pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01654 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Quasistatic response for nonequilibrium processes: evaluating the Berry potential and curvature

Aaron Beyen , Faezeh Khodabandehlou , Christian Maes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords nonequilibrium thermodynamicsBerry phaseMarkov jump processesquasistatic responseBerry curvatureClausius theoremMaxwell relationsentropy flux
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cyclic changes in nonequilibrium steady states produce excess responses given by a geometric Berry phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how slow time-dependent perturbations change the expected excesses in observables such as dynamical activity and entropy flux for systems already in a nonequilibrium steady state. For closed cycles in the space of control parameters, these excesses take the form of a Berry phase computed directly from the instantaneous steady-state distribution. The associated Berry potential and curvature then quantify the geometric contribution to the response. Nonzero curvature implies that standard thermodynamic identities, including Maxwell relations and the Clausius heat theorem, cease to hold. The work also identifies a parameter-space analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect and sufficient conditions, based on mean first-passage times, under which the geometric quantities vanish at absolute zero.

Core claim

When slow cyclic perturbations are applied to a Markov jump process in a nonequilibrium steady state, the excess values of observables are expressed through a Berry phase extracted from the steady-state probability distribution. The Berry potential and its curvature serve as the response functions that measure this geometric excess. Nonzero curvature produces a breakdown of the thermodynamic Maxwell relations and of the Clausius heat theorem. The same framework yields a parameter-space version of the Aharonov-Bohm effect in which a nonzero phase accumulates along a path with vanishing curvature, and it supplies sufficient no-localization conditions, stated in terms of mean first-passage time

What carries the argument

The Berry phase extracted from the nonequilibrium steady-state distribution of a Markov jump process, which defines the potential and curvature that quantify excess responses to slow cyclic driving.

If this is right

  • Excesses in dynamical activity and entropy flux during a cycle equal the Berry phase accumulated along the closed path in parameter space.
  • Nonzero Berry curvature implies that thermodynamic Maxwell relations no longer hold.
  • The Clausius heat theorem is violated whenever the Berry curvature is nonzero.
  • Under no-localization conditions expressed via mean first-passage times, both Berry potential and curvature vanish at absolute zero for arbitrary driving protocols.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric construction could be tested in other driven classical systems whose steady states are known analytically or numerically.
  • Measuring the curvature in an experiment would give a direct signature that standard equilibrium thermodynamic identities must be replaced by nonequilibrium versions.
  • The Aharonov-Bohm analogue suggests that phase accumulation can occur even when local curvature is zero, which might be observable in systems with topologically nontrivial parameter spaces.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbations must be slow enough that the system remains in a well-defined nonequilibrium steady state at every instant so that the Berry quantities can be read off from the steady-state distribution alone.

What would settle it

Perform a slow cyclic protocol on a concrete Markov jump process, compute the excess entropy flux from direct simulation or experiment, and compare it with the line integral of the Berry potential around the same cycle; a statistically significant mismatch would falsify the claimed geometric description.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.01654 by Aaron Beyen, Christian Maes, Faezeh Khodabandehlou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows these responses as function of β2 for α = 1, β1 = 0.5 and β1 = 3. R1 α , β1=0.5 R1 α , β1=3 R2 α , β1=0.5 R2 α , β1=3 0 1 2 3 4 5 -0.025 -0.020 -0.015 -0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 β2 FIG. 4: The response RPi α of the excess heat to each of the heat baths upon changing the switching rate α in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (b) shows that the driving E does not significantly affect the excess reactivity for large driving, since the corresponding response RA E becomes small. Example 3: Excess current To illustrate how to calculate the excess current (27), consider the jump process on the graph in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: j(1,2)/a j(4,6)/a 0 2 4 6 8 10 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 α Steady current (a) β=1 β=1.5 0 2 4 6 8 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 α exc(4,6) (b) FIG. 9: (a) Steady currents jλ (in units of a) in the left and right triangles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate how introducing slow, time-dependent perturbations to a steady, nonequilibrium process alters the expected (excess) values of important observables, such as the dynamical activity and entropy flux. When we make a cyclic thermodynamic transformation, the excesses are described in terms of a (geometric) Berry phase with corresponding Berry potential and Berry curvature quantifying the response. Focussing on Markov jump processes, we show how a non-zero Berry curvature leads to a breakdown of the thermodynamic Maxwell relations and of the Clausius heat theorem. We also present a variant of the Aharonov-Bohm effect in which the parameters follow a curve with vanishing Berry curvature, but the system still experiences a nonzero Berry phase. Finally, we identify (sufficient) no-localization conditions in terms of mean first-passage times under which the corresponding Berry potentials and curvatures vanish at absolute zero, extending, for arbitrary driving, e.g., the case of vanishing heat capacity as for the Nernst postulate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a geometric framework for the quasistatic response of nonequilibrium steady states under slow time-dependent driving, focusing on Markov jump processes. Excess dynamical activity and entropy flux for cyclic protocols are expressed as a Berry phase computed from the instantaneous steady-state distribution, with the associated Berry potential and curvature quantifying the response. Nonzero curvature is shown to violate thermodynamic Maxwell relations and the Clausius heat theorem. The work also presents an Aharonov-Bohm-like effect with vanishing curvature but nonzero phase, and derives sufficient no-localization conditions (via mean first-passage times) under which the Berry quantities vanish at absolute zero, extending the Nernst postulate.

Significance. If the central derivations are free of gaps, the paper supplies a parameter-free geometric interpretation of excess observables in driven nonequilibrium systems. This could unify aspects of stochastic thermodynamics with Berry-phase concepts, offering falsifiable predictions for the breakdown of equilibrium-like relations under cyclic driving and concrete conditions for zero-temperature behavior. The explicit treatment of Markov processes and the Aharonov-Bohm variant add technical value.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of excess observables and Berry curvature (around the quasistatic expansion)] The central identification of excess entropy flux and dynamical activity with a Berry phase (computed solely from the instantaneous nonequilibrium steady-state distribution) is load-bearing for the claimed breakdown of Maxwell relations and Clausius theorem. The derivation must explicitly demonstrate that the O(ε) correction in the adiabatic parameter ε is purely geometric and independent of the relaxation spectrum; if mean first-passage times remain comparable to the driving period, transient currents enter at the same order and the curvature interpretation does not hold.
  2. [Zero-temperature section on mean first-passage times] The no-localization conditions stated in terms of mean first-passage times are used to conclude vanishing Berry potential/curvature at T=0 for arbitrary driving. It is necessary to show that these conditions are sufficient to eliminate all non-geometric contributions uniformly along the cycle, rather than only for specific protocols or equilibrium limits.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and definitions] Notation for the Berry potential and curvature should be introduced with explicit formulas early in the text to aid readability, especially when contrasting with equilibrium thermodynamic potentials.
  2. [Discussion of Maxwell relations] The manuscript would benefit from a brief comparison table or explicit example contrasting the new nonequilibrium Maxwell relations with their equilibrium counterparts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments raise important points regarding the rigor of the quasistatic expansion and the zero-temperature analysis. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of excess observables and Berry curvature (around the quasistatic expansion)] The central identification of excess entropy flux and dynamical activity with a Berry phase (computed solely from the instantaneous nonequilibrium steady-state distribution) is load-bearing for the claimed breakdown of Maxwell relations and Clausius theorem. The derivation must explicitly demonstrate that the O(ε) correction in the adiabatic parameter ε is purely geometric and independent of the relaxation spectrum; if mean first-passage times remain comparable to the driving period, transient currents enter at the same order and the curvature interpretation does not hold.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of timescale separation is essential for the geometric interpretation. In the manuscript the quasistatic expansion is performed under the assumption that the driving rate ε is small compared with the inverse of the longest relaxation time set by the mean first-passage times of the Markov generator. Under this condition the probability distribution follows the instantaneous steady state plus an O(ε) correction whose leading term is the Berry connection evaluated on the manifold of steady-state distributions; transient currents decay exponentially and do not contribute at order ε. We will revise the derivation section to include a short paragraph that states this spectral-gap assumption explicitly and shows that the O(ε) excess is thereby independent of further details of the relaxation spectrum beyond the existence of a gap. This clarification will also be cross-referenced to the discussion of the Aharonov-Bohm variant. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Zero-temperature section on mean first-passage times] The no-localization conditions stated in terms of mean first-passage times are used to conclude vanishing Berry potential/curvature at T=0 for arbitrary driving. It is necessary to show that these conditions are sufficient to eliminate all non-geometric contributions uniformly along the cycle, rather than only for specific protocols or equilibrium limits.

    Authors: The no-localization conditions are formulated directly on the instantaneous generator at each point of the parameter manifold and require that the mean first-passage times diverge as T→0 for every admissible driving protocol. Because the conditions are uniform in the control parameters and the cycle is compact, the localization (and consequent vanishing of the Berry quantities) holds uniformly along the entire path. Non-geometric contributions, which rely on finite relaxation rates, are likewise suppressed uniformly once the mean first-passage times become arbitrarily large. We will expand the zero-temperature section with a brief argument making this uniformity explicit and noting that the argument applies to arbitrary cyclic protocols, thereby extending the Nernst-like statement beyond equilibrium. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard Berry geometry to parameter-dependent steady states

full rationale

The paper constructs the Berry potential and curvature directly from the instantaneous nonequilibrium steady-state distribution via the standard adiabatic phase definition for Markov jump processes. Excess observables are then obtained as first-order corrections in the slow-driving expansion of the master equation, which is an independent dynamical calculation rather than a redefinition or fit. No load-bearing self-citations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work; the claimed breakdown of Maxwell relations follows mathematically from nonzero curvature in the quasistatic limit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on the standard mathematical definition of Berry phase for a parameter-dependent family of steady-state distributions of Markov processes, plus the assumption that slow driving allows adiabatic following of the instantaneous steady state.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is described by a continuous-time Markov jump process whose transition rates depend smoothly on external parameters.
    Invoked to define the steady-state distribution from which the Berry connection is constructed.
  • domain assumption The driving is slow enough that the system stays close to the instantaneous nonequilibrium steady state throughout the cycle.
    Required for the quasistatic excess to be captured by the geometric Berry phase rather than transient dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5477 in / 1498 out tokens · 28001 ms · 2026-05-17T03:00:21.718420+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Specific heat of thermally driven chains

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A harmonic oscillator chain driven by boundary temperature differences has a nonequilibrium specific heat matrix that depends on friction coefficient differences and acquires nontrivial temperature dependence when bat...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    That discretization is in line with the necessary quantum (and quantization) aspects that show up for physical systems at very low temperatures

    We restrict ourselves to Markov jump processes. That discretization is in line with the necessary quantum (and quantization) aspects that show up for physical systems at very low temperatures. Shortly, it will become clear how, for instance, tunneling effects con- tribute positively as well. Moreover, the transition rates of the Markov jump process need t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Secondly, there is an equilibrium-like condition, that the low-temperature behavior in an open neighborhood of parameters is determined equally bydominantstatesx ∗of the system. More specifically, we suppose that for the considered parameter value, there is a setBof states (called dominant) and an open neighborhoodD ∗around that value 4, so that lim β↑∞ ρ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    For example, in the case of Fig

    So far, these conditions do not deviate much from the typical equilibrium statistical mechanical setup for the Third Law (except that we do not consider limits of spatial 4 Importantly,D∗does not need to be narrow. For example, in the case of Fig. 5, one finds that for any values of U >4 and 0≤E≤1.5, the stationary probability at low temperature satisfies...

    work page

  4. [4]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz.Statistical Physics, Part 1, volume 5 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    Pippard.Elements of Classical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics

    A.B. Pippard.Elements of Classical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics. University Press, 1966

    work page 1966

  6. [6]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. Nonequilibrium corrections to gradient flow.Chaos, 29(7), 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Oono and M

    Y. Oono and M. Paniconi. Steady State Thermodynamics.Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 130:29–44, (1998)

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Hatano and S.-i

    T. Hatano and S.-i. Sasa. Steady-State Thermodynamics of Langevin Systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(16):3463–3466, 2001

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Boksenbojm, C

    E. Boksenbojm, C. Maes, K. Netoˇ cn´ y, and J. Peˇ sek. Heat capacity in nonequilibrium steady states. Europhys. Lett., 96(4):40001, (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    T. S. Komatsu, N. Nakagawa, S. Sasa, and H. Tasaki. Steady-State Thermodynamics for Heat Conduction: Microscopic Derivation.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100(23), June 2008

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. Revisiting the Glansdorff–Prigogine Criterion for Stability within Irre- versible Thermodynamics.Journal of Statistical Physics, 159(6):1286–1299, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Khodabandehlou, C

    F. Khodabandehlou, C. Maes, and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. A Nernst heat theorem for nonequilibrium jump processes.J. Chem. Phys., 158(20), (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    C. Maes. Local detailed balance.SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, page 32, (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    M. V. Berry. Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 392(1802):45–57, 1984

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    M. V. Berry. Classical adiabatic angles and quantal adiabatic phase.J. Phys. A, 18(1):15, 1985

    work page 1985

  16. [16]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Shapere.Geometric Phases in Physics. Advanced series in mathematical physics. World Scientific, 1989

    work page 1989

  17. [17]

    J. H. Hannay. Angle variable holonomy in adiabatic excursion of an integrable Hamiltonian.J. Phys. A, 18(2):221, 1985

    work page 1985

  18. [18]

    Kariyado and Y

    T. Kariyado and Y. Hatsugai. Hannay Angle: Yet Another Symmetry-Protected Topological Order Parameter in Classical Mechanics.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 85(4):043001, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    J. Robbins. The Hannay angle, thirty years on.J. Phys. A, 49, 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    N. A. Sinitsyn and I. Nemenman. The Berry phase and the pump flux in stochastic chemical kinetics.EPL, 77(5):58001, 2007

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    V. Y. Chernyak and N. A. Sinitsyn. Robust quantization of a molecular motor motion in a stochastic environment.J. Chem. Phys., 131(18), November 2009

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    N. A. Sinitsyn. The stochastic pump effect and geometric phases in dissipative and stochastic systems.J. Phys. A, 42(19):193001, 2009

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Sacristan, F

    J. Sacristan, F. Alvarez, and J. Colmenero. On the momentum transfer dependence of the atomic motions in the alpha-relaxation range. Polymers vs. low–molecular-weight glass-forming systems. EPL, 80(3):38001, 2007. 27

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    C. Z. Ning and H. Haken. Geometrical phase and amplitude accumulations in dissipative systems with cyclic attractors.Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:2109–2112, 1992

    work page 1992

  25. [25]

    Ning and H

    C.Z. Ning and H. Haken. The geometric phase in nonlinear dissipative systems.Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 06(25):1541–1568, 1992

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm. Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory. Phys. Rev., 115:485–491, 1959

    work page 1959

  27. [27]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano.Modern Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 3 edition, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    T. S. Komatsu, N. Nakagawa, S. Sasa, and H. Tasaki. Representation of Nonequilibrium Steady States in Large Mechanical Systems.J. Stat. Phys., 134(2):401–423, (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Khodabandehlou, C

    F. Khodabandehlou, C. Maes, I. Maes, and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. The Vanishing of Excess Heat for Nonequi- librium Processes Reaching Zero Ambient Temperature.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 25(7):3371–3403, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    C. Maes. Frenesy: Time-symmetric dynamical activity in nonequilibria.Phys. Rep., 850:1–33, 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Khodabandehlou and I

    F. Khodabandehlou and I. Maes. Drazin-Inverse and heat capacity for driven random walks on the ring.Stoch. Process. Their Appl., 164:337–356, (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Khodabandehlou, C

    F. Khodabandehlou, C. Maes, and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. On the Poisson equation for nonreversible Markov jump processes.J. Math. Phys., 65(4), 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. Nonequilibrium calorimetry.J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp., 2019(11):114004, (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Khodabandehlou, C

    F. Khodabandehlou, C. Maes, and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. Affine relationships between steady currents.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 58(15):155002, 2025

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Gabriel.Differential Geometry in Physics

    L. Gabriel.Differential Geometry in Physics. University of North Carolina Wilmington William Madison Randall Library, 10 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Demaerel, C

    T. Demaerel, C. Maes, and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. Stabilization in the Eye of a Cyclone.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 19(9):2673–2699, 2018

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Baiesi, C

    M. Baiesi, C. Maes, and B. Wynants. Nonequilibrium Linear Response for Markov Dynamics, I: Jump Processes and Overdamped Diffusions.J. Stat. Phys., 137(5):1094–1116, 2009

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Baiesi, C

    M. Baiesi, C. Maes, and B. Wynants. Fluctuations and Response of Nonequilibrium States.Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:010602, 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Baiesi and C

    M. Baiesi and C. Maes. An update on the nonequilibrium linear response.New J. Phys., 15(1):013004, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Pei and C

    J.-H. Pei and C. Maes. Induced friction on a probe moving in a nonequilibrium medium.Phys. Rev. E, 111(3), 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    C. Maes. Response Theory: A Trajectory-Based Approach.Front. Phys., 8, 2020

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Clausius

    R. Clausius. Ueber verschiedene f¨ ur die Anwendung bequeme Formen der Hauptgleichungen der mechanischen W¨ armetheorie.Ann. Phys., 125:353–400, 1865

    work page

  43. [43]

    T. S. Komatsu and N. Nakagawa. Expression for the Stationary Distribution in Nonequilibrium Steady States.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:030601, (2008). 28

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Netoˇ cn´ y. A Nonequilibrium Extension of the Clausius Heat Theorem.J. Stat. Phys., 154(1–2):188–203, 2013

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Khodabandehlou and C

    F. Khodabandehlou and C. Maes. Close-to-equilibrium heat capacity.J. Phys. A, 57(20):205001, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Bertini, D

    L. Bertini, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim. Thermodynamic Transformations of Nonequilibrium States.J. Stat. Phys., 149(5):773–802, (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Bertini, D

    L. Bertini, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim. Clausius Inequality and Optimality of Quasistatic Transformations for Nonequilibrium Stationary States.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(2), (2013)

    work page 2013