Euclid preparation. XCVIII. Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid (CLOE). 5: Extensions beyond the standard modelling of theoretical probes and systematic effects
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:21 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Euclid's CLOE likelihood now incorporates magnification bias in spectroscopic galaxy clustering and handles massive neutrinos plus modified gravity in photometric probes.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We have extended CLOE to incorporate the magnification bias term into the spectroscopic two-point correlation function of galaxy clustering and adapted the implementation of Euclid primary photometric probes to account for massive neutrinos and modified gravity extensions, with validation through dedicated forecasts on synthetic Euclid-like data by sampling the full posterior distribution and comparing with previous literature.
What carries the argument
The CLOE likelihood pipeline with added magnification bias term in spectroscopic clustering and updated modeling of massive neutrinos and modified gravity in photometric observables.
If this is right
- Euclid measurements of galaxy clustering can now include the magnification bias contribution when fitting cosmological models.
- Photometric observables can be used to constrain models that include massive neutrinos.
- Modified gravity extensions can be tested directly with the adapted photometric likelihood functions.
- Full posterior sampling on synthetic data confirms consistency with prior literature results for these extensions.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The noted directions for novel inference and machine learning techniques could reduce the computational cost of exploring large parameter spaces in beyond-LCDM analyses.
- These CLOE updates may support more flexible joint analyses that combine Euclid data with other surveys once real observations begin.
- Further refinements to the beyond-LCDM modeling identified in the work could improve the pipeline's ability to handle additional systematic effects.
Load-bearing premise
The synthetic Euclid-like data sets used for validation faithfully reproduce the statistical properties, selection effects, and systematic uncertainties that will be present in the actual Euclid observations.
What would settle it
Running the extended CLOE on real Euclid data and checking whether the recovered constraints on cosmological parameters match those obtained from independent analysis codes would test the extensions.
Figures
read the original abstract
Euclid is expected to establish new state-of-the-art constraints on extensions beyond the standard LCDM cosmological model by measuring the positions and shapes of billions of galaxies. Specifically, its goal is to shed light on the nature of dark matter and dark energy. Achieving this requires developing and validating advanced statistical tools and theoretical prediction software capable of testing extensions of the LCDM model. In this work, we describe how the Euclid likelihood pipeline, Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid (CLOE), has been extended to accommodate alternative cosmological models and to refine the theoretical modelling of Euclid primary probes. In particular, we detail modifications made to CLOE to incorporate the magnification bias term into the spectroscopic two-point correlation function of galaxy clustering. Additionally, we explain the adaptations made to CLOE's implementation of Euclid primary photometric probes to account for massive neutrinos and modified gravity extensions. Finally, we present the validation of these CLOE modifications through dedicated forecasts on synthetic Euclid-like data by sampling the full posterior distribution and comparing with the results of previous literature. In conclusion, we have identified in this work several functionalities with regards to beyond-LCDM modelling that could be further improved within CLOE, and outline potential research directions to enhance pipeline efficiency and flexibility through novel inference and machine learning techniques.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript describes extensions to the CLOE likelihood pipeline for Euclid cosmology analysis. It incorporates the magnification bias term into the spectroscopic two-point correlation function of galaxy clustering and adapts the photometric probes (weak lensing and galaxy clustering) to include massive neutrinos and modified gravity effects. Validation is performed via full posterior sampling on synthetic Euclid-like datasets, with comparisons to prior literature forecasts. The paper concludes by noting areas for further improvement in beyond-LCDM modelling and suggests future directions involving machine learning techniques.
Significance. If the implementations are accurate, this work meaningfully advances Euclid's readiness to constrain extensions beyond LCDM, including neutrino mass and modified gravity, which are central to dark energy and dark matter science. The reuse and extension of an existing validated pipeline is a practical strength, and the use of full posterior sampling on synthetic data provides a direct test of the likelihood. However, the overall significance is moderated by the need for clearer demonstration that the new physics terms are exercised in the validation.
major comments (2)
- [Validation and forecasts] Validation and forecasts section: the synthetic Euclid-like data used for posterior sampling are not explicitly stated to incorporate massive neutrinos or modified gravity effects. If the mocks are generated under standard LCDM assumptions (a common default), the exercise primarily verifies consistency with LCDM rather than confirming that the new implementations correctly capture neutrino suppression or scale-dependent growth modifications in the photometric observables. This directly affects the central claim that the adaptations have been validated.
- [Adaptations for photometric probes] Section describing photometric probe adaptations: the modifications for massive neutrinos and modified gravity are presented as additions to the existing implementation, but no explicit equations or parameter mappings are shown for how the growth factor or power spectrum are altered in the weak lensing and photometric clustering predictions. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the extensions are complete and free of implementation inconsistencies.
minor comments (2)
- [Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion mention potential improvements via machine learning but do not provide concrete examples or references to existing ML-based inference methods in cosmology likelihoods.
- [Magnification bias incorporation] Notation for the magnification bias term in the spectroscopic correlation function should be cross-referenced to the specific equation number where it is first introduced.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the text accordingly to improve clarity and strengthen the validation description.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Validation and forecasts section: the synthetic Euclid-like data used for posterior sampling are not explicitly stated to incorporate massive neutrinos or modified gravity effects. If the mocks are generated under standard LCDM assumptions (a common default), the exercise primarily verifies consistency with LCDM rather than confirming that the new implementations correctly capture neutrino suppression or scale-dependent growth modifications in the photometric observables. This directly affects the central claim that the adaptations have been validated.
Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not explicitly state the cosmological model used to generate the synthetic data. The mocks were produced under standard ΛCDM assumptions, which is the conventional approach for baseline pipeline testing. The validation of the extensions themselves is achieved through full posterior sampling using the updated CLOE implementation and by comparing the resulting forecasts directly to prior literature results that incorporate massive neutrinos and modified gravity. We will revise the validation section to state the mock assumptions explicitly and to clarify how the literature comparison exercises the new physics terms in the photometric observables. revision: yes
-
Referee: Section describing photometric probe adaptations: the modifications for massive neutrinos and modified gravity are presented as additions to the existing implementation, but no explicit equations or parameter mappings are shown for how the growth factor or power spectrum are altered in the weak lensing and photometric clustering predictions. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the extensions are complete and free of implementation inconsistencies.
Authors: The current text describes the adaptations at the level of pipeline integration rather than re-deriving the underlying theory. To address the request for greater transparency, we will add the relevant equations for the modified growth factor and power spectrum, together with the parameter mappings applied to the weak lensing and photometric galaxy clustering predictions, in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: CLOE extensions are additive implementations validated externally
full rationale
The paper describes software modifications to an existing likelihood pipeline (CLOE) for adding magnification bias to spectroscopic clustering and adapting photometric probes for massive neutrinos and modified gravity. Validation consists of running forecasts on synthetic Euclid-like data and comparing posterior results to prior literature. No equations or derivations are presented that reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input or self-citation by construction; the central claims are implementation statements plus numerical checks against independent mocks and external results. This is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Standard cosmological perturbation theory remains valid when adding magnification bias, massive neutrinos, and modified gravity to the probe modeling.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
we explain the adaptations made to CLOE’s implementation of Euclid primary photometric probes to account for massive neutrinos and modified gravity extensions... using MGCAMB... Γ(z)=PΥΥ(k,z)/Pm(k,z)
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
PNL_m(k)≈f²_cb PNL_cb(k)+... (1-8fν) scaling for galaxy bias with massive neutrinos
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
\textit{Euclid} preparation. Baryon acoustic oscillations extraction techniques: comparison and optimisation
End-to-end validation on Euclid-like mocks shows RecSym and RecIso reconstruction yield unbiased BAO measurements, improving figure of merit for Omega_m and H0 rs by factor of ~3 across 0.9<z<1.8.
-
Euclid preparation. Three-dimensional galaxy clustering in configuration space: Three-point correlation function estimation
Euclid collaboration develops and validates direct and spherical-harmonic estimators plus a random-split optimization for measuring the three-point galaxy correlation function at the scale of the full Euclid survey.
-
cloelike: A Python Library for Cosmological Likelihood Inference in the Euclid Era
cloelike is a new open Python package implementing composable Gaussian likelihoods for WL, GCph, GGL, full-shape spectra, and BAO in joint probe combinations for Euclid analyses.
-
cloelib: A Flexible Python Library for Computing Cosmological Observables in the Euclid Era
cloelib is a modular JAX-based Python library for cosmological observables intended as reference infrastructure for Euclid's first data release.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline
ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...
-
[2]
" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....
-
[3]
Abdalla , E., Abellán , G. F., Aboubrahim , A., et al. 2022, JHEAP, 34, 49
work page 2022
-
[4]
2021, Modified Gravity and Cosmology
Akrami , Y., Bahamonde , S., Blázquez-Salcedo , J., et al. 2021, Modified Gravity and Cosmology. An Update by the CANTATA Network (Springer)
work page 2021
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
-
[8]
Euclid: Field-level inference of primordial non-Gaussianity and cosmic initial conditions
Andrews , A., Jasche , J., Lavaux , G., et al. 2024, A&A, submitted, arXiv:2412.11945
-
[9]
Arnold, C., Li, B., Giblin, B., Harnois-Déraps, J., & Cai, Y.-C. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4161
work page 2022
-
[10]
Audren, B., Lesgourgues, J., Benabed, K., & Prunet, S. 2013, JCAP, 02, 001
work page 2013
-
[11]
Ballardini , M., Akrami , Y., Finelli , F., et al. 2024, , 683, A220
work page 2024
- [12]
-
[13]
Bonici, M., D'Amico, G., Bel, J., & Carbone, C. 2025, arXiv:2501.04639
- [14]
-
[15]
Bose, B., Cataneo, M., Tröster, T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 4650
work page 2020
- [16]
-
[17]
2013, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30, 214005
Brax , P. 2013, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30, 214005
work page 2013
- [18]
-
[19]
Brinckmann , T. & Lesgourgues , J. 2019, Physics of the Dark Universe, 24, 100260
work page 2019
-
[20]
Carrasco , J. J. M., Hertzberg , M. P., & Senatore , L. 2012, JHEP, 2012, 82
work page 2012
-
[21]
M., Sawicki , I., Silvestri , A., & Trodden , M
Carroll , S. M., Sawicki , I., Silvestri , A., & Trodden , M. 2006, New Journal of Physics, 8, 323
work page 2006
-
[22]
Euclid: Constraints on f(R) cosmologies from the spectroscopic and photometric primary probes
Casas , S., Cardone , V. F., Sapone , D., et al. 2023, , submitted, arXiv:2306.11053
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
- [23]
- [24]
-
[25]
Chevallier , M. & Polarski , D. 2001, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 213
work page 2001
-
[26]
DES Collaboration: Abbott , T. M. C., Abdalla , F. B., Avila , S., et al. 2019, , 99, 123505
work page 2019
-
[27]
DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements
DESI Collaboration: Adame , A. G., Aguilar , J., Ahlen , S., et al. 2024 a , arXiv:2411.12022
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[28]
G., Aguilar , J., Ahlen , S., et al
DESI Collaboration: Adame , A. G., Aguilar , J., Ahlen , S., et al. 2024 b , AJ, 167, 62
work page 2024
-
[29]
Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape
DESI Collaboration: Elbers , W., Aviles , A., Noriega , H. E., et al. 2025, arXiv:2503.14744
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
- [30]
- [31]
-
[32]
Elvin-Poole , J., MacCrann , N., Everett , S., et al. 2023, , 523, 3649
work page 2023
-
[33]
Euclid Collaboration , Lesgourgues , J., Schwagereit , J., et al. 2025, , 693, A249
work page 2025
-
[34]
Euclid Collaboration: Adamek , J., Fiorini , B., Baldi , M., et al. 2025, , 695, A230
work page 2025
-
[35]
S., Frusciante , N., Sakr , Z., et al
Euclid Collaboration: Albuquerque , I. S., Frusciante , N., Sakr , Z., et al. 2025, arXiv:2506.03008
-
[36]
Euclid Collaboration: Archidiacono , M., Lesgourgues , J., Casas , S., et al. 2025, , 693, A58
work page 2025
-
[37]
Euclid Collaboration: Blanchard , A., Camera , S., Carbone , C., et al. 2020, , 642, A191
work page 2020
-
[38]
Euclid Collaboration: Bose , B., Carrilho , P., Marinucci , M., et al. 2024, , 689, A275
work page 2024
-
[39]
F., Joudaki , S., Blot , L., et al
Euclid Collaboration: Cardone , V. F., Joudaki , S., Blot , L., et al. 2025, A&A, submitted
work page 2025
-
[40]
Euclid Collaboration: Castander , F., Fosalba , P., Stadel , J., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A5
work page 2025
-
[41]
Euclid Collaboration: Ca n as-Herrera , G., Goh , L. W. K., Blot , L., et al. 2025, A&A submitted
work page 2025
-
[42]
Euclid Collaboration: Jelic-Cizmek , G., Sorrenti , F., Lepori , F., et al. 2024, , 685, A167
work page 2024
-
[43]
Euclid Collaboration: Joudaki , S., Pettorino , V., Blot , L., et al. 2025, A&A submitted
work page 2025
-
[44]
Euclid Collaboration: Knabenhans , M., Stadel , J., Potter , D., et al. 2021, , 505, 2840
work page 2021
-
[45]
2024, A&A, in press, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452184, arXiv:2409.03524
Euclid Collaboration: Koyama , K., Pamuk , S., Casas , S., et al. 2024, A&A, in press, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452184, arXiv:2409.03524
-
[46]
Euclid Collaboration: Lepori , F., Tutusaus , I., Viglione , C., et al. 2022, , 662, A93
work page 2022
-
[47]
Euclid Collaboration: Lesgourgues , J., Schwagereit , J., Bucko , J., et al. 2025, , 693, A249
work page 2025
-
[48]
Euclid Collaboration: Mellier , Y., Abdurro'uf , Acevedo Barroso , J., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A1
work page 2025
-
[49]
Euclid Collaboration: R \'a cz , G., Breton , M.-A., Fiorini , B., et al. 2025, , 695, A232
work page 2025
-
[50]
Euclid Collaboration: Tanidis , K., Cardone , V. F., Martinelli , M., et al. 2024, , 683, A17
work page 2024
-
[51]
Franco Abell\'an, G., Ca\ nas Herrera, G., Martinelli, M., et al. 2024, JCAP, 11, 057
work page 2024
- [52]
-
[53]
Giri, S. K. & Schneider, A. 2021, JCAP, 12, 046
work page 2021
- [54]
-
[55]
Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Final Report
Green , J., Schechter , P., Baltay , C., et al. 2012, arXiv:1208.4012
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[56]
G\"unther, S., Lesgourgues, J., Samaras, G., et al. 2022, JCAP, 11, 035
work page 2022
-
[57]
Handley , W. J., Hobson , M. P., & Lasenby , A. N. 2015 a , , 450, L61
work page 2015
-
[58]
Handley , W. J., Hobson , M. P., & Lasenby , A. N. 2015 b , , 453, 4384
work page 2015
- [59]
-
[60]
Horndeski , G. W. 1974, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 10, 363
work page 1974
- [61]
-
[62]
Huterer , D. & Shafer , D. L. 2018, Reports on Progress in Physics, 81, 016901
work page 2018
-
[63]
Ishak , M., Baker , T., Bull , P., et al. 2019, arXiv:1905.09687
- [64]
- [65]
- [66]
- [67]
- [68]
- [69]
- [70]
-
[71]
Kilbinger , M., Heymans , C., Asgari , M., et al. 2017, , 472, 2126
work page 2017
-
[72]
2016, Reports on Progress in Physics, 79, 046902
Koyama , K. 2016, Reports on Progress in Physics, 79, 046902
work page 2016
-
[73]
Lange , J. U. 2023, , 525, 3181
work page 2023
-
[74]
Euclid Definition Study Report
Laureijs , R., Amiaux , J., Arduini , S., et al. 2011, ESA/SRE(2011)12, arXiv:1110.3193
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[75]
2013, Neutrino Cosmology (Cambridge University Press)
Lesgourgues, J., Mangano, G., Miele, G., & Pastor, S. 2013, Neutrino Cosmology (Cambridge University Press)
work page 2013
-
[76]
Levi, M. E. et al. 2019, arXiv: 1907.10688
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[77]
Linder , E. V. 2003, , 90, 091301
work page 2003
- [78]
-
[79]
Mahony, C., Fortuna, M. C., Joachimi, B., et al. 2022, , 513, 1210
work page 2022
- [80]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.