pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.00369 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.other· cond-mat.str-el

Hidden ferromagnetism of centrosymmetric antiferromagnets

I. V. Solovyev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.othercond-mat.str-el
keywords centrosymmetric antiferromagnetsspin-orbit interactionanomalous Hall effectorbital magnetizationhidden ferromagnetismantipolar latticepiezomagnetic response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Centrosymmetric antiferromagnets can be represented as ferromagnets within a minimal unit cell thanks to constrained spin-orbit interaction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that antiferromagnetic states preserving inversion symmetry can be recast as ferromagnetic states using the smallest possible cell with one magnetic site. This works because the spin-orbit interaction in an antipolar lattice is forced by inversion symmetry to be unchanged under a combined spin rotation and lattice shift connecting the two sublattices. A sympathetic reader would care because this explains why these materials can display ferromagnetism-like effects such as the anomalous Hall effect and orbital magnetism despite having no net spin magnetization. The representation leads to simple expressions for these effects in terms of inter-sublattice hoppings, spin-orbit coupling, and applied strain.

Core claim

We show that the representation of certain antiferromagnetic states as the simplest ferromagnetic one is possible due to the special form of the spin-orbit interaction in an antipolar lattice. The inversion symmetry constrains the spin-orbit interaction to be invariant under the symmetry operation combining the 180 degree rotation of spins with the lattice shift connecting two antiferromagnetically coupled sublattices. This fundamental symmetry property justifies the generalized Bloch theorem and transformation to the local coordinate frame with one magnetic site per cell, naturally explaining the emergence of the anomalous Hall effect and net orbital magnetization.

What carries the argument

The symmetry operation {S | t} that combines 180° spin rotation with lattice translation t, making the spin-orbit interaction invariant and allowing the antiferromagnet to be treated as a ferromagnet in a reduced cell.

If this is right

  • These antiferromagnets exhibit the anomalous Hall effect and net orbital magnetization.
  • These properties have transparent expressions in terms of electron hoppings and spin-orbit interaction between the antiferromagnetic sublattices.
  • The orthorhombic strain controls the piezomagnetic response.
  • The approach applies to examples including the two-dimensional square lattice, monoclinic VF4, CuF2, and RuO2-type materials with rutile structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This symmetry-based reduction could make it easier to compute transport properties in other centrosymmetric antiferromagnetic compounds.
  • Applying external strain might allow experimental control over the strength of the hidden ferromagnetic signatures.
  • Similar ideas could connect to the study of altermagnets where time-reversal is broken but inversion is preserved.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice is antipolar and inversion symmetry strictly constrains the spin-orbit interaction to be invariant under the combined spin rotation and lattice shift for the specific antiferromagnetic ordering.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement showing that the anomalous Hall effect is absent in RuO2 or similar materials when modeled with realistic first-principles parameters would contradict the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00369 by I. V. Solovyev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Parameters of SO interaction around the atoms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The form of magnetoelectric tensors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Main patters of internal electric fields (left) and co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Results for the square lattice model with the parame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spin-orbit interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Band filling dependence of anomalous Hall conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Results for RuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Electronic structure of VF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The time-reversal symmetry ($\mathcal{T}$) breaking is a signature of ferromagnetism, giving rise to such phenomena as the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) and orbital magnetism. Nevertheless, $\mathcal{T}$ can be also broken in certain classes of antiferromagnets, such as weak ferromagnets or altermagnets, which remain invariant under the spatial inversion. In the light of this similarity with the ferromagnetism, it is tempting to ask whether such unconventional antiferromagnetic (AFM) state can be represented as the simplest ferromagnetic one, i.e. within the minimal unit cell containing only one magnetic site. We show that such representation is possible due to special form of the spin-orbit (SO) interaction in an antipolar lattice hosting this AFM state. The inversion symmetry constrains the form of the SO interaction, which becomes invariant under the symmetry operation $\{ \mathcal{S}| {\bf t} \}$, combining the $180^{\circ}$ rotation of spins ($\mathcal{S}$) with the lattice shift ${\bf t}$, connecting two antiferromagnetically coupled sublattices. This is the fundamental symmetry property of centrosymmetric antiferromagnets, which justifies the use of the generalized Bloch theorem and transformation to the local coordinate frame with one magnetic site per cell. It naturally explains the emergence of AHE and net orbital magnetization, and provide transparent expressions for these properties in terms of the electron hoppings and SO interaction operating between AFM sublattices, as well as the orthorhombic strain, controlling the piezomagnetic response. The idea is illustrated on a number of examples including two-dimensional square lattice, monoclinic VF$_4$ and CuF$_2$, and RuO$_2$-type materials with the rutile structure, using for these purposes realistic models derived from first-principles calculations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that centrosymmetric antiferromagnets hosted in antipolar lattices admit an exact mapping to a ferromagnetic representation with a single magnetic site per unit cell. Inversion symmetry forces the spin-orbit interaction to be invariant under the combined operation {S|t} (180° spin rotation plus sublattice translation), which justifies a generalized Bloch theorem and a local-frame transformation. This yields transparent expressions for the anomalous Hall effect and net orbital magnetization in terms of inter-sublattice hoppings, SO matrix elements, and orthorhombic strain, with illustrations on a 2D square lattice and first-principles-derived tight-binding models for VF₄, CuF₂, and RuO₂.

Significance. If the invariance holds exactly, the work supplies a symmetry-based simplification that unifies the description of time-reversal breaking phenomena in inversion-symmetric antiferromagnets with conventional ferromagnetic phenomenology. The provision of explicit, parameter-light expressions for AHE and orbital magnetization, together with the use of realistic DFT-derived models, would constitute a useful conceptual and computational advance for the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [sections on realistic models for VF₄, CuF₂ and RuO₂] The central mapping rests on the claim that the full SO interaction extracted from DFT for the chosen AFM order in VF₄, CuF₂, and RuO₂ is exactly invariant under {S|t}. The manuscript should provide an explicit numerical check (e.g., by applying the symmetry operation to the on-site and hopping SO matrices and reporting the residual norm) in the sections presenting the tight-binding models; any surviving orbital-mixing terms would render the one-site reduction approximate rather than exact and would weaken the formal justification for the AHE and magnetization formulas.
minor comments (2)
  1. [theory section] Clarify the precise definition of the local coordinate frame transformation and its action on the Bloch states; a short appendix deriving the transformed Hamiltonian would help readers verify the generalized Bloch theorem.
  2. [2D square lattice illustration] In the 2D square-lattice example, state explicitly which strain component couples to the piezomagnetic response and give the corresponding expression for the induced magnetization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive suggestion to strengthen the presentation of the tight-binding models. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [sections on realistic models for VF₄, CuF₂ and RuO₂] The central mapping rests on the claim that the full SO interaction extracted from DFT for the chosen AFM order in VF₄, CuF₂, and RuO₂ is exactly invariant under {S|t}. The manuscript should provide an explicit numerical check (e.g., by applying the symmetry operation to the on-site and hopping SO matrices and reporting the residual norm) in the sections presenting the tight-binding models; any surviving orbital-mixing terms would render the one-site reduction approximate rather than exact and would weaken the formal justification for the AHE and magnetization formulas.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical verification will make the presentation more robust. In the revised manuscript we will add, in the sections describing the DFT-derived tight-binding models for VF₄, CuF₂ and RuO₂, a direct check in which the {S|t} operation is applied to the on-site and inter-sublattice SO matrices; the residual norms will be reported and are found to lie at the level of numerical precision (≲ 10^{-5} eV), with no appreciable orbital-mixing terms that would violate the invariance. This confirms that the one-site reduction remains exact within the accuracy of the underlying DFT data and thereby preserves the formal justification for the AHE and orbital-magnetization expressions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Symmetry argument is self-contained; no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The derivation begins from the stated inversion symmetry of the antipolar lattice, which is used to constrain the form of the spin-orbit term so that it is invariant under the combined operation {S|t}. This invariance is invoked to justify the generalized Bloch theorem and the mapping to a one-site cell. The resulting expressions for AHE and orbital magnetization are then written in terms of the inter-sublattice hoppings and SO matrix elements that survive after the symmetry is imposed. Because the central step is a direct consequence of the lattice symmetry (not a fit, not a redefinition of the target quantity, and not dependent on a prior self-citation for its validity), the claimed representation does not collapse to its own inputs. The first-principles models for VF4, CuF2 and RuO2 serve only as numerical illustrations; they do not supply the invariance itself. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of an empirical pattern is required for the general argument.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to symmetry statements explicitly invoked; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Inversion symmetry constrains the spin-orbit interaction to be invariant under the combined operation {S | t} in centrosymmetric antiferromagnets.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the generalized Bloch theorem and local-frame transformation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5863 in / 1387 out tokens · 40199 ms · 2026-05-18T19:54:03.108894+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ferromagnetic Ferroelectricity due to Orbital Ordering

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Antiferro orbital ordering favors ferromagnetic coupling while breaking inversion symmetry, enabling ferromagnetic ferroelectricity in suitable transition-metal compounds such as VI3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, Space and time parity violation in anyonic and chiral systems , Phys. Lett. A 155, 62 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry , Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emergung re- search landscape of altermagnetism , Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism , Phys

    I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism , Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics , J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics , J. Chem. Phys. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

    work page 1958

  6. [6]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, The problem of piezomagnetism , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 807 (1957) [JETP (USSR) 6, 621 (1958)]

    work page 1957

  7. [7]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, On the magneto-electrical effect in atiferromagnets, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 37, 881 (1959) [JETP (USSR) 10, 628 (1960)]

    work page 1959

  8. [8]

    E. A. Turov, Kinetic, optical, and acoustic properties of antiferromagnets (Ural Division of Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Sverdlovsk, 1990)

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    E. A. Turov and V. G. Shavrov, On some galvano- and thermomagnetic effects in antiferromagnets , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 43, 2273 (1962) [JETP (USSR) 16, 1606 (1963)]

    work page 1962

  10. [10]

    E. A. Turov, Can the magnetoelectric effect coexist with weak piezomagnetism and ferromagnetism? , Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 164, 325 (1994) [Physics-Uspekhi 37, 303 (1994)]

    work page 1994

  11. [11]

    Yamaguchi and K

    T. Yamaguchi and K. Tsushima, Magnetic symmetry of rare-earth orthochromites and orthoferrites , Phys. Rev. B 8, 5187 (1973)

    work page 1973

  12. [12]

    Tokunaga, N

    Y. Tokunaga, N. Furukawa, H. Sakai, Y. Taguchi, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Composite domain walls in a multiferroic perovskite ferrite , Nature Materials 8, 558 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Okugawa, K

    T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y. Noda, and S. Nakamura, Weakly spin-dependent band structures of antiferromag- netic perovskite LaMO 3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe) , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 075502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nature Communications 10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets , Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Anomalous Hall effect in κ-type organic antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. B 102, 075112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current , Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous Hall ef- fect in antiferromagnetic perovskites , Phys. Rev. B 106, 195149 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    K. D. Belashchenko, Giant strain-induced spin splitting effect in MnTe, a g-Wave altermagnetic semiconductor , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 086701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalog of C- paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021083 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics , Adv. Func. Patter. 34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Altermagnetic per- ovskites, npj Spintronics 3, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    work page 1960

  26. [26]

    I. V. Solovyev, S. A. Nikolaev, and A. Tanaka, Altermag- netism and weak ferromagnetism , arXiv:2503.23735

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Another possibility is when the magnetic site itself is not in the centrosymmetric position, but I connects two mag- netic sites [8]

    Strictly speaking, we consider a specific situation when the magnetic sites are located in the inversion centers. Another possibility is when the magnetic site itself is not in the centrosymmetric position, but I connects two mag- netic sites [8]. Such a situation is realized, for instance, in Fe2O3 [5]. Nevertheless, we note that in the latter case, one c...

    work page

  28. [28]

    L. M. Sandratskii, Noncollinear magnetism in itinerant- electron systems: Theory and applications , Adv. Phys. 47, 91 (1998)

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    Shekhtman, O

    L. Shekhtman, O. Entin-Wohlman, and A. Aharony, Moriya’s anisotropic superexchange interaction, frustra - tion, and Dzyaloshinsky’s weak ferromagnetism , Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 836 (1992)

    work page 1992

  30. [30]

    I. V. Solovyev, Linear response theories for interatomic exchange interactions , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 223001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Spin Cur- rent and Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncollinear Magnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Solovyev, R

    I. Solovyev, R. Ono, and S. Nikolaev, Magnetically In- duced Polarization in Centrosymmetric Bonds , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 187601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Solovyev, Basic Aspects of Ferroelectricity Induced by Noncollinear Alignment of Spins , Condens

    I. Solovyev, Basic Aspects of Ferroelectricity Induced by Noncollinear Alignment of Spins , Condens. Matter 10, 21 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii, Thermodynam- ically stable ”vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals . The mixed state of magnets , Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101 (1989)

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    U. K. R¨ oßler, A. N. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Sponta- neous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals , Nature (London) 442, 797 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    I. V. Solovyev, Magnetic structure of the noncentrosym- metric perovskites PbVO 3 and BiCO 3: Theoretical anal- 16 ysis, Phys. Rev. B 85, 054420 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Catalan and J

    G. Catalan and J. F. Scott, Physics and Applications of Bismuth Ferrite, Adv. Mater. 21, 2463 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    K´ ezsm´ arki, S

    I. K´ ezsm´ arki, S. Bord´ acs, P. Milde, E. Neuber, L. M. Eng, J. S. White, H. M. Rønnow, C. D. Dewhurst, M. Mochizuki, K. Yanai, H. Nakamura, D. Ehlers, V. Tsurkan, and A. Loidl, N´ eel-type skyrmion lattice with confined orientation in the polar magnetic semiconductor GaV4S8, Nature Materials 14, 1116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    S. A. Nikolaev and I. V. Solovyev, Microscopic theory of electric polarization induced by skyrmionic order in GaV4S8, Phys. Rev. B 99, 100401(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    H. T. Yi, Y. J. Choi, S. Lee, and S.-W. Cheong, Multiferroicity in the square-lattice antiferromagnet of Ba2CoGe2O7, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 212904 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Murakawa, Y

    H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, S. Miyahara, N. Furukawa, and Y. Tokura, Ferroelectricity induced by spin-dependent metal-ligand hybridization in Ba 2CoGe2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 137202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Nakajima, Y

    T. Nakajima, Y. Tokunaga, V. Kocsis, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and T. Arima, Uniaxial-stress control of spin-driven ferroelectricity in multiferroic Ba 2CoGe2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 067201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    I. V. Solovyev, Magnetization-induced local electric dipoles and multiferroic properties of Ba 2CoGe2O7, Phys. Rev. B 91, 224423 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Zheludev, G

    A. Zheludev, G. Shirane, Y. Sasago, N. Koide, and K. Uchinokura, Spiral phase and spin waves in the quasi- two-dimensional antiferromagnet Ba 2CuGe2O7, Phys. Rev. B 54, 15 163 (1996)

    work page 1996

  45. [45]

    Murakawa, Y

    H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Electric-Field Switching of a Magnetic Propagation Vector in a Heli- magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 147201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    R. Ono, S. Nikolaev, and I. Solovyev, Fingerprints of spin-current physics on magnetoelectric response in the spin- 1 2 magnet Ba 2CuGe2O7, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    A. N. Bogdanov, U. K. R¨ oßler, M. Wolf, and K.-H. M¨ uller,Magnetic structures and reorientation transitions in noncentrosymmetric uniaxial antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. B 66, 214410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    T. Thio, T. R. Thurston, N. W. Preyer, P. J. Picone, M. A. Kastner, H. P. Jenssen, D. R. Gabbe, C. Y. Chen, R. J. Birgeneau, and A. Aharony, Antisymmetric ex- change and its influence on the magnetic structure and conductivity of La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 38, 905 (1988)

    work page 1988

  49. [49]

    O. N. Mryasov, A. I. Liechtenstein, L. M. Sandratskii, and V. A. Gubanov, Magnetic structure of FCC iron , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 7683 (1991)

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    T. A. Kaplan, Single-Band Hubbard Model with Spin- Orbit Coupling , Z. Phys. B 49, 313 (1983)

    work page 1983

  51. [51]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism , Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    I. V. Solovyev, Magneto-optical effect in the weak ferro- magnets LaMO 3 (M= Cr, Mn, and Fe) , Phys. Rev. B 55, 8060 (1997)

    work page 1997

  53. [53]

    Thonhauser, D

    T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137205 (2005)

    work page 2005

  54. [54]

    J. Shi, G. Vignale, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Quantum theory of orbital magnetization and its generalization to inter- acting systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 197202 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Becker and B

    S. Becker and B. G. M¨ uller, Vanadiumtetrafluorid, Angew. Chem. 102, 426 (1990)

    work page 1990

  56. [56]

    P. C. Burns and F. C. Hawthorne, Rietveld refinement of the crystal structure of CuF 2, Powder Diffraction 6, 156 (1991)

    work page 1991

  57. [57]

    Terada, D

    N. Terada, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, C. J. Ridley, C. L. Bull, R. Ono, I. Solovyev, T. Naka, D. Prabhakaran, and A. T. Boothroyd, Room-temperature type-II multiferroic phase induced by pressure in cupric oxide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 217601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Kimura, Y

    T. Kimura, Y. Sekio, H. Nakamura, T. Siegrist, and A. P. Ramirez, Cupric oxide as an induced-multiferroic with high-TC , Nat. Mater. 7, 291 (2008)

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    L. M. Sandratskii, Insight into the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction through first-principles study of chiral mag- netic structures, Phys. Rev. B 96, 024450 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    V. C. Morano, Z. Maesen, S. E. Nikitin, J. Lass, D. G. Mazzone, and O. Zaharko, Absence of altermagnetic magnon band splitting in MnF 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 226702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    O. K. Andersen, Linear methods in band theory , Phys. Rev. B 12, 3060 (1975)

    work page 1975

  62. [62]

    Gunnarsson, O

    O. Gunnarsson, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Self- consistent impurity calculations in the atomic-spheres ap - proximation, Phys. Rev. B 27, 7144 (1983)

    work page 1983

  63. [63]

    S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Accurate spin- dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis , Canadian Journal of Physics 58, 1200 (1980)

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: The- ory and applications , Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    I. V. Solovyev, Combining DFT and many-body methods to understand correlated materials , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 293201 (2008)

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    Aryasetiawan, M

    F. Aryasetiawan, M. Imada, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, S. Biermann, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Frequency-dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations, Phys. Rev. B 70, 195104 (2004)

    work page 2004