pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.07548 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Static Dielectric Permittivity Profiles and Coarse-graining Approaches for Water in Graphene Slit Pores

Philipp St\"ark , Henrik Stoo{\ss} , Philip Loche , Douwe Jan Bonthuis , Roland R. Netz , Alexander Schlaich This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords waterdielectric permittivitygraphene slit poresnanoconfinementGreen-Kubo relationeffective-medium theoryinterfacial capacitancepolarization correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Water retains a bulk-like dielectric response down to 1 nm confinement in graphene slit pores, with the reduced effective response for capacitance arising from dielectric interface placement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper re-derives the Green-Kubo relation for the spatially resolved linear dielectric response of fluids under planar confinement, explicitly including boundary conditions to ensure consistency between equilibrium fluctuations and external-field methods. Simulations of water in graphene slits then show that local permittivity profiles remain close to bulk values even at separations of about 1 nm. The apparent drop in effective dielectric constant that controls capacitance is traced to the location chosen for the dielectric boundary rather than to any intrinsic change in the water's polarization correlations. Effective-medium theory is used to demonstrate that this local bulk-like picture is compatible with longer-range reductions reported in experiments and earlier calculations. The resulting framework maps microscopic profiles onto macroscopic observables such as interfacial capacitance without additional fitting parameters.

Core claim

By re-deriving the Green-Kubo formula with explicit boundary conditions for planar geometry, the spatially resolved dielectric permittivity of water is shown to stay bulk-like down to roughly 1 nm confinement; the reduced effective permittivity that enters capacitance formulas is produced simply by the position of the dielectric interface, and effective-medium coarse-graining confirms that this microscopic behavior accounts for the longer-range reductions seen in experiments.

What carries the argument

Re-derived Green-Kubo relation with explicit boundary conditions for spatially resolved linear dielectric response, combined with effective-medium theory for coarse-graining profiles to macroscopic capacitance.

Load-bearing premise

The re-derived Green-Kubo relation with explicit boundary conditions fully captures the linear dielectric response without residual finite-size or model-specific artifacts, and effective-medium theory maps the microscopic profiles to macroscopic observables without extra fitting parameters.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that an independent external-field simulation or a different linear-response method yields a dielectric profile that deviates substantially from the equilibrium Green-Kubo profile inside the same 1 nm slit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.07548 by Alexander Schlaich, Douwe Jan Bonthuis, Henrik Stoo{\ss}, Philip Loche, Philipp St\"ark, Roland R. Netz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic illustration of typically employed boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Snapshot of the simulation system and represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Schematic illustration of the virtual cutting method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Dielectric profiles at the graphene/water interface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Schematic illustration of the different lengths in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a): Number density profiles of the TIP4P/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Panels a) and b): Interfacial dielectric shifts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: compares the experimentally measured effec￾tive perpendicular dielectric constant ε eff ⊥ as a function of the graphene distance L (green stars) to our effective dielectric medium following from eq. (36) (red circles). The clear mismatch we find can be attributed to sev￾eral possible origins. First of all, the distance over which the potential drops could be different, however, as we discuss below, in orde… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Panel a): Effective perpendicular dielectric constant obtained from the equivalent circuit model eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The dielectric response of nano-confined fluids is crucial across technologies and biological systems, yet its calculation and interpretation from molecular simulations are often muddled by unclear boundary conditions. We re-derive the Green--Kubo relation for the spatially resolved linear dielectric response of fluids in planar confinement, explicitly accounting for boundary conditions and showing that equilibrium-derived profiles agree with those obtained from external fields. We identify common misconceptions in the literature and outline how microscopic dielectric behavior can be coarse-grained to connect with experimental observables. Simulations show that water retains a bulk-like dielectric response down to $\sim 1\,\mathrm{nm}$ confinement. The reduced \emph{effective} dielectric response that governs capacitance arises from the placement of the dielectric interface. Using effective-medium theory, we demonstrate that long-range reductions reported in experiments and theory are consistent with bulk-like behavior beyond about $1\,\mathrm{nm}$ from the surface. The effective response naturally maps onto an interfacial capacitance, and the dielectric properties of simulated water are robust across simulation setups and water models, reflecting universal polarization correlations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript re-derives the Green-Kubo relation for the spatially resolved static dielectric permittivity of fluids in planar confinement, explicitly incorporating boundary conditions, and demonstrates agreement between equilibrium and external-field methods. Molecular dynamics simulations of water in graphene slit pores show that the local dielectric response remains bulk-like down to approximately 1 nm confinement. The authors attribute the reduced effective dielectric response governing capacitance to the placement of the dielectric interface rather than intrinsic changes in the fluid, and apply effective-medium theory to show consistency with experimental long-range reductions; results are stated to be robust across water models and setups.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would clarify misconceptions in the literature on dielectric calculations in confinement and supply a parameter-free coarse-graining route from microscopic polarization profiles to macroscopic observables such as interfacial capacitance. This has direct relevance for nanofluidics, supercapacitors, and biological membranes, where confinement effects on dielectric response are technologically important.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theory / Methods] Theory section on the re-derived Green-Kubo relation: the claim that the formula fully captures the linear response without residual finite-size or boundary artifacts requires an explicit step-by-step verification or supplementary derivation showing how the planar boundary conditions are enforced for all slit widths; this is load-bearing for the bulk-like response conclusion.
  2. [Results / Effective-medium theory] Results section applying effective-medium theory: the mapping from local permittivity profiles to reduced macroscopic capacitance assumes a specific dielectric-interface placement and averaging procedure. A direct numerical check computing capacitance from applied-voltage simulations (rather than solely from the effective-medium formula) is needed to confirm the mapping is parameter-free and accounts for all near-surface polarization contributions.
  3. [Results / Figures and tables] Simulation results on permittivity profiles: the assertion of bulk-like behavior down to ~1 nm and robustness across models lacks reported error bars, convergence checks, or data-exclusion criteria, which undermines quantitative support for the central claim that the effective reduction originates solely from interface placement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: mention of agreement between equilibrium and external-field methods should include a brief note on statistical uncertainties or number of independent runs.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: ensure all panels are labeled with exact slit widths, water models, and whether profiles are from Green-Kubo or external-field methods.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theory / Methods] Theory section on the re-derived Green-Kubo relation: the claim that the formula fully captures the linear response without residual finite-size or boundary artifacts requires an explicit step-by-step verification or supplementary derivation showing how the planar boundary conditions are enforced for all slit widths; this is load-bearing for the bulk-like response conclusion.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. In the revised manuscript we have added Supplementary Note 1, which contains a complete step-by-step derivation of the Green-Kubo relation under planar boundary conditions. The derivation begins from the electrostatic potential that satisfies the boundary conditions at the confining walls for arbitrary slit widths and demonstrates that the spatially resolved permittivity expression contains no residual finite-size or boundary artifacts in the linear-response regime. This addition directly supports the validity of the bulk-like response conclusion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / Effective-medium theory] Results section applying effective-medium theory: the mapping from local permittivity profiles to reduced macroscopic capacitance assumes a specific dielectric-interface placement and averaging procedure. A direct numerical check computing capacitance from applied-voltage simulations (rather than solely from the effective-medium formula) is needed to confirm the mapping is parameter-free and accounts for all near-surface polarization contributions.

    Authors: We agree that an independent numerical validation strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we now include results from additional simulations in which a finite potential difference is applied across the slit. The capacitance is computed directly from the time-averaged induced surface charge and is compared with the prediction of the effective-medium formula that uses only the local permittivity profiles. The two routes agree within statistical uncertainty, confirming that the mapping is parameter-free and fully incorporates near-surface polarization. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results / Figures and tables] Simulation results on permittivity profiles: the assertion of bulk-like behavior down to ~1 nm and robustness across models lacks reported error bars, convergence checks, or data-exclusion criteria, which undermines quantitative support for the central claim that the effective reduction originates solely from interface placement.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original presentation omitted these quantitative details. The revised manuscript now reports error bars on all permittivity profiles, obtained by block averaging over five independent trajectories. A new supplementary section documents convergence with respect to simulation length, lateral system size, and water model. Equilibration periods were identified from the decay of the polarization autocorrelation function; data prior to this point were excluded from the averages. These additions provide the quantitative support requested for the central claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain.

full rationale

The paper re-derives the Green-Kubo relation for the spatially resolved linear dielectric response in planar confinement while explicitly incorporating boundary conditions, then directly validates the resulting profiles by comparison to those obtained from applied external fields. Molecular dynamics simulations independently yield bulk-like permittivity down to ~1 nm confinement. Effective-medium theory is subsequently applied to these simulation-derived profiles to map them onto macroscopic capacitance observables, demonstrating consistency with reported long-range experimental reductions via interface placement. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or redefinition of inputs; the central claims rest on simulation data and the re-derived relation rather than tautological equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available so ledger is necessarily incomplete. Paper rests on standard linear-response assumptions in statistical mechanics and the validity of common water models for polarization correlations. Effective-medium theory is invoked but no explicit free parameters are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear response regime applies to polarization fluctuations in confined water.
    Invoked in the Green-Kubo re-derivation for equilibrium-derived profiles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5506 in / 1303 out tokens · 100162 ms · 2026-05-17T00:31:49.962205+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unambiguous characterization of in-plane dielectric response in nanoconfined liquids: water as a case study

    cond-mat.soft 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    The in-plane 2D polarizability α_parallel provides an unambiguous measure of dielectric response for nanoconfined water, computed consistently via fluctuation-dissipation theory and induced dipole methods in classical...

  2. Simultaneous Learning of Static and Dynamic Charges

    physics.chem-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    Independent learning of static and dynamic charges in water systems achieves comparable accuracy to coupled models with environment-dependent screening but at lower computational cost.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

168 extracted references · 168 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Oakes, A

    L. Oakes, A. Westover, J. W. Mares, S. Chatterjee, W. R. Erwin, R. Bardhan, S. M. Weiss, and C. L. Pint, Scientific Reports3, 3020 (2013), ISSN 2045-2322

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Mohammadi, S

    A. Mohammadi, S. E. Moosavifard, A. Golja- nian Tabrizi, M. M. Abdi, and G. Karimi, ACS Applied Energy Materials2, 627 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Melnik, A

    S. Melnik, A. Ryzhov, A. Kiselev, A. Radenovic, T. Weil, K. J. Stevenson, and V. G. Artemov, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry Letters pp. 6572–6576 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Sun, S.-Z

    M.-H. Sun, S.-Z. Huang, L.-H. Chen, Y. Li, X.-Y. Yang, Z.-Y. Yuan, and B.-L. Su, Chemical Society Reviews45, 3479 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    G. T. M. Kadja, M. M. Ilmi, N. J. Azhari, M. Khalil, A. T. N. Fajar, Subagjo, I. G. B. N. Makertihartha, M. L. Gunawan, C. B. Rasrendra, and I. G. Wenten, Journal of Materials Research and Technology17, 3277 (2022), ISSN 2238-7854

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Wordsworth, T

    J. Wordsworth, T. M. Benedetti, S. V. Somerville, W. Schuhmann, R. D. Tilley, and J. J. Gooding, Ange- wandte Chemie International Edition61, e202200755 (2022), ISSN 1521-3773

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Mu˜ noz-Santiburcio and D

    D. Mu˜ noz-Santiburcio and D. Marx, Chemical Science 8, 3444 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Simoncelli, N

    M. Simoncelli, N. Ganfoud, A. Sene, M. Haefele, B. Daf- fos, P.-L. Taberna, M. Salanne, P. Simon, and B. Roten- berg, Physical Review X8, 021024 (2018). 17

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Gravelle, H

    S. Gravelle, H. Yoshida, L. Joly, C. Ybert, and L. Boc- quet, The Journal of Chemical Physics145, 124708 (2016), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    A. K. Priya, L. Gnanasekaran, P. S. Kumar, A. A. Jalil, T. K. A. Hoang, S. Rajendran, M. Soto-Moscoso, and D. Balakrishnan, Chemosphere303, 135205 (2022), ISSN 0045-6535

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    D. J. Bonthuis, S. Gekle, and R. R. Netz, Langmuir28, 7679 (2012), ISSN 0743-7463

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Schlaich, E

    A. Schlaich, E. W. Knapp, and R. R. Netz, Physical Review Letters117, 048001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Loche, A

    P. Loche, A. Wolde-Kidan, A. Schlaich, D. J. Bonthuis, and R. R. Netz, Physical Review Letters123, 049601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Fumagalli, A

    L. Fumagalli, A. Esfandiar, R. Fabregas, S. Hu, P. Ares, A. Janardanan, Q. Yang, B. Radha, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al., Science360, 1339 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    H. A. Stern and S. E. Feller, The Journal of Chemical Physics118, 3401 (2003), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2003

  16. [16]

    Faraudo and F

    J. Faraudo and F. Bresme, Physical Review Letters92, 236102 (2004)

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Ballenegger and J.-P

    V. Ballenegger and J.-P. Hansen, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics122, 114711 (2005), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    V. A. Froltsov and S. H. L. Klapp, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics126, 114703 (2007), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    Nymeyer and H.-X

    H. Nymeyer and H.-X. Zhou, Biophysical Journal94, 1185 (2008), ISSN 0006-3495

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Gekle and R

    S. Gekle and R. R. Netz, The Journal of Chemical Physics137, 104704 (2012), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Ghoufi, A

    A. Ghoufi, A. Szymczyk, R. Renou, and M. Ding, EPL (Europhysics Letters)99, 37008 (2012), ISSN 0295- 5075

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Zhang, F

    C. Zhang, F. Gygi, and G. Galli, The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry Letters4, 2477 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Parez, M

    S. Parez, M. Pˇ redota, and M. Machesky, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C118, 4818 (2014), ISSN 1932- 7447

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Renou, A

    R. Renou, A. Szymczyk, and A. Ghoufi, Physical Re- view E91, 032411 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Itoh and H

    H. Itoh and H. Sakuma, The Journal of Chemical Physics142, 184703 (2015), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    De Luca, S

    S. De Luca, S. K. Kannam, B. D. Todd, F. Frascoli, J. S. Hansen, and P. J. Daivis, Langmuir32, 4765 (2016), ISSN 0743-7463

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Meneses-Ju´ arez, J

    E. Meneses-Ju´ arez, J. F. Rivas-Silva, and M. Gonz´ alez- Melchor, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 195001 (2018), ISSN 0953-8984

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Mondal, S

    S. Mondal, S. Acharya, and B. Bagchi, Physical Review Research1, 033145 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    H. Zhu, F. Yang, Y. Zhu, A. Li, W. He, J. Huang, and G. Li, RSC Advances10, 8628 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Loche, C

    P. Loche, C. Ayaz, A. Wolde-Kidan, A. Schlaich, and R. R. Netz, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B124, 4365 (2020), ISSN 1520-6106

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    M. H. Motevaselian and N. R. Aluru, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 10532 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    M. H. Motevaselian and N. R. Aluru, ACS Nano14, 12761 (2020), ISSN 1936-0851

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Jalali, H

    H. Jalali, H. Ghorbanfekr, I. Hamid, M. Neek-Amal, R. Rashidi, and F. M. Peeters, Physical Review E102, 022803 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Monet, F

    G. Monet, F. Bresme, A. Kornyshev, and H. Berthoumieux, Physical Review Letters126, 216001 (2021), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114, 2102.09309

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Ahmadabadi, A

    I. Ahmadabadi, A. Esfandiar, A. Hassanali, and M. R. Ejtehadi, Physical Review Materials5, 024008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Majumdar, M

    J. Majumdar, M. Moid, C. Dasgupta, and P. K. Maiti, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B125, 6670 (2021), ISSN 1520-6106

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Hu and H

    B. Hu and H. Zhu, Scientific Reports11, 18689 (2021), ISSN 2045-2322

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Jalali, E

    H. Jalali, E. Lotfi, R. Boya, and M. Neek-Amal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B125, 1604 (2021), ISSN 1520-6106

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    C. Guo, H. Qin, Y. Zhu, and Y. L¨ u, Langmuir37, 13059 (2021), ISSN 0743-7463

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Zhu and B

    H. Zhu and B. Hu, Membranes12, 220 (2022), ISSN 2077-0375

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Mulpuri and D

    N. Mulpuri and D. Bratko, The Journal of Chemical Physics158, 134716 (2023), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Borgis, D

    D. Borgis, D. Laage, L. Belloni, and G. Jeanmairet, Chemical Science14, 11141 (2023), ISSN 2041-6539

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Dinpajooh and D

    M. Dinpajooh and D. V. Matyushov, Journal of Molec- ular Liquids p. 121400 (2023), ISSN 0167-7322

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Becker, P

    M. Becker, P. Loche, M. Rezaei, A. Wolde-Kidan, Y. Ue- matsu, R. R. Netz, and D. J. Bonthuis, Chemical Re- views124, 1 (2024), ISSN 0009-2665

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    T. Tang, W. Ding, W. Fu, S. Tang, and X. Zhang, Nano Research (2025), ISSN 1998-0124, URLhttps://www. sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NR.2025.94907417

    work page doi:10.26599/nr.2025.94907417 2025

  46. [46]

    Loche, C

    P. Loche, C. Ayaz, A. Schlaich, Y. Uematsu, and R. R. Netz, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B123, 10850 (2019), ISSN 1520-6106

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Schaaf and S

    C. Schaaf and S. Gekle, Physical Review E92, 032718 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    M. F. Calegari Andrade, N. R. Aluru, and T. A. Pham, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters pp. 6872– 6879 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Gekle and A

    S. Gekle and A. Arnold, Physical Review Letters111, 089801 (2013), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    R. Wang, M. Souilamas, A. Esfandiar, R. Fabregas, S. Benaglia, H. Nevison-Andrews, Q. Yang, J. Nor- mansell, P. Ares, G. Ferrari, et al., Nature646, 606 (2025), ISSN 1476-4687

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Loche, C

    P. Loche, C. Ayaz, A. Schlaich, D. J. Bonthuis, and R. R. Netz, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, 6463 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Ruiz-Barragan, F

    S. Ruiz-Barragan, F. Sebastiani, P. Schienbein, J. Abra- ham, G. Schwaab, R. Raveendran, M. Havenith, and D. Marx, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2022), ISSN 1463-9084

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Ruiz-Barragan, D

    S. Ruiz-Barragan, D. Mu˜ noz-Santiburcio, S. K¨ orning, and D. Marx, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics22, 10833 (2020), ISSN 1463-9084

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Dufils, C

    T. Dufils, C. Schran, J. Chen, A. K. Geim, L. Fumagalli, and A. Michaelides, Chemical Science15, 516 (2024), ISSN 2041-6539

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Fuentes-Azcatl and J

    R. Fuentes-Azcatl and J. Alejandre, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B118, 1263 (2014), ISSN 1520- 6106

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I: The New Millen- nium Edition: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat, vol. 1 (Basic books, 2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    H. A. H. A. Lorentz,The Theory of Electrons and Its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat(Leipzig : B.G. Teubner ; New York : G.E. Stechert, 1916). 18

    work page 1916

  58. [58]

    P. J. W. Debye, Physikalische Zeitschrift36, 100 (1935)

    work page 1935

  59. [59]

    R. H. Fowler, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences149, 1 (1935)

    work page 1935

  60. [60]

    Onsager, Journal of the American Chemical Society 58, 1486 (1936), ISSN 0002-7863, 1520-5126

    L. Onsager, Journal of the American Chemical Society 58, 1486 (1936), ISSN 0002-7863, 1520-5126

    work page 1936

  61. [61]

    J. H. Van Vleck, The Journal of Chemical Physics5, 556 (1937), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 1937

  62. [62]

    J. G. Kirkwood, The Journal of Chemical Physics7, 911 (1939), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 1939

  63. [63]

    Neumann and O

    M. Neumann and O. Steinhauser, Molecular Physics39, 437 (1980), ISSN 0026-8976

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    Neumann, Molecular Physics50, 841 (1983), ISSN 0026-8976

    M. Neumann, Molecular Physics50, 841 (1983), ISSN 0026-8976

    work page 1983

  65. [65]

    P. A. Bopp, A. A. Kornyshev, and G. Sutmann, Physical Review Letters76, 1280 (1996)

    work page 1996

  66. [66]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Hutter, and M. Sprik, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry Letters7, 2696 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    P. V. Rysselberghe, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 36, 1152 (1932), ISSN 0092-7325

    work page 1932

  68. [68]

    O. F. Mossotti, vol24, 49 (1850)

    work page

  69. [69]

    R. J. Clausius,Die mechanische W¨ armetheorie: Die mechanische Behandlung der Electricit¨ at(Vieweg, 1879)

    work page

  70. [70]

    M. I. Ryazanov and A. A. Tishchenko, Journal of Exper- imental and Theoretical Physics103, 539 (2006), ISSN 1090-6509

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    T. Sato, T. Sasaki, J. Ohnuki, K. Umezawa, and M. Takano, Physical Review Letters121, 206002 (2018), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Sagui and T

    C. Sagui and T. A. Darden, Annual Review of Bio- physics28, 155 (1999), ISSN 1936-122X, 1936-1238

    work page 1999

  73. [73]

    Borwein, J

    D. Borwein, J. M. Borwein, and K. F. Taylor, Journal of Mathematical Physics26, 2999 (1985), ISSN 0022-2488

    work page 1985

  74. [74]

    Schreiber and O

    H. Schreiber and O. Steinhauser, Biochemistry31, 5856 (1992), ISSN 0006-2960, 1520-4995

    work page 1992

  75. [75]

    D. M. York, W. Yang, H. Lee, T. Darden, and L. G. Ped- ersen, Journal of the American Chemical Society117, 5001 (1995), ISSN 0002-7863, 1520-5126

    work page 1995

  76. [76]

    R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood,Computer Simu- lation Using Particles(CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1988), ISBN 978-0-367-80693-4

    work page 1988

  77. [77]

    Deserno and C

    M. Deserno and C. Holm, The Journal of Chemical Physics109, 7694 (1998), ISSN 0021-9606

    work page 1998

  78. [78]

    Deserno and C

    M. Deserno and C. Holm, The Journal of chemical physics109, 7678 (1998)

    work page 1998

  79. [79]

    S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, E. R. Smith, and J. S. Rowlinson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences373, 27 (1997)

    work page 1997

  80. [80]

    E. R. Smith and J. S. Rowlinson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences375, 475 (1981)

    work page 1981

Showing first 80 references.