data science. Found. Trends Mach. Learn.11, 355–607 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    In: Fletcher, R.(ed.) Optimization, pp

    Powell, M.: A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems. In: Fletcher, R.(ed.) Optimization, pp. 283–298. Academic Press, New York (1969)

    work page 1969

  47. [47]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)

    Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)

    work page 1970

  48. [48]

    Rockafellar, R.T.: Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming. Math. Oper. Res.1, 97–116 (1976)

    work page 1976

  49. [49]

    Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2003)

    Saad, Y.: Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2003)

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    Calculus of Variations, PDEs, and Modeling

    Santambrogio, F.: Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians. Calculus of Variations, PDEs, and Modeling. Springer, Cham (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    IEEE Access5, 271–282 (2017)

    Schrieber, J., Schuhmacher, D., Gottschlich, C.: Dotmark–a benchmark for discrete optimal transport. IEEE Access5, 271–282 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Sun, D.F., Yuan, Y.C., Zhang, G.J., Zhao, X.Y.: Accelerating preconditioned ADMM via degenerate proximal point mappings. SIAM J. Optim.35(2), 1165–1193 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Tang, T.Y., Toh, K.-C.: Self-adaptive ADMM for semi-strongly convex problems. Math. Program. Comput.16, 113–150 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Tartavel, G., Peyr´ e, G., Gousseau, Y.: Wasserstein loss for image synthesis and restoration. SIAM J. Imaging Sci.9(4), 1726–1755 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Tutuncu, R.H., Toh, K.-C., Todd, M.J.: Solving semidefinite-quadratic-linear programs using SDPT3. Math. Program.95, 189–217 (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Graduate studies in mathematics, American Mathe- matical Society, Providence (2003)

    Villani, C.: Topics in Optimal Transportation. Graduate studies in mathematics, American Mathe- matical Society, Providence (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Wan, W., Zhang, Y.J., Bao, C.L., Dong, B., Shi, Z.Q.: A scalable deep learning approach for solving high-dimensional dynamic optimal transport. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.45(4), B544–B563 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Wang, R., Zhang, Z.: Quadratic-form optimal transport. Math. Program. (2025),https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10107-025-02282-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-025-02282-5 2025

  59. [59]

    Xiao, Y.H., Chen, L., Li, D.H.: A generalized alternating direction method of multipliers with semi- proximal terms for convex composite conic programming. Math. Program. Comput.10(4), 533–555 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Yang, L., Liang, L., Chu, T., Toh, K.-C.: A corrected inexact proximal augmented Lagrangian method with a relative error criterion for a class of group-quadratic regularized optimal transport problems. J. Sci. Comput.99(3), 1–36 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Yu, J.J., Lai, R.J., Li, W.C., Osher, S.: Computational mean-field games on manifolds. J. Comput. Phys.484, 112070 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Yu, J.J., Lai, R.J., Li, W.C., Osher, S.: A fast proximal gradient method and convergence analysis for dynamic mean field planning. Math. Comput.93, 603–642 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    IEEE Trans

    Zhang, G., Gu, Z., Yuan, Y., Sun, D.F.: HOT: an efficient Halpern accelerating algorithm for optimal transport problems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.47(8), 6703–6714 (2025) 28

    work page 2025