Wide-spectrum security of quantum key distribution

Feihu Xu; Hao Tan; Jian-Wei Pan; Liying Han; Mikhail Petrov; Sheng-Kai Liao; Vadim Makarov; Weiyang Zhang

arxiv: 2508.15136 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-21 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Wide-spectrum security of quantum key distribution

Hao Tan , Mikhail Petrov , Weiyang Zhang , Liying Han , Sheng-Kai Liao , Vadim Makarov , Feihu Xu , Jian-Wei Pan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics

keywords quantum key distributionoptical securitytransmittance characterizationTrojan-horse attackinsertion lossspectral analysisfiber-optic componentsQKD certification

0 comments

The pith

QKD systems achieve full optical spectrum safety by characterizing transmittance from 400 to 2300 nm with high sensitivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a wide-spectrum security evaluation methodology to protect quantum key distribution implementations from optical attacks that use arbitrary wavelengths. Most such attacks rely on injecting or detecting light through transparency windows in fiber-optic components, so the method requires measuring insertion loss over a broad band with high dynamic range. A practical testbench is presented that covers 400 to 2300 nm and reaches 70 dB sensitivity. The authors apply the approach to perform complete Trojan-horse attack analysis on typical QKD configurations and briefly consider induced-photorefraction and detector-backflash attacks. The resulting data support certification of QKD systems for comprehensive optical safety.

Core claim

We propose a wide-spectrum security evaluation methodology to achieve full optical spectrum safety for QKD systems. This technique requires transmittance characterisation in a wide spectral band with a high sensitivity. We report a testbench that characterises insertion loss of fiber-optic components in a wide spectral range of 400 to 2300 nm and up to 70 dB dynamic range. To illustrate practical application, we give a full Trojan-horse attack analysis for some typical QKD system configurations and discuss briefly induced-photorefraction and detector-backflash attacks.

What carries the argument

Wide-spectrum transmittance characterisation testbench measuring insertion loss from 400 to 2300 nm with up to 70 dB dynamic range, used to identify exploitable transparency windows.

If this is right

Typical QKD configurations receive full Trojan-horse attack analysis once wide-spectrum insertion loss data are available.
QKD systems can be certified against optical attacks that exploit any transparency window in the measured band.
Induced-photorefraction and detector-backflash attacks can be evaluated using the same transmittance dataset.
Eavesdroppers are prevented from gaining advantage by choosing attack wavelengths within the characterized spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Deployed QKD networks might require periodic re-testing of components if environmental factors alter transmittance over time.
Manufacturers could incorporate this testbench into quality control to reduce hidden spectral vulnerabilities before installation.
The same wide-spectrum approach could extend to other quantum optics protocols that use fiber channels.

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory insertion loss measurements from 400 to 2300 nm are sufficient to capture all relevant attack wavelengths and accurately predict component behavior in deployed QKD systems.

What would settle it

Successful eavesdropping on a characterized QKD system at a wavelength where the testbench reported high insertion loss, or using a wavelength outside the 400-2300 nm band, would show the methodology fails to ensure safety.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.15136 by Feihu Xu, Hao Tan, Jian-Wei Pan, Liying Han, Mikhail Petrov, Sheng-Kai Liao, Vadim Makarov, Weiyang Zhang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scheme of the spectral characterisation testbench. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectral performance of the testbench. (a) Spectrum of the light source (measured with the DUT replaced with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Transmittance of a 2-m long single-mode fiber patch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Source configurations. The fiber coil is used as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spectral characteristics of the isolator. The spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Spectral characteristics of MEMS VOA at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Spectral characteristics of DWDM. The scan is at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Spectral characteristics of the FBG-based filter. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Security analysis of BB84 QKD under the THA. (a) Secure key rate for different attenuations of Trojan photons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Security analysis of MDI QKD under the THA. (a) Secure key rate for different attenuations of Trojan photons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13. Total measured attenuation of Eve’s light reaching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Implementations of quantum key distribution (QKD) need vulnerability assessment against loopholes in their optical scheme. Most of the optical attacks involve injecting or receiving extraneous light via the communication channel. An eavesdropper can choose her attack wavelengths arbitrarily within the quantum channel passband to maximise the attack performance, exploiting spectral transparency windows of system components. Here we propose a wide-spectrum security evaluation methodology to achieve full optical spectrum safety for QKD systems. This technique requires transmittance characterisation in a wide spectral band with a high sensitivity. We report a testbench that characterises insertion loss of fiber-optic components in a wide spectral range of 400 to 2300 nm and up to 70 dB dynamic range. To illustrate practical application of the proposed methodology, we give a full Trojan-horse attack analysis for some typical QKD system configurations and discuss briefly induced-photorefraction and detector-backflash attacks. Our methodology can be used for certification of QKD systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A practical testbench for wide-band transmittance checks on QKD components, but lab data alone does not prove safety in deployed systems.

read the letter

Hi, the main takeaway is that the authors built a testbench to measure insertion loss of fiber components from 400 to 2300 nm with up to 70 dB dynamic range and used it to scan for Trojan-horse attack paths in a few typical QKD setups. They also touch on induced photorefraction and detector backflash risks. This gives a systematic way to look for spectral transparency windows instead of checking only the operating wavelength. The approach builds on existing optical measurement practices but applies them more broadly to security certification, which is a useful incremental step for practical QKD work. The experimental demonstration on real components shows how the method can flag potential leaks. The soft spot is the lack of any data on how those loss curves behave outside the lab. Temperature drift, aging, or mechanical stress could shift the spectra or drop the effective dynamic range, creating new attack windows that the bench measurements would miss. The paper does not address this gap, so the claim of full optical spectrum safety rests on an assumption that lab conditions represent field use. Calibration details and uncertainty budgets for the 70 dB range are also thin in what is shown. This is aimed at experimental groups and certification labs working on real QKD hardware. A reader who needs a concrete procedure for checking components across wavelengths will find something usable here. It deserves peer review because the method is grounded and addresses a known practical need, even though it would benefit from added robustness tests.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a wide-spectrum security evaluation methodology for QKD systems to achieve full optical spectrum safety. It requires transmittance characterization over 400–2300 nm with high sensitivity and reports a testbench achieving up to 70 dB dynamic range for insertion-loss measurements of fiber-optic components. The approach is illustrated via Trojan-horse attack analysis for typical QKD configurations, with brief discussion of induced-photorefraction and detector-backflash attacks; the methodology is positioned for use in QKD certification.

Significance. If the laboratory measurements prove representative of deployed systems, the work provides a concrete, standards-grounded procedure for identifying spectral vulnerabilities that narrow-band checks could miss, strengthening practical security assessment and certification of QKD implementations.

major comments (2)

[Testbench section] Testbench description (likely §3): the 70 dB dynamic range claim is presented without accompanying calibration procedures, uncertainty budgets, or raw data, which are required to substantiate the high-sensitivity characterization that underpins the wide-spectrum safety methodology.
[Discussion of deployed systems] Methodology application and discussion (likely §4–5): the central claim that the characterization delivers full optical-spectrum safety for QKD systems rests on the unexamined assumption that lab-measured loss spectra remain valid under deployed conditions; no data or analysis addresses shifts due to temperature drift, mechanical stress, or aging that could open new transparency windows below the 70 dB floor.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from explicitly naming the specific QKD configurations used in the Trojan-horse analysis.
[Methods] Notation for insertion loss and dynamic range should be defined consistently when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and substantiation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Testbench section] Testbench description (likely §3): the 70 dB dynamic range claim is presented without accompanying calibration procedures, uncertainty budgets, or raw data, which are required to substantiate the high-sensitivity characterization that underpins the wide-spectrum safety methodology.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from additional details to support the reported dynamic range. In the revised version, we will expand the testbench description in §3 to include the calibration procedures employed, an uncertainty budget for the insertion-loss measurements across the 400–2300 nm range, and representative raw data or example spectra demonstrating the achieved sensitivity. These additions will directly substantiate the high-sensitivity characterization central to the proposed methodology. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion of deployed systems] Methodology application and discussion (likely §4–5): the central claim that the characterization delivers full optical-spectrum safety for QKD systems rests on the unexamined assumption that lab-measured loss spectra remain valid under deployed conditions; no data or analysis addresses shifts due to temperature drift, mechanical stress, or aging that could open new transparency windows below the 70 dB floor.

Authors: The referee correctly notes that our discussion does not examine how lab-measured spectra might change under deployed conditions. The manuscript presents a laboratory methodology for identifying spectral vulnerabilities to support security evaluation and certification. We will revise §§4–5 to explicitly clarify that the reported characterizations provide a baseline assessment under controlled conditions, and that full optical-spectrum safety in the field would require additional verification accounting for environmental factors such as temperature drift, mechanical stress, and aging. We will also note that such extended testing is recommended for certification but lies beyond the scope of the current work, which focuses on establishing the wide-spectrum evaluation approach itself. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental methodology is self-contained

full rationale

The manuscript proposes and demonstrates an experimental testbench for wide-spectrum insertion-loss characterization of QKD components (400–2300 nm, up to 70 dB dynamic range) and illustrates its use on Trojan-horse, induced-photorefraction, and detector-backflash attacks. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are defined in terms of themselves; the central claim is a practical measurement procedure grounded in standard optical metrology rather than a derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction. No self-citations serve as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatzes or renamings of known results are smuggled in. The work therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard domain assumptions from quantum optics and fiber component characterization without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Eavesdroppers can select attack wavelengths arbitrarily within the quantum channel passband to exploit spectral transparency windows of system components.
Invoked to justify the need for wide-spectrum rather than narrow-band testing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5710 in / 1289 out tokens · 43069 ms · 2026-05-18T22:42:27.627911+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We report a testbench that characterises insertion loss of fiber-optic components in a wide spectral range of 400 to 2300 nm and up to 70 dB dynamic range.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean embed_strictMono_of_one_lt unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

γ(λ) = [F(λ)]² ∏ P_in_i(λ) P_out_i(λ) (Trojan-horse round-trip transmittance)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Reference-Beam Attacks against Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution using Optical Injection Locking
quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

Experimental demonstration that reference-beam manipulation in OIL-based TF-QKD enables deterministic photon-number increase or decoy-state circumvention, with practical countermeasures proposed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

We test a polarisation-insensitive isolator (Optizone Technology PII-55-P-T-2-11-LL-1)

Characterisation of individual components Isolator. We test a polarisation-insensitive isolator (Optizone Technology PII-55-P-T-2-11-LL-1). Its trans- Laser Modulator(s) VOAs Isolators Fiber coil DWDM ComPass Ref Circulator FBG (a) (b) (c) in out       1 2 3 FIG. 5. Source configurations. The fiber coil is used as the broadband physical filter. T...

work page 2000
[2]

Planes Complementarios de I+D+I con las Comunidades Au- tonomas

Security evaluation The impact of information leakage from the encod- ing module caused by the THA needs to be quantified. Since the target susceptibility S to THA is assumed to be wavelength-independent and need not be tested, the above measurements are sufficient for protocol security analysis [28]. The targets of the THA are the phase and intensity mod...

work page 2000
[3]

C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing, in Proc. Inter- national Conference on Computers, Systems, and Sig- nal Processing (IEEE Press, New York, Bangalore, India,

work page
[4]

A. K. Ekert, Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)

work page 1991
[5]

F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Se- cure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002 (2020). 12

work page 2020
[6]

Diamanti, H.-K

E. Diamanti, H.-K. Lo, B. Qi, and Z. Yuan, Practical challenges in quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Inf. 2, 16025 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

Vakhitov, V

A. Vakhitov, V. Makarov, and D. R. Hjelme, Large pulse attack as a method of conventional optical eavesdropping in quantum cryptography, J. Mod. Opt. 48, 2023 (2001)

work page 2023
[8]

Gisin, S

N. Gisin, S. Fasel, B. Kraus, H. Zbinden, and G. Ri- bordy, Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022320 (2006)

work page 2006
[9]

Makarov, A

V. Makarov, A. Anisimov, and J. Skaar, Effects of de- tector efficiency mismatch on security of quantum cryp- tosystems, Phys. Rev. A74, 022313 (2006), erratum ibid. 78, 019905 (2008)

work page 2006
[10]

Makarov, Controlling passively quenched single pho- ton detectors by bright light, New J

V. Makarov, Controlling passively quenched single pho- ton detectors by bright light, New J. Phys. 11, 065003 (2009)

work page 2009
[11]

F. Xu, B. Qi, and H.-K. Lo, Experimental demonstration of phase-remapping attack in a practical quantum key distribution system, New J. Phys. 12, 113026 (2010)

work page 2010
[12]

Lydersen, C

L. Lydersen, C. Wiechers, C. Wittmann, D. Elser, J. Skaar, and V. Makarov, Hacking commercial quan- tum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumina- tion, Nat. Photonics 4, 686 (2010)

work page 2010
[13]

H.-W. Li, S. Wang, J.-Z. Huang, W. Chen, Z.-Q. Yin, F.-Y. Li, Z. Zhou, D. Liu, Y. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, W.-S. Bao, and Z.-F. Han, Attacking a practical quantum-key- distribution system with wavelength-dependent beam- splitter and multiwavelength sources, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062308 (2011)

work page 2011
[14]

N. Jain, E. Anisimova, I. Khan, V. Makarov, C. Mar- quardt, and G. Leuchs, Trojan-horse attacks threaten the security of practical quantum cryptography, New J. Phys. 16, 123030 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

Sajeed, I

S. Sajeed, I. Radchenko, S. Kaiser, J.-P. Bourgoin, A. Pappa, L. Monat, M. Legr´ e, and V. Makarov, Attacks exploiting deviation of mean photon number in quan- tum key distribution and coin tossing, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032326 (2015)

work page 2015
[16]

A. N. Bugge, S. Sauge, A. M. M. Ghazali, J. Skaar, L. Ly- dersen, and V. Makarov, Laser damage helps the eaves- dropper in quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 070503 (2014)

work page 2014
[17]

S.-H. Sun, F. Xu, M.-S. Jiang, X.-C. Ma, H.-K. Lo, and L.-M. Liang, Effect of source tampering in the security of quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022304 (2015)

work page 2015
[18]

Y. Shi, J. Z. J. Lim, H. S. Poh, P. K. Tan, P. A. Tan, A. Ling, and C. Kurtsiefer, Breakdown flash at telecom wavelengths in InGaAs avalanche photodiodes, Opt. Ex- press 25, 30388 (2017)

work page 2017
[19]

P. V. P. Pinheiro, P. Chaiwongkhot, S. Sajeed, R. T. Horn, J.-P. Bourgoin, T. Jennewein, N. L¨ utkenhaus, and V. Makarov, Eavesdropping and countermeasures for backflash side channel in quantum cryptography, Opt. Express 26, 21020 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

Huang, ´A

A. Huang, ´A. Navarrete, S.-H. Sun, P. Chaiwongkhot, M. Curty, and V. Makarov, Laser-seeding attack in quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 064043 (2019)

work page 2019
[21]

K. Wei, W. Zhang, Y.-L. Tang, L. You, and F. Xu, Im- plementation security of quantum key distribution due to polarization-dependent efficiency mismatch, Phys. Rev. A 100, 022325 (2019)

work page 2019
[22]

Huang, R

A. Huang, R. Li, V. Egorov, S. Tchouragoulov, K. Ku- mar, and V. Makarov, Laser-damage attack against opti- cal attenuators in quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034017 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

H. Tan, W. Li, L. Zhang, K. Wei, and F. Xu, Chip-based quantum key distribution against Trojan-horse attack, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 064038 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Ponosova, D

A. Ponosova, D. Ruzhitskaya, P. Chaiwongkhot, V. Egorov, V. Makarov, and A. Huang, Protecting fiber- optic quantum key distribution sources against light- injection attacks, PRX Quantum 3, 040307 (2022)

work page 2022
[25]

P. Ye, W. Chen, G.-W. Zhang, F.-Y. Lu, F.-X. Wang, G.-Z. Huang, S. Wang, D.-Y. He, Z.-Q. Yin, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Induced-photorefraction attack against quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054052 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

L. Han, Y. Li, H. Tan, W. Zhang, W. Cai, J. Yin, J. Ren, F. Xu, S. Liao, and C. Peng, Effect of light injection on the security of practical quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 044013 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

Fadeev, A

M. Fadeev, A. Ponosova, Q. Peng, A. Huang, R. Shakhovoy, and V. Makarov, Optical-pumping at- tack on a quantum key distribution laser source, arXiv:2503.11239 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[28]

Sajeed, C

S. Sajeed, C. Minshull, N. Jain, and V. Makarov, Invisible Trojan-horse attack, Sci. Rep. 7, 8403 (2017)

work page 2017
[29]

A. Meda, I. P. Degiovanni, A. Tosi, Z. Yuan, G. Brida, and M. Genovese, Quantifying backflash radiation to prevent zero-error attacks in quantum key distribution, Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16261 (2017)

work page 2017
[30]

Lucamarini, I

M. Lucamarini, I. Choi, M. B. Ward, J. F. Dynes, Z. L. Yuan, and A. J. Shields, Practical security bounds against the Trojan-horse attack in quantum key distri- bution, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031030 (2015)

work page 2015
[31]

N. Jain, B. Stiller, I. Khan, V. Makarov, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuch, Risk analysis of Trojan-horse attacks on practical quantum key distribution systems, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 21, 6600710 (2015)

work page 2015
[32]

ISO/IEC 23837-2:2023(en). Information security — Se- curity requirements, test and evaluation methods for quantum key distribution — Part 2: Evaluation and test- ing methods, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso: std:iso- iec:23837:-2:ed-1:v1:en , visited 22 Nov 2023

work page 2023
[33]

Makarov, A

V. Makarov, A. Abrikosov, P. Chaiwongkhot, A. K. Fe- dorov, A. Huang, E. Kiktenko, M. Petrov, A. Ponosova, D. Ruzhitskaya, A. Tayduganov, D. Trefilov, and K. Za- itsev, Preparing a commercial quantum key distribu- tion system for certification against implementation loop- holes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 044076 (2024)

work page 2024
[34]

Tomita, Implementation cecurity certification of decoy-BB84 quantum key distribution systems, Adv

A. Tomita, Implementation cecurity certification of decoy-BB84 quantum key distribution systems, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1900005 (2019)

work page 2019
[35]

Sajeed, P

S. Sajeed, P. Chaiwongkhot, A. Huang, H. Qin, V. Egorov, A. Kozubov, A. Gaidash, V. Chistiakov, A. Vasiliev, A. Gleim, and V. Makarov, An approach for security evaluation and certification of a complete quan- tum communication system, Sci. Rep. 11, 5110 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

Draft ETSI GS QKD 010 V0.4.1 (2021-06). Quantum key distribution (QKD); Implementation security: protection against Trojan horse attacks, https://docbox.etsi.or g/ISG/QKD/Open/GS-QKD-0010_ISTrojan_v0.4.1_Open Area.pdf, visited 16 Mar 2025

work page 2021
[37]

Zhang, Y

Y. Zhang, Y. Bian, Z. Li, S. Yu, and H. Guo, Continuous- variable quantum key distribution system: past, present, 13 and future, Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 011318 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

Marquardt, U

C. Marquardt, U. Seyfarth, S. Bettendorf, M. Bohmann, A. Buchner, M. Curty, D. Elser, S. Eul, T. Gehring, N. Jain, T. Klocke, M. Reinecke, N. Sieber, R. Ursin, M. Wehling, and H. Weier, Implementation attacks against QKD systems, BSI technical report, https: //www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Service- Navi/Publikatio nen/Studien/QKD-Systems/Implementation_Attacks_ QKD_...

work page 2024
[39]

NKT Photonics, SuperK Fianium supercontinuum white light fiber lasers, https://www.nktphotonics.com/pro ducts/supercontinuum-white-light-lasers/superk -fianium/, visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023
[40]

Nasedkin, F

B. Nasedkin, F. Kiselev, I. Filipov, D. Tolochko, A. Ismagilov, V. Chistiakov, A. Gaidash, A. Tcyp- kin, A. Kozubov, and V. Egorov, Loopholes in the 1500–2100-nm range for quantum-key-distribution com- ponents: prospects for Trojan-horse attacks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014038 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

NKT Photonics, SuperK Split spectral splitter, https: //www.nktphotonics.com/products/supercontinuum -white-light-lasers/superk-split/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023
[42]

NKT Photonics, SuperK Connect broadband fiber deliv- ery, https://www.nktphotonics.com/products/supe rcontinuum-white-light-lasers/superk-connect/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023
[43]

Yokogawa, AQ6374 wide range optical spectrum ana- lyzer, https://tmi.yokogawa.com/solutions/disco ntinued/aq6374-wide-range-optical-spectrum-ana lyzer-350-1750-nm/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023
[44]

Yokogawa, AQ6375B wide range optical spectrum ana- lyzer, https://tmi.yokogawa.com/solutions/discont inued/aq6375b-optical-spectrum-analyzer/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023
[45]

Q. Wang, G. Farrell, and T. Freir, Theoretical and exper- imental investigations of macro-bend losses for standard single mode fibers, Opt. Express 13, 4476 (2005)

work page 2005
[46]

W. Chen, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Li, and Y. Lian, Agarose coated macro-bend fiber sensor for relative humidity and temperature measurement at 2 µm, Opt. Fiber Technol. 50, 118 (2019)

work page 2019
[47]

M. A. Green and M. J. Keevers, Optical properties of intinsic silicon at 300 K, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 3, 189 (1995)

work page 1995
[48]

M. A. Green, Self-consistent optical parameters of intrin- sic silicon at 300 K including temperature coefficients, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92, 1305 (2008)

work page 2008
[49]

Kasap and P

S. Kasap and P. Kapper, eds., Springer handbook of elec- tronic and photonic materials (Springer, St¨ urtz GmbH, W¨ urzburg, 2006) p. 54

work page 2006
[50]

Tamaki, M

K. Tamaki, M. Curty, and M. Lucamarini, Decoy-state quantum key distribution with a leaky source, New J. Phys. 18, 065008 (2016)

work page 2016
[51]

Sun and F

S. Sun and F. Xu, Security of quantum key distribution with source and detection imperfections, New J. Phys. 23, 023011 (2021)

work page 2021
[52]

X. Ma, B. Qi, Y. Zhao, and H.-K. Lo, Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012326 (2005)

work page 2005
[53]

H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi, Measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130503 (2012)

work page 2012
[54]

Zhou, Z.-W

Y.-H. Zhou, Z.-W. Yu, and X.-B. Wang, Making the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution practically useful, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042324 (2016)

work page 2016
[55]

W. Wang, F. Xu, and H.-K. Lo, Asymmetric protocols for scalable high-rate measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution networks, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041012 (2019)

work page 2019
[56]

F. Xu, M. Curty, B. Qi, and H.-K. Lo, Practical aspects of measurement-device-independent quantum key distri- bution, New J. Phys. 15, 113007 (2013)

work page 2013
[57]

Kashyap and K

R. Kashyap and K. J. Blow, Observation of catastrophic self-propelled self-focusing in optical fibres, Electron. Lett. 24, 47 (1988)

work page 1988
[58]

D. D. Davis, S. C. Mettler, and D. J. DiGiovanni, A comparative evaluation of fiber fuse models, Proc. SPIE 2966, 592 (1997)

work page 1997
[59]

W. Li, V. Zapatero, H. Tan, K. Wei, H. Min, W.-Y. Liu, X. Jiang, S.-K. Liao, C.-Z. Peng, M. Curty, F. Xu, and J.- W. Pan, Experimental quantum key distribution secure against malicious devices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034081 (2021)

work page 2021
[60]

W. Li, L. Zhang, H. Tan, Y. Lu, S.-K. Liao, J. Huang, H. Li, Z. Wang, H.-K. Mao, B. Yan, Q. Li, Y. Liu, Q. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, L. You, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 Mb s −1, Nat. Photonics 17, 416 (2023)

work page 2023
[61]

Cao, Y.-H

Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, K.-X. Yang, Y.-F. Jiang, S.-L. Li, X.- L. Hu, M. Abulizi, C.-L. Li, W. Zhang, Q.-C. Sun, W.- Y. Liu, X. Jiang, S.-K. Liao, J.-G. Ren, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, J. Yin, C.-Y. Lu, X.-B. Wang, Q. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribu- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett 125, 260503 (2020)

work page 2020
[62]

K. Wei, W. Li, H. Tan, Y. Li, H. Min, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, X. Jiang, T.-Y. Chen, S.-K. Liao, C.-Z. Peng, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, High-speed measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution with inte- grated silicon photonics, Phys. Rev. X10, 031030 (2020)

work page 2020
[63]

F.-Y. Lu, P. Ye, Z.-H. Wang, S. Wang, Z.-Q. Yin, R. Wang, X.-J. Huang, W. Chen, D.-Y. He, G.-J. Fan- Yuan, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Hacking measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution, Optica10, 520 (2023)

work page 2023
[64]

Koehler-Sidki, J

A. Koehler-Sidki, J. Dynes, T. Para¨ ıso, M. Lucamarini, A. W. Sharpe, Z. Yuan, and A. Shields, Backflashes from fast-gated avalanche photodiodes in quantum key distri- bution, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 154001 (2020)

work page 2020
[65]

Molotkov, Trojan horse attacks, decoy state method, and side channels of information leakage in quantum cryptography, J

S. Molotkov, Trojan horse attacks, decoy state method, and side channels of information leakage in quantum cryptography, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 130, 809 (2020)

work page 2020
[66]

Marini, R

L. Marini, R. Camphausen, B. J. Eggleton, and S. Palomba, Deterministic filtering of breakdown flashing at telecom wavelengths, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 213501 (2017)

work page 2017
[67]

Huang, S

A. Huang, S. H. Sun, Z. Liu, and V. Makarov, Quantum key distribution with distinguishable decoy states, Phys. Rev. A 98, 012330 (2018)

work page 2018
[68]

C. C. W. Lim, M. Curty, N. Walenta, F. Xu, and H. Zbinden, Concise security bounds for practical decoy- state quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A89, 022307 (2014)

work page 2014

[1] [1]

We test a polarisation-insensitive isolator (Optizone Technology PII-55-P-T-2-11-LL-1)

Characterisation of individual components Isolator. We test a polarisation-insensitive isolator (Optizone Technology PII-55-P-T-2-11-LL-1). Its trans- Laser Modulator(s) VOAs Isolators Fiber coil DWDM ComPass Ref Circulator FBG (a) (b) (c) in out       1 2 3 FIG. 5. Source configurations. The fiber coil is used as the broadband physical filter. T...

work page 2000

[2] [2]

Planes Complementarios de I+D+I con las Comunidades Au- tonomas

Security evaluation The impact of information leakage from the encod- ing module caused by the THA needs to be quantified. Since the target susceptibility S to THA is assumed to be wavelength-independent and need not be tested, the above measurements are sufficient for protocol security analysis [28]. The targets of the THA are the phase and intensity mod...

work page 2000

[3] [3]

C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing, in Proc. Inter- national Conference on Computers, Systems, and Sig- nal Processing (IEEE Press, New York, Bangalore, India,

work page

[4] [4]

A. K. Ekert, Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)

work page 1991

[5] [5]

F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Se- cure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002 (2020). 12

work page 2020

[6] [6]

Diamanti, H.-K

E. Diamanti, H.-K. Lo, B. Qi, and Z. Yuan, Practical challenges in quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Inf. 2, 16025 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [7]

Vakhitov, V

A. Vakhitov, V. Makarov, and D. R. Hjelme, Large pulse attack as a method of conventional optical eavesdropping in quantum cryptography, J. Mod. Opt. 48, 2023 (2001)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Gisin, S

N. Gisin, S. Fasel, B. Kraus, H. Zbinden, and G. Ri- bordy, Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022320 (2006)

work page 2006

[9] [9]

Makarov, A

V. Makarov, A. Anisimov, and J. Skaar, Effects of de- tector efficiency mismatch on security of quantum cryp- tosystems, Phys. Rev. A74, 022313 (2006), erratum ibid. 78, 019905 (2008)

work page 2006

[10] [10]

Makarov, Controlling passively quenched single pho- ton detectors by bright light, New J

V. Makarov, Controlling passively quenched single pho- ton detectors by bright light, New J. Phys. 11, 065003 (2009)

work page 2009

[11] [11]

F. Xu, B. Qi, and H.-K. Lo, Experimental demonstration of phase-remapping attack in a practical quantum key distribution system, New J. Phys. 12, 113026 (2010)

work page 2010

[12] [12]

Lydersen, C

L. Lydersen, C. Wiechers, C. Wittmann, D. Elser, J. Skaar, and V. Makarov, Hacking commercial quan- tum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumina- tion, Nat. Photonics 4, 686 (2010)

work page 2010

[13] [13]

H.-W. Li, S. Wang, J.-Z. Huang, W. Chen, Z.-Q. Yin, F.-Y. Li, Z. Zhou, D. Liu, Y. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, W.-S. Bao, and Z.-F. Han, Attacking a practical quantum-key- distribution system with wavelength-dependent beam- splitter and multiwavelength sources, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062308 (2011)

work page 2011

[14] [14]

N. Jain, E. Anisimova, I. Khan, V. Makarov, C. Mar- quardt, and G. Leuchs, Trojan-horse attacks threaten the security of practical quantum cryptography, New J. Phys. 16, 123030 (2014)

work page 2014

[15] [15]

Sajeed, I

S. Sajeed, I. Radchenko, S. Kaiser, J.-P. Bourgoin, A. Pappa, L. Monat, M. Legr´ e, and V. Makarov, Attacks exploiting deviation of mean photon number in quan- tum key distribution and coin tossing, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032326 (2015)

work page 2015

[16] [16]

A. N. Bugge, S. Sauge, A. M. M. Ghazali, J. Skaar, L. Ly- dersen, and V. Makarov, Laser damage helps the eaves- dropper in quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 070503 (2014)

work page 2014

[17] [17]

S.-H. Sun, F. Xu, M.-S. Jiang, X.-C. Ma, H.-K. Lo, and L.-M. Liang, Effect of source tampering in the security of quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022304 (2015)

work page 2015

[18] [18]

Y. Shi, J. Z. J. Lim, H. S. Poh, P. K. Tan, P. A. Tan, A. Ling, and C. Kurtsiefer, Breakdown flash at telecom wavelengths in InGaAs avalanche photodiodes, Opt. Ex- press 25, 30388 (2017)

work page 2017

[19] [19]

P. V. P. Pinheiro, P. Chaiwongkhot, S. Sajeed, R. T. Horn, J.-P. Bourgoin, T. Jennewein, N. L¨ utkenhaus, and V. Makarov, Eavesdropping and countermeasures for backflash side channel in quantum cryptography, Opt. Express 26, 21020 (2018)

work page 2018

[20] [20]

Huang, ´A

A. Huang, ´A. Navarrete, S.-H. Sun, P. Chaiwongkhot, M. Curty, and V. Makarov, Laser-seeding attack in quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 064043 (2019)

work page 2019

[21] [21]

K. Wei, W. Zhang, Y.-L. Tang, L. You, and F. Xu, Im- plementation security of quantum key distribution due to polarization-dependent efficiency mismatch, Phys. Rev. A 100, 022325 (2019)

work page 2019

[22] [22]

Huang, R

A. Huang, R. Li, V. Egorov, S. Tchouragoulov, K. Ku- mar, and V. Makarov, Laser-damage attack against opti- cal attenuators in quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034017 (2020)

work page 2020

[23] [23]

H. Tan, W. Li, L. Zhang, K. Wei, and F. Xu, Chip-based quantum key distribution against Trojan-horse attack, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 064038 (2021)

work page 2021

[24] [24]

Ponosova, D

A. Ponosova, D. Ruzhitskaya, P. Chaiwongkhot, V. Egorov, V. Makarov, and A. Huang, Protecting fiber- optic quantum key distribution sources against light- injection attacks, PRX Quantum 3, 040307 (2022)

work page 2022

[25] [25]

P. Ye, W. Chen, G.-W. Zhang, F.-Y. Lu, F.-X. Wang, G.-Z. Huang, S. Wang, D.-Y. He, Z.-Q. Yin, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Induced-photorefraction attack against quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054052 (2023)

work page 2023

[26] [26]

L. Han, Y. Li, H. Tan, W. Zhang, W. Cai, J. Yin, J. Ren, F. Xu, S. Liao, and C. Peng, Effect of light injection on the security of practical quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 044013 (2023)

work page 2023

[27] [27]

Fadeev, A

M. Fadeev, A. Ponosova, Q. Peng, A. Huang, R. Shakhovoy, and V. Makarov, Optical-pumping at- tack on a quantum key distribution laser source, arXiv:2503.11239 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv

[28] [28]

Sajeed, C

S. Sajeed, C. Minshull, N. Jain, and V. Makarov, Invisible Trojan-horse attack, Sci. Rep. 7, 8403 (2017)

work page 2017

[29] [29]

A. Meda, I. P. Degiovanni, A. Tosi, Z. Yuan, G. Brida, and M. Genovese, Quantifying backflash radiation to prevent zero-error attacks in quantum key distribution, Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16261 (2017)

work page 2017

[30] [30]

Lucamarini, I

M. Lucamarini, I. Choi, M. B. Ward, J. F. Dynes, Z. L. Yuan, and A. J. Shields, Practical security bounds against the Trojan-horse attack in quantum key distri- bution, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031030 (2015)

work page 2015

[31] [31]

N. Jain, B. Stiller, I. Khan, V. Makarov, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuch, Risk analysis of Trojan-horse attacks on practical quantum key distribution systems, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 21, 6600710 (2015)

work page 2015

[32] [32]

ISO/IEC 23837-2:2023(en). Information security — Se- curity requirements, test and evaluation methods for quantum key distribution — Part 2: Evaluation and test- ing methods, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso: std:iso- iec:23837:-2:ed-1:v1:en , visited 22 Nov 2023

work page 2023

[33] [33]

Makarov, A

V. Makarov, A. Abrikosov, P. Chaiwongkhot, A. K. Fe- dorov, A. Huang, E. Kiktenko, M. Petrov, A. Ponosova, D. Ruzhitskaya, A. Tayduganov, D. Trefilov, and K. Za- itsev, Preparing a commercial quantum key distribu- tion system for certification against implementation loop- holes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 044076 (2024)

work page 2024

[34] [34]

Tomita, Implementation cecurity certification of decoy-BB84 quantum key distribution systems, Adv

A. Tomita, Implementation cecurity certification of decoy-BB84 quantum key distribution systems, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1900005 (2019)

work page 2019

[35] [35]

Sajeed, P

S. Sajeed, P. Chaiwongkhot, A. Huang, H. Qin, V. Egorov, A. Kozubov, A. Gaidash, V. Chistiakov, A. Vasiliev, A. Gleim, and V. Makarov, An approach for security evaluation and certification of a complete quan- tum communication system, Sci. Rep. 11, 5110 (2021)

work page 2021

[36] [36]

Draft ETSI GS QKD 010 V0.4.1 (2021-06). Quantum key distribution (QKD); Implementation security: protection against Trojan horse attacks, https://docbox.etsi.or g/ISG/QKD/Open/GS-QKD-0010_ISTrojan_v0.4.1_Open Area.pdf, visited 16 Mar 2025

work page 2021

[37] [37]

Zhang, Y

Y. Zhang, Y. Bian, Z. Li, S. Yu, and H. Guo, Continuous- variable quantum key distribution system: past, present, 13 and future, Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 011318 (2024)

work page 2024

[38] [38]

Marquardt, U

C. Marquardt, U. Seyfarth, S. Bettendorf, M. Bohmann, A. Buchner, M. Curty, D. Elser, S. Eul, T. Gehring, N. Jain, T. Klocke, M. Reinecke, N. Sieber, R. Ursin, M. Wehling, and H. Weier, Implementation attacks against QKD systems, BSI technical report, https: //www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Service- Navi/Publikatio nen/Studien/QKD-Systems/Implementation_Attacks_ QKD_...

work page 2024

[39] [39]

NKT Photonics, SuperK Fianium supercontinuum white light fiber lasers, https://www.nktphotonics.com/pro ducts/supercontinuum-white-light-lasers/superk -fianium/, visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023

[40] [40]

Nasedkin, F

B. Nasedkin, F. Kiselev, I. Filipov, D. Tolochko, A. Ismagilov, V. Chistiakov, A. Gaidash, A. Tcyp- kin, A. Kozubov, and V. Egorov, Loopholes in the 1500–2100-nm range for quantum-key-distribution com- ponents: prospects for Trojan-horse attacks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014038 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [41]

NKT Photonics, SuperK Split spectral splitter, https: //www.nktphotonics.com/products/supercontinuum -white-light-lasers/superk-split/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023

[42] [42]

NKT Photonics, SuperK Connect broadband fiber deliv- ery, https://www.nktphotonics.com/products/supe rcontinuum-white-light-lasers/superk-connect/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023

[43] [43]

Yokogawa, AQ6374 wide range optical spectrum ana- lyzer, https://tmi.yokogawa.com/solutions/disco ntinued/aq6374-wide-range-optical-spectrum-ana lyzer-350-1750-nm/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023

[44] [44]

Yokogawa, AQ6375B wide range optical spectrum ana- lyzer, https://tmi.yokogawa.com/solutions/discont inued/aq6375b-optical-spectrum-analyzer/ , visited 27 Nov 2023

work page 2023

[45] [45]

Q. Wang, G. Farrell, and T. Freir, Theoretical and exper- imental investigations of macro-bend losses for standard single mode fibers, Opt. Express 13, 4476 (2005)

work page 2005

[46] [46]

W. Chen, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Li, and Y. Lian, Agarose coated macro-bend fiber sensor for relative humidity and temperature measurement at 2 µm, Opt. Fiber Technol. 50, 118 (2019)

work page 2019

[47] [47]

M. A. Green and M. J. Keevers, Optical properties of intinsic silicon at 300 K, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 3, 189 (1995)

work page 1995

[48] [48]

M. A. Green, Self-consistent optical parameters of intrin- sic silicon at 300 K including temperature coefficients, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92, 1305 (2008)

work page 2008

[49] [49]

Kasap and P

S. Kasap and P. Kapper, eds., Springer handbook of elec- tronic and photonic materials (Springer, St¨ urtz GmbH, W¨ urzburg, 2006) p. 54

work page 2006

[50] [50]

Tamaki, M

K. Tamaki, M. Curty, and M. Lucamarini, Decoy-state quantum key distribution with a leaky source, New J. Phys. 18, 065008 (2016)

work page 2016

[51] [51]

Sun and F

S. Sun and F. Xu, Security of quantum key distribution with source and detection imperfections, New J. Phys. 23, 023011 (2021)

work page 2021

[52] [52]

X. Ma, B. Qi, Y. Zhao, and H.-K. Lo, Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012326 (2005)

work page 2005

[53] [53]

H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi, Measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130503 (2012)

work page 2012

[54] [54]

Zhou, Z.-W

Y.-H. Zhou, Z.-W. Yu, and X.-B. Wang, Making the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution practically useful, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042324 (2016)

work page 2016

[55] [55]

W. Wang, F. Xu, and H.-K. Lo, Asymmetric protocols for scalable high-rate measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution networks, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041012 (2019)

work page 2019

[56] [56]

F. Xu, M. Curty, B. Qi, and H.-K. Lo, Practical aspects of measurement-device-independent quantum key distri- bution, New J. Phys. 15, 113007 (2013)

work page 2013

[57] [57]

Kashyap and K

R. Kashyap and K. J. Blow, Observation of catastrophic self-propelled self-focusing in optical fibres, Electron. Lett. 24, 47 (1988)

work page 1988

[58] [58]

D. D. Davis, S. C. Mettler, and D. J. DiGiovanni, A comparative evaluation of fiber fuse models, Proc. SPIE 2966, 592 (1997)

work page 1997

[59] [59]

W. Li, V. Zapatero, H. Tan, K. Wei, H. Min, W.-Y. Liu, X. Jiang, S.-K. Liao, C.-Z. Peng, M. Curty, F. Xu, and J.- W. Pan, Experimental quantum key distribution secure against malicious devices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034081 (2021)

work page 2021

[60] [60]

W. Li, L. Zhang, H. Tan, Y. Lu, S.-K. Liao, J. Huang, H. Li, Z. Wang, H.-K. Mao, B. Yan, Q. Li, Y. Liu, Q. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, L. You, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 Mb s −1, Nat. Photonics 17, 416 (2023)

work page 2023

[61] [61]

Cao, Y.-H

Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, K.-X. Yang, Y.-F. Jiang, S.-L. Li, X.- L. Hu, M. Abulizi, C.-L. Li, W. Zhang, Q.-C. Sun, W.- Y. Liu, X. Jiang, S.-K. Liao, J.-G. Ren, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, J. Yin, C.-Y. Lu, X.-B. Wang, Q. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribu- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett 125, 260503 (2020)

work page 2020

[62] [62]

K. Wei, W. Li, H. Tan, Y. Li, H. Min, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, X. Jiang, T.-Y. Chen, S.-K. Liao, C.-Z. Peng, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, High-speed measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution with inte- grated silicon photonics, Phys. Rev. X10, 031030 (2020)

work page 2020

[63] [63]

F.-Y. Lu, P. Ye, Z.-H. Wang, S. Wang, Z.-Q. Yin, R. Wang, X.-J. Huang, W. Chen, D.-Y. He, G.-J. Fan- Yuan, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, Hacking measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution, Optica10, 520 (2023)

work page 2023

[64] [64]

Koehler-Sidki, J

A. Koehler-Sidki, J. Dynes, T. Para¨ ıso, M. Lucamarini, A. W. Sharpe, Z. Yuan, and A. Shields, Backflashes from fast-gated avalanche photodiodes in quantum key distri- bution, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 154001 (2020)

work page 2020

[65] [65]

Molotkov, Trojan horse attacks, decoy state method, and side channels of information leakage in quantum cryptography, J

S. Molotkov, Trojan horse attacks, decoy state method, and side channels of information leakage in quantum cryptography, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 130, 809 (2020)

work page 2020

[66] [66]

Marini, R

L. Marini, R. Camphausen, B. J. Eggleton, and S. Palomba, Deterministic filtering of breakdown flashing at telecom wavelengths, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 213501 (2017)

work page 2017

[67] [67]

Huang, S

A. Huang, S. H. Sun, Z. Liu, and V. Makarov, Quantum key distribution with distinguishable decoy states, Phys. Rev. A 98, 012330 (2018)

work page 2018

[68] [68]

C. C. W. Lim, M. Curty, N. Walenta, F. Xu, and H. Zbinden, Concise security bounds for practical decoy- state quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A89, 022307 (2014)

work page 2014