Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The paper constructs the one-dimensional self-repelling Brownian polymer with singular local-time drift in an annealed random environment, proves its mollified approximations converge to a unique limit, and shows it is superdiffusive.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-05 05:28 UTC pith:B3TZW5RI

load-bearing objection The annealed construction is real and mostly solid, but the uniqueness theorem claims a wider solution class than the proof covers — fixable, and worth refereeing. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05286 v1 pith:B3TZW5RI submitted 2025-09-05 math.PR

Construction of the 1d Self-repelling Brownian Polymer

Harry Giles , Lukas Gr\"afner This is my paper
classification math.PR MSC 60H1560J5560J6082B41
keywords self-repelling Brownian polymerlocal timesingular SDEsdistributional driftsuperdiffusivityenergy solutionsenvironment processrandom environments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the one-dimensional self-repelling Brownian polymer, the diffusion whose drift is the negative gradient of its own local time, even though this drift is too singular for classical SDE theory. Because the singularity makes the equation meaningless pathwise, the authors work in an annealed setting: the interaction kernel V and the environment ω are drawn from a Gaussian reference measure, and the process is built as the limit of mollified versions. They prove the limit exists, is independent of the mollifier, and satisfies a well-posedness notion called an energy solution, for both the environment process and for the polymer itself. For the canonical delta interaction, the constructed process satisfies superdiffusive bounds t^{5/4} ≲ E[X_t^2] ≲ t^{3/2}, matching the known window from earlier smooth approximations. The construction explicitly does not cover the deterministic case ω ≡ 0, so the results are annealed rather than quenched.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the formal SDE dX_t = dB_t − β^2(∫_0^t ∇δ(X_t−X_s)ds)dt, and more generally dX_t = dB_t − βω(X_t)dt − β^2(∫_0^t ∇V(X_t−X_s)ds)dt for positive-definite V satisfying Assumption 1.1, has a unique annealed solution. The route goes through the environment process η_t seen from the particle: its singular SPDE is solved in the sense of energy solutions, and the polymer is recovered from the identity X_t = B_t − β∫η_s(0)ds, with the driving Brownian motion recovered from the martingale associated to η. Under the assumption that the environment distribution π_0 is absolutely continuous with respect to the Gaussian measure π(V) with square-integrable density, the moll

What carries the argument

The central object is the environment process η_t(x) = ω(x+X_t) + β∫_0^t ∇V(x+X_t−X_s)ds, the field seen from the moving particle, paired with the generator L = L_0 + A on the Gaussian chaos space. The bridging identity is X_t = B_t − β∫_0^t η_s(0)ds, which lets the polymer be defined from the environment. The main mechanism is the notion of energy solution: a martingale problem for L tested only on linear and quadratic cylinder functions, together with the Itô trick, an integrability condition that gives meaning to additive functionals of the singular field. The Brownian motion B is recovered from the martingale M(ℓ_ϕ) by dividing by η_s(∇ϕ), and uniqueness is obtained by solving Kolmogorov

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes the random environment's law is absolutely continuous with respect to the Gaussian reference measure π(V) with square-integrable density, and that the Itô-trick bound has constants uniform in the mollification; the deterministic case ω ≡ 0 is outside the paper's claims.

What would settle it

Take two test functions φ1, φ2 and an allowed environment distribution π_0; the construction recovers Brownian motions B_{φ1}, B_{φ2} from the martingale M(ℓ_φ) via (6.2) and asserts E⟨B_{φ1}−B_{φ2}⟩_t=0. Directly computing this quadratic covariation for a candidate limit — if it came out nonzero — would show the noise depends on the test function and the limiting polymer is not canonical.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • A well-defined 1d SRBP exists for the singular delta interaction and for the wider class of interactions V satisfying Assumption 1.1, independent of the chosen mollifier.
  • The law of the polymer is pinned down by its first two moments: any candidate satisfying the energy-solution conditions with initial environment law π_0 is the same process (Theorem 1.6).
  • The environment process is itself unique and Markov, and in the stationary case keeps the Gaussian law π(V) invariant, so time-stationary analysis is available.
  • For the canonical V=δ, the polymer is superdiffusive in the Tauberian sense: t^{5/4} ≲ E[X_t^2] ≲ t^{3/2}; the general case gives the α-parametrized window of Theorem 1.4.
  • Because convergence holds for every positive-definite mollifier, the constructed limit is not an artifact of one regularization scheme.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same energy-solution route could extend to d≥2 wherever the inner-integral quantity J_1(λ) stays finite, since that condition is scaling critical; the paper notes this possibility but does not carry it out.
  • The discrete 'true' self-avoiding walk is a natural candidate for an energy-solution verification: if its rescaled environment satisfies the Itô trick and moment conditions, uniqueness would give convergence to the SRBP without a separate fixed-point argument.
  • Since ω≡0 is excluded, any statement about the deterministic self-repelling polymer must be read through the annealed average; a quenched construction would require a mechanism that does not rely on absolute continuity against the Gaussian reference.
  • The superdiffusivity window t^{5/4} to t^{3/2} leaves the conjectured t^{4/3} behaviour open; the Markov property of the constructed environment may make sharper bounds accessible through spectral or variational estimates on the generator L.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a rigorous construction of the 1d self-repelling Brownian polymer with a singular interaction V (e.g. V=δ) in an annealed random-environment setting. It defines an environment process η solving a singular SPDE, introduces a notion of energy solution (Definition 3.10), proves existence by mollification and tightness (Section 4), proves uniqueness via a cylinder-function martingale problem and a Kolmogorov backward equation (Section 5), transfers the results to the polymer X (Section 6), and derives superdiffusive bounds in the Tauberian sense (Theorem 1.4). The claimed main results are Theorems 1.3–1.6: mollification-independent limits ENV(V,β,π0) and SRBP(V,β,π0), uniqueness of these limits as energy solutions, and superdiffusive upper/lower bounds.

Significance. If the construction is correct, this is a major contribution: it gives the first rigorous meaning to the 1d self-repelling Brownian polymer with δ-type self-interaction in the annealed setting, together with a dynamical characterisation and superdiffusive bounds matching the known t^{5/4}–t^{3/2} window. The paper contains a substantial and mostly carefully executed technical apparatus: the uniform Itô-trick estimates of Proposition 4.1, the tightness and limit identification in Section 4, the Kolmogorov-backward-equation construction in Theorem 5.2, the scaling argument that removes the smallness condition in Theorem 5.4, and the careful transfer from the environment process to the polymer in Theorem 6.2. The authors are also transparent about the main limitation: the deterministic case ω≡0 is not covered. However, the uniqueness statement in Theorem 1.5 overreaches the proof as written, and the title/abstract overstate the deterministic scope; these points need correction before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 1.5, Definition 3.10, Theorem 3.15] The third bullet of Theorem 1.5 claims that ENV(V,β,π0) is the unique distribution satisfying Definition 3.10. But Definition 3.10(1) only requires the Itô trick for some p0≥1, whereas the bridge to the cylinder-function martingale problem (Theorem 3.15) requires p0>4: the hard-term estimate chooses α,β∈(0,3/4−1/p0) with α+β>1, which is possible only when 3/4−1/p0>1/2, i.e. p0>4; Lemma 3.16 has the same condition. Uniqueness is proved in Theorem 5.4 only for the cylinder-function martingale problem. No argument shows that an arbitrary energy solution with 1≤p0≤4 satisfies that martingale problem. Thus the stated uniqueness among all energy solutions is not established. The proof does establish uniqueness among subsequential limits of the natural approximation (which satisfy the Itô trick for all p), or among energy solutions with p0>4. Please restrict Definition 3.10 to p0>4, or add a pr
  2. [Title/Abstract vs. Section 1.1] The paper advertises construction of the 1d self-repelling Brownian polymer (Eq. (1.1)), but all main theorems concern the annealed law with π0≪π(V), and Section 1.1 explicitly states that the results do not cover ω≡0. Since the deterministic SRBP corresponds to ω≡0, the original object in the title is not actually constructed; what is constructed is an average over random environments. This is a serious scope limitation that should be stated in the abstract and reflected in the title, because it changes the interpretation of Theorems 1.3–1.6 and of the superdiffusivity result. The mathematical content is not invalidated by this, but the presentation overstates the coverage.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.3, Eq. (6.31)] The variational formula contains the symbol S in ⟨Af,(λ−S)^{-1}Af⟩, but S is never defined. It should presumably be L0.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 6.5, uniqueness paragraph] The displayed formula for the observable contains 'g1(Xt1)...g1(Xt1)'; the indices should be distinct, i.e. g1(Xt1)...gn(Xtn).
  3. [General notation] The term 'Itô trick' is sometimes capitalized inconsistently, and the path space notation C(R_{≥0},S'(R)) is introduced without a definition of the topology; this is standard but should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central existence/uniqueness is proved in-text; the paper's self-citations describe method rather than importing an unverified theorem. A p0>4 clause in Definition 3.10 vs Theorem 3.15 leaves a proof gap for the literal uniqueness claim, but that is a correctness issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Central derivation is self-contained: the mollified family is tight (Prop 4.1), subsequential limits are energy solutions (Thm 4.2), and uniqueness is proved inside Section 5 via the Kolmogorov backward equation (Thm 5.2) and the cylinder-function martingale problem (Thm 5.4). The polymer transfer (Thms 6.2, 6.5) is likewise proved internally, with the maps (1.7)/(1.6) shown to be inverses through approximation arguments. Consequently no claim reduces by definition to its own input and nothing is a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction. The self-citations [GPP24, Grä25] concern the semigroup-based method; because the actual a priori bounds and uniqueness argument are reproduced in Sections 5.1-5.2, the citation is not load-bearing as an external unverified fact. The paper itself flags the biggest scope limitation: 'We emphasise that our results do not cover the case ω≡0' (Section 1.1); this is an honest restriction. One genuine gap affects the literal wording of Theorem 1.5: Definition 3.10 requires the Itô trick only for some p0≥1, but Theorem 3.15 requires p0>4 to reach the cylinder-function martingale problem, and the proof of Theorem 1.5 applies Theorem 3.15 to the subsequential limit without proving uniqueness for hypothetical energy solutions with p0≤4. This is a correctness gap (the stated solution class is broader than the uniqueness proof covers), not a circular reduction, so I do not count it as circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters fitted to data; the model inputs are the coupling beta^2, the interaction V under Assumption 1.1, the Gaussian environment measure pi(V), and the mild assumption d pi_0 / d pi in L^2(V), all stated as hypotheses. The smallness constant 1/400 in Theorem 5.2 is a technical device removed by diffusive scaling rather than a physical parameter. No new entities are postulated: the environment process is a standard tool and the energy-solution notion is prior literature. The axioms are dominated by standard Gaussian analysis and by the domain assumption that the annealed random-environment setting, with omega = 0 excluded, is the correct interpretation of the SRBP.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.1: V positive definite, V_hat in L^1_loc, sup over z of integral_{z}^{z+1} V_hat(p) dp finite
    Defines the admissible interaction class; the canonical example is V = delta. Needed for J_s(lambda) < infinity (Prop 3.2) and for the Graded Sector Condition (Lemma 3.4); if it fails the machinery collapses (Remark 3.3).
  • domain assumption The environment is random: law(omega) = pi_0 with pi_0 absolutely continuous w.r.t. pi(V) and d pi_0 / d pi in L^2(V); the deterministic case omega = 0 is excluded
    Section 1.1: 'We emphasise that our results do not cover the case omega = 0.' All subsequent definitions (incompressibility, Ito trick, stationarity of pi(V)) and the recovery of the Brownian motion in Section 6.1 require a random environment.
  • domain assumption Energy-solution characterization, Definition 3.10: Ito trick with p_0 > 4, incompressibility, linear and quadratic martingale problem, and quadratic variation (3.5) capture the unique limiting law
    The limiting object is defined as the unique process satisfying this notion. Uniqueness is proven (Thm 5.4), but the notion itself is the paper's framework, adapted from prior energy-solutions literature, not an independently established standard for this equation.
  • domain assumption Infrared growth conditions: (1.5) for Theorem 1.4, and (6.15) with alpha in (-1, infinity), alpha* < 2 + alpha for Theorem 6.5
    Control the low-frequency behavior of V_hat. They are used for the superdiffusivity weights and for the variance growth of eta_0(grad f_m) in the uniqueness proof of Theorem 6.5. The canonical V = delta (alpha = alpha* = 0) satisfies them.
  • standard math Classical Gaussian analysis background: Bochner-Minlos theorem, chaos decomposition, hypercontractivity, Mitoma tightness, Kolmogorov criteria, martingale problem techniques
    Section 2.1 and throughout; standard tools invoked without proof, cited to Janson, Kallenberg, Mitoma, and others.
  • domain assumption The smallness condition J_1(1) <= 1/400 in Theorem 5.2 is initially imposed to solve Kolmogorov's backward equation, then removed via the diffusive rescaling of Proposition 5.6
    Theorem 5.2 hypothesis. Removal requires scale-invariance of the model; the proof of Proposition 5.6 is omitted ('We omit the proof'), so the invariance of all three conditions in Definition 3.14 must be taken on faith or checked by the reader.

pith-pipeline@v1.4.0-alltime-deepseek-medium · 5406 in / 7976 out tokens · 390614 ms · 2026-08-05T05:28:21.347203+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Construction of the 1d Self-repelling Brownian Polymer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B3TZW5RI

@misc{pith2026250905286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Construction of the 1d Self-repelling Brownian Polymer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B3TZW5RI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05286}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We consider the self-repelling Brownian polymer, introduced in [APP83], which is formally defined as the solution of a singular SDE. The singularity comes from the drift term, which is given by the negative gradient of the local time. We construct a solution of the equation in d = 1, give a dynamic characterisation of its law, and show that it is the limiting distribution for a natural family of approximations. In addition, we show that the solution is superdiffusive. As part of the construction, we consider a singular SPDE which is solved by the (recentered) local time. Using the method of energy solutions, we show that this SPDE is well-posed, and prove that this property can be transferred to the original process. Our results hold for a larger class of drift terms, in which the gradient of the local time is a special case.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the role of positivity preservation for high order approximations of the Dean--Kawasaki equation

    math.PR 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0

    For the spectral regularization of Dean-Kawasaki, superpolynomial weak convergence to N-particle empirical measures holds if and only if the initial density is bounded away from zero; otherwise only polynomial rates a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Armstrong , A

    S. Armstrong , A. Bou-Rabee , and T. Kuusi . Superdiffusive central limit theorem for a B rownian particle in a critically-correlated incompressible random drift. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01115 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    D. J. Amit , G. Parisi , and L. Peliti . Asymptotic behavior of the ``true" self-avoiding walk. Physical Review B 27, no. 3, (1983), 1635--1645. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.27.1635 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.27.1635

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.27.1635 1983

  3. [3]

    Bahouri , J.-Y

    H. Bahouri , J.-Y. Chemin , and R. Danchin . Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, vol. 343 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Butkovsky and L

    O. Butkovsky and L. Mytnik . Weak uniqueness for singular stochastic equations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13780, 2024. Preprint

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Cannizzaro and K

    G. Cannizzaro and K. Chouk . Multidimensional SDEs with singular drift and universal construction of the polymer measure with white noise potential. Annals of Probability 46, no. 3, (2018), 1710--1763

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Catellier and M

    R. Catellier and M. Gubinelli . Averaging along irregular curves and regularisation of odes. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 126, no. 8, (2016), 2323--2366

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Cannizzaro and H

    G. Cannizzaro and H. Giles . An invariance principle for the 2d weakly self-repelling Brownian polymer. Probability Theory and Related Fields (2025). doi:10.1007/s00440-025-01363-y https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-025-01363-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-025-01363-y 2025

  8. [8]

    Cannizzaro , M

    G. Cannizzaro , M. Gubinelli , and F. Toninelli . Gaussian Fluctuations for the Stochastic Burgers Equation in Dimension d 2 . Communications in Mathematical Physics 405, no. 4, (2024), 89. doi:10.1007/s00220-024-04966-z https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-024-04966-z

    doi:10.1007/s00220-024-04966-z 2024

  9. [9]

    Cannizzaro , L

    G. Cannizzaro , L. Haunschmid-Sibitz , and F. Toninelli . Sqrt(log t)-superdiffusivity for a Brownian particle in the curl of the 2d GFF . Annals of Probability 50, no. 6, (2021), 2475--2498

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Chatzigeorgiou , P

    G. Chatzigeorgiou , P. Morfe , F. Otto , and L. Wang . The Gaussian free-field as a stream function: Asymptotics of effective diffusivity in infra-red cut-off. The Annals of Probability 53, no. 4, (2025), 1510--1536. doi:10.1214/24-AOP1740 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/24-AOP1740

    work page doi:10.1214/24-aop1740 2025

  11. [11]

    Delarue and R

    F. Delarue and R. Diel . Rough paths and 1d SDE with a time dependent distributional drift: application to polymers. Probability Theory and Related Fields 165, no. 1-2, (2016), 1--63

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Regularisation by Gaussian rough path lifts of fractional Brownian motions

    K. Dareiotis , M. Gerencsér , K. Lê , and C. Ling . Regularisation by gaussian rough path lifts of fractional brownian motions. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.01645, 2024. Preprint

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    L. C. Evans . Partial Differential Equations. No. v. 19 in Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I, 2nd ed ed., 2010

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Flandoli , E

    F. Flandoli , E. Issoglio , and F. Russo . Multidimensional stochastic differential equations with distributional drift. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 369, (2017), 1665--1688

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Flandoli , F

    F. Flandoli , F. Russo , and J. Wolf . Some sdes with distributional drift.: part ii: lyons-zheng structure, ito's formula and semimartingale characterization. Random Operators and Stochastic Equations 12, no. 02, (2004), 145--184. doi:10.1515/156939704323074700 https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/156939704323074700

    work page doi:10.1515/156939704323074700 2004

  16. [16]

    Galeati and M

    L. Galeati and M. Gubinelli . Noiseless regularisation by noise. Revista Matematica Iberoamericana 38, no. 2, (2022), 433--502

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Galeati and M

    L. Galeati and M. Gerencs \'e r . Solution theory of fractional sdes in complete subcritical regimes. Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 13, no. 12(2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Gubinelli , P

    M. Gubinelli , P. Imkeller , and N. Perkowski . Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs . Forum of Mathematics, Pi 3, no. e6(2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Gubinelli and M

    M. Gubinelli and M. Jara . Regularization by noise and stochastic Burgers equations. Stochastic Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations 1, no. 2, (2013), 325--350

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Gon c alves and M

    P. Gon c alves and M. Jara . Nonlinear Fluctuations of Weakly Asymmetric Interacting Particle Systems . Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 212, no. 2, (2014), 597--644. doi:10.1007/s00205-013-0693-x https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-013-0693-x

    doi:10.1007/s00205-013-0693-x 2014

  21. [21]

    Gubinelli and N

    M. Gubinelli and N. Perkowski . Energy solutions of KPZ are unique. Journal of the American Mathematical Society 31, no. 2, (2018), 427--471. doi:10.1090/jams/889 https://dx.doi.org/10.1090/jams/889

    work page doi:10.1090/jams/889 2018

  22. [22]

    Gubinelli and N

    M. Gubinelli and N. Perkowski . The infinitesimal generator of the stochastic Burgers equation. Probability Theory and Related Fields 178, no. 3-4, (2020), 1067--1124. doi:10.1007/s00440-020-00996-5 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-020-00996-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-020-00996-5 2020

  23. [23]

    Gr \"a fner and N

    L. Gr \"a fner and N. Perkowski . Weak well-posedness of energy solutions to singular SDEs with supercritical distributional drift . https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.09046, 2024. Preprint

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Energy solutions of singular SPDEs on Hilbert spaces with applications to domains with boundary conditions

    L. Gr \"a fner , N. Perkowski , and S. Popat . Energy solutions of singular SPDEs on Hilbert spaces with applications to domains with boundary conditions, 2024. arXiv:2411.07680 https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07680

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Gr \"a fner

    L. Gr \"a fner . Fraktionale stochastische quasigeostrophische Gleichungen auf dem zweidimensionalen Torus. Master's thesis, Humbolt-Universit t zu Berlin, 2021. Master's thesis

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Energy solutions to SDEs with supercritical distributional drift: An extension and weak convergence rates

    L. Gr \"a fner . Energy solutions to SDEs with supercritical distributional drift: A stopping argument . https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.09222, 2024. Preprint

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Gr \"a fner

    L. Gr \"a fner . Energy solutoins and singular s(p)des, 2025. PhD thesis, submitted

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Gubinelli and M

    M. Gubinelli and M. Turra . Hyperviscous stochastic Navier--Stokes equations with white noise invariant measure. Stochastics and Dynamics https://www.worldscientific.com/toc/sd/20/06 20, no. 6(2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    M. Hairer . A theory of regularity structures. Invent. Math. 198, no. 2, (2014), 269--504

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    T. Hida . Brownian Motion . Springer US, New York, NY, 1980. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6030-1 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6030-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6030-1 1980

  31. [31]

    F. A. Harang and N. Perkowski . C^ -regularization of odes perturbed by noise. Stochastics and Dynamics 21, no. 08, (2021), 2140010. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219493721400104 https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219493721400104 . doi:10.1142/S0219493721400104 https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219493721400104

    doi:10.1142/s0219493721400104 2021

  32. [32]

    Horv \'a th , B

    I. Horv \'a th , B. T \'o th , and B. Vet o . Diffusive limits for ``true'' (or myopic) self-avoiding random walks and self-repellent Brownian polymers in d 3. Probability Theory and Related Fields 153, no. 3-4, (2012), 691--726. doi:10.1007/s00440-011-0358-3 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-011-0358-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-011-0358-3 2012

  33. [33]

    Huang and X

    X. Huang and X. Wang . Path dependent mckean-vlasov sdes with hölder continuous diffusion. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S 16, no. 5, (2023), 982--998

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    SDEs with supercritical distributional drifts

    Z. Hao and X. Zhang . SDES WITH SUPERCRITICAL DISTRIBUTIONAL DRIFTS . https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.11145, 2023. Preprint

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    S. Janson . Gaussian Hilbert Spaces . Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526169 https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526169

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526169 1997

  36. [36]

    Kallenberg

    O. Kallenberg . Foundations of Modern Probability , vol. 99 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61871-1 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61871-1

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61871-1 2021

  37. [37]

    Komorowski , C

    T. Komorowski , C. Landim , and S. Olla . Fluctuations in Markov Processes : Time Symmetry and Martingale Approximation , vol. 345 of Grundlehren Der Mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29880-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29880-6

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29880-6 2012

  38. [38]

    Rough weak solutions for singular L\'evy SDEs

    H. Kremp and N. Perkowski . Rough weak solutions for singular L\'e vy SDE s. arXiv:2309.15460 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    true" self-avoiding walks to the T \'o th-Werner

    E. Kosygina and J. Peterson . Convergence of rescaled "true" self-avoiding walks to the T \'o th-Werner "true" self-repelling motion, 2025. arXiv:2502.10960 https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10960

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Luo and R

    D. Luo and R. Zhu . Stochastic mSQG equations with multiplicative transport noises: White noise solutions and scaling limit. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 140, (2021), 236--286

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    I. Mitoma . Tightness of probabilities on C( 0, 1 ; S ') and D( 0, 1 ; S ') . The Annals of Probability 11, no. 4, (1983), 989--999. doi:10.1214/aop/1176993447 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176993447

    arXiv 1983

  42. [42]

    Madras and G

    N. Madras and G. Slade . The Self-Avoiding Walk . Birkh \"a user Boston, Boston, MA, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4132-4 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4132-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4132-4 1996

  43. [43]

    J. R. Norris , L. C. G. Rogers , and D. Williams . Self-avoiding random walk: A Brownian motion model with local time drift. Probability Theory and Related Fields 74, no. 2, (1987), 271--287. doi:10.1007/BF00569993 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00569993

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00569993 1987

  44. [44]

    On some path-dependent SDEs involving distributional drifts

    A. Ohashi , F. Russo , and A. Teixeira . On some path-dependent sdes involving distributional drifts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02384, 2020. Preprint

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor . Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, vol. 293 of A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, 1991

    work page 1991

  46. [46]

    T \'o th

    B. T \'o th . The `` True " Self-Avoiding Walk with Bond Repulsion on Z : Limit Theorems . The Annals of Probability 23, no. 4, (1995), 1523--1556. doi:10.1214/aop/1176987793 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176987793

    work page arXiv 1995

  47. [47]

    Tarr \`e s , B

    P. Tarr \`e s , B. T \'o th , and B. Valk \'o . Diffusivity bounds for 1D Brownian polymers. The Annals of Probability 40, no. 2(2012). doi:10.1214/10-AOP630 https://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-AOP630

    work page doi:10.1214/10-aop630 2012

  48. [48]

    T \'o th and B

    B. T \'o th and B. Valk \'o . Superdiffusive Bounds on Self-repellent Brownian Polymers and Diffusion in the Curl of the Gaussian Free Field in d=2. Journal of Statistical Physics 147, no. 1, (2012), 113--131. doi:10.1007/s10955-012-0462-5 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0462-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-012-0462-5 2012

  49. [49]

    T \'o th and W

    B. T \'o th and W. Werner . The true self-repelling motion. Probability Theory and Related Fields 111, no. 3, (1998), 375--452. doi:10.1007/s004400050172 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004400050172

    doi:10.1007/s004400050172 1998

  50. [50]

    Wang , C

    F.-Y. Wang , C. Yuan , and X.-Y. Zhao . Path-distribution dependent sdes: well-posedness and asymptotic log-harnack inequality. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S (2025). doi:10.3934/dcdss.2025109 https://dx.doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2025109

    work page doi:10.3934/dcdss.2025109 2025

  51. [51]

    Zhang and G

    X. Zhang and G. Zhao . Heat kernel and ergodicity of sdes with distributional drifts. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10537, 2017. Preprint

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017