pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.20568 · v5 · pith:C2MIX7HMnew · submitted 2025-11-25 · 🧮 math.DG · hep-th

On the rigidity of special and exceptional geometries with torsion a closed 3-form

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DG hep-th MSC 53C2553C29
keywords rigiditytorsion 3-formspecial geometriesG2 manifoldsSpin(7) manifoldsHKT manifoldsclosed 3-formproduct decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Riemannian manifolds with a closed and parallel torsion 3-form decompose locally into a product of a torsion-free manifold and a semisimple Lie group.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that under suitable assumptions, a Riemannian manifold equipped with a metric and a closed 3-form H, where H is the torsion of a connection that is covariantly constant with respect to that connection, is locally isometric to the product of a Riemannian manifold N on which H vanishes and a semisimple Lie group G. When the manifold is simply connected and complete, the de Rham theorem implies that this product decomposition holds globally. The result is applied to simplify proofs for strong Calabi-Yau with torsion and hyper-Kahler with torsion manifolds, and to extend similar rigidity results to strong G2 and Spin(7) manifolds with torsion. It further describes the geometry of all complete and simply connected G2 and Spin(7) manifolds satisfying the conditions, and analyzes the group actions on compact strong 8-dimensional HKT manifolds.

Core claim

Manifolds (M, g, H) that admit a connection with torsion the closed 3-form H which is also parallel with respect to the connection are locally isometric to N × G where G is semisimple and H restricts to zero on N. For simply connected complete manifolds the splitting is global.

What carries the argument

The connection with torsion given by a closed 3-form that is covariantly constant, which forces the curvature to allow a product decomposition.

If this is right

  • Strong CYT and HKT manifolds under these hypotheses split as products.
  • The rigidity extends to strong G2 and Spin(7) manifolds with torsion.
  • Complete simply connected G2 and Spin(7) manifolds with these properties have their geometries explicitly described.
  • Compact strong 8-dimensional HKT manifolds not hyper-Kahler admit specific locally free actions or are group manifolds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This rigidity implies that torsion in these special geometries is primarily contributed by semisimple group factors.
  • Similar decomposition techniques might apply to other exceptional geometries or higher-dimensional special holonomy manifolds.
  • The classification of such G2 and Spin(7) manifolds could help in constructing or ruling out compact examples in string theory compactifications.

Load-bearing premise

The manifold, metric, and connection satisfy suitable assumptions that permit the local product decomposition via the properties of the torsion form.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a connected Riemannian manifold with a closed parallel torsion 3-form that is not locally a product of a torsion-free factor and a semisimple group.

read the original abstract

Under some suitable assumptions Riemannian manifolds $(M, g, H)$ that admit a connection $\hat\nabla$ with torsion a 3-form $H$, which is both closed $d H=0$ and $\hat\nabla$-covariantly constant, are locally isometric to a product $N\times G$, where $G$ is a semisimple group and $N$ is a Riemannian manifold with $H\vert_N=0$. If $M$ is simply connected and complete, then by the de Rham theorem $M=N\times G$ globally. We use this to simplify the proof of similar results for strong CYT and HKT manifolds that obey the above hypotheses and extend them to strong $G_2$ and $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ manifolds with torsion. As an application, we describe the geometry of all complete and simply connected $G_2$ and $\mathrm{Spin}(7)$ manifolds that satisfy the above conditions. Compact, strong, 8-dimensional HKT manifolds, which are not hyper-K\"ahler, admit an either $\oplus^4 \mathfrak{u}(1)$ or a $\mathfrak{u}(1)\oplus \mathfrak{su}(2)$ locally free action, otherwise, they are group manifolds. We find that if these Lie algebra actions can be integrated to an appropriate free action of $T^4$ or $S(U(1)\times U(2))$ Lie groups that preserves the span of three complex structures, then these HKT manifolds are either locally isometric and tri-holomorphic to $\mathbb{R}\times S^3\times B^4$ or diffeomorphic to $SU(3)$, where $B^4= \mathbb{R}\times S^3$, $\mathbb{R}^4$ or $K_3$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes a rigidity theorem for Riemannian manifolds (M, g, H) admitting a metric-compatible connection ∇̂ whose torsion is a closed 3-form H that is also ∇̂-parallel. Under explicitly stated assumptions (including algebraic curvature conditions ensuring reducible holonomy), such manifolds are locally isometric to a product N × G with G semisimple and H vanishing on N. When M is simply connected and complete, the de Rham theorem yields a global splitting. The result is applied to simplify proofs for strong CYT and HKT manifolds and to extend analogous statements to strong G₂ and Spin(7) manifolds with torsion. Further applications classify the geometry of all complete simply connected G₂ and Spin(7) manifolds satisfying the hypotheses and describe compact strong 8-dimensional HKT manifolds (not hyper-Kähler) in terms of local free actions or group manifold structures.

Significance. If the central claims hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a unified, transparent framework for rigidity results in special and exceptional geometries with closed parallel torsion, relying on standard holonomy reduction and the de Rham decomposition theorem. Strengths include the explicit listing of hypotheses, the direct specialization of the general argument to CYT, HKT, G₂, and Spin(7) cases without additional hidden conditions, and the concrete classification statements for HKT and exceptional manifolds. These features enhance reproducibility and applicability within the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (curvature conditions): The algebraic conditions on the curvature of ∇̂ that make the orthogonal complement to the kernel of the torsion map parallel with respect to the Levi-Civita connection are load-bearing for the reducible holonomy representation and subsequent local product decomposition; these conditions should be stated explicitly (perhaps as an equation or proposition) and verified directly for the Spin(7) specialization to confirm the argument applies without additional assumptions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The opening phrase 'under some suitable assumptions' could be replaced by a concise list of the key hypotheses (metric compatibility, ∇̂H = 0, dH = 0, and the curvature conditions) to improve immediate readability.
  2. [HKT section] HKT classification paragraph: The statement that the Lie algebra actions integrate to a free action of T⁴ or S(U(1)×U(2)) preserving the span of the three complex structures would benefit from a brief remark on the integrability conditions required for the resulting local isometry or diffeomorphism types.
  3. [Introduction] Notation: The symbol Ĝ for the connection is introduced without an immediate reminder of its metric compatibility; a parenthetical note at first use would aid clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, the positive evaluation of the manuscript, and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (curvature conditions): The algebraic conditions on the curvature of ∇̂ that make the orthogonal complement to the kernel of the torsion map parallel with respect to the Levi-Civita connection are load-bearing for the reducible holonomy representation and subsequent local product decomposition; these conditions should be stated explicitly (perhaps as an equation or proposition) and verified directly for the Spin(7) specialization to confirm the argument applies without additional assumptions.

    Authors: We agree that these algebraic curvature conditions are central to establishing the reducible holonomy and the local product decomposition. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit proposition in §3 that isolates the required curvature conditions on ∇̂ as an equation. We will also include a direct verification for the Spin(7) case, showing that the conditions hold under the standard hypotheses already stated for strong Spin(7) manifolds with torsion and that no further assumptions are needed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard external theorems

full rationale

The central claim follows from explicitly stated assumptions on the metric-compatible connection ∇̂ with ∇̂H=0 and dH=0, plus algebraic curvature conditions ensuring the orthogonal complement to the kernel of the torsion map is parallel under the Levi-Civita connection. This yields a reducible holonomy representation implying local product structure N×G. The global splitting then invokes the classical de Rham theorem on simply-connected complete manifolds, which is an independent external result. Extensions to CYT, HKT, G2 and Spin(7) cases are direct specializations of the same holonomy argument with no additional fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work; the argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard differential-geometric background results with no free parameters or newly postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • standard math de Rham decomposition theorem for simply connected complete Riemannian manifolds
    Invoked to promote the local product isometry to a global product when M is simply connected and complete.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5860 in / 1251 out tokens · 35882 ms · 2026-05-21T18:24:12.915990+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometries with parallel, skew-symmetric and closed torsion

    math.DG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PSCT manifolds locally split into products of well-understood factors for complete local classification, with analysis of almost Hermitian G-structures in Gray-Hervella classes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Geometry, Topology and Supersymmetry in Nonlinear Models,

    T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos, “Geometry, Topology and Supersymmetry in Nonlinear Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1799 (1984)

  2. [2]

    Two-dimensional supersymmetric nonlinear sigma-models with torsion,

    P. S. Howe and G. Sierra, “Two-dimensional supersymmetric nonlinear sigma-models with torsion,” Phys. Lett. B148, 451-455 (1984)

  3. [3]

    Twisted Multiplets and New Supersymmetric Nonlinear sigma-models,

    S. J. Gates, Jr., C. M. Hull and M. Roˇ cek, “Twisted Multiplets and New Supersymmetric Nonlinear sigma-models,” Nucl. Phys. B248, 157-186 (1984)

  4. [4]

    Supersymmetric Sigma-Models and the Heterotic String,

    C. M. Hull and E. Witten, “Supersymmetric Sigma-Models and the Heterotic String,” Phys. Lett. B160, 398-402 (1985)

  5. [5]

    Torsion and Geometrostasis in Nonlinear sigma-models,

    E. Braaten, T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos, “Torsion and Geometrostasis in Nonlinear sigma-models,” Nucl. Phys. B260, 630 (1985) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B266, 748-748 (1986)]

  6. [6]

    Superstrings with Torsion,

    A. Strominger, “Superstrings with Torsion,” Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 253

  7. [7]

    Compactifications of the Heterotic Superstring,

    C. M. Hull, “Compactifications of the Heterotic Superstring,” Phys. Lett. B178, 357-364 (1986) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91393-6

  8. [8]

    Thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Holes and Conformal Field Theories,

    P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Further Remarks on the Geometry of Two- dimensional Nonlinear σ Models,” Class. Quant. Grav.5(1988), 1647-1661 doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/5/12/014 28

  9. [9]

    Twistor spaces for HKT manifolds

    P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor spaces for HKT manifolds,” Phys. Lett. B379 (1996), 80-86 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00393-0 [arXiv:hep-th/9602108 [hep-th]]

  10. [10]

    Geometry of Hyper-K\"ahler Connections with Torsion

    G. Grantcharov and Y. S. Poon, “Geometry of hyper-Kahler connections with torsion,” Commun. Math. Phys.213(2000), 19-37 doi:10.1007/s002200000231 [arXiv:math/9908015 [math]]

  11. [11]

    Vanishing Theorems and String Backgrounds

    S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos, “Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds,” Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001), 1089-1110 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/309 [arXiv:math/0010038 [math.DG]]

  12. [12]

    Geometric Model for Complex Non-Kaehler Manifolds with SU(3) Structure

    E. Goldstein and S. Prokushkin, “Geometric model for complex nonKahler manifolds with SU(3) structure,” Commun. Math. Phys.251(2004), 65-78 doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1167-7 [arXiv:hep-th/0212307 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    Families of strong KT structures in six dimensions

    A . Fino, M . Parton and S . Salamon,“Families of strong KT structures in six dimensions,” [arXiv:math/0209259 math.DG]

  14. [14]

    Calabi-Yau Connections with Torsion on Toric Bundles

    D. Grantcharov, G. Grantcharov and Y. S. Poon, “Calabi-Yau connections with torsion on toric bundles,” J. Diff. Geom.78(2008) no.1, 13-32 [arXiv:math/0306207 [math.DG]]

  15. [15]

    Non-Kaehler Heterotic String Compactifications with non-zero fluxes and constant dilaton

    M. Fernandez, S. Ivanov, L. Ugarte and R. Villacampa, “Non-Kaehler Heterotic String Compactifications with non-zero fluxes and constant dilaton,” Commun. Math. Phys.288 (2009), 677-697 doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0714-z [arXiv:0804.1648 [math.DG]]

  16. [16]

    Three-Manifolds with Positive Ricci Curvature,

    R. S. Hamilton, “Three-Manifolds with Positive Ricci Curvature,” J. Diff. Geom.17(1982) 255

  17. [17]

    The Formation of Singularities in Ricci Flow,

    R. S. Hamilton, “The Formation of Singularities in Ricci Flow,” Surveys in Differential Geometry, (1995) Vol 2, International Press

  18. [18]

    Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric appli - cations, arXiv math.DG/0211159, (2002)

    G. Perelman, “The Entropy Formula For The Ricci Flow and Its Applications,” math.DG/0211159

  19. [19]

    Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds

    G. Perelman, “Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three- manifolds,” [arXiv:math/0307245 [math.DG]]

  20. [20]

    A Gradient Flow for Worldsheet Nonlinear Sigma Models

    T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeeta, and E. Woolgar, “A Gradient Flow for Worldsheet Nonlinear Sigma-Models,” Nucl. Phys.B739(2006) 441-458, arXiv:hep-th/0510239

  21. [21]

    Irreversibility of World-sheet Renormalization Group Flow

    T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeta, and E. Woolgar, “Irreversibility of World-sheet Renormalization Group Flow,” Phys.Lett.B610(2005) 115-121, arXiv:hep-th/0410001

  22. [22]

    On sigma model RG flow, "central charge" action and Perelman's entropy

    A. A. Tseytlin, “On Sigma-model RG Flow, ‘Central Charge’ Action, and Perelman’s Entropy,” arXiv:hep-th/0612296

  23. [23]

    Generalized Ricci flow and supergravity vacuum solutions,

    S. Hu, Z. Hu and R. Zhang, “Generalized Ricci flow and supergravity vacuum solutions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25, 2535-2549 (2010)

  24. [24]

    Regularity results for pluriclosed flow

    J. Streets and G. Tian, “Regularity results for pluriclosed flow,” [arXiv:1008.2794 [math.DG]]

  25. [25]

    Generalized Kahler Geometry and the Pluriclosed Flow

    J. Streets and G. Tian, “Generalized K¨ ahler geometry and the pluriclosed flow,” Nucl. Phys. B858, 366-376 (2012) [arXiv:1109.0503 [math.DG]]. 29

  26. [26]

    Garcia-Fernandez and J

    M. Garcia-Fernandez and J. Streets,Generalized Ricci Flow(American Mathematical Society, 2021), arXiv:2008.07004

  27. [27]

    Scale and conformal invariance in 2d σ-models, with an application to N = 4 supersymmetry,

    G. Papadopoulos and E. Witten, “Scale and conformal invariance in 2d σ-models, with an application to N = 4 supersymmetry,” JHEP03(2025), 056 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)056 [arXiv:2404.19526 [hep-th]]

  28. [28]

    Scale and conformal invariance in heterotic σ-models,

    G. Papadopoulos, “Scale and conformal invariance in heterotic σ-models,” JHEP09(2025), 112 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)112 [arXiv:2409.01818 [hep-th]]

  29. [29]

    L¨ ubke and A

    M. L¨ ubke and A. Teleman, ” The Kobayashi-Hitchin correspondence,” World Scientific (1995)

  30. [30]

    Instantons, Poisson structures and generalized Kaehler geometry

    N. Hitchin, “Instantons, Poisson structures and generalized Kahler geometry,” Commun. Math. Phys.265(2006), 131-164 [arXiv:math/0503432 [math.DG]]

  31. [31]

    Stable bundles on hypercomplex surfaces

    R. Moraru and M. Verbitsky, ”Stable bundles on hyper-complex surfaces,” [arXiv:math/0611714]

  32. [32]

    Instantons and the large N = 4 algebra,

    E. Witten, “Instantons and the large N = 4 algebra,” J. Phys. A58(2025) no.3, 035403 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ada64d [arXiv:2407.20964 [hep-th]]

  33. [33]

    Geometry and symmetries of Hermitian-Einstein and instanton connec- tion moduli spaces,

    G. Papadopoulos, “Geometry and symmetries of Hermitian-Einstein and instanton connec- tion moduli spaces,” J. Geom. Phys.213(2025), 105474 doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2025.105474 [arXiv:2501.09474 [hep-th]]

  34. [34]

    Twistor Spaces for QKT Manifolds

    P. S. Howe, A. Opfermann and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor spaces for QKT manifolds,” Com- mun. Math. Phys.197(1998), 713-727 doi:10.1007/s002200050469 [arXiv:hep-th/9710072 [hep-th]]

  35. [35]

    Homogeneous HKT and QKT manifolds,

    A. Opfermann and G. Papadopoulos, “Homogeneous HKT and QKT manifolds,” [arXiv:math- ph/9807026 [math-ph]]

  36. [36]

    CYT and SKT manifolds with parallel Bismut torsion,

    B . Brienza, A . Fino and G . Grantcharov, “CYT and SKT manifolds with parallel Bismut torsion,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics, CUP, (2024), 1-26; [arXiv:2401.07800 [math.DG]], DOI=10.1017/prm.2024.115

  37. [37]

    Pluriclosed manifolds with parallel Bismut torsion

    G. Barbaro, F. Pediconi and N . Tardini, “Pluriclosed manifolds with parallel Bismut torsion,” [ArXiv: 2406.07039 math.DG]

  38. [38]

    The classification of non-K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau geometries on threefolds,

    V. Apostolov, G. Barbaro, K. H. Lee and J. Streets, “The classification of non-K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau geometries on threefolds,” [arXiv:2408.09648 [math.DG]]

  39. [39]

    On the structure of compact strong HKT manifolds,

    B . Brienza, A . Fino, G. Grantcharov and M . Verbitsky, “On the structure of compact strong HKT manifolds,” [arXiv:2505.06058 [math.DG]]

  40. [40]

    A no-go theorem for string warped compactifications

    S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos, “A No go theorem for string warped compactifications,” Phys. Lett. B497(2001), 309-316 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01330-7 [arXiv:hep-th/0008232 [hep-th]]

  41. [41]

    Self-Dual Manifolds with Positive Ricci Curvature

    C . LeBrun, S . Nayatani and T . Nitta, “Self-dual manifolds with positive Ricci curvature,” Mathematische Zeitschrift224no1(1997), 49-63. [arXiv:dg-ga/9411001] 30

  42. [42]

    The spinorial geometry of supersymmetric heterotic string backgrounds

    U. Gran, P. Lohrmann and G. Papadopoulos, “The Spinorial geometry of supersymmetric heterotic string backgrounds,” JHEP02(2006), 063 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/02/063 [arXiv:hep-th/0510176 [hep-th]]

  43. [43]

    Classification, geometry and applications of supersymmetric backgrounds

    U. Gran, J. Gutowski and G. Papadopoulos, “Classification, geometry and applications of su- persymmetric backgrounds,” Phys. Rept.794(2019), 1-87 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.005 [arXiv:1808.07879 [hep-th]]

  44. [44]

    Extended Supersymmetric sigma- models on Group Manifolds. 1. The Complex Structures,

    P. Spindel, A. Sevrin, W. Troost and A. Van Proeyen, “Extended Supersymmetric sigma- models on Group Manifolds. 1. The Complex Structures,” Nucl. Phys. B308, 662-698 (1988)

  45. [45]

    Killing spinor equations in dimension 7 and geometry of integrable G_2-manifolds

    T. Friedrich and S. Ivanov, “Killing spinor equations in dimension 7 and geometry of integrable G(2) manifolds,” J. Geom. Phys.48, 1 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(03)00005-6 [arXiv:math/0112201 [math.DG]]

  46. [46]

    Metrics with exceptional holonomy,

    R . L . Bryant, “Metrics with exceptional holonomy,” Annals of Mathematics,126no3 (1987), 525-576; doi 10.2307/1971360

  47. [47]

    On the construction of some complete metrics with exceptional holonomy,

    R . L . Bryant and S . M . Salamon, “On the construction of some complete metrics with exceptional holonomy,” Duke Mathematical Journal58no3(1989), 829-850; doi 10.1215/S0012-7094-89-05839-0

  48. [48]

    Connection with torsion, parallel spinors and geometry of Spin(7) manifolds

    S. Ivanov, “Connection with torsion, parallel spinors and geometry of spin(7) manifolds,” [arXiv:math/0111216 [math.DG]]

  49. [49]

    Lorentzian Cayley Form,

    K . Krasnov, “Lorentzian Cayley Form,” [arXiv:math/2304.01118 [math.DG]]

  50. [50]

    Notes on the octonions

    D . A . Salamon and T . Walpuski, “Notes on the octonions,” [arXiv:1005.2820 [math.RA]]

  51. [51]

    Ivanov, N

    S. Ivanov and N. Stanchev, “The Riemannian Bianchi identities of metric connections with skew torsion and generalized Ricci solitons,” [arXiv:2307.03986 [math.DG]]

  52. [52]

    The Riemannian curvature identities of a G2 connection with skew-symmetric torsion and generalized Ricci solitons,

    S. Ivanov and N. Stanchev, “The Riemannian curvature identities of a G2 connection with skew-symmetric torsion and generalized Ricci solitons,” [arXiv:2307.05619 [math.DG]]

  53. [53]

    Geometry of Quaternionic K\"ahler connections with torsion

    S. Ivanov, “Geometry of quaternionic Kahler connections with torsion,” J. Geom. Phys.41 (2002), 235-257 doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(01)00058-4 [arXiv:math/0003214 [math]]

  54. [54]

    Geometry and supersymmetry of heterotic warped flux AdS backgrounds

    S. W. Beck, J. B. Gutowski and G. Papadopoulos, “Geometry and supersymmetry of het- erotic warped flux AdS backgrounds,” JHEP07(2015), 152 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)152 [arXiv:1505.01693 [hep-th]]

  55. [55]

    Riemannian geometry and holonomy groups,

    S . Salamon, “Riemannian geometry and holonomy groups,” Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, Longman Group (1989). 31