pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.08626 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-10 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · hep-ex

Measurement of D⁰ meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex hep-ex
keywords D0 meson photoproductionultraperipheral collisionsnuclear PDFslead nucleiheavy ion collisionsphotonuclear processesCMS experiment
0
0 comments X

The pith

The first measurement of D0 meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral lead-lead collisions characterizes nuclear parton distributions at low momentum fractions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the initial observation of D0 mesons produced when a photon from one lead nucleus interacts with the other in ultraperipheral collisions. Events are selected by detecting neutrons from the breakup of one nucleus while ensuring no particles appear in the forward region associated with the intact nucleus. The D0 is identified through its decay to a kaon and pion, allowing extraction of the production cross section in bins of transverse momentum and rapidity. These data are then compared against theoretical predictions from perturbative quantum chromodynamics using updated nuclear parton distribution functions and from the color glass condensate model. Such a measurement matters because it directly tests how partons are distributed inside heavy nuclei at very small fractional momenta, a regime important for understanding high-energy nuclear collisions.

Core claim

The central discovery is the measurement of the D0 meson cross section in photonuclear processes within ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 5.36 TeV. Using 1.34 nb^{-1} of data, the CMS experiment reconstructs D0 via the K- pi+ channel and reports differential cross sections as functions of the D0 transverse momentum and rapidity. This provides the first experimental characterization of the lead nuclear parton distribution functions for parton fractional momenta x ranging from a few times 10^{-4} to 10^{-2} at different hard scales Q^2, through comparison with next-to-leading-order pQCD calculations and color glass condensate predictions.

What carries the argument

The photonuclear production cross section of D0 mesons, measured differentially in transverse momentum and rapidity, which probes the nuclear parton distribution functions when compared to theoretical models.

If this is right

  • The data constrain the nuclear PDFs of lead in the low-x region.
  • The results test the validity of NLO pQCD calculations for this process.
  • Comparisons with CGC predictions assess the role of gluon saturation effects.
  • Future measurements can extend this to higher precision or other heavy flavors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar photonuclear measurements could be performed at other facilities to map nuclear structure across different energies.
  • This approach may help resolve uncertainties in modeling initial conditions for quark-gluon plasma studies in heavy-ion collisions.
  • Extending the analysis to other decay channels or particles would provide complementary constraints on the PDFs.

Load-bearing premise

The event selection using neutron emissions from nuclear breakup and the absence of particles in a large rapidity gap toward the photon-emitting nucleus sufficiently isolates pure photonuclear interactions without significant hadronic contamination.

What would settle it

A significant discrepancy between the measured cross sections and both the pQCD and CGC predictions that cannot be accounted for by systematic uncertainties would indicate that the measurement does not accurately reflect the nuclear PDFs in the claimed x range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08626 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Invariant mass distribution of D0 mesons with 5 < pT < 8 GeV and 0.0 < y < 1.0. The description of the fit template is provided in the text. The combinatorial background, arising from track pairs unrelated to genuine D0 meson decays, is modeled with an exponential function whose slope and normalization are determined from the fit. The signal shape consists of a superposition of two Gaussian functions shari… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cross sections for D0 production in γN events (Xn0n + 0nXn) in three pT intervals. Vertical bars (brackets) indicate statistical (systematic) uncertainties. Sub-panels show theory￾over-data ratios: the middle panel compares GγA-FONLL with EPPS21 lead nPDFs and a CGC calculation [15], while the bottom panel shows GγA-FONLL with CT18NLO proton PDFs. Light-shaded bands reflect scale variations, hatched bands … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This Letter reports the first measurement of photonuclear D$^0$ meson production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions. The study is performed using lead-lead collision data, with an integrated luminosity of 1.34 nb$^{-1}$, collected by the CMS experiment at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 5.36 TeV. Photonuclear events, where one of the colliding nuclei breaks up and the other remains intact, are selected based on breakup neutron emissions and by requiring no particle activity in a large rapidity interval in the direction of the photon-emitting nucleus. The D$^0$ mesons are reconstructed via the D$^0$ $\to$ K$^-$$\pi^+$ decay channel, with the cross section measured as a function of D$^0$ meson transverse momentum and rapidity. The results are compared with next-to-leading-order perturbative QCD calculations that employ recent parametrizations of the lead nuclear parton distribution functions, as well as with predictions based on the color glass condensate framework. This measurement is the first photonuclear collision study characterizing parton distribution functions of lead nuclei for parton fractional momenta $x$ (relative to the nucleon) ranging approximately from a few 10$^{-4}$ to 10$^{-2}$ for different hard energy scale $Q^2$ selections.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first measurement of D0 meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.36 TeV with the CMS experiment, using 1.34 nb^{-1} of data. Photonuclear events are selected via neutron breakup from one nucleus combined with no particle activity in a large rapidity gap in the photon-emitting direction. D0 candidates are reconstructed in the K- pi+ decay channel, and differential cross sections are presented as functions of D0 pT and rapidity. The results are compared to NLO pQCD calculations employing recent lead nuclear PDF parametrizations and to color-glass-condensate predictions; the work claims to characterize nuclear PDFs at x approximately 10^{-4} to 10^{-2} for varying Q2 scales.

Significance. If the photonuclear purity is quantitatively validated, the measurement supplies the first direct experimental probe of lead nuclear parton distributions via photonuclear D0 production at low x, offering new constraints on gluon modifications and potential saturation effects. The direct comparison to both NLO pQCD with nPDFs and CGC frameworks is a strength, as is the use of a well-defined decay channel in a high-luminosity UPC dataset.

major comments (1)
  1. [Event selection] Event selection section: The claim that the selected events allow characterization of nuclear PDFs at x ~ 10^{-4}–10^{-2} rests on the assumption that hadronic contamination is negligible. The manuscript must supply a quantitative estimate of the residual hadronic fraction (from simulation or data-driven sidebands), together with its uncertainty, to anchor the mapping from observed yield to nuclear PDF modification.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction should explicitly quote the measured x range with the corresponding Q2 selections used in the comparison.
  2. [Results] Figure captions for the cross-section plots should state the rapidity and pT binning explicitly and indicate whether the data points include statistical and systematic uncertainties.
  3. [Systematic uncertainties] A short table summarizing the dominant systematic uncertainties (e.g., tracking efficiency, background subtraction, luminosity) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive comment on the event selection. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Event selection] Event selection section: The claim that the selected events allow characterization of nuclear PDFs at x ~ 10^{-4}–10^{-2} rests on the assumption that hadronic contamination is negligible. The manuscript must supply a quantitative estimate of the residual hadronic fraction (from simulation or data-driven sidebands), together with its uncertainty, to anchor the mapping from observed yield to nuclear PDF modification.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that a quantitative estimate of residual hadronic contamination is required to rigorously validate the photonuclear purity and to support the interpretation of the results in terms of nuclear PDF modifications. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph to the Event Selection section that reports this estimate, obtained from a combination of Monte Carlo simulations of hadronic Pb-Pb interactions (scaled to the data luminosity) and a data-driven sideband method in the D0 invariant-mass distribution. The resulting hadronic fraction is found to be small (a few percent) with a well-quantified uncertainty; this contribution is included in the systematic uncertainty budget and does not affect the mapping of the measured cross section to the x range of approximately 10^{-4} to 10^{-2}. The updated text now explicitly anchors the claim made in the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurement compared to independent external calculations

full rationale

The paper reports a direct measurement of D0 photoproduction cross sections in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions using CMS data. Event selection relies on breakup neutrons and rapidity gaps, with results compared to external NLO pQCD calculations employing nuclear PDFs and to CGC predictions. No internal equations, fits, or self-citations reduce the measured yields or the PDF characterization claim to parameters defined within the paper itself. The derivation chain consists of experimental reconstruction and comparison to independent theory inputs, with no self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing reductions present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental measurement relying on established particle physics techniques and prior theoretical frameworks for comparison. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the measurement itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in heavy ion collision event selection and particle reconstruction are valid.
    The paper relies on established methods for identifying ultraperipheral collisions and reconstructing D0 decays via the K pi channel.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5758 in / 1410 out tokens · 51744 ms · 2026-05-18T17:44:00.226872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measurement of jet photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions without nuclear breakup at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First measurement of γ+IP→jets cross-sections in 0n0n ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, achieved by statistically separating photon-pomeron, photon-photon, and peripheral photonuclear contributions via te...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Probing small $x$ parton densities in ultraperipheral $AA$ and $pA$ collisions at the LHC

    M. Strikman, R. Vogt, and S. N. White, “Probing smallxparton densities in ultraperipheral AA and pA collisions at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 082001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.082001,arXiv:hep-ph/0508296

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.082001 2006

  2. [2]

    Photonuclear and two-photon interactions at high-energy nuclear colliders

    S. Klein and P . Steinberg, “Photonuclear and two-photon interactions at high-energy nuclear colliders”,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 323, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923,arXiv:2005.01872

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923 2020

  3. [3]

    Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Rept.1115(2025) 219,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.007, arXiv:2405.10785

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.007 2025

  4. [4]

    Heavy Quark Photoproduction in Ultra-peripheral Heavy Ion Collisions

    S. R. Klein, J. Nystrand, and R. Vogt, “Heavy quark photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions”,Phys. Rev. C66(2002) 044906, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.044906,arXiv:hep-ph/0206220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.044906 2002

  5. [5]

    Inclusive open charm photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC with GγA-FONLL

    M. Cacciari, G. M. Innocenti, and A. M. Sta ´sto, “Inclusive open charm photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC with GγA-FONLL”, 6, 2025.arXiv:2506.09893

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Charm, Beauty and Top at HERA

    O. Behnke, A. Geiser, and M. Lisovyi, “Charm, beauty and top at HERA”,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.84(2015) 1,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.06.002,arXiv:1506.07519

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.06.002 2015

  7. [7]

    D-meson production in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$ TeV and in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “D-meson production in p-Pb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV and in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV”,Phys. Rev. C94(2016) 054908, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054908,arXiv:1605.07569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.054908 2016

  8. [8]

    Study of prompt D$^0$ meson production in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=5 TeV

    LHCb Collaboration, “Study of prompt D 0 meson production inpPb collisions at√sNN =5 TeV”,JHEP10(2017) 090,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)090, arXiv:1707.02750

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)090 2017

  9. [9]

    Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high-multiplicity pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\mathrm{NN}}} =$ 8.16 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high-multiplicity pPb collisions at √sNN =8.16 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 082301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.082301,arXiv:1804.09767

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.082301 2018

  10. [10]

    Λ + c production and baryon-to-meson ratios in pp and p-Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV at the LHC

    ALICE Collaboration, “Λ + c production and baryon-to-meson ratios in pp and p-Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 202301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.202301,arXiv:2011.06078

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.202301 2021

  11. [11]

    Observation of strangeness enhancement with charmed mesons in high-multiplicitypPb collisions at √sNN = 8.16 TeV

    LHCb Collaboration, “Observation of strangeness enhancement with charmed mesons in high-multiplicitypPb collisions at √sNN = 8.16 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D110(2023) L031105, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L031105,arXiv:2311.08490. 8

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.l031105 2023

  12. [12]

    Peripheral heavy ion collisions as a probe of the nuclear gluon distribution

    V . P . Goncalves and C. A. Bertulani, “Peripheral heavy ion collisions as a probe of the nuclear gluon distribution”,Phys. Rev. C65(2002) 054905, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.054905,arXiv:hep-ph/0110370

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.054905 2002

  13. [13]

    The QCD Pomeron in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions: III. Photonuclear production of heavy quarks

    V . P . Goncalves and M. V . T. Machado, “The QCD pomeron in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions. 3. Photonuclear production of heavy quarks”,Eur. Phys. J. C31(2003) 371, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01348-4,arXiv:hep-ph/0308120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01348-4 2003

  14. [14]

    Nuclear effects in photoproduction of heavy quarks and vector mesons in ultraperipheral PbPb and pPb collisions at the LHC

    A. Adeluyi, C. A. Bertulani, and M. J. Murray, “Nuclear effects in photoproduction of heavy quarks and vector mesons in ultraperipheral PbPb and pPb collisions at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. C86(2012) 047901,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.047901, arXiv:1208.6258

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.86.047901 2012

  15. [15]

    Gimeno-Estivill, T

    P . Gimeno-Estivill, T. Lappi, and H. M¨antysaari, “Inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions”, 3, 2025.arXiv:2503.16108

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2025.doi:10.17182/hepdata.156822

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.156822 2025

  17. [17]

    Performance of the CMS Zero Degree Calorimeters in pPb collisions at the LHC

    O. Sur ´anyi et al., “Performance of the CMS Zero Degree Calorimeters in pPb collisions at the LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05008,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05008, arXiv:2102.06640

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05008 2021

  18. [18]

    L1 trigger and ZDC performance during 2023 heavy ion run

    CMS Collaboration, “L1 trigger and ZDC performance during 2023 heavy ion run”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2024-002, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  20. [20]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  21. [21]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  22. [22]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  23. [23]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019

  24. [24]

    A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    C. Bierlich et al., “A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3”, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022(2022) 8,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8, arXiv:2203.11601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.8 2022

  25. [25]

    Simulations of photo-nuclear dijets with Pythia 8 and their sensitivity to nuclear PDFs

    I. Helenius, “Simulations of photo-nuclear dijets with Pythia 8 and their sensitivity to nuclear PDFs”,PoSDIS2018(2018) 113,doi:10.22323/1.316.0113, arXiv:1806.07326

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.316.0113 2018

  26. [26]

    New 5-flavor LO analysis and parametrization of parton distributions in the real photon

    F. Cornet, P . Jankowski, M. Krawczyk, and A. Lorca, “New 5-flavor LO analysis and parametrization of parton distributions in the real photon”,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 014010,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.014010. References 9

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.014010 2003

  27. [27]

    EPPS21: a global QCD analysis of nuclear PDFs

    K. J. Eskola, P . Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, “EPPS21: a global QCD analysis of nuclear PDFs”,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 413, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10359-0,arXiv:2112.12462

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10359-0 2022

  28. [28]

    Agostinelli, et al., Nucl

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4 — a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  29. [29]

    The EvtGen particle decay simulation package

    D. J. Lange, “TheEVTGENparticle decay simulation package”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462(2001) 152,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00089-4 2001

  30. [30]

    PHOTOS: A universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays

    E. Barberio, B. van Eijk, and Z. Was, “PHOTOS: A universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays”,Comput. Phys. Commun.66(1991) 115, doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90012-A

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90012-a 1991

  31. [31]

    Nuclear modification factor of D$^0$ mesons in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Nuclear modification factor of D 0 mesons in PbPb collisions at√sNN =5.02 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 474, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.05.074,arXiv:1708.04962

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.05.074 2018

  32. [32]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  33. [33]

    Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group, “Review of particle physics”,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  34. [34]

    Improving vertex position determination by using a kinematic fit

    G. E. Forden and D. H. Saxon, “Improving vertex position determination by using a kinematic fit”, technical report, RAL, Chilton, 1985

    work page 1985

  35. [35]

    Measurement of the cross section for electromagnetic dissociation with neutron emission in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76$ TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “Measurement of the cross section for electromagnetic dissociation with neutron emission in PbPb Collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 252302,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.252302,arXiv:1203.2436

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.252302 2012

  36. [36]

    Search for the rare decay D 0 →µ +µ− in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13.6 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for the rare decay D 0 →µ +µ− in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13.6 TeV”, 6, 2025.arXiv:2506.06152. Submitted toPhys. Rev. Lett

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    CMS luminosity measurement for nucleus-nucleus collisions at 5.02 TeV in Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for nucleus-nucleus collisions at 5.02 TeV in Run 2”, technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    The p_T Spectrum in Heavy-Flavour Hadroproduction

    M. Cacciari, M. Greco, and P . Nason, “Thep T spectrum in heavy-flavor hadroproduction.”,JHEP05(1998) 007,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/05/007, arXiv:hep-ph/9803400

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/05/007 1998

  39. [39]

    The p_T Spectrum in Heavy-Flavour Photoproduction

    M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, and P . Nason, “Thep T spectrum in heavy-flavor photoproduction”,JHEP03(2001) 006,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/03/006, arXiv:hep-ph/0102134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/03/006 2001

  40. [40]

    Phenomenological study of charm photoproduction at HERA

    S. Frixione and P . Nason, “Phenomenological study of charm photoproduction at HERA”,JHEP03(2002) 053,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/053, arXiv:hep-ph/0201281

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/053 2002

  41. [41]

    Spatial resolution of dijet photoproduction in near-encounter ultraperipheral nuclear collisions

    K. J. Eskola et al., “Spatial resolution of dijet photoproduction in near-encounter ultraperipheral nuclear collisions”,Phys. Rev. C110(2024) 054906, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.054906,arXiv:2404.09731. 10

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.054906 2024

  42. [42]

    New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC

    T.-J. Hou et al., “New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 014013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014013,arXiv:1912.10053. 11 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia V . Chekhovsky, A. Hayrapetyan, V . Makarenko , A. Tumasyan1 Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, V...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.014013 2021