pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.13671 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.optics

Robust Superradiance and Spontaneous Spin Ordering in Disordered Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics

Xin H. H. Zhang , Daniel Malz , Peter Rabl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 07:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords superradiancedisordered arrayswaveguide QEDcollective decayspin orderingfinite-size scalingvariational estimate
0
0 comments X

The pith

The hallmark N squared scaling of superradiant emission remains asymptotically robust to strong spatial and spectral disorder in a one-dimensional waveguide.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines collective light emission from a disordered array of N excited two-level atoms coupled to a one-dimensional photonic waveguide. Large-scale semiclassical simulations show that the characteristic superradiant burst, with peak emission rate scaling as N squared, persists in the large-N limit even when atoms have random positions and transition frequencies. The atoms spontaneously self-organize their spin states according to their locations to favor constructive interference of emitted light. An analytical variational estimate for the maximal decay rate tightly bounds the numerical results and accounts for how disorder modifies the collective dynamics.

Core claim

In a disordered array of excited two-level atoms coupled to a 1D waveguide, the characteristic superradiant burst with peak emission rate scaling as N squared remains asymptotically robust under strong spatial and spectral disorder, as shown by semiclassical simulations of large systems. The spins spontaneously self-organize according to their spatial locations to optimize constructive interference, which also produces mirror-asymmetric correlations during decay. A variational upper bound on the maximal decay rate explains the observed robustness and the role of disorder.

What carries the argument

Spontaneous self-organization of the atomic spins according to their spatial locations, which optimizes constructive interference in the emitted light.

If this is right

  • The peak emission rate approaches N squared scaling for sufficiently large N regardless of disorder strength.
  • Subtle finite-size scaling governs how quickly the system approaches the asymptotic superradiant limit.
  • Mirror-asymmetric correlations between atoms emerge naturally during the superradiant decay process.
  • The variational estimate provides a configuration-dependent upper bound that matches the numerically observed maximal decay rates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same self-organization principle may enable robust collective emission in other disordered settings such as photonic-crystal waveguides or free-space atomic arrays.
  • This robustness suggests that fabrication imperfections in real devices need not destroy superradiant effects for large enough ensembles.
  • Quantum corrections beyond the semiclassical treatment could become visible at moderate N or for particular disorder realizations and would be testable by exact diagonalization on smaller systems.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical approximation used for large-scale simulations accurately captures the collective decay dynamics even under strong disorder without significant quantum corrections.

What would settle it

An observation, in simulation or experiment, that the peak collective emission rate scales slower than N squared for large N at fixed strong disorder strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.13671 by Daniel Malz, Peter Rabl, Xin H. H. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of a disordered waveguide QED system, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical methods. (a) Sketch of the extended system de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Benchmarking of DTWA and QSDMF methods. (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Superradiant dynamics for spatial disorder strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Superradiant scaling in the presence of spatial disorder. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Photon-photon correlations. Plot of (a) the auto-correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Asymptotic limit. Plot of the scaled superradiant rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Spontaneous spin ordering. The joint probability distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Superradiant scaling in the presence of frequency disor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Impact of non-Markovianity on superradiant scaling. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of different methods. Error in computing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Superradiance with Gaussian-distributed positions. Scal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Comparison of superradiant scaling with (solid lines) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Spontaneous spin ordering in regular lattices. (a) and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the collective emission of a disordered array of $N$ excited two-level atoms into a one-dimensional photonic waveguide. In the perfectly ordered case, where atoms are spaced by exact integer multiples of the wavelength, the system exhibits the characteristic superradiant burst with a peak emission rate scaling as $N^2$. Using large-scale semiclassical simulations, we find that this key signature of superradiance remains asymptotically robust under strong spatial and spectral disorder, but also exhibits subtle finite-size scaling toward this limit. To explain our observations, we provide an analytical variational estimate for the maximal decay rate, which tightly bounds the numerical results and reveals how disorder shapes the collective decay. Specifically, we find that even in the presence of strong disorder, the spins tend to self-organize spontaneously according to their locations, which overall optimizes constructive interference effects and explains the emergence of mirror-asymmetric correlations in superradiant decay. These findings resolve important open questions regarding the existence and nature of superradiance in strongly disordered arrays and offer valuable insights for understanding collective quantum optical phenomena in realistic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies collective emission from a disordered array of N excited two-level atoms into a 1D photonic waveguide. It claims that the N² superradiant burst remains asymptotically robust under strong spatial and spectral disorder, supported by large-scale semiclassical simulations that also reveal subtle finite-size scaling; an analytical variational estimate tightly bounds the numerics and attributes the behavior to spontaneous self-organization of spins by location, optimizing constructive interference and producing mirror-asymmetric correlations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work resolves open questions on the existence and character of superradiance in realistic disordered waveguide QED systems. Strengths include the large-scale semiclassical simulations and the variational bound that provides a parameter-free explanation via location-dependent interference; these elements offer falsifiable predictions for finite-size scaling and correlation asymmetry.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods and large-scale simulations] The central claim that N² scaling remains asymptotically robust requires that the semiclassical (mean-field/Bloch) dynamics accurately capture the many-body quantum evolution even under strong disorder. The manuscript should supply direct comparisons between semiclassical results and exact quantum dynamics (or at least entanglement measures) for moderate N and increasing disorder strength to rule out fluctuation corrections that could suppress the observed robustness.
  2. [Analytical variational estimate] The variational estimate is presented as bounding the numerics and explaining self-organization, yet it appears constructed to reproduce the same semiclassical trajectories. Clarify whether this bound is derived independently of the simulation data (e.g., from a variational ansatz on the master equation) or whether it reduces to a post-hoc fit; if the latter, it does not independently certify the absence of quantum corrections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results and figures] Specify the precise ranges of spatial and spectral disorder strengths (e.g., standard deviations in position and detuning) used to generate the finite-size scaling plots, and report the number of disorder realizations and convergence criteria for the large-N simulations.
  2. [Abstract and variational section] The abstract states that the variational estimate 'tightly bounds' the numerics; add a quantitative measure (e.g., relative error or bound tightness as a function of N and disorder) in the main text or supplementary material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical methods and large-scale simulations] The central claim that N² scaling remains asymptotically robust requires that the semiclassical (mean-field/Bloch) dynamics accurately capture the many-body quantum evolution even under strong disorder. The manuscript should supply direct comparisons between semiclassical results and exact quantum dynamics (or at least entanglement measures) for moderate N and increasing disorder strength to rule out fluctuation corrections that could suppress the observed robustness.

    Authors: We agree that direct comparisons between semiclassical and exact quantum dynamics for moderate N would strengthen the justification for the large-N results. We will add such benchmarks in the revised manuscript, including emission-rate comparisons and entanglement measures (e.g., von Neumann entropy) for N up to 12 across a range of disorder strengths. These will demonstrate that fluctuation corrections remain small and do not suppress the observed robustness. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Analytical variational estimate] The variational estimate is presented as bounding the numerics and explaining self-organization, yet it appears constructed to reproduce the same semiclassical trajectories. Clarify whether this bound is derived independently of the simulation data (e.g., from a variational ansatz on the master equation) or whether it reduces to a post-hoc fit; if the latter, it does not independently certify the absence of quantum corrections.

    Authors: The variational estimate is derived independently via a variational ansatz applied directly to the master equation: we maximize the instantaneous collective decay rate over a parameterized family of spin configurations that incorporate the position-dependent phases induced by disorder. The resulting analytical upper bound is obtained without reference to the numerical trajectories and naturally yields the location-dependent self-organization that explains the mirror-asymmetric correlations. We will expand the derivation section in the revised manuscript to emphasize this independence. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent numerics and variational bounds

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of large-scale semiclassical simulations that directly observe the N² scaling robustness under disorder, followed by an independent analytical variational estimate for the maximal decay rate that provides tight bounds and explains spontaneous self-organization via location-dependent interference. These steps are not equivalent to their inputs by construction: the simulations generate the data, and the variational analysis is derived separately to bound and interpret those results without fitting parameters to the target superradiance signature or relying on self-citations for load-bearing uniqueness. The approach is self-contained against the numerical benchmarks and does not reduce predictions to fitted quantities or rename known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard assumptions of waveguide QED and semiclassical approximations for collective decay; no new free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced beyond the disorder model itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical treatment of atomic dipoles and photon field is sufficient to capture the leading collective decay dynamics
    Invoked implicitly when using large-scale semiclassical simulations to study superradiance under disorder

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5733 in / 1260 out tokens · 26443 ms · 2026-05-18T07:06:34.283044+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum to classical relaxation dynamics of the dissipative Rydberg gas

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using the truncated Wigner approximation on large 1D and 2D systems, the authors find a pronounced slowdown in magnetization relaxation and transient signatures of quantum kinetically constrained dynamics starting fro...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (10) can be separated into a stochastic part dα(0) R/L =− κ 2 α(0) R/Ldt+ r κ 2 dWR/L, (B1) and a deterministic part d dt α(1) R/L =− κ 2 α(1) R/L + g√ 2 ˜JR/L

    Reduction of the SDE By settingα R/L =α (0) R/L +α (1) R/L, the stochastic differential equation (SDE) in Eq. (10) can be separated into a stochastic part dα(0) R/L =− κ 2 α(0) R/Ldt+ r κ 2 dWR/L, (B1) and a deterministic part d dt α(1) R/L =− κ 2 α(1) R/L + g√ 2 ˜JR/L. (B2) For the initial state, we can letα (0) R/L(0) =α R/L(0)and α(1) R/L(0) = 0. The s...

    work page

  2. [2]

    With κ/(γN)≫1, Eq

    Adiabatic Elimination In the Markovian limit, where the bosonic modes are heav- ily damped withκ≫γN, we can adiabatically elimi- nate the dynamics ofα R(t)andα L(t)to derive a set of re- duced stochastic equations for the spin variables only. With κ/(γN)≫1, Eq. (9) can be formally integrated as αR/L(t) = r γ 2κ ˜JR/L(t) + r 2 κ dWR/L/dt. (B3) This tells u...

    work page

  3. [3]

    That is, we can further have [64] λmax( ˆR2)≤6λ prod,max( ˆR2).(F8) We then have an upper bound ofλ max( ˆR2)given by λmax( ˆR)≤γN+ 6λ prod,max( ˆR2).(F9) Combining Eq

    FromTr( ˆR1) =γN, we know−Tr( ˆR2)< γN, which bounds maximal eigenvalue of− ˆR2 byγNfrom above. That is, we can further have [64] λmax( ˆR2)≤6λ prod,max( ˆR2).(F8) We then have an upper bound ofλ max( ˆR2)given by λmax( ˆR)≤γN+ 6λ prod,max( ˆR2).(F9) Combining Eq. (F7) and (F9), we have λmax( ˆR)≤ 3 2ΓmaxN− 1 2 γN→ 3γ 4 N2(1 + sin Θ Θ ), (F10) of which th...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Simulations useN= 400 atoms and10 3 trajectories

    for results on other lattice constants. Simulations useN= 400 atoms and10 3 trajectories. Appendix H: Spontaneous Spin Ordering in a Regular Lattice Here, besides the disordered case considered in Sec. V B, we would like to show that the spontaneous spin ordering sim- ilarly exists for a regular lattice with a lattice constantd. The upper bound can be wri...

    work page

  5. [5]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  6. [6]

    N. E. Rehler and J. H. Eberly, Superradiance, Phys. Rev. A3, 1735 (1971)

    work page 1971

  7. [7]

    Bonifacio, P

    R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann, and F. Haake, Quantum statis- tical theory of superradiance. i, Phys. Rev. A4, 302 (1971)

    work page 1971

  8. [8]

    Bonifacio, P

    R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann, and F. Haake, Quantum statis- tical theory of superradiance. ii, Phys. Rev. A4, 854 (1971)

    work page 1971

  9. [9]

    Degiorgio, Statistical properties of superradiant pulses, Op- tics Communications2, 362 (1971)

    V . Degiorgio, Statistical properties of superradiant pulses, Op- tics Communications2, 362 (1971)

    work page 1971

  10. [10]

    Degiorgio and F

    V . Degiorgio and F. Ghielmetti, Approximate solution to the superradiance master equation, Phys. Rev. A4, 2415 (1971)

    work page 1971

  11. [11]

    Haake and R

    F. Haake and R. J. Glauber, Quantum statistics of superradiant pulses, Phys. Rev. A5, 1457 (1972)

    work page 1972

  12. [12]

    L. M. Narducci, C. A. Coulter, and C. M. Bowden, Exact diffu- sion equation for a model for superradiant emission, Phys. Rev. A9, 829 (1974)

    work page 1974

  13. [13]

    G. S. Agarwal, Quantum statistical theories of spontaneous emission and their relation to other approaches, inQuantum Optics, edited by G. H ¨ohler (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,

    work page

  14. [14]

    Bonifacio and L

    R. Bonifacio and L. A. Lugiato, Cooperative radiation pro- cesses in two-level systems: Superfluorescence, Phys. Rev. A 11, 1507 (1975)

    work page 1975

  15. [15]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the the- ory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports93, 301 (1982)

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    Skribanowitz, I

    N. Skribanowitz, I. P. Herman, J. C. MacGillivray, and M. S. Feld, Observation of dicke superradiance in optically pumped hf gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 309 (1973)

    work page 1973

  17. [17]

    Gross, C

    M. Gross, C. Fabre, P. Pillet, and S. Haroche, Observation of near-infrared dicke superradiance on cascading transitions in atomic sodium, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 1035 (1976)

    work page 1976

  18. [18]

    Q. H. F. Vrehen, H. M. J. Hikspoors, and H. M. Gibbs, Quantum beats in superfluorescence in atomic cesium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 764 (1977)

    work page 1977

  19. [19]

    J. M. Raimond, P. Goy, M. Gross, C. Fabre, and S. Haroche, Statistics of millimeter-wave photons emitted by a rydberg- atom maser: An experimental study of fluctuations in single- mode superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1924 (1982)

    work page 1924

  20. [20]

    Goban, C.-L

    A. Goban, C.-L. Hung, J. D. Hood, S.-P. Yu, J. A. Mu- niz, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Superradiance for atoms 18 trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 063601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    B. Zhu, J. Schachenmayer, M. Xu, F. Herrera, J. G. Restrepo, M. J. Holland, and A. M. Rey, Synchronization of interacting quantum dipoles, New Journal of Physics17, 083063 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    selective radiance

    A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X7, 031024 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Z. Wang, T. Jaako, P. Kirton, and P. Rabl, Supercorrelated ra- diance in nonlinear photonic waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 213601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Pi ˜neiro Orioli, J

    A. Pi ˜neiro Orioli, J. K. Thompson, and A. M. Rey, Emergent dark states from superradiant dynamics in multilevel atoms in a cavity, Phys. Rev. X12, 011054 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    S. J. Masson and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Universality of dicke su- perradiance in arrays of quantum emitters, Nature Communica- tions13, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    D. Malz, R. Trivedi, and J. I. Cirac, Large-nlimit of dicke su- perradiance, Phys. Rev. A106, 013716 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Reitz, C

    M. Reitz, C. Sommer, and C. Genes, Cooperative quantum phe- nomena in light-matter platforms, PRX Quantum3, 010201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Rubies-Bigorda, S

    O. Rubies-Bigorda, S. Ostermann, and S. F. Yelin, Character- izing superradiant dynamics in atomic arrays via a cumulant expansion approach, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013091 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    W.-K. Mok, A. Asenjo-Garcia, T. C. Sum, and L.-C. Kwek, Dicke superradiance requires interactions beyond nearest neighbors, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 213605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Ferioli, A

    G. Ferioli, A. Glicenstein, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, A non-equilibrium superradiant phase transition in free space, Nature Physics19, 1345 (2023), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    C. D. Mink and M. Fleischhauer, Collective radiative interac- tions in the discrete truncated Wigner approximation, SciPost Phys.15, 233 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Cardenas-Lopez, S

    S. Cardenas-Lopez, S. J. Masson, Z. Zager, and A. Asenjo- Garcia, Many-body superradiance and dynamical mirror sym- metry breaking in waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Tiranov, V

    A. Tiranov, V . Angelopoulou, C. J. van Diepen, B. Schrinski, O. A. D. Sandberg, Y . Wang, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Collective super- and subradiant dynamics between distant optical quan- tum emitters, Science379, 389 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Liedl, F

    C. Liedl, F. Tebbenjohanns, C. Bach, S. Pucher, A. Rauschen- beutel, and P. Schneeweiss, Observation of superradiant bursts in a cascaded quantum system, Phys. Rev. X14, 011020 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Fasser, L

    M. Fasser, L. Ostermann, H. Ritsch, and C. Hotter, Subradiance and superradiant long-range excitation transport among quan- tum emitter ensembles in a waveguide, Optica Quantum2, 397 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Tebbenjohanns, C

    F. Tebbenjohanns, C. D. Mink, C. Bach, A. Rauschenbeutel, and M. Fleischhauer, Predicting correlations in superradiant emission from a cascaded quantum system, Phys. Rev. A110, 043713 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    C. Bach, F. Tebbenjohanns, C. Liedl, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Emergence of second-order coherence in superfluorescence (2024), arXiv:2407.12549 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Windt, M

    B. Windt, M. Bello, D. Malz, and J. I. Cirac, Effects of retar- dation on many-body superradiance in chiral waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 173601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    W.-K. Mok, S. J. Masson, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, T. Zelevinsky, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Ground-state selection via many-body superradiant decay, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022015 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    X. H. H. Zhang, D. Malz, and P. Rabl, Unraveling superradi- ance: Entanglement and mutual information in collective decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 033602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    J. T. Lee, S. Cardenas-Lopez, S. J. Masson, R. Trivedi, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Exact many-body quantum dynamics in one- dimensional baths via ”superspins” (2025), arXiv:2505.00588 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    V ovk, A

    T. V ovk, A. V . de Walle, H. Pichler, and A. Bohrdt, Neural quantum states for emitter dynamics in waveguide qed (2025), arXiv:2508.08964 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    W.-K. Mok, A. Poddar, E. Sierra, C. C. Rusconi, J. Preskill, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Universal scaling laws for correlated de- cay of many-body quantum systems (2024), arXiv:2406.00722 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Holzinger and S

    R. Holzinger and S. F. Yelin, Analytical prediction of the su- perradiant emission peak and timing in fully excited quantum emitter ensembles (2025), arXiv:2504.09985 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    N. S. Bassler, Absence of entanglement growth in dicke super- radiance (2025), arXiv:2504.13646 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Rosario, L

    P. Rosario, L. O. R. Solak, A. Cidrim, R. Bachelard, and J. Schachenmayer, Unraveling dicke superradiant decay with separable coherent spin states, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 133602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Meiser, J

    D. Meiser, J. Ye, D. R. Carlson, and M. J. Holland, Prospects for a millihertz-linewidth laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 163601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon, Nature484, 78 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    M. A. Norcia, M. N. Winchester, J. R. K. Cline, and J. K. Thompson, Superradiance on the millihertz linewidth strontium clock transition, Science Advances2, e1601231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Paulisch, M

    V . Paulisch, M. Perarnau-Llobet, A. Gonz´alez-Tudela, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum metrology with one-dimensional superradiant photonic states, Phys. Rev. A99, 043807 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Perarnau-Llobet, A

    M. Perarnau-Llobet, A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, and J. I. Cirac, Mul- timode fock states with large photon number: effective descrip- tions and applications in quantum metrology, Quantum Science and Technology5, 025003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg, Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional continuum, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 031002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V . Iorsh, A. V . Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collec- tive radiance and photon-photon correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Schachenmayer, A

    J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, and A. M. Rey, Many-body quantum spin dynamics with monte carlo trajectories on a dis- crete phase space, Phys. Rev. X5, 011022 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Huber, A

    J. Huber, A. M. Rey, and P. Rabl, Realistic simulations of spin squeezing and cooperative coupling effects in large ensembles of interacting two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A105, 013716 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Gisin and I

    N. Gisin and I. C. Percival, The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General25, 5677 (1992)

    work page 1992

  58. [58]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993)

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993). 19

    work page 1993

  59. [59]

    Dzsotjan, A

    D. Dzsotjan, A. S. Sørensen, and M. Fleischhauer, Quantum emitters coupled to surface plasmons of a nanowire: A green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. B82, 075427 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Lalumi `ere, B

    K. Lalumi `ere, B. C. Sanders, A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Input-output theory for waveguide qed with an ensemble of inhomogeneous atoms, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043806 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Note that for a chiral waveguide, the spatial dependence can be removed with a phase transformation for the spin operators

    work page

  62. [62]

    Hosseinabadi, O

    H. Hosseinabadi, O. Chelpanova, and J. Marino, User-friendly truncated wigner approximation for dissipative spin dynamics, PRX Quantum6, 030344 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Verstraelen, D

    W. Verstraelen, D. Huybrechts, T. Roscilde, and M. Wouters, Quantum and classical correlations in open quantum spin lat- tices via truncated-cumulant trajectories, PRX Quantum4, 030304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Z. Li, A. Delmonte, X. Turkeshi, and R. Fazio, Monitored long- range interacting systems: spin-wave theory for quantum trajec- tories, Nature Communications16, 4329 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

    R. Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

    work page 1962

  66. [66]

    Plankensteiner, C

    D. Plankensteiner, C. Hotter, and H. Ritsch, QuantumCumu- lants.jl: A Julia framework for generalized mean-field equa- tions in open quantum systems, Quantum6, 617 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    E. H. Lieb, The classical limit of quantum spin systems, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics31, 327 (1973)

    work page 1973

  68. [68]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. Gosset, R. K ¨onig, and K. Temme, Approxima- tion algorithms for quantum many-body problems, Journal of Mathematical Physics60, 032203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    See Supplemental Material for (i) a proof of irrelevance of de- tuning in the DTW A formalism, (ii) the smooth crossover be- tween weak (Θ =π/4) and strong disorders (Θ = 2π), (iii) plots of spin ordering for regular lattice withk 0d= 2π/3and 2π/N, (iv) the distributions of the propagating phases∆ξand the relative spin angles∆ϕ, and (v) the error of DTW A...

    work page

  70. [70]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Collo- quium: Non-markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2273 (1993)

    work page 1993

  73. [73]

    C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2269 (1993)

    work page 1993

  74. [74]

    Cardenas-Lopez, E

    S. Cardenas-Lopez, E. Guardiola-Navarrete, and A. Asenjo- Garcia, (to appear)

    work page

  75. [75]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14235279

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14235279

  76. [76]

    W. K. Wootters, A wigner-function formulation of finite-state quantum mechanics, Annals of Physics176, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  77. [77]

    Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equi- librium, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equi- librium, Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932)

    work page 1932

  78. [78]

    Robust Superradiance and Spontaneous Spin Ordering in Disordered Waveguide QED

    C. W. Gardiner,Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry, and the natural sciences, 3rd ed., Springer series in synergetics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin ; New York, 2004). 1 Supplemental Material for “Robust Superradiance and Spontaneous Spin Ordering in Disordered Waveguide QED” Xin H. H. Zhang,1,2,3 Daniel Malz4 and Peter Rabl1,2,3 1Technical Un...

    work page 2004