Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring the Effect of Context-Awareness and Popularity Calibration on Popularity Bias in POI Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.03503 v2 pith:YALWCIKC submitted 2025-07-04 cs.IR

Exploring the Effect of Context-Awareness and Popularity Calibration on Popularity Bias in POI Recommendations

classification cs.IR
keywords popularitybiasaccuracycalibrationmodelsbalancecontext-awarecontext-awareness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Point-of-interest (POI) recommender systems help users discover relevant locations, but their effectiveness is often compromised by popularity bias, which disadvantages less popular, yet potentially meaningful places. This paper addresses this challenge by evaluating the effectiveness of context-aware models and calibrated popularity techniques as strategies for mitigating popularity bias. Using four real-world POI datasets (Brightkite, Foursquare, Gowalla, and Yelp), we analyze the individual and combined effects of these approaches on recommendation accuracy and popularity bias. Our results reveal that context-aware models cannot be considered a uniform solution, as the models studied exhibit divergent impacts on accuracy and bias. In contrast, calibration techniques can effectively align recommendation popularity with user preferences, provided there is a careful balance between accuracy and bias mitigation. Notably, the combination of calibration and context-awareness yields recommendations that balance accuracy and close alignment with the users' popularity profiles, i.e., popularity calibration.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multistakeholder Fairness in Tourism: What can Algorithms learn from Tourism Management?

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    A comparative literature review shows tourism management and computer science define multistakeholder fairness differently, and argues algorithmic design should adopt qualitative, participatory methods from tourism research.