pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.07334 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Weak localization and universal conductance fluctuations in large area twisted bilayer graphene

Spenser Talkington , Debarghya Mallick , An-Hsi Chen , Benjamin F. Mead , Seong-Jun Yang , Cheol-Joo Kim , Shaffique Adam , Liang Wu
show 2 more authors
Matthew Brahlek Eugene J. Mele
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 23:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords twisted bilayer grapheneweak localizationuniversal conductance fluctuationsmagnetotransportphase coherence lengthintervalley scatteringmoiré materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Twisted bilayer graphene shows weak localization in all tested twist angles, revealing electron-electron dephasing and point-defect intervalley scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures magnetotransport in large-area, highly p-doped twisted bilayer graphene samples with twist angles of 1, 7, 9, and 20 degrees. Weak localization appears in every sample, which is reported here for the first time in this material. From the shape of the magnetoconductance, the authors extract the phase coherence length and the intervalley scattering length. These lengths indicate that dephasing is driven by electron-electron scattering while intervalley scattering arises from point defects. The 9-degree sample additionally displays signatures of universal conductance fluctuations, linked to its high mobility near the van Hove singularity.

Core claim

In diffusive magnetotransport measurements on highly p-doped large-area twisted bilayer graphene at 1°, 7°, 9°, and 20° twist angles, weak localization is observed in all samples. Extraction of the phase coherence length and intervalley scattering length from these data shows that dephasing is caused by electron-electron scattering and that intervalley scattering is caused by point defects. Signatures of universal conductance fluctuations appear in the high-mobility 9° sample near the van Hove singularity.

What carries the argument

Weak localization in the magnetoconductance, which encodes the phase coherence length and intervalley scattering length through the standard 2D WL formula applied to the measured resistivity curves.

If this is right

  • Dephasing in twisted bilayer graphene at these dopings is dominated by electron-electron interactions rather than other mechanisms.
  • Intervalley scattering is produced by point defects, so reducing defect density should lengthen the intervalley scattering time.
  • Universal conductance fluctuations become visible once mobility is high enough and the Fermi level sits near the van Hove singularity.
  • Further sample-quality improvements should make additional quantum-interference phenomena accessible in large-area moiré systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same WL analysis could be applied to other moiré heterostructures to compare dephasing sources across different twist-angle and stacking configurations.
  • If point defects are the main source of intervalley scattering, deliberate defect engineering might offer a route to tune coherence lengths in large-area devices.
  • Observation of UCF in the 9° sample suggests that similar fluctuations may appear in other high-mobility moiré samples once disorder is sufficiently reduced.

Load-bearing premise

That the standard weak-localization theory developed for conventional 2D electron gases applies without major changes to the moiré band structure and twist-dependent scattering present in these samples.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the extracted phase coherence length fails to follow the temperature dependence expected for electron-electron scattering, or in which intervalley scattering length shows no correlation with defect density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.07334 by An-Hsi Chen, Benjamin F. Mead, Cheol-Joo Kim, Debarghya Mallick, Eugene J. Mele, Liang Wu, Matthew Brahlek, Seong-Jun Yang, Shaffique Adam, Spenser Talkington.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Crossing the van Hove singularity in doped twisted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Weak localization in twisted bilayer graphene. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Universal conductance fluctuations in the 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Raw magnetoresistance data. The color bar scale is the same as in the main text, where dark blue is 2 K and dark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study diffusive magnetotransport in highly p-doped large area twisted bilayer graphene in 1{\deg}, 7{\deg}, 9{\deg} and 20{\deg} samples. We report weak localization in twisted bilayer graphene for the first time. All samples exhibit weak localization, from which we extract the phase coherence length and intervalley scattering lengths, and from that determine that dephasing is caused by electron-electron scattering and intervalley scattering is caused by point defects. We observe signatures of universal conductance fluctuations in the 9{\deg} sample, which has high mobility and is near the van Hove singularity. Further improvements in sample quality and applications to large area moire materials will open new avenues to observe quantum interference effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental study of diffusive magnetotransport in highly p-doped large-area twisted bilayer graphene samples with twist angles of 1°, 7°, 9°, and 20°. It claims the first observation of weak localization (WL) in TBG, from which the phase coherence length l_φ and intervalley scattering length l_iv are extracted via magnetoconductance fits. The authors conclude that dephasing arises from electron-electron scattering and intervalley scattering from point defects. Signatures of universal conductance fluctuations are also reported in the high-mobility 9° sample near the van Hove singularity.

Significance. If the applicability of conventional 2D WL theory holds without major moiré-induced corrections, this would constitute the first demonstration of WL in TBG and provide concrete information on scattering mechanisms in moiré systems. The UCF observation in one sample further supports the potential for quantum interference studies in large-area moiré materials, consistent with the paper's forward-looking statement on sample quality improvements.

major comments (2)
  1. The central extraction of l_φ and l_iv and the assignment of scattering mechanisms rest on fits to standard WL formulas (e.g., graphene-adapted Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka), yet the manuscript provides no raw magnetoconductance traces, fitting curves, or error bars to allow assessment of fit quality. This is load-bearing for the claim that dephasing is due to electron-electron scattering and intervalley scattering to point defects.
  2. The weakest assumption—that conventional 2D WL theory applies quantitatively to TBG without moiré-specific modifications—is not addressed. For the 1° sample near the magic angle, the reconstructed Brillouin zone, modified diffusion constant, and possible residual flat-band effects or twist disorder could introduce additional phase-breaking channels or alter valley mixing and Berry-phase contributions; no justification or comparison to moiré-adapted models is given.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text would benefit from explicit mention of the magnetic field and temperature ranges over which the WL fits were performed, as well as the mobility values for each sample to contextualize the diffusive regime.
  2. Notation for the extracted lengths (l_φ, l_iv) should be defined at first use with reference to the specific fitting equation employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments, which have helped us identify areas to strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central extraction of l_φ and l_iv and the assignment of scattering mechanisms rest on fits to standard WL formulas (e.g., graphene-adapted Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka), yet the manuscript provides no raw magnetoconductance traces, fitting curves, or error bars to allow assessment of fit quality. This is load-bearing for the claim that dephasing is due to electron-electron scattering and intervalley scattering to point defects.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of raw data and fit details limits the ability to assess the robustness of the extracted parameters. The original manuscript focused on the extracted lengths and physical conclusions but omitted the supporting traces for brevity. In the revised version, we will include a dedicated figure (or supplementary figure) showing the magnetoconductance data for all four twist angles, overlaid with the best-fit curves to the graphene-adapted Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka formula. Error bars on l_φ and l_iv will be reported, derived from the covariance matrix of the fits or from repeated measurements. This addition will directly support our assignments of electron-electron dephasing and point-defect intervalley scattering. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The weakest assumption—that conventional 2D WL theory applies quantitatively to TBG without moiré-specific modifications—is not addressed. For the 1° sample near the magic angle, the reconstructed Brillouin zone, modified diffusion constant, and possible residual flat-band effects or twist disorder could introduce additional phase-breaking channels or alter valley mixing and Berry-phase contributions; no justification or comparison to moiré-adapted models is given.

    Authors: We acknowledge that moiré effects warrant explicit discussion, particularly for the 1° sample. However, all measurements were performed at high hole doping (far from charge neutrality), where the Fermi level lies in dispersive bands well above the flat-band region; residual flat-band effects are therefore expected to be minimal. The standard 2D WL theory has been successfully applied to other graphene heterostructures at comparable dopings, and our data show consistent WL behavior across 1°–20° with no obvious anomalies at 1°. In the revision we will add a paragraph in the discussion section justifying the use of conventional theory on the basis of the doping regime, the absence of flat-band signatures in the transport data, and consistency with literature values for l_φ and l_iv in non-moiré graphene. A brief note on the potential need for future moiré-specific models will also be included. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental fits to standard weak-localization theory

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental study of diffusive magnetotransport. Weak localization is observed in the measured magnetoconductance of the TBG devices; the phase-coherence length l_φ and intervalley scattering length l_iv are obtained by fitting those data to the conventional Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka (or graphene-adapted) formula. The subsequent assignment of dephasing to electron-electron scattering and intervalley scattering to point defects follows from comparing the temperature and doping dependence of the fitted lengths to established theoretical expressions that are external to the paper. Because the inputs are raw experimental traces and the outputs are parameters extracted via an independently validated model, no step reduces a claimed prediction to the paper’s own inputs by construction. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorem is invoked to support the central extraction or interpretation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of standard weak-localization theory to TBG and on the interpretation of fitted lengths as direct measures of specific scattering processes.

free parameters (2)
  • phase coherence length
    Extracted by fitting WL magnetoconductance formula to data; value depends on chosen fitting range and background subtraction.
  • intervalley scattering length
    Extracted simultaneously from the same WL fits; value is sensitive to the assumed form of the scattering term.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka or equivalent WL formula applies to TBG without moiré-specific corrections
    Invoked when fitting data to extract lengths and assign scattering mechanisms.
  • domain assumption Electron-electron scattering dominates dephasing and point defects dominate intervalley scattering
    Conclusion drawn from temperature and density dependence of the extracted lengths.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1405 out tokens · 32432 ms · 2026-05-17T23:24:34.348946+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hamiltonian learning for spin-spiral moir\'e magnets from electronic magnetotransport

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Supervised ML trained on field- and bias-dependent conductance extracts the q-vector of arbitrary spin-spiral magnets in 2D moiré systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 134 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 673 (1979)

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    C. W. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 731 (1997)

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    Das Sarma, S

    S. Das Sarma, S. Adam, E. Hwang, and E. Rossi, Electronic transport in two-dimensional graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 407 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    N. Wei, Y. Zeng, and A. H. MacDonald, Weak local- ization as a probe of intervalley coherence in graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. B111, L241103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    S. Adam, P. W. Brouwer, J. P. Sethna, and X. Wain- tal, Enhanced mesoscopic fluctuations in the crossover between random-matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. B66, 165310 (2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Lopes dos Santos, N

    J. Lopes dos Santos, N. Peres, and A. Castro Neto, Con- tinuum model of the twisted graphene bilayer, Phys. Rev. B86, 155449 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    S. J. Yang, S. Choi, F. O. Odongo Ngome, K. J. Kim, S. Y. Choi, and C. J. Kim, All-dry transfer of graphene film by van der waals interactions, Nano Letters19, 3590 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    S. J. Yang, J. H. Jung, E. Lee, E. Han, M. Y. Choi, D. Jung, S. Choi, J. H. Park, D. Oh, S. Noh, et al., Wafer-scale programmed assembly of one-atom-thick crystals, Nano Letters22, 1518 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    S. J. Yang and C. J. Kim, Twisted growth by design, Nature Materials21, 1215 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    S. V. Morozov, K. S. Novoselov, M. Katsnelson, F. Schedin, L. Ponomarenko, D. Jiang, and A. K. Geim, Strong suppression of weak localization in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 016801 (2006)

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    E. S. Morell, J. Correa, P. Vargas, M. Pacheco, and Z. Barticevic, Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations, Phys. Rev. B82, 121407 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Trambly de Laissardi` ere, D

    G. Trambly de Laissardi` ere, D. Mayou, and L. Mag- aud, Localization of dirac electrons in rotated graphene bilayers, Nano Letters10, 804 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. National Acad. Sciences108, 12233 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact contin- uum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Research1, 013001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Yudhistira, N

    I. Yudhistira, N. Chakraborty, G. Sharma, D. Y. Ho, E. Laksono, O. P. Sushkov, G. Vignale, and S. Adam, Gauge-phonon dominated resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene near magic angle, Phys. Rev. B99, 140302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Sharma, I

    G. Sharma, I. Yudhistira, N. Chakraborty, D. Y. Ho, M. A. Ezzi, M. S. Fuhrer, G. Vignale, and S. Adam, Carrier transport theory for twisted bilayer graphene in the metallic regime, Nature Comm.12, 5737 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    V. H. Nguyen, D. Paszko, M. Lamparski, B. Van Troeye, V. Meunier, and J. C. Charlier, Electronic localization in small-angle twisted bilayer graphene, 2D Materials8, 035046 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    S. Lisi, X. Lu, T. Benschop, T. A. de Jong, P. Stepanov, J. R. Duran, F. Margot, I. Cucchi, E. Cappelli, A. Hunter, et al., Observation of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics17, 189 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    M. I. B. Utama, R. J. Koch, K. Lee, N. Leconte, H. Li, S. Zhao, L. Jiang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Visualization of the flat electronic band in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle twist, Nature Physics17, 184 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Zhang, A

    S. Zhang, A. Song, L. Chen, C. Jiang, C. Chen, L. Gao, Y. Hou, L. Liu, T. Ma, H. Wang, et al., Abnormal con- ductivity in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Science Adv.6, eabc5555 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    A. C. Gadelha, D. A. Ohlberg, C. Rabelo, E. G. Neto, T. L. Vasconcelos, J. L. Campos, J. S. Lemos, V. Or- nelas, D. Miranda, R. Nadas, et al., Localization of lat- tice dynamics in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Na- ture590, 405 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, et al., Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene super- lattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo Herrero, Unconventional su- perconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019). 7

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nature Materials19, 1265 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Morales-Inostroza and R

    L. Morales-Inostroza and R. A. Vicencio, Simple method to construct flat-band lattices, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043831 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    J. W. Rhim and B. J. Yang, Singular flat bands, Adv. Phys. X6, 1901606 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Talkington and M

    S. Talkington and M. Claassen, Dissipation-induced flat bands, Phys. Rev. B106, L161109 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Regnault, Y

    N. Regnault, Y. Xu, M. R. Li, D. S. Ma, M. Jovanovic, A. Yazdani, S. S. Parkin, C. Felser, L. M. Schoop, N. P. Ong, et al., Catalogue of flat-band stoichiometric mate- rials, Nature603, 824 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    C˘ alug˘ aru, A

    D. C˘ alug˘ aru, A. Chew, L. Elcoro, Y. Xu, N. Regnault, Z. D. Song, and B. A. Bernevig, General construction and topological classification of crystalline flat bands, Nature Physics18, 185 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    G. H. Wannier, Wave functions and effective hamilto- nian for Bloch electrons in an electric field, Phys. Rev. 117, 432 (1960)

    work page 1960

  34. [34]

    A. R. Kolovsky and E. N. Bulgakov, Wannier-Stark states and Bloch oscillations in the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. A87, 033602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    H. K. Kelardeh, V. Apalkov, and M. I. Stockman, Wannier-Stark states of graphene in strong electric field, Phys. Rev. B90, 085313 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Iafrate and V

    G. Iafrate and V. Sokolov, The Bloch electron response to electric fields: Application to graphene, Phys. Stat. Solid.257, 1900660 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    De Beule, S

    C. De Beule, S. Gassner, S. Talkington, and E. J. Mele, Floquet-Bloch theory for nonperturbative response to a static drive, Phys. Rev. B109, 235421 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Shallcross, S

    S. Shallcross, S. Sharma, and O. A. Pankratov, Quan- tum interference at the twist boundary in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 056803 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    E. J. Mele, Commensuration and interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B81, 161405 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    E. J. Mele, Interlayer coupling in rotationally faulted multilayer graphenes, J. Phys D: Applied Physics45, 154004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    McCann, Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene, Phys

    E. McCann, Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B74, 161403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    E. V. Castro, K. Novoselov, S. Morozov, N. Peres, J. L. Dos Santos, J. Nilsson, F. Guinea, A. Geim, and A. C. Neto, Biased bilayer graphene: semiconductor with a gap tunable by the electric field effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 216802 (2007)

    work page 2007

  43. [43]

    K. F. Mak, C. H. Lui, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Obser- vation of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 256405 (2009)

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    Talkington and E

    S. Talkington and E. J. Mele, Electric-field-tunable band gap in commensurate twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B107, L041408 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Talkington and E

    S. Talkington and E. J. Mele, Terahertz circular dichro- ism in commensurate twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B108, 085421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Talkington and M

    S. Talkington and M. Claassen, Linear and non-linear response of quadratic lindbladians, npj Quantum Mate- rials9, 104 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    B. F. Mead, S. Talkington, A.-H. Chen, D. Mallick, Z. Chu, X. Han, S.-J. Yang, C.-J. Kim, M. Brahlek, E. J. Mele, et al., Terahertz Landau level spectroscopy of Dirac fermions in millimeter-scale twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B112, 205116 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Z. L. Li, X. H. Li, and Y. Wan, Time-domain interferom- etry of electron weak localization through terahertz non- linear response, Phys. Rev. Research6, 033125 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    P. A. Guerrero, V. H. Nguyen, J. M. Romeral, A. W. Cummings, J. H. Garcia, J. C. Charlier, and S. Roche, Disorder-induced delocalization in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 126301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Mondal, P

    A. Mondal, P. Sinha, and B. L. Chittari, Magneto trans- port of pressure induced flatbands in large angle twisted bilayer graphene, arXiv2503, 22920 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Lopes dos Santos, N

    J. Lopes dos Santos, N. Peres, and A. Castro Neto, Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 256802 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Shallcross, S

    S. Shallcross, S. Sharma, and O. Pankratov, Emergent momentum scale, localization, and van Hove singular- ities in the graphene twist bilayer, Phys. Rev. B87, 245403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    G. Li, A. Luican, J. Lopes dos Santos, A. Castro Neto, A. Reina, J. Kong, and E. Andrei, Observation of van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers, Nature Physics6, 109 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    W. Yan, M. Liu, R. F. Dou, L. Meng, L. Feng, Z. D. Chu, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. C. Nie, and L. He, Angle- dependent van Hove singularities in a slightly twisted graphene bilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 126801 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    D. Wong, Y. Wang, J. Jung, S. Pezzini, A. M. DaSilva, H. Z. Tsai, H. S. Jung, R. Khajeh, Y. Kim, J. Lee,et al., Local spectroscopy of moir´ e-induced electronic struc- ture in gate-tunable twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B92, 155409 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Y. Kim, P. Herlinger, P. Moon, M. Koshino, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and J. H. Smet, Charge inversion and topological phase transition at a twist an- gle induced van Hove singularity of bilayer graphene, Nano Letters16, 5053 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Ribeiro, K

    H. Ribeiro, K. Sato, G. Eliel, E. De Souza, C. C. Lu, P. W. Chiu, R. Saito, and M. Pimenta, Origin of van Hove singularities in twisted bilayer graphene, Carbon 90, 138 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Van Hove, The occurrence of singularities in the elas- tic frequency distribution of a crystal, Physical Review 89, 1189 (1953)

    L. Van Hove, The occurrence of singularities in the elas- tic frequency distribution of a crystal, Physical Review 89, 1189 (1953)

    work page 1953

  59. [59]

    Markiewicz, Van Hove singularities and high-Tc su- perconductivity, Int

    R. Markiewicz, Van Hove singularities and high-Tc su- perconductivity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B5, 2037 (1991)

    work page 2037

  60. [60]

    N. F. Yuan, H. Isobe, and L. Fu, Magic of high-order van Hove singularity, Nature Comm.10, 5769 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Classen and J

    L. Classen and J. J. Betouras, High-order van Hove sin- gularities and their connection to flat bands, Ann. Rev. CMP16, 229 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene, Nature Materials6, 183 (2007)

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    J. L. McChesney, A. Bostwick, T. Ohta, T. Seyller, K. Horn, J. Gonz´ alez, and E. Rotenberg, Extended van hove singularity and superconducting instability in doped graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 136803 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    Rosenzweig, H

    P. Rosenzweig, H. Karakachian, D. Marchenko, K. K¨ uster, and U. Starke, Overdoping graphene beyond the van Hove singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 176403 8 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    McCann and M

    E. McCann and M. Koshino, The electronic properties of bilayer graphene, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 056503 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    H. Zhou, L. Holleis, Y. Saito, L. Cohen, W. Huynh, C. L. Patterson, F. Yang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in bernal bilayer graphene, Science 375, 774 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Wagner, Y

    G. Wagner, Y. H. Kwan, N. Bultinck, S. H. Simon, and S. Parameswaran, Superconductivity from repulsive interactions in bernal-stacked bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B110, 214517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    J. H. Son, Y. T. Hsu, and E. A. Kim, Switching between superconductivity and current density waves in bernal bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B111, 115144 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Z. Dong, P. A. Lee, and L. Levitov, Charge and spin den- sity wave orders in field-biased bernal bilayer graphene, arXiv2404, 18073 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Kramer and A

    B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, Localization: theory and experiment, Rep. Prog. Phys.56, 1469 (1993)

    work page 1993

  72. [72]

    Rammer, Quantum Transport Theory (CRC Press, 2004)

    J. Rammer, Quantum Transport Theory (CRC Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  73. [73]

    K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. Booth, V. Khotkevich, S. Morozov, and A. K. Geim, Two- dimensional atomic crystals, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451 (2005)

    work page 2005

  74. [74]

    X. Wu, X. Li, Z. Song, C. Berger, and W. A. de Heer, Weak antilocalization in epitaxial graphene: Evidence for chiral electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 136801 (2007)

    work page 2007

  75. [75]

    Tikhonenko, D

    F. Tikhonenko, D. Horsell, R. Gorbachev, and A. Savchenko, Weak localization in graphene flakes, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 056802 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    D. K. Ki, D. Jeong, J. H. Choi, H. J. Lee, and K. S. Park, Inelastic scattering in a monolayer graphene sheet: A weak-localization study, Phys. Rev. B78, 125409 (2008)

    work page 2008

  77. [77]

    Tikhonenko, A

    F. Tikhonenko, A. Kozikov, A. Savchenko, and R. Gor- bachev, Transition between electron localization and an- tilocalization in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 226801 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Horsell, A

    D. Horsell, A. Savchenko, F. Tikhonenko, K. Kechedzhi, I. Lerner, and V. Fal’ko, Mesoscopic conductance fluc- tuations in graphene, Solid State Comm.149, 1041 (2009)

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    Y. F. Chen, M. H. Bae, C. Chialvo, T. Dirks, A. Bezryadin, and N. Mason, Magnetoresistance in single-layer graphene: weak localization and universal conductance fluctuation studies, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 22, 205301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    Berezovsky, M

    J. Berezovsky, M. Borunda, E. J. Heller, and R. M. Westervelt, Imaging coherent transport in graphene (part I): mapping universal conductance fluctuations, Nanotechnology21, 274013 (2010)

    work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.