Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Happel's question, Han's conjecture and $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For bound quiver algebras, infinite τ-Hochschild cohomology is equivalent to infinite co+ global dimension, and infinite τ-Hochschild homology to infinite + global dimension; this recasts Happel's question and Han's conjecture in terms of t

desk verdict Genuinely new higher τ-Hochschild invariants with a sound central theorem, but the radical-square-zero computations in Section 7 overcount τ-homology in even degrees, so the paper needs revision before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.05135 v2 pith:KTG4VLIN submitted 2025-09-05 math.KT math.RAmath.RT

Claude Cibils , Marcelo Lanzilotta , Eduardo N. Marcos , Andrea Solotar This is my paper
classification math.KTmath.RAmath.RT MSC 16E4016G7016D2016E30
keywords τ-HochschildcohomologyhomologyHappel'squestionHan'sconjectureboundquiveralgebrashigherAuslander–Reitentranslateglobaldimensionminimalprojectiveresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces τ-Hochschild homology and τ-Hochschild cohomology, built from Iyama's higher Auslander–Reiten translate, and proves they are well adapted to detecting infinite global dimension. For a bound quiver algebra, the main theorem states that the τ-Hochschild cohomology is infinite exactly when the algebra has infinite co+ global dimension, and the τ-Hochschild homology is infinite exactly when it has infinite + global dimension, where these two properties are explicit conditions involving non-zero Peirce components and infinite Tor spaces between simple modules. Because a positive answer to Happel's question implies infinite co+ global dimension and a positive answer to Han's conjecture implies infinite + global dimension, a counterexample to either conjecture would have to be an infinite-global-dimension algebra failing the corresponding condition. The paper also derives dimension formulas relating τ-Hochschild spaces to ordinary Hochschild spaces in lower degrees plus Tor/Ext spaces of simples, proves Morita invariance and absence of derived invariance, and computes the invariants for radical square zero algebras.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the higher Auslander–Reiten translate τ_n = τΩ^{n-1} on the bimodule category, where τ=DTr is the usual Auslander–Reiten translate; the τ-Hochschild spaces are D Hom_{Λ-Λ}(X, τ_n Λ) and Hom_{Λ-Λ}(DX, τ_n Λ). Theorem 2.12 identifies these spaces with the cokernel of the n-th coboundary map and the kernel of the n-th boundary map in the minimal projective bimodule resolution, so they encode the full chain and cochain spaces rather than their homology. The resolution itself is controlled by the Butler–King/Happel theorem P_n = Λ ⊗_E Tor^Λ_n(E,E) ⊗_E Λ with E=Λ/r separable; the dimension formulas of Theorem 4.5 and the vanishing equivalence of Theorem 5.3 both flow fro

What would settle it

For a radical square zero algebra Λ=kQ/F^2 with Q connected and not a crown, Corollary 7.6 predicts HH^τ_n(Λ)=Ker(id+(-1)^n t on kO_n) ⊕ kO_{n+1}. Compute these dimensions for a small quiver with an oriented cycle and compare them with the Tor criterion of Definition 5.4: if for some n the τ-homology is non-zero while no pair of vertices has both a non-zero Peirce component and infinite Tor, or vice versa, then Theorem 5.5 fails. This is a finite linear algebra calculation for any prescribed quiver.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the τ-Hochschild (co)homology spaces H^n_τ(Λ)=D Hom_{Λ-Λ}(Λ, τ_n Λ) and H^τ_n(Λ)=Hom_{Λ-Λ}(DΛ, τ_n Λ), with τ_n=τΩ^{n-1}, are not just variants of Hochschild theory but the right detectors of a refined form of infinite global dimension. Theorem 5.5 states that for Λ=kQ/I, Λ has infinite co+ global dimension if and only if HH^*_τ(Λ) is infinite, and infinite + global dimension if and only if HH^τ_*(Λ) is infinite. Thus Happel's question and Han's conjecture are restated as questions about whether infinite global dimension alone forces infinite co+ or infinite + dimension. The paper also shows that finite global dimension d forces vanishing of τ-Hochschild (co)homolog

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the theorem that every term in the minimal projective bimodule resolution of Λ has the form Λ ⊗_E Tor^Λ_n(E,E) ⊗_E Λ, which is invoked for Λ whose semisimple quotient E=Λ/r is separable; if that decomposition fails, the τ-Hochschild dimension formulas and the main if-and-only-ifs do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the main theorem is right, Han's conjecture is equivalent to the statement that every bound quiver algebra of infinite global dimension has infinite + global dimension; a single algebra failing this condition would disprove Han's conjecture.
  • Happel's question is equivalent to the statement that every bound quiver algebra of infinite global dimension has infinite co+ global dimension.
  • Finite global dimension forces τ-Hochschild (co)homology to vanish in all sufficiently high degrees; consequently infinite τ-Hochschild homology or cohomology is a certificate of infinite global dimension.
  • Every non-trivial local bound quiver algebra has infinite τ-Hochschild homology and cohomology, so the known local negative answers to Happel's question become positive answers to the τ-version.
  • For radical square zero algebras, explicit combinatorial formulas compute the τ-Hochschild dimensions from cycle sets, making the invariants directly calculable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence in Theorem 5.5 is close to a reformulation of the definitions; the genuinely open content is whether infinite global dimension forces infinite + and infinite co+ global dimension. The paper's contribution is isolating that question rather than resolving it.
  • The dimension formulas suggest a practical route for testing Han's conjecture on a family: instead of computing Hochschild homology directly, it suffices to control the growth of Tor between simple modules in non-zero Peirce components.
  • Because τ-Hochschild homology is not derived invariant, it captures information lost under derived equivalence; comparing τ-Hochschild invariants along derived equivalences might give a new obstruction to derived equivalence.
  • The framework depends on the separable quotient E; extending the definitions beyond separable quotients would require a different minimal-resolution theorem, so the main equivalence should be expected to need modification in positive characteristic for non-separable E.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces τ-Hochschild cohomology and homology H^n_τ and H^τ_n for finite-dimensional algebras, defined via Iyama's higher Auslander–Reiten translates τ_n = τΩ^{n-1} on the enveloping algebra. It proves basic properties: Morita invariance, non-derived invariance (Example 4.12), vanishing above the global dimension, and explicit dimension formulas in Theorem 4.5. The central theoretical results are in Section 5: for a bound quiver algebra, Λ has infinite co+ global dimension iff HH^*_τ(Λ) is infinite, and Λ has infinite + global dimension iff HH^τ_*(Λ) is infinite; the paper then provides sufficient conditions for these properties and derives conditional consequences for Happel's question and Han's conjecture. Section 7 computes the invariants for radical-square-zero algebras.

Significance. If correct, the paper offers new invariants sensitive to infinite global dimension and a reformulation of Happel's question and Han's conjecture in terms of τ-Hochschild (co)homology. The dimension formulas in Theorem 4.5 and the worked examples (including negative answers to Happel's question in Example 6.2) are useful and the paper is transparent about open implications (Remark 5.7, §6.5). It should be stressed, however, that Definition 5.4 is tailored so that the main equivalences in Theorem 5.5 follow almost directly from Theorem 5.3 and the finiteness of Q_0; the contribution is thus a reformulation and a computational toolkit, not a proof of either conjecture. Moreover, two statements in the current version are incorrect and must be repaired before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 5.3 (Section 5)] The stated equivalence is false as written. The RHS 'A_i(X)=0 for i>N' only forces H^i_τ(Λ,X)=0 for i>N, since H^N_τ = Coker δ_N and A_{N+1}=0 does not imply that δ_N is surjective. The proof's 'converse is clear' is not valid for i=N. The correct formulation should be either 'H^i_τ=0 for i>N ⇔ A_i=0 for i>N' or 'H^i_τ=0 for i≥N ⇔ A_i=0 for i≥N'. This does not affect the cofinite-support part used in Theorem 5.5, but the theorem as stated must be corrected.
  2. [Theorem 7.7(a) (Section 7.3)] Theorem 7.7(a) contradicts Corollary 7.6. Corollary 7.6 gives dim HHτ_n(Λ) = dim Ker(Id+(-1)^n t on kO_n) + |O_{n+1}|. In Assertion 1 of the proof, the even-n/char≠2 case is computed correctly for each orbit (kernel dimension 1 if the orbit has even cardinality and 0 otherwise), but the assertion then incorrectly concludes the total kernel dimension is |Ω_n|. Thus for n even and char k ≠ 2 the correct formula is dim HHτ_n = |Ω_n^{even}| + |O_{n+1}|. For example, take Λ=k[a]/(a^2) over a field of characteristic ≠2: O_2={a^2} has one 1-element orbit and O_3={a^3}; Corollary 7.6 gives dim HHτ_2 = 0+1 = 1, while Theorem 7.7(a) gives 1+1 = 2.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Example 4.12] The line 'dim_k HH0(Λ)=6 = dim_k HH0(Λ′)' should use HH_0 (homology), not HH^0; the superscript/subscript notation is currently inconsistent.
  2. [Remark 2.7] The remark refers to 'Appendix 7', but Section 7 is not labeled as an appendix. Please correct the cross-reference.
  3. [Proof of Theorem 4.17] There is a typo: 'we jnow' should be 'we know'.
  4. [Notation, Definition 2.1 and Remark 7.4] The symbol Ω is used both for the syzygy functor (Definition 2.1) and for the set of cyclic orbits (Remark 7.4). This is potentially confusing; a different symbol, e.g. C_n or Orb_n, would help in Section 7.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; Theorem 5.5 is a transparent corollary of an independent structural theorem and the explicit Definition 5.4, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central equivalence in Theorem 5.5 is not circular. The τ-Hochschild (co)homology is defined independently in Definition 2.3 via the higher Auslander–Reiten translate. Theorem 5.3, which is the load-bearing bridge, is proved from Theorem 2.12 and the minimal projective resolution Theorem 3.2 (an external Butler–King/Happel result). Definition 5.4 then introduces 'infinite +/co+ global dimension' via an explicit Tor-vanishing condition together with a non-vanishing Peirce component (yΛx ≠ 0). This definition does not mention τ-Hochschild (co)homology. The proof of Theorem 5.5 simply identifies A_n(Λ) = ⊕ Hom_k(Tor^Λ_n(ky,xk), yΛx) (Proposition 3.8) and applies Theorem 5.3. Thus the claimed 'if and only if' is a genuine theorem relating two separately defined conditions, not a self-definition or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper also contains independent computations and examples (Sections 6 and 7) that do not rely on the equivalence being assumed. The Section 7 issue noted in the reader's take is a mathematical error in the dimension formula for radical-square-zero algebras, not a circularity. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: Theorem 3.2 is externally sourced, and self-citations such as [16] only recall earlier degree-one results. Therefore the paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters: the paper is pure algebra with no empirical fitting. The axioms listed are standard theorems or explicitly stated hypotheses such as separability of E. No invented entities: the new invariant is the object of study, not a hidden postulate; the higher AR translate tau_n is from Iyama's prior work (cited as [27,28]), not introduced here.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Wedderburn-Mal'tsev decomposition: Lambda = E direct sum r with E = Lambda/r a separable semisimple subalgebra
    Stated at the start of Section 3; required so every projective bimodule is Lambda tensor_E T tensor_E Lambda and the isotypic decomposition by vertex idempotents is available.
  • standard math Butler-King/Happel minimal resolution: P_n is isomorphic to Lambda tensor_E Tor^Lambda_n(E,E) tensor_E Lambda for n >= 0
    Theorem 3.2, cited to [13,21]; the load-bearing structural input for the dimension formulas in Theorem 4.5 and the termwise identifications in Theorem 5.3.
  • standard math Han-Keller vanishing theorem: HH_n(Lambda) = 0 for all n > 0 when gl.dim Lambda is finite
    Used in Proposition 4.1 to conclude HHtau_d(Lambda) = 0; cited to [20] and [32].
  • standard math Bongartz's isomorphisms for Tor of a bound quiver algebra
    Lemma 4.14, used to prove vanishing of tau-Hochschild homology when the quiver has no oriented cycles (Theorem 4.17).
  • standard math Auslander-Reiten duality for Lambda-bimodules: Ext^1_A(M,N) is isomorphic to D Hom_A(N, tau M)
    The basis for expressing both classical and tau-Hochschild spaces as Hom into tau_n Lambda in Proposition 2.2 and Definition 2.3.
  • domain assumption The semisimple quotient E is separable so that the Wedderburn-Mal'tsev splitting and Peirce decompositions behave classically
    Assumed in the opening paragraph for all algebras considered; if E were not separable the minimal-resolution theorem and the vertex decompositions in Theorem 4.5 could fail or need modification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Happel's question, Han's conjecture and $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KTG4VLIN

@misc{pith2026250905135,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Happel's question, Han's conjecture and $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KTG4VLIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05135}
}
abstract

We introduce the $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology of a finite dimensional associative algebra $\Lambda$ by means of the higher Auslander-Reiten translate of O. Iyama. We show that the global dimension of $\Lambda$, Happel's question and Han's conjecture are related to the $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Protected corners and a trichotomy for Han's conjecture

    math.RT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    All three simples of a three-vertex Gap-A failure cannot all have infinite projective dimension; the two-infinite case is forced to be a 'mutual dumbbell', and a protected corner forces Ext^n(S_x,S_x) nonzero in every degree.

  2. $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology, the square of the Serre bimodule, and the Coxeter automorphism of the Tamarkin--Tsygan calculus

    math.RT 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    τ-translates of the regular bimodule are the cycle modules of the Nakayama-twisted Happel resolution of the square of the Serre bimodule, linking τ-Hochschild theory to the Coxeter automorphism.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    An Introduction to Auslander-Reiten Theory

    Angeleri H¨ ugel, L. An Introduction to Auslander-Reiten Theory. Lecture Notes Advanced School on Representation Theory and related Topics, 2006, ICTP Trieste. http://docplayer.net/178390377-Advanced-school-and-conference-on-representation- theory-and-related-topics.html

    work page arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Representation theory of Artin algebras III: Almost split sequences

    Auslander, M.; Reiten, I. Representation theory of Artin algebras III: Almost split sequences. Comm. Algebra 3 (1975), 239–294

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    Representation Theory of Artin Alge- bras

    Auslander, M.; Reiten, I.; Smalø, S.O. Representation Theory of Artin Alge- bras. Cambridge University Press; 1995. 24

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    L.; Iyengar, S

    Avramov, L. L.; Iyengar, S. Gaps in Hochschild cohomology imply smoothness for commutative algebras. Math. Res. Lett. 12 (2005), 789—804

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    L.; Vigu´ e-Poirrier M

    Avramov, L. L.; Vigu´ e-Poirrier M. Hochschild homology criteria for smooth- ness. Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1 (1992), 17–25

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    Bardzell, M. J. The alternating syzygy behavior of monomial algebras. J. Al- gebra 188 (1997), 69–89

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    A.; Erdmann, E

    Bergh, P. A.; Erdmann, E. Homology and cohomology of quantum complete intersections. Algebra Number Theory 2 (2008), 501–522

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    A.; Madsen, D

    Bergh, P. A.; Madsen, D. Hochschild homology and global dimension. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 41 (2009), 473–482

    work page 2009

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    A.; Madsen, D

    Bergh, P. A.; Madsen, D. Hochschild homology and trivial extension algebras. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), 1475–1480

    2017

  2. [10]

    Algebras and quadratic forms, J

    Bongartz, K. Algebras and quadratic forms, J. London Math. Soc. 28 (1983), 461–469

    1983

  3. [11]

    Finite Hochschild coho- mology without finite global dimension, Math

    Buchweitz, R.-O.; Green, E.; Madsen, D.; Solberg, Ø. Finite Hochschild coho- mology without finite global dimension, Math. Res. Lett. 12 (2005), 805–816

    2005

  4. [12]

    A.; Guccione J

    Buenos Aires Cyclic Homology Group; Cyclic homology of algebras with one generator, (Guccione J. A.; Guccione J. J.; Redondo M. J.; Solotar A.; Villa- mayor O. participated in this research) K-Theory 5 (1991), 51–69

    1991

  5. [13]

    Butler, M. C. R.; King A. D. Minimal resolutions of algebras, J. Algebra 212 (1999), 323–362

    1999

  6. [14]

    Cyclic and Hochschild homology of 2-nilpotent algebras

    Cibils, C. Cyclic and Hochschild homology of 2-nilpotent algebras. K-Theory 4 (1990), 131–141

    1990

  7. [15]

    Hochschild cohomology algebra of radical square zero algebras

    Cibils, C. Hochschild cohomology algebra of radical square zero algebras. Re- iten, Idun (ed.) et al., Algebras and modules II. Eighth international confer- ence on representations of algebras, Geiranger, Norway, August 4–10, 1996. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society...

    1996

  8. [16]

    N.; Solotar, A

    Cibils C.; Lanzilotta, M.; Marcos, E. N.; Solotar, A. On the firstτ- Hochschild cohomology of an algebra. To appear in J. Noncommut. Geom. arxiv.org/abs/2404.06916

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    L.; Marcos, E

    Green, E. L.; Marcos, E. N.; Mart ´ ınez-Villa; R., Zhang, P. D-Koszul algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 193 (2004), 141–162

    2004

  10. [18]

    L.; Solberg, Ø; Zacharia D

    Green, E. L.; Solberg, Ø; Zacharia D. Minimal projective resolutions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), 2915–2939

    2001

  11. [19]

    L.; Zacharia, D

    Green, E. L.; Zacharia, D. The cohomology ring of a monomial algebra. Manuscr. Math. 85 (1994), 11–23

    1994

  12. [20]

    Hochschild (co)homology dimension

    Han, Y. Hochschild (co)homology dimension. J. London Math. Soc. 73 (2006), 657–668. 25

    2006

  13. [21]

    Hochschild cohomology of finite-dimensional algebras

    Happel, D. Hochschild cohomology of finite-dimensional algebras. S´ eminaire d’alg` ebre P. Dubreil et M.-P. Malliavin, Proc., Paris/Fr. 1987/88, Lect. Notes Math. 1404 (1989), 108–126

    1987

  14. [22]

    Algebras of finite global dimension

    Happel, D.; Zacharia, D. Algebras of finite global dimension. Buan, Aslak Bakke (ed.) et al., Algebras, quivers and representations. The Abel symposium

  15. [23]

    Indecomposable representations and the loop-space operation

    Heller, A. Indecomposable representations and the loop-space operation. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 12 (1961), 640–643

    1961

  16. [24]

    On the cohomology groups of an associative algebra

    Hochschild, G. On the cohomology groups of an associative algebra. Ann. Math. 46 (1945), 58–67

    1945

  17. [25]

    Notes on the no loops conjecture, J

    Igusa, E. Notes on the no loops conjecture, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 69 (1990), 161–176

    1990

  18. [26]

    A proof of the strong no loop conjecture

    Igusa, E.; Liu, S.; Paquette, C. A proof of the strong no loop conjecture. Adv. Math. 228 (2011), 2731–2742

    2011

  19. [27]

    Higher-dimensional Auslander-Reiten theory on maximal orthogonal subcategories

    Iyama, O. Higher-dimensional Auslander-Reiten theory on maximal orthogonal subcategories. Adv. Math. 210 (2007), 22–50

    2007

  20. [28]

    Auslander correspondence

    Iyama, O. Auslander correspondence. Adv. Math. 210 (2007), 51–82

    2007

  21. [29]

    Introduction toτ-tilting theory

    Iyama, O.; Reiten, I. Introduction toτ-tilting theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 (2014), 9704–9711

    2014

  22. [30]

    Higher Nakayama algebras I: Construction

    Jasso, G; K¨ ulshammer, J. Higher Nakayama algebras I: Construction. Adv. Math. 351 (2019), 1139–1200

    2019

  23. [31]

    An introduction to higher Auslander-Reiten theory

    Jasso, G.; Kvamme, S. An introduction to higher Auslander-Reiten theory. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 51 (2019), 1–24

    2019

  24. [32]

    Invariance and localization for cyclic homology of DG algebras, J

    Keller, B. Invariance and localization for cyclic homology of DG algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 123 (1998), 223–273

    1998

  25. [33]

    Nilpotente Elemente in Ringen von endlicher globaler Dimension, Math

    Lenzing, H. Nilpotente Elemente in Ringen von endlicher globaler Dimension, Math. Z. 108 (1969), 313–324

    1969

  26. [34]

    Liu, S.; Morin, J. P. The strong no loop conjecture for special biserial algebras. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004), 3513–3523

    2004

  27. [35]

    Mal’tsev, A. I. On the representation of an algebra as a direct sum of the radical and a semi-simple subalgebra. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 36 (1942), 42–45

    1942

  28. [36]

    Mini-course at theτ- Research School, 5–8 September 2023, University of Cologne

    Marsh, B.τ-tilting theory andτ-exceptional sequences. Mini-course at theτ- Research School, 5–8 September 2023, University of Cologne. https://sites.google.com/view/tau-tilting-school-cologne/schedule-abstracts http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~ marsh/MarshTauTiltingParts1to4.pdf

    2023

  29. [37]

    A family of Koszul self-injective algebras with finite Hochschild cohomology

    Parker, A.; Snashall, N. A family of Koszul self-injective algebras with finite Hochschild cohomology. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 216 (2012), 1245–1252. 26

    2012

  30. [38]

    Hochschild homology and coho- mology of generalized Weyl algebras: the quantum case

    Solotar, A.; Su´ arez-Alvarez, M.; Vivas, Q. Hochschild homology and coho- mology of generalized Weyl algebras: the quantum case. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 63 (2013), 923–956

    2013

  31. [39]

    Two classes of algebras with infinite Hochschild homology, Proc

    Solotar, A.; Vigu´ e-Poirrier M. Two classes of algebras with infinite Hochschild homology, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), 861–869

    2010

  32. [40]

    Jordan, David (ed.) et al., Modern trends in algebra and representation theory

    Treffinger, H.τ-tilting theory – an introduction. Jordan, David (ed.) et al., Modern trends in algebra and representation theory. Based on the LMS autumn algebra school 2020. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 486 (2023), 46–108

    2020

  33. [41]

    Wedderburn, J. H. M. On hypercomplex numbers. Proc. London Math. Soc. 6 (1908), 77–118

    1908

  34. [42]

    Derived equivalences of algebras

    Xi, C. Derived equivalences of algebras. Bull. London Math. Soc. 50 (2018), 945–985

    2018

  35. [43]

    Rafael Laguardia

    Xu, Y.; Zhang, C. On Happel’s question and Snashall-Solberg’s conjecture. Acta Math. Sin., Chin. Ser. 55 (2012), 1067–1084. C.C.: Institut Montpelli´ erain Alexander Grothendieck, CNRS, Univ. Montpellier, France. Claude.Cibils@umontpellier.fr M.L.: Instituto de Matem´ atica y ...

    2012

  36. [2011]

    Abel Symposia 8 (2013), 95–113

    Selected papers of the 8th Abel symposium, Balestrand, Norway, June 20–23, 2011. Abel Symposia 8 (2013), 95–113

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.