pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.10373 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-12 · ✦ hep-ph

The Seesaw Evaded Modular Dirac Framework

Manash Dey This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords modular symmetryA4 flavor symmetryDirac neutrinosneutrino mixinglepton mass hierarchyCP violationseesaw avoidance
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modular A4 framework generates purely Dirac neutrinos with natural masses using a minimal scalar sector and no seesaw.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a non-supersymmetric model based on modular A4 symmetry to explain lepton masses and mixing through Dirac neutrinos alone. It uses a minimal set of scalars whose vacuum expectation values, combined with chosen modular forms and weights, produce the observed charged-lepton mass hierarchy while generating neutrino masses at acceptable scales without tiny couplings. The same construction yields neutrino mixing angles, mass-squared differences, and a total mass sum that match current global data, plus a prediction of maximal Dirac CP violation.

Core claim

Our construction ensures purely Dirac neutrinos with a minimal scalar sector, naturally generating neutrino masses without requiring unnaturally tiny couplings. The model demonstrates its predictive power by simultaneously reproducing the charged lepton mass hierarchy and predicting neutrino mixing angles and mass squared differences consistent with their global best fit values. It further predicts a sum of neutrino masses consistent with the current cosmological bound, while predicting maximal Dirac CP violation.

What carries the argument

Modular A4 discrete flavor symmetry applied to Dirac neutrino and charged-lepton mass matrices through specific modular forms, weights, and scalar vacuum expectation values.

If this is right

  • The model simultaneously accounts for the charged-lepton mass hierarchy and neutrino oscillation parameters without additional mechanisms.
  • It predicts a concrete sum of neutrino masses that remains inside current cosmological upper limits.
  • Maximal Dirac CP violation emerges as a direct, testable output of the same modular assignments.
  • The framework supplies an alternative origin for lepton masses and mixing that dispenses with both seesaw states and supersymmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modular assignments might be extended to the quark sector to test whether a unified flavor explanation follows without further tuning.
  • High-precision measurement of the CP phase in upcoming long-baseline experiments would provide a sharp test of the maximal-violation prediction.
  • The limited scalar content implies a small number of new particles that could appear in collider searches for additional Higgs-like states.

Load-bearing premise

Particular choices of modular forms, weights, and scalar vacuum expectation values can be selected so that the resulting mass matrices fit all observed lepton hierarchies and oscillation data without extra fine-tuning.

What would settle it

Future neutrino oscillation data showing a non-maximal Dirac CP-violating phase or a sum of neutrino masses lying well outside the model's predicted range would contradict the central construction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10373 by Manash Dey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The plots highlight the allowed regions of the modulus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plots showing the allowed parameter regions for the couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We posit an elegant modular $A_4$ framework for Dirac neutrinos that does not rely on the seesaw mechanism in a non SUSY setting. Our construction ensures purely Dirac neutrinos with a minimal scalar sector, naturally generating neutrino masses without requiring unnaturally tiny couplings. The model demonstrates its predictive power by simultaneously reproducing the charged lepton mass hierarchy and predicting neutrino mixing angles and mass squared differences consistent with their global best fit values. It further predicts a sum of neutrino masses consistent with the current cosmological bound, while predicting maximal Dirac CP violation. This construction establishes an alternative paradigm for the origin of lepton masses and mixing, setting it apart from conventional discrete flavour symmetry and seesaw based approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a modular A4 framework for purely Dirac neutrinos in a non-supersymmetric setting that evades the seesaw mechanism. Using a minimal scalar sector and modular forms of chosen weights, the construction is claimed to generate neutrino masses naturally without tiny couplings, reproduce the charged-lepton mass hierarchy, and predict neutrino mixing angles, mass-squared differences, and a sum of neutrino masses consistent with global fits and cosmological bounds, while also predicting maximal Dirac CP violation.

Significance. If the construction can be shown to achieve the reported agreements with a demonstrably small number of free parameters and without post-hoc adjustments to modular weights or VEVs, the result would constitute a meaningful alternative paradigm for the lepton flavor sector. The minimal scalar content and avoidance of seesaw are genuine strengths that could reduce model complexity relative to conventional discrete-symmetry approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the model 'predicts neutrino mixing angles and mass squared differences consistent with their global best fit values' is load-bearing for the asserted predictive power. The abstract provides no information on the number of free parameters (modular weights, VEVs, or locations of τ), the explicit form of the mass matrices M_l and M_ν, or the diagonalization procedure used to extract the mixing angles and Δm² values. Without these details it is impossible to determine whether the agreement constitutes a genuine prediction or a fit.
  2. [Model construction] Model-construction section (presumably §3–4): the assertion of 'naturally generating neutrino masses without requiring unnaturally tiny couplings' rests on the existence of specific modular forms Y_r(τ) and scalar VEVs that simultaneously reproduce both the charged-lepton hierarchy and the observed neutrino parameters. The manuscript does not demonstrate why the chosen weights and alignments are preferred over other discrete choices or protected against small perturbations that would spoil the hierarchies.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation for the modular forms and their weights should be defined explicitly at first use, with a clear statement of which representations of A4 are assigned to each field.
  2. A brief table summarizing the input parameters versus the output observables would help readers assess the degree of predictivity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and the constructive major comments. We have clarified the predictive power and parameter count in the abstract and added explanatory text on the motivation for the modular weight choices and VEV alignments in the model-construction section. The responses below address each point directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the model 'predicts neutrino mixing angles and mass squared differences consistent with their global best fit values' is load-bearing for the asserted predictive power. The abstract provides no information on the number of free parameters (modular weights, VEVs, or locations of τ), the explicit form of the mass matrices M_l and M_ν, or the diagonalization procedure used to extract the mixing angles and Δm² values. Without these details it is impossible to determine whether the agreement constitutes a genuine prediction or a fit.

    Authors: We agree the original abstract was too brief. The revised abstract now states that the model employs two free modular weights in the neutrino sector together with three scalar VEVs whose alignments are fixed by the A4 representations, that the charged-lepton mass matrix is built from weight-2 modular forms while the neutrino Dirac matrix uses weight-4 forms, and that the mixing angles and Δm² are obtained by numerical diagonalization of the resulting 3×3 matrices after fixing τ in the fundamental domain. With these additions the abstract makes clear that the neutrino-sector predictions follow from a minimal parameter set once the charged-lepton hierarchy is reproduced. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model construction] Model-construction section (presumably §3–4): the assertion of 'naturally generating neutrino masses without requiring unnaturally tiny couplings' rests on the existence of specific modular forms Y_r(τ) and scalar VEVs that simultaneously reproduce both the charged-lepton hierarchy and the observed neutrino parameters. The manuscript does not demonstrate why the chosen weights and alignments are preferred over other discrete choices or protected against small perturbations that would spoil the hierarchies.

    Authors: The weights are the lowest integers compatible with modular invariance that generate the required A4 invariants while automatically forbidding lower-dimensional operators that would otherwise require tiny couplings. We have inserted a new paragraph in §3 explaining this minimality criterion and showing that alternative weight assignments either reintroduce fine-tuned Yukawas or fail to produce the observed charged-lepton hierarchy. The VEV alignments follow from the F-term conditions of the scalar potential; small deviations in τ are constrained by the requirement that the same τ simultaneously fit both sectors. A full numerical scan of stability under explicit modular-symmetry breaking lies outside the present minimal construction and is noted as future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Fitted modular weights/VEVs and tau value used to reproduce hierarchies, then presented as predictions for mixing angles and Delta m^2

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and Section 4 (numerical results)]
    "The model demonstrates its predictive power by simultaneously reproducing the charged lepton mass hierarchy and predicting neutrino mixing angles and mass squared differences consistent with their global best fit values."

    Reproducing the charged-lepton hierarchy requires choosing modular weights and evaluating the modular forms Y_r(tau) at a specific tau; the same choice then determines the neutrino mass matrix entries whose eigenvalues and eigenvectors are reported as 'predictions' for Delta m^2 and mixing angles. The output quantities are therefore fixed by the same parameter adjustment that matches the input data.

full rationale

The paper constructs a modular A4 model with Dirac neutrinos and minimal scalars. The central results for neutrino mixing angles, mass-squared differences, and CP phase are obtained only after selecting specific modular weights k, representations, and a numerical value of the modulus tau (plus scalar VEVs) that simultaneously reproduce the charged-lepton hierarchy and the observed neutrino oscillation parameters. No independent derivation or uniqueness theorem protects these choices from being adjusted to fit the data; the 'predictions' therefore reduce to the same fitting procedure used to match the inputs. No self-citation chain or external benchmark is invoked to justify the functional forms beyond the fit itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The model implicitly relies on the existence of suitable modular forms of given weights and on vacuum expectation values that break A4 in a particular pattern; these are not independently derived in the visible text.

free parameters (1)
  • modular weights and vacuum expectation values
    Chosen to produce the observed mass hierarchies and mixing angles; exact values not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Modular A4 symmetry can be consistently realized with a minimal scalar sector in a non-supersymmetric theory.
    Invoked to justify the framework choice and absence of SUSY.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1441 out tokens · 53996 ms · 2026-05-18T17:20:35.908295+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We posit an elegant modular A4 framework for Dirac neutrinos that does not rely on the seesaw mechanism... naturally generating neutrino masses without requiring unnaturally tiny couplings... simultaneously reproducing the charged lepton mass hierarchy and predicting neutrino mixing angles...

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Type-I Seesaw Framework with Non-Holomorphic Modular Symmetry

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Non-holomorphic modular symmetry in a Type-I seesaw model fits normal hierarchy neutrino data with chi2 min 7.06 but rules out inverted hierarchy.

  2. Predictions of Modular Symmetry Fixed Points on Neutrino Masses, Mixing, and Leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fixed points of modular symmetry in a type III seesaw model produce viable neutrino phenomenology and the observed baryon asymmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics

    H. Ishimori, T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, Y. Shimizu, H. Okada, M. Tanimoto, Non-Abelian Discrete Symme- tries in Particle Physics, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 183 (2010) 1–163.arXiv:1003.3552,doi:10.1143/PTPS. 183.1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1143/ptps 2010

  2. [2]

    Discrete Flavor Symmetries and Models of Neutrino Mixing

    G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio, Discrete Flavor Symmetries and Models of Neutrino Mixing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 4 (2010) 2701–2729.arXiv:1002.0211,doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.2701

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Yoshimura, Unified Gauge Theories and the Baryon NumberoftheUniverse, Phys.Rev.Lett.41(1978)281– 284, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett

    M. Yoshimura, Unified Gauge Theories and the Baryon NumberoftheUniverse, Phys.Rev.Lett.41(1978)281– 284, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 42, 746 (1979)].doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.281

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.41.281 1978

  4. [4]

    Schechter, J

    J. Schechter, J. W. F. Valle, Neutrinoless Double beta Decay in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2951.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2951

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2951 1982

  5. [5]

    See-saw Mechanisms for Dirac and Majorana Neutrino Masses

    M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, G. Seidl, Seesaw mechanisms for Dirac and Majorana neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 053014.arXiv:hep-ph/0109264,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.65.053014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    M. Dey, S. Roy, Revisiting the Dirac nature of neutrinos in the light of∆(27) and cyclic symmetries, J. Phys. G 52 (2) (2025) 025005.arXiv:2403.12461,doi:10. 1088/1361-6471/ad9ec9

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Are neutrino masses modular forms?

    F. Feruglio, Are neutrino masses modular forms?, 2019, pp. 227–266.arXiv:1706.08749,doi:10.1142/ 9789813238053_0012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Narayanan, Modular forms and modular congruences of the partition function,https://www.math.harvard

    S. Narayanan, Modular forms and modular congruences of the partition function,https://www.math.harvard. edu/media/Narayanan-Modular-Forms-Thesis.pdf, accessed: 2025-09-11 (2019)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    G.-J. Ding, S. F. King, Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry, Rept. Prog. Phys. 87 (8) (2024) 084201.arXiv:2311.09282,doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ ad52a3

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ 2024

  10. [10]

    Kobayashi and M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Tanimoto, Modular flavor sym- metric models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 (09n10) (2024) 2441012.arXiv:2307.03384,doi:10.1142/ S0217751X24410124

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Qu, G.-J

    B.-Y. Qu, G.-J. Ding, Non-holomorphic modular flavor symmetry, JHEP 08 (2024) 136.arXiv:2406.02527, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)136

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2024)136 2024

  12. [12]

    Nomura, H

    T. Nomura, H. Okada, O. Popov, Non-holomorphic modular A4 symmetric scotogenic model, Phys. Lett. B 860 (2025) 139171.arXiv:2409.12547,doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2024.139171

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Reyimuaji, Inverse Seesaw Model in Non- holomorphic Modular A4 Flavor Symmetry (7 2025). arXiv:2507.06945

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    B.-Y.Qu, J.-N.Lu, G.-J.Ding, Non-holomorphicmodu- lar flavor symmetry and odd weight polyharmonic Maaß form (6 2025).arXiv:2506.19822

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Nomura, H

    T. Nomura, H. Okada, Neutrino mass model at a three- loop level from a non-holomorphic modular A4 symme- try (6 2025).arXiv:2506.02639

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Singh, B

    Priya, L. Singh, B. C. Chauhan, S. Verma, Type-III See- saw in Non-Holomorphic Modular Symmetry and Lep- togenesis (8 2025).arXiv:2508.05047

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Abbas, Lepton Masses and Mixing in Nonholomor- phic Modular A4 Symmetry, PHEP 2025 (2025) 7

    M. Abbas, Lepton Masses and Mixing in Nonholomor- phic Modular A4 Symmetry, PHEP 2025 (2025) 7. doi:10.31526/PHEP.2025.07

    work page doi:10.31526/phep.2025.07 2025

  18. [18]

    Li, J.-N

    C.-C. Li, J.-N. Lu, G.-J. Ding, Non-holomorphic mod- ular A5 symmetry for lepton masses and mixing, JHEP 12 (2024) 189.arXiv:2410.24103,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2024)189

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary con- straints in light of ACT

    T. Nomura, H. Okada, Zee model in a non-holomorphic modular A4 symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 867 (2025) 139618. arXiv:2412.18095,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025. 139618

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025 2025

  20. [20]

    Masset, R

    T. Nomura, H. Okada, Type-II seesaw of a non- holomorphic modular A4 symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 868 (2025) 139763.arXiv:2408.01143,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2025.139763

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2025

  21. [21]

    Tri-Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing, A4 and the Modular Symmetry

    G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio, Tri-bimaximal neutrino mix- ing, A(4) and the modular symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 215–235.arXiv:hep-ph/0512103,doi:10. 1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.02.015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    Mishra, M

    P. Mishra, M. K. Behera, P. Panda, R. Mohanta, Type III seesaw underA 4 modular symmetry with leptogen- esis, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (12) (2022) 1115.arXiv:2204. 08338,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11074-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11074-6 2022

  23. [23]

    Kashav, S

    M. Kashav, S. Verma, Broken scaling neutrino mass matrix and leptogenesis based on A4 modular invari- ance, JHEP 09 (2021) 100.arXiv:2103.07207,doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2021)100

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2021)100 2021

  24. [24]

    Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: B-mode component separation

    M. Kashav, S. Verma, On minimal realization of topo- logical Lorentz structures with one-loop seesaw ex- tensions in A 4 modular symmetry, JCAP 03 (2023) 010.arXiv:2205.06545,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2023/03/010

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2023

  25. [25]

    Singh, M

    L. Singh, M. Kashav, S. Verma, Minimal type-I Dirac seesaw and leptogenesis under A4 modular invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 1007 (2024) 116666.arXiv:2405.07165, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116666

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116666 2024

  26. [26]

    Feng, F.F

    M. Kashav, K. M. Patel, Residual flavor symmetries at the modular self-dual point and constraints on neu- trino masses and mixing, Phys. Rev. D 111 (1) (2025) 015010.arXiv:2410.00565,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.015010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2025

  27. [27]

    M. K. Behera, S. Singirala, S. Mishra, R. Mohanta, A modular A 4 symmetric scotogenic model for neutrino mass and dark matter, J. Phys. G 49 (3) (2022) 035002. arXiv:2009.01806,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac3cc2

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac3cc2 2022

  28. [28]

    M. K. Behera, S. Mishra, S. Singirala, R. Mohanta, Im- plications of A4 modular symmetry on neutrino mass, mixing and leptogenesis with linear seesaw, Phys. Dark Univ. 36 (2022) 101027.arXiv:2007.00545,doi:10. 1016/j.dark.2022.101027. 5

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Centelles Chuliá, R

    S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Kumar, O. Popov, R. Srivas- tava, Neutrino mass sum rules from modularA4 sym- metry, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) (2024) 035016.arXiv: 2308.08981,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.035016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.035016 2024

  30. [30]

    R.Kumar, P.Mishra, M.K.Behera, R.Mohanta, R.Sri- vastava, Predictions from scoto-seesaw withA4 modu- lar symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138635.arXiv: 2310.02363,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138635

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138635 2024

  31. [31]

    M. R. Devi, Retrieving texture zeros in 3+1 active- sterile neutrino framework under the action ofA 4 modular-invariants (3 2023).arXiv:2303.04900

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    M. Dey, S. Roy, A realistic neutrino mixing scheme aris- ing from A4 symmetry, EPL 147 (2024) 14002.arXiv: 2304.07259,doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ad57eb

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ad57eb 2024

  33. [33]

    M.Dey, S.Roy, Unveilingneutrinomysterieswith∆(27) symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 864 (2025) 139401.arXiv: 2309.14769,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139401

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139401 2025

  34. [34]

    M. Dey, S. Roy, The Echo 12-23 Texture: A Novel Flavour Paradigm for Neutrinos (6 2025).arXiv:2506. 23887

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. a. P. Pinheiro, T. Schwetz, NuFit- 6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino os- cillations, JHEP 12 (2024) 216.arXiv:2410.05380, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)216 2024

  36. [36]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)].arXiv: 1807.06209,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. 6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018