Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Aligning Personalized Conversational Recommendation Agents with Users' Privacy Preferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.07672 v1 pith:LTFMH6Q2 submitted 2025-08-11 cs.HC

Towards Aligning Personalized Conversational Recommendation Agents with Users' Privacy Preferences

classification cs.HC
keywords privacyagentspreferencesusersaligningalignmentcontrolconversational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The proliferation of AI agents, with their complex and context-dependent actions, renders conventional privacy paradigms obsolete. This position paper argues that the current model of privacy management, rooted in a user's unilateral control over a passive tool, is inherently mismatched with the dynamic and interactive nature of AI agents. We contend that ensuring effective privacy protection necessitates that the agents proactively align with users' privacy preferences instead of passively waiting for the user to control. To ground this shift, and using personalized conversational recommendation agents as a case, we propose a conceptual framework built on Contextual Integrity (CI) theory and Privacy Calculus theory. This synthesis first reframes automatically controlling users' privacy as an alignment problem, where AI agents initially did not know users' preferences, and would learn their privacy preferences through implicit or explicit feedback. Upon receiving the preference feedback, the agents used alignment and Pareto optimization for aligning preferences and balancing privacy and utility. We introduced formulations and instantiations, potential applications, as well as five challenges.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring the Interaction of Explanation Styles, Context, and Trust of AI Privacy Redaction in AI-mediated Interactions

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Explanation preferences for AI privacy redaction vary systematically with domain and redaction amount; giving users their preferred styles raises trust over random or no explanations.

  2. Autonomous Information Seeking: A Roadmap for Agentic Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Agentic recommender systems are organized by agent role (assisted, as-recommender, as-simulator) crossed with autonomy levels L2–L5, yielding a roadmap of architectures, evaluation limits, and open challenges.