Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Brownian Bridge Augmented Surrogate Simulation and Injection Planning for Geological CO$_2$ Storage

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.18204 v1 pith:ASU3CKYU submitted 2025-05-21 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords planningbrownianinjectionbridgesimulationstatestoragesurrogate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Geological CO2 storage (GCS) involves injecting captured CO2 into deep subsurface formations to support climate goals. The effective management of GCS relies on adaptive injection planning to dynamically control injection rates and well pressures to balance both storage safety and efficiency. Prior literature, including numerical optimization methods and surrogate-optimization methods, is limited by real-world GCS requirements of smooth state transitions and goal-directed planning within limited time. To address these limitations, we propose a Brownian Bridge-augmented framework for surrogate simulation and injection planning in GCS and develop two insights: (i) Brownian bridge as a smooth state regularizer for better surrogate simulation; (ii) Brownian bridge as goal-time-conditioned planning guidance for improved injection planning. Our method has three stages: (i) learning deep Brownian bridge representations with contrastive and reconstructive losses from historical reservoir and utility trajectories, (ii) incorporating Brownian bridge-based next state interpolation for simulator regularization, and (iii) guiding injection planning with Brownian utility-conditioned trajectories to generate high-quality injection plans. Experimental results across multiple datasets collected from diverse GCS settings demonstrate that our framework consistently improves simulation fidelity and planning effectiveness while maintaining low computational overhead.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Supply Chain Optimization via Generative Simulation and Iterative Decision Policies

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sim-to-Dec, an autoregressive simulator paired with a dual-loss decision policy, improves simulated timely delivery and profit, but the reported gains are measured inside the paper's own simulator.

  2. Teaching Time Series to See and Speak: Forecasting with Aligned Visual and Textual Perspectives

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    TimesCLIP aligns image-based and text-based views of the same time series via contrastive learning to improve forecasting accuracy on several benchmarks, but the full multimodal model is not used on two of the six lon...

  3. LLM-ML Teaming: Integrated Symbolic Decoding and Gradient Search for Valid and Stable Generative Feature Transformation

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A product-of-experts decoder that blends a fine-tuned LLM's token probabilities with a gradient-searched sequence decoder produces more valid and stable feature transformations than either alone.

Pith tools