Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Minkowski's monotonicity problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.20082 v1 pith:2XH6HFDZ submitted 2025-07-26 math.MG math.DG

On Minkowski's monotonicity problem

classification math.MG math.DG
keywords convexmixedbodiescharacterizationconjecturemathbbminkowskimonotonicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We address an old open question in convex geometry that dates back to the work of Minkowski: what are the equality cases of the monotonicity of mixed volumes? The problem is equivalent to that of providing a geometric characterization of the support of mixed area measures. A conjectural characterization was put forward by Schneider (1985), but has been verified to date only for special classes of convex bodies. In this paper we resolve one direction of Schneider's conjecture for arbitrary convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and resolve the full conjecture in $\mathbb{R}^3$. Among the implications of these results is a mixed counterpart of the classical fact, due to Monge, Hartman--Nirenberg, and Pogorelov, that a surface with vanishing Gaussian curvature is a ruled surface.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Godbersen's conjecture and the $L_p$-Rogers-Shephard inequality

    math.MG 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Godbersen's 1938 conjecture is proved: V(K[k],−K[n−k]) ≤ C(n,k) vol(K) for all convex bodies, with equality characterizations, and it yields the sharp L_p Rogers–Shephard inequality.