Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The rank two Jacobi algebra

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The two-variable Jacobi polynomials orthogonal on a triangle generate a rank two quadratic algebra, the rank two Jacobi algebra, which contains rank one Jacobi and Racah subalgebras and yields structure relations for the polynomials.

desk verdict Genuine new quadratic algebra with a real structure story, but the defining relations are asserted complete rather than proven complete. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07766 v1 pith:AYOJ3ZOT submitted 2025-07-10 math-ph math.MP

Nicolas Crampe , Satoshi Tsujimoto , Luc Vinet , Alexei Zhedanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 33C5033C45
keywords ranktwoJacobialgebraquadratictwo-variablepolynomialsbispectraloperatorsRacahstructurerelationsdifferenceorthogonalonthetriangle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper identifies a quadratic algebra—the rank two Jacobi algebra—that captures the bispectrality of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials orthogonal on the triangle. It shows that the two differential operators and the two multiplication operators coming from the recurrence relations, together with a fifth operator $L_3$ forced by closure, generate an algebra whose defining relations are quadratic, and that this algebra admits the rank one Jacobi and Racah algebras as subalgebras. If the construction is correct, the two-variable Jacobi polynomials support a representation of this algebra, and the two realizations of it (differential in the variables, difference in the degrees) yield structure relations for the polynomials. This matters because it extends to two variables the algebraic framework that underpins the univariate Askey scheme and its solvable-model applications.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rank two Jacobi algebra, a quadratic algebra generated by $\{L, L_1, L_3, X_1, X_3\}$, with the five primary commutators $N_1, N_3, M_3, G_{13}, J_1$ and with all triple commutators expressed as symmetric quadratic expressions in the generators. The carrying mechanism is the closure computation: starting from the bispectral operators, the paper computes $[L,X_1]$, $[L,X_3]$, $[L_1,X_3]$, $[L_1,L_3]$, and $[L_3,X_1]$, then iterates commutation until every triple commutator is a quadratic expression in the five generators, using the Jacobi identity to correlate dependent relations. A secondary mechanism is the pentagon of centralizers (Figure 1), which organizes the subalgebra structure: generators around each vertex commute, each solid edge generates a Jacobi algebra, and each dashed edge generates a Racah algebra.

What would settle it

Compute a higher commutator such as $[X_1,[X_1,[L_1,L_3]]]$ directly in the differential realization (3.4)--(3.29) and in the degree realization (4.11)--(4.14), and reduce it to quadratic expressions in $\{L, L_1, L_3, X_1, X_3\}$ using the stated relations; if the two reductions disagree, or if a reduction yields an expression outside the span of symmetric quadratic combinations, the relations are not complete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working with the two-variable Jacobi polynomials $J_{n,k}^{(a,b,c)}(x,y)$ orthogonal on the triangle, the paper takes the two differential operators $L$ and $L_1$ of which they are joint eigenfunctions, together with the two multiplication operators $X_1=x$ and $X_3=1-x-y$ corresponding to the recurrence relations, and shows that the cascade of commutators among these four operators closes only after adding a fifth generator $L_3$, the third piece of the decomposition of $L$. The resulting quadratic algebra, called the rank two Jacobi algebra, has as defining relations the primary commutators (3.56)--(3.57) and the triple commutators of Sections 3.2--3.4, all expressed as symmetric quadratic expressions in the generators. The paper argues that these relations define a well-formed algebra, that $L_1$ and $L_3$ generate a rank one Racah subalgebra (a central extension), that each of the four other centralizer pairs generates a rank one Jacobi subalgebra, and that the whole structure is a specialization of the rank two Racah algebra obtained by a contraction. It then constructs the dual representation on the degree lattice of the bivariate Jacobi polynomials, showing that the same relations are satisfied by difference operators, and derives from the equality of the two realizations structure relations for the polynomials.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the triple commutators listed, together with their Jacobi-identity consequences, form a complete set of defining relations for the algebra generated by $L, L_1, L_3, X_1, X_3$, so that no additional independent relations exist; if any do, the abstract algebra presented differs from the operator algebra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bivariate Jacobi polynomials form a basis for a representation of the rank two Jacobi algebra, with $L$ and $L_1$ diagonal, so the algebra acts as a symmetry algebra of the second-order operator $L$.
  • Equating the differential realization with the degree realization yields first-order structure relations for the bivariate Jacobi polynomials, recorded in (4.17)--(4.19).
  • The generators $L_1$ and $L_3$ realize a central extension of the rank one Racah algebra, so for fixed $n$ the polynomials transform among themselves under a Racah algebra.
  • The rank two Jacobi algebra is a specialization of the rank two Racah algebra $R(4)$ under the contraction (3.64)--(3.66).
  • The construction yields one additional independent structure relation, the action of $xy(\partial_x-\partial_y)$, beyond the two obtained earlier as a $q\to 1$ limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The isomorphism between rank one Jacobi and Hahn algebras, which survives because defining relations are insensitive to polynomial limits, suggests that a rank two Hahn algebra with the same presentation should exist; locating it via a limit of discrete bivariate Hahn polynomials would be a direct test of the presentation's generality.
  • The cyclic centralizer pattern shown in the pentagon hints that rank $n$ Jacobi algebras would be organized by an $(n+2)$-cycle of subalgebras; constructing the rank three case would reveal whether the pattern persists.
  • Because the two-variable Jacobi polynomials are wavefunctions of the generic superintegrable system on the 2-sphere, the rank two Jacobi algebra is a plausible dynamical symmetry algebra for that model; checking whether the model's integrals close under the algebra would test this role.
  • The extra structure relation that goes beyond the $q\to 1$ relations of [28] suggests that earlier algebraic data for these polynomials were incomplete; one may expect analogous missing relations in the structure-relation literature for other multivariate families.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a quadratic algebra, which it calls the rank two Jacobi algebra, from the bispectral operators of the two-variable Jacobi polynomials on the triangle. The authors take as generators the two differential operators L and L1, the multiplication operators X1 and X3, and the additional differential operator L3 that commutes with L. They compute primary and triple commutators among these generators, propose these relations as the defining relations of the algebra, identify rank one Jacobi and Racah subalgebras, give a difference-operator (degree) realization, and derive structure relations for the bivariate polynomials. The presentation is computational and the formulas are explicit, but the central claim that these relations completely define the algebra is not proved.

Significance. If the proposed presentation is complete and consistent, this would be a valuable contribution: it introduces a higher-rank quadratic algebra with explicit differential and difference realizations, contains rank one Jacobi and Racah subalgebras, and yields new structure relations for classical bivariate orthogonal polynomials. The paper is rich in explicit formulas and includes a dual representation, which are strengths. However, the main assertion—that the displayed relations constitute a complete presentation of the algebra generated by L,L1,L3,X1,X3—is not established; the authors themselves phrase it as 'posited to define.' The significance of the paper would be considerably enhanced by a rigorous completeness or closedness proof, or by an explicit statement that this remains a conjecture.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sections 3.4 and 3.6.3] The paper's central claim is the completeness of the defining relations: that the primary and triple commutators collected in Sections 3.2–3.6 give a complete presentation of the algebra generated by L, L1, L3, X1, X3. This is not established. Only commutators of the fundamental generators with the derived operators N1,N3,M3,J1,G13 are computed; commutators of the derived operators among themselves (e.g., [N1,N3]=[[L,X1],[L,X3]], [N1,M3], [G13,J1]) are quartic in the original generators and are never evaluated. Without such checks, the abstract algebra generated by the displayed relations may be strictly larger than the operator algebra, and the degree representation of Section 4 may realize only a quotient. In addition, the exhaustiveness of the triple-commutator list is asserted rather than proved: Section 3.4 says the list 'was formed so as to be exhaustive through a systematic enumeration' and Section 3.6 says the relations 'were posited to define' the algebra. A Gröbner-basis computation of the ideal generated by the proposed relations, or an explicit argument that all quartic (and higher) relations are consequences of the listed ones, would settle the question. This is load-bearing for the abstract's claim that the rank two Jacobi algebra has been 'identified.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.13)] The displayed commutator [\hat L1, \hat X3] = \hat M1 = 0 is inconsistent with the definitions in Section 3.1, where M1 = [L1,X1] = 0 and M3 = [L1,X3] is nonzero. This is almost certainly a typo and should read [\hat L1, \hat X1] = \hat M1 = 0; also, the text at the start of Section 4.3 refers to operators \hat N1, \hat N3, \hat M3, \hat K1, but \hat K1 is never defined (presumably \hat J1 is meant).
  2. [Section 3.4] The sentence 'the relations appear to hold for any choice of index pairs' is not a verification. If the symmetry under index permutations is intended as a structural property, it should be stated precisely and justified, or relegated to a remark rather than left as 'appear to hold.'
  3. [Section 3.7] The claimed contraction from the rank two Racah algebra R(4) is asserted with 'A straightforward computations shows' but no details are given. Since this connection is not central to the main construction, please provide the explicit verification or clearly label the statement as a conjecture/consequence to be detailed elsewhere.
  4. [Section 5] There are minor typographical issues: the phrase 'rank two Jacobi Jacobi algebra' appears in the first paragraph of Section 5, and Section 3.6.3 ends with 'rank two Jacobi identities' where 'algebra' seems intended. Also, in the proof of the recurrence (2.13), the notation J^{(a,b,c)}_n(x,y) should be J^{(a,b,c)}_{n,k}(x,y) in several places.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rank two Jacobi algebra is constructed from explicit bispectral operators, with no fitted parameter or self-citation chain bearing the central claim.

full rationale

The paper's central object is defined by relations computed directly from explicit differential operators in Section 3, and the degree realization is built from the identity O J = \hat O J (eq. 4.4), so the later 'check' that both realizations satisfy the same commutation relations is a consistency verification, not a prediction forced by fitted parameters. The parameters a, b, c are inputs from the polynomial family; no quantity is adjusted to force the result. The completeness caveat in Sections 3.4 and 3.6 ('was formed so as to be exhaustive' and 'were posited to define') is an honest statement that the defining relations were selected from a computed list; the question whether additional independent relations exist is a substantive mathematical issue, but it is not circularity. Citations [15] and [31] supply independent published presentations and representations; even where [15] has overlapping authors, the rank-two Racah presentation is external input used for a contextual comparison in Section 3.7, not the load-bearing derivation of the Jacobi algebra itself. The typo in (4.13), which repeats [L1,X3] where Section 3.6.2 defines M1 = [L1,X1] = 0, is an editorial slip rather than a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard properties of Jacobi polynomials, the known bispectral equations for the bivariate family, and the completeness assumption for the newly posited algebra presentation. No numbers are fitted to data; the parameters a, b, c and the spectral labels are fixed inputs from the polynomial family.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The two-variable Jacobi polynomials are joint eigenfunctions of L and L1 with eigenvalues (2.9) and (2.10).
    Starting point of the paper, cited to Koornwinder [17] and Geronimo-Iliev [25]; a sketch of a direct proof is offered using the differential properties in Appendix B.
  • domain assumption The recurrence relations (2.12) and (2.13) hold with the given coefficients.
    The relations are proved in the text using univariate Jacobi recurrence and contiguity relations; they are essential for the degree representation and for the structure relations in Section 4.
  • standard math The univariate Jacobi properties in Appendix A (recurrence, shift, contiguity) are correct.
    Classical results used throughout the paper, particularly in the proofs of (2.13) and in Appendix B.
  • ad hoc to paper The list of triple commutators in Sections 3.2 to 3.4 is exhaustive and generates a complete presentation of the algebra.
    The paper asserts this from a 'systematic enumeration' but does not prove that no additional relations are needed; the completeness claim is a posited defining feature rather than a derived theorem.
  • domain assumption The presentation of R(4) in reference [15] and the contraction map (3.64)-(3.66) are correct.
    The connection between the new rank two Jacobi algebra and the known rank two Racah algebra is asserted via a 'straightforward computation' that is not displayed.
invented entities (1)
  • rank two Jacobi algebra independent evidence
    purpose: Abstract quadratic algebra with generators L, L1, L3, X1, X3 that organizes the bispectrality of bivariate Jacobi polynomials and contains rank one Jacobi and Racah subalgebras.
    Although this is a new mathematical structure rather than a physical entity, it is anchored by two explicit realizations (differential in variables, difference in degrees) whose commutation relations can be checked directly, giving falsifiable handles inside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The rank two Jacobi algebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AYOJ3ZOT

@misc{pith2026250707766,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The rank two Jacobi algebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AYOJ3ZOT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07766}
}
read the original abstract

The quadratic rank two Jacobi algebra is identified from the relations obeyed by the bispectral operators of the two variable Jacobi polynomials orthogonal on the triangle. It is seen to admit as subalgebras Racah and Jacobi algebras of rank one. The dual realizations in terms of differential operators in the variable representation and in terms of difference operators in the degree representation are provided. Structure relations for the two variable Jacobi polynomials are obtained as a by product.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07766 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rules: Two generators around the same vertex commute; two generators at the boundaries of the same solid line generate a Ja￾cobi algebra; two generators at the boundaries of the same dashed edge generate a Racah algebra; the generator at the middle of an edge cor￾responds to the commutator of the generators at the boundaries of this edge. 3.7. Connection to the rank two Racah algebra. How the rank two Jacobi algebra… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Realization embeddings of the rank two Racah algebra into the rank two Jacobi algebra

    math-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rank-two Racah algebra is realized inside the rank-two Jacobi algebra through tridiagonalization, with eigenfunctions and overlaps given by Jacobi, Wilson, and Tratnik polynomials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials

    Roelof Koekoek, Peter A Lesky, and Ren´ e F Swarttouw. Hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials . Springer, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Tridiagonalization of the hypergeometric operator and the Racah–Wilson algebra

    Vincent Genest, Mourad Ismail, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Tridiagonalization of the hypergeometric operator and the Racah–Wilson algebra. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , 144(10):4441– 4454, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Nature of the symmetry group of the 6 j-symbol

    AS Zhedanov and Ya A Granovskiı. Nature of the symmetry group of the 6 j-symbol. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 94:49, 1988

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Superintegrability in two dimensions and the Racah–Wilson algebra

    Vincent X Genest, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Superintegrability in two dimensions and the Racah–Wilson algebra. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 104:931–952, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    The Racah algebra and superintegrable models

    Vincent X Genest, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The Racah algebra and superintegrable models. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume 512, page 012011. IOP Publishing, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Hidden symmetry

    Alexei S Zhedanov. “Hidden symmetry” of Askey-Wilson polynomials. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 89(2):1146–1157, 1991

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Hidden Symmetry of the Racah and Clebsch-Gordan Problems for the Quantum Algebra sl_q(2)

    Ya I Granovskii and Alexei S Zhedanov. Hidden Symmetry of the Racah and Clebsch-Gordan Problems for the Quantum Algebra slq(2). arXiv preprint hep-th/9304138 , 1993

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  8. [8]

    The Askey–Wilson algebra and its avatars.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(6):063001, 2021

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Luc Frappat, Julien Gaboriaud, Lo ¨ ıc Poulain d’Andecy, Eric Ragoucy, and Luc Vinet. The Askey–Wilson algebra and its avatars.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(6):063001, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Mutual integrability, quadratic algebras, and dynamical symmetry

    Ya I Granovskii, IM Lutzenko, and AS Zhedanov. Mutual integrability, quadratic algebras, and dynamical symmetry. Annals of Physics , 217(1):1–20, 1992

    1992

  2. [10]

    Jacobi algebra and potentials generated by it

    IM Lutsenko. Jacobi algebra and potentials generated by it. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 93(1):1081– 1090, 1992

    1992

  3. [11]

    A higher rank Racah algebra and the Zn 2 Laplace–Dunkl operator

    Hendrik De Bie, Vincent X Genest, Wouter van de Vijver, and Luc Vinet. A higher rank Racah algebra and the Zn 2 Laplace–Dunkl operator. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 51(2):025203, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Racah algebras, the centralizer Zn(sl2) and its Hilbert-Poincar´ e series.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 23:2657–2682, 2022

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Julien Gaboriaud, Lo ¨ ıc Poulain d’Andecy, and Luc Vinet. Racah algebras, the centralizer Zn(sl2) and its Hilbert-Poincar´ e series.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 23:2657–2682, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Some multivariable orthogonal polynomials of the Askey tableau-discrete families

    MV Tratnik. Some multivariable orthogonal polynomials of the Askey tableau-discrete families. Journal of Mathematical Physics (New York) , 32(9):2337–2342, 1991

    1991

  6. [14]

    Two-variable Wilson polynomials and the generic superin- tegrable system on the 3-sphere

    Ernie G Kalnins, Willard Miller, and Sarah Post. Two-variable Wilson polynomials and the generic superin- tegrable system on the 3-sphere. SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications , 7:051, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    Representations of the rank two Racah algebra and orthogonal multivariate polynomials

    Nicolas Cramp´ e, Luc Frappat, and Eric Ragoucy. Representations of the rank two Racah algebra and orthogonal multivariate polynomials. Linear Algebra and its Applications , 664:165–215, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    The Racah algebra of rank 2: Properties, symmetries and representation

    Sarah Post and S´ ebastien Bertrand. The Racah algebra of rank 2: Properties, symmetries and representation. SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications , 20:085, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Two-variable analogues of the classical orthogonal polynomials

    Tom Koornwinder. Two-variable analogues of the classical orthogonal polynomials. In Theory and application of special functions , pages 435–495. Elsevier, 1975

    1975

  10. [18]

    Sur une famille de polynˆ omes ` a deux variables orthogonaux dans un triangle.Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences, 245(26):2459–2461, 1957

    Joseph Proriol. Sur une famille de polynˆ omes ` a deux variables orthogonaux dans un triangle.Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences, 245(26):2459–2461, 1957

    1957

  11. [19]

    Orthogonal polynomials of several variables

    Charles F Dunkl and Yuan Xu. Orthogonal polynomials of several variables. Number 155. Cambridge University Press, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Spectral/hp element methods for computational fluid dynamics

    George Karniadakis and Spencer J Sherwin. Spectral/hp element methods for computational fluid dynamics . Oxford University Press, 2005

    2005

  13. [21]

    Orthogonal polynomials in two variables

    HL Krall and Isador Mitchell Sheffer. Orthogonal polynomials in two variables. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 76:325–376, 1967

    1967

  14. [22]

    On some two-dimensional analogues of classical orthogonal polynomials

    GK Engelis. On some two-dimensional analogues of classical orthogonal polynomials. Latv. mat. ezhegodnik , 15:169–202, 1974. 18 NICOLAS CRAMP ´E, SATOSHI TSUJIMOTO, LUC VINET, ALEXEI ZHEDANOV

    1974

  15. [23]

    Two-Dimensional Krall–Sheffer Polynomials and Quantum Systems on Spaces with Constant Curvature

    Luc Vinet and Alexei Zhedanov. Two-Dimensional Krall–Sheffer Polynomials and Quantum Systems on Spaces with Constant Curvature. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 65:83–94, 2003

    2003

  16. [24]

    Recent trends on two variable orthogonal polynomials

    Lidia Fern´ andez, Francisco Marcell´ an, Teresa E P´ erez, and Miguel A Pinar. Recent trends on two variable orthogonal polynomials. Differential algebra, complex analysis and orthogonal polynomials , 5986, 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    Bispectrality of multivariable Racah–Wilson polynomials

    Jeffrey S Geronimo and Plamen Iliev. Bispectrality of multivariable Racah–Wilson polynomials. Constructive Approximation, 31(3):417–457, 2010

    2010

  18. [26]

    Orthogonal polynomials in two variables of q-Hahn and q-Jacobi type

    Charles F Dunkl. Orthogonal polynomials in two variables of q-Hahn and q-Jacobi type. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 1(2):137–151, 1980

    1980

  19. [27]

    Two-variable orthogonal polynomials of big q-Jacobi type.Journal of computational and applied mathematics , 233(6):1554–1561, 2010

    Stanis law Lewanowicz and Pawe l Wo´ zny. Two-variable orthogonal polynomials of big q-Jacobi type.Journal of computational and applied mathematics , 233(6):1554–1561, 2010

    2010

  20. [28]

    Structure relations for the bivariate big q-Jacobi polynomials

    Stanis law Lewanowicz, Pawe l Wo´ zny, and Rafa l Nowak. Structure relations for the bivariate big q-Jacobi polynomials. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 219(16):8790–8802, 2013

    2013

  21. [29]

    Two-variable −1 Jacobi polynomials

    Vincent X Genest, Jean-Michel Lemay, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Two-variable −1 Jacobi polynomials. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 26(6):411–425, 2015

    2015

  22. [30]

    A limit q = −1 for the big q-Jacobi polynomials

    Luc Vinet and Alexei Zhedanov. A limit q = −1 for the big q-Jacobi polynomials. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 364(10):5491–5507, 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    Symmetry algebra for the generic superintegrable system on the sphere

    Plamen Iliev. Symmetry algebra for the generic superintegrable system on the sphere. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(2), 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Realisations of Racah algebras using Jacobi operators and convolution identities

    Q Labriet and L Poulain d’Andecy. Realisations of Racah algebras using Jacobi operators and convolution identities. Advances in Applied Mathematics , 153:102620, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Bargmann and Barut-Girardello models for the Racah algebra

    Hendrik De Bie, Plamen Iliev, and Luc Vinet. Bargmann and Barut-Girardello models for the Racah algebra. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 60(1), 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    Bispectrality of Multivariable Racah–Wilson Polynomials

    J S Geronimo and P Iliev. Bispectrality of Multivariable Racah–Wilson Polynomials. Constructive Approxima- tion, 31:417–457, 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    Racah Polynomials and Recoupling Schemes of su(1, 1)

    Post S. Racah Polynomials and Recoupling Schemes of su(1, 1). Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Meth- ods and Applications , 11:057, 2015

    2015

  28. [36]

    The generalized Racah algebra as a commutant

    J Gaboriaud, L Vinet, S Vinet, and A Zhedanov. The generalized Racah algebra as a commutant. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1194:012034, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    The Racah algebra: An overview and recent results

    H De Bie, P Iliev, W van de Vijver, and L Vinet. The Racah algebra: An overview and recent results. Constructive Approximation, 52:1–29, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Embedding of the Racah Algebra R(n) and Superintegrability

    D Latini, I Marquette, and Y-Z Zhang. Embedding of the Racah Algebra R(n) and Superintegrability. Annals of Physics , 426:168397, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Frappat, J Gaboriaud, E Ragoucy, L Vinet, and M Zaimi

    N Cramp´ e, L. Frappat, J Gaboriaud, E Ragoucy, L Vinet, and M Zaimi. Griffiths polynomials of Racah type. Journal of mathematical physics , 65:083507, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    The structure relation for Askey–Wilson polynomials

    Tom H Koornwinder. The structure relation for Askey–Wilson polynomials. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 207(2):214–226, 2007

    2007

  33. [41]

    Degenerate Sklyanin algebras, Askey– Wilson polynomials and Heun operators

    Julien Gaboriaud, Satoshi Tsujimoto, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Degenerate Sklyanin algebras, Askey– Wilson polynomials and Heun operators. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 53(44):445204, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Bivariate second-order linear partial differential equations and orthogonal polynomial solutions

    Iv´ an Area, E Godoy, Andr´ e Ronveaux, and A Zarzo. Bivariate second-order linear partial differential equations and orthogonal polynomial solutions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 387(2):1188–1208, 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    Weak classical orthogonal polynomials in two variables

    Lidia Fern´ andez, Teresa E P´ erez, and Miguel A Pi˜ nar. Weak classical orthogonal polynomials in two variables. Journal of computational and applied mathematics , 178(1-2):191–203, 2005

    2005

  36. [44]

    Tridiagonalization and the Heun equation

    F Alberto Gr¨ unbaum, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Tridiagonalization and the Heun equation. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 58(3), 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    Dunkl shift operators and Bannai–Ito polynomials

    Satoshi Tsujimoto, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. Dunkl shift operators and Bannai–Ito polynomials. Ad- vances in Mathematics , 229(4):2123–2158, 2012

    2012

  38. [46]

    A Laplace–Dunkl equation on S2 and the Bannai–Ito algebra

    Vincent X Genest, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. A Laplace–Dunkl equation on S2 and the Bannai–Ito algebra. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 336:243–259, 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    The Bannai-Ito algebra and some applications

    Hendrik De Bie, Vincent X Genest, Satoshi Tsujimoto, Luc Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The Bannai-Ito algebra and some applications. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume 597, page 012001. IOP publishing, 2015

    2015

  40. [48]

    FactorizedA2-Leonard pair

    Nicolas Cramp´ e and Meri Zaimi. FactorizedA2-Leonard pair. The Ramanujan Journal , 66(2):25, 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    The Higgs and Hahn algebras from a Howe duality perspective

    Luc Frappat, Julien Gaboriaud, Luc Vinet, St´ ephane Vinet, and Alexei Zhedanov. The Higgs and Hahn algebras from a Howe duality perspective. Physics Letters A , 383(14):1531–1535, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Higher transcendental functions, volume II.Bateman Manuscript Project) Mc Graw-Hill Book Company , 410, 1953

    Harry Bateman and Arthur Erd´ elyi. Higher transcendental functions, volume II.Bateman Manuscript Project) Mc Graw-Hill Book Company , 410, 1953

    1953

  43. [51]

    An introduction to orthogonal polynomials

    Theodore S Chihara. An introduction to orthogonal polynomials . Courier Corporation, 2011. CNRS - Universit´e de Montr´eal CRM-CNRS, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montr´eal (Qu´ebec), H3C 3J7 Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Kyoto, Jap...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.