Detuning the Floquet anomalous chiral spin liquid

Didier Poilblanc; Matthieu Mambrini; Nathan Goldman

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Detuning the Floquet anomalous chiral spin liquid

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the low-frequency 'Swap' chiral spin liquid and the high-frequency chiral spin liquid are distinct phases, separated by a resonance-dominated window in which the driven system likely heats, so no continuous interpolat

desk verdict A solid Floquet many-body study with a clean analytic core; the no-transition claim outruns the numerics, but the construction and diagnostics are worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.23418 v3 pith:3RWADXKQ submitted 2025-12-29 cond-mat.str-el

Matthieu Mambrini , Nathan Goldman , Didier Poilblanc This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-el

keywords FloquetdrivingchiralspinliquidanomaloustopologySwapmodelaverage-energyspectrumgeometricBerryphaseprethermalizationdrivenquantummagnets

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a square-lattice spin-1/2 system driven by a four-step periodic sequence. At specially tuned low frequencies, the drive acts as a swap circuit: the bulk time-evolution operator over one period is trivial, yet the edges carry one-way spin transport, forming an anomalous chiral spin liquid (CSL). The authors detune the frequency and use the average-energy spectrum together with geometric Berry phases to unfold the Floquet spectrum, identifying three regimes: a finite-size regime, a narrow folding regime with few resonances, and a resonance-dense regime that suggests heating. Their central claim, based on all data, is that the anomalous CSL is not continuously connected to the high-frequency CSL along the constructed family of drives; instead, a direct transition appears absent, with a possible long-lived prethermal regime near the anomalous phase. This matters because it separates driven many-body topological phases into genuinely distinct basins that cannot be adiabatically connected, unlike the non-interacting Floquet case.

What carries the argument

The central object is the four-step piecewise-constant XXZ drive that at tuned frequencies realizes a swap circuit on the square lattice; the Floquet unitary then factorizes into local swap gates in the bulk, while edges acquire nontrivial micromotion. The diagnostic that carries the detuning analysis is the average-energy spectrum, defined as æ_n = (1/T)∫₀ᵀ ⟨φ_n(t)|H(t)|φ_n(t)⟩ dt, together with the geometric Berry phase Φ_n = T(E_n − æ_n) mod 2π; these unfold the folded quasi-energy spectrum and expose resonances. The empirical bandwidth scaling W(δω) ≃ w_{p,q} L_geo N δω determines the crossover frequencies δω_fold and δω×, and the interpolating path J_ω(ω) links the low-frequency Swap po

What would settle it

Run exact time evolution from the anomalous ground state at a detuning inside the intermediate window and measure a local observable such as the edge spin current or energy density over many periods; if the observable shows no secular drift and the average-energy spectrum stays smooth on larger clusters, the claimed heating barrier and the absence of a continuous connection would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the anomalous CSL realized by low-frequency Swap drives and the dynamical CSL realized at high frequency belong to different phases, with no direct continuous transition along the interpolation the authors construct. Evidence comes from the average-energy spectrum and geometric Berry phases, which behave smoothly for small detuning, then become increasingly erratic in an intermediate frequency interval as the density of Floquet resonances proliferates, an effect interpreted as heating toward infinite temperature. At small detuning, edge modes remain visible in the dynamical structure factor and the anomalous winding number obtained from the Streda flux response stay

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on treating the dense spectral resonances seen on a 16-site cluster as a thermodynamic-limit heating region and on the chosen interpolation path being representative; if a different path or a larger-system calculation connects the phases smoothly, the conclusion fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the two phases are indeed disconnected, any adiabatic attempt to go from the anomalous to the ordinary CSL by raising frequency must pass through a resonance/heating region, not a conventional phase transition.
Small detuning preserves the anomalous phase's fingerprints: chiral edge modes persist in the edge dynamical structure factor and the anomalous winding number from the Streda response remains quantized, so the phase is stable to weak frequency errors.
The narrow intermediate folding regime provides a candidate prethermal anomalous CSL, meaning an experiment could observe anomalous edge transport for long but finite times before heating.
On a cylinder, the stable detuning window shrinks as 1/N^{3/2} (versus 1/N on a torus), so in the thermodynamic limit the phase around the swap point is protected only in a prethermal sense.
The high-frequency effective Hamiltonian reduces to the same chiral Heisenberg form as a sinusoidal drive, so the high-frequency part of the phase diagram is protocol-independent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the no-transition conclusion is established only for the single interpolation path chosen by the authors; a different detuning protocol (for example, a different static coupling or a two-tone drive) could in principle thread between the phases while avoiding the chaotic window.
Editorial inference: the heating interpretation could be tested directly by time-evolving local observables (energy density or edge spin current) over many periods; the intermediate regime would be genuinely prethermal if those observables stay close to their initial values for exponentially long times.
Editorial inference: if resonance proliferation is generic in interacting Floquet systems, then interacting anomalous topological phases are fundamentally harder to connect to their high-frequency counterparts than non-interacting ones, where edge states can persist across the frequency domain.
Editorial inference: the average-energy unfolding method could serve more broadly as a resonance detector for driven many-body systems whenever quasi-energy spectra fold.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. The paper builds something genuinely new: an infinite family of Swap drives at omega_s=1/(4p+2) and a first-order detuned Floquet Hamiltonian with sqrt(5)-range couplings, verified against exact diagonalization. That part is clean. The larger punchline — that the anomalous CSL is not continuously connected to the high-frequency CSL — is plausible but underdetermined. All the interpolation evidence follows one hand-picked curve J_omega(omega) in Eq. (46). A different path through parameter space could conceivably keep a gap and connect the two phases; the paper supplies no quantized invariant that forbids it. W_A is zero in the S_z=0 sector at both endpoints, so it can't serve as a barrier. The authors hedge ('our data suggest', 'it is not clear whether regime ii) will survive'), which is honest, but the abstract's phrasing is a bit stronger than the evidence.

What the paper does well: the average-energy unfolding is applied carefully across three regimes, the Berry phase diagnostics are internally consistent, and the high-frequency limit reproduces the known static chiral Hamiltonian — a good consistency check on the square drive. The Streda-response calculation for few-particle sectors matches the non-interacting benchmark. No circularity: the self-citations are anchors, not inputs.

Soft spots, in proportion. The biggest is the path-dependence issue above; a referee should ask for at least one alternative interpolation or a clearer statement that only a path-specific statement is being made. Second, 'heating' is inferred from the density of spectral resonances; no time-evolved local observable is computed. That's a minor-moderate gap, but the language is appropriately tentative. Third, the bandwidth scaling Eq. (15) that sets the regime boundaries is measured on one 16-site cluster; the N-dependence is plausible but not established. These aren't fatal — the analytic expansion and the regime characterization stand on their own.

Who this is for: people working on Floquet engineering of chiral spin liquids and on anomalous Floquet topology in interacting systems will get real value from the construction and the diagnostic toolkit. It deserves peer review, not desk rejection. With a modest revision — softening the no-transition claim and adding a discussion of path dependence — it would be a solid contribution. I'd send it to referees.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a family of four-step square-wave Floquet drives on the square lattice that, at tuned low frequencies, realize 'Swap' models with an anomalous chiral spin liquid (CSL) phase: the bulk one-period evolution is trivial while chiral edge modes persist. The authors study the fate of this phase upon detuning the frequency, using exact diagonalization (ED) on 4x4 tori, cylinders, and a 2x8 ribbon. They develop a first-order-in-detuning expansion of the Floquet Hamiltonian (Appendix B), obtain the average-energy spectrum and geometric Berry phases, extract edge modes spectroscopically, and compute the anomalous winding number via a Streda-like response. At high frequency they reproduce, for the square drive, the effective static chiral Hamiltonian previously derived for sinusoidal drives, confirming the dynamical CSL. Interpolating between the low- and high-frequency regimes along a single one-parameter path, they observe three regimes (unfolded finite-size, folded prethermal-like, and resonance-dominated) and conclude that the anomalous CSL is not continuously connected to the high-frequency CSL, with a possibly heating intermediate interval.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is an important result: it contrasts with non-interacting anomalous Floquet systems where chiral edge modes persist across frequencies, and it gives concrete evidence that in interacting many-body Floquet systems the low-frequency anomalous phase and the high-frequency effective static CSL are separated by a heating-like chaotic region. The paper's methodological strengths are substantial: the first-order detuning expansion of Appendix B is internally clean and verified against ED (Fig. 6); the single-spin-flip benchmark reproduces the known W_A=+1 anomalous winding number of Ref. [28] (Fig. 14); and the high-frequency square-drive spectrum matches the static chiral Hamiltonian (Fig. 21). These anchors make the paper a solid platform for studying frequency-driven transitions in interacting spin systems. However, as detailed below, the load-bearing claim of 'no continuous connection' rests on a single interpolation path and on finite-size spectral criteria, so the result is currently suggestive rather than established.

major comments (3)

[Section IV B, Eq. (46)] The central no-transition conclusion is established only along the single ad hoc interpolation curve J_omega(omega) given by Eq. (46), which smoothly connects lambda_omega~2 at high frequency to J_omega=0 at omega=J/2. A different deformation through the (omega, J_omega, Delta) parameter space, e.g. keeping lambda_omega~2 for all omega while varying Delta, could plausibly avoid the chaotic interval while maintaining a finite quasi-energy gap. Moreover, in the S_z=0 sector the paper itself shows W_A=0 both at the Swap point (particle-hole symmetry) and in the high-frequency static limit (Section III D), so no quantized invariant is available to preclude a continuous path. The data therefore support 'no direct transition along this path', not 'no continuous connection' in general. Please either scan a multi-parameter family, identify a symmetry-breaking or topological obstruction, or consi
[Section III B, Eq. (15)] Equation (15), W(delta omega) ~ w_{p,q} L_geo N delta omega, is measured on a single 16-site cluster and used to extrapolate the thermodynamic fate of the three regimes: delta_omega_fold ~ 1/N on a torus and ~ 1/N^{3/2} on a cylinder (Eq. (16) and following text). No finite-size scaling across multiple cluster sizes is presented, so the existence and even the scaling of the 'prethermal' intermediate regime ii) and the resonance-dominated regime iii) are not established beyond N=16. Since these regimes are the basis for the statement that the two CSLs are separated by a heating region, this extrapolation is load-bearing. The authors' own caveat that 'it is not clear whether regime ii) will survive in that limit' is appropriate but should be reflected in the abstract's stronger claim.
[Sections III B and IV B] The identification of the intermediate/interpolated frequency interval as 'heating' and 'infinite temperature' is inferred solely from the proliferation of spectral resonances and erratic Berry-phase/spectral behavior. No time-evolved local observable (e.g., energy absorption rate, entanglement entropy growth, or imbalance decay) is computed anywhere in the paper. The phrasing 'system may heat up' is appropriately hedged, but the conclusion that 'the two phases are believed to be separated by a region where the system absorbs energy' (Section V) overstates what the ED spectra alone can show. A direct calculation of a heating diagnostic on the same small clusters would greatly strengthen the claim; absent that, the heating interpretation remains a plausible conjecture.

minor comments (4)

[Section III D] Two numerical slopes appear to contain typographical errors: 'W_A = 13' for N_p=2 and 'W_A = 88' for N_p=3. Please check whether these are intended values or formatting artifacts; the dashed lines in Fig. 14 suggest non-integer slopes, so the text should be clarified.
[Sections I and IV] The symbol 'AE' (average energy) is used throughout but is not defined in a glossary. Consider defining it at first use in Section III B and consistently referring to it as 'average-energy spectrum' to avoid confusion with the quasi-energy E.
[Appendix D, Eq. (D3)] In Eq. (D3), the product of determinants reads D_a(omega)D_c(omega)D_b(omega, phi)D_d(omega, phi), but the order in Eq. (2) is d,c,b,a. The notation is clear enough, but a short sentence explaining that the determinants commute would help the reader.
[General] The paper would benefit from a table summarizing the three frequency regimes, their estimated boundaries (delta_omega_fold, delta_omega_x), and the diagnostics used to identify them. This would make the central frequency-interpolation argument easier to follow across Figs. 5-9 and 16.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the no-transition claim is an interpretation of exact-diagonalization spectra along an explicitly constructed drive family, not an output of the cited inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the Floquet unitary is built from the XXZ bond Hamiltonians, the detuning expansion (Eq. 12) is computed analytically and checked against exact spectra, the average-energy spectrum (Eqs. 17-19) is defined directly from the micromotion, and the high-frequency effective Hamiltonian (Eqs. 35-41) follows from a Magnus expansion. The bandwidth scaling of Eq. (15) is an empirical fit to 4x4 data, but it is used as a diagnostic to define the three frequency regimes rather than being relabeled as an independent prediction. The high-frequency CSL identification relies on prior work, including self-cited iPEPS and Floquet studies, but those serve as external benchmarks and are not the source of the paper's main conclusion. The interpolation path Eq. (46) is explicitly a hand-chosen cosine ramp satisfying the stated boundary conditions; the 'no direct transition' claim is an interpretation of the spectra along that one path, with the authors explicitly hedging ('Our data suggest...', 'It is not clear whether regime ii) will survive in that limit...'). A different path in parameter space might connect the two phases, but that would be an underdetermination/robustness limitation, not a circular reduction by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation to justify the central conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is chiefly supported by the paper's own ED spectra and first-order expansions. External inputs: the average-energy unfolding formalism of Schindler-Bukov (independent of the authors), the Streda-response method of Gavensky-Usaj-Goldman (co-author Goldman; benchmarked here against the non-interacting limit), and the high-frequency CSL endpoint from the authors' own prior work used as a consistency anchor. The quantities not obtained for free are the empirically fitted bandwidth scaling (Eq. 15), the regime boundaries δω_fold/δω_×, the sharpness of λ_ω ≈ 2, and the interpretation that resonance density equals heating. No fitted constants enter the first-order derivations; the E_n vs æ_n relation and W_A values are genuine outputs. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)

J_ω(ω) interpolation amplitude = Eq. (46): J_ω/J = (-1/4 + πJ/32ω) (1 + cos(πJ/2ω)) / 2
Hand-chosen cosine path connecting the high-frequency requirement J_ω = -J/4 + πJ²/32ω to the swap point J_ω = 0 at ω = J/2. The no-direct-transition claim is probed only along this single path.
λ_ω (dimensionless Heisenberg coefficient in H_eff) = λ_ω = 2 + O(1/ω)
Set 'around 2' to place the high-frequency effective Hamiltonian inside the CSL window of the static chiral Heisenberg model (Refs. [18,21], which include the authors). Not derived in this paper.
Regime boundaries and bandwidth prefactor = δω_fold ≃ 0.05J, δω_× ≃ 0.075J on 4×4 systems; w_{p,q} in Eq. (15)
Determined empirically from the N=16 spectra and used to extrapolate the three-regime picture to the thermodynamic limit (δω_fold ~ 1/N on torus, 1/N^{3/2} on cylinder). Disclosed as empirical.

assumptions (6)

standard math High-frequency (Magnus) expansion for a 4-step drive, Eqs. (34)-(40), from Goldman-Dalibard (Ref. [30])
Input for the effective chiral Hamiltonian at high frequency; accepted published result.
domain assumption The average-energy spectrum Eq. (17) and geometric Berry phases Eq. (24) provide a meaningful spectral ordering/unfolding of Floquet states
Adopted from Schindler-Bukov (Ref. [22]); the physical value of the average-energy 'ground state' is a methodological premise, not derived here.
domain assumption The static chiral antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model hosts a CSL for λ ≈ 2
From Refs. [18,21] (Poilblanc et al., including authors); anchors the high-frequency CSL endpoint of the interpolation.
ad hoc to paper Empirical bandwidth scaling W(δω) ≃ w_{p,q} L_geo N δω (Eq. 15) extrapolates beyond N=16
Fitted on 4×4 clusters; the derived 1/N and 1/N^{3/2} shrink rates of the finite-size regime depend on it.
domain assumption Density of quasi-energy resonances is a proxy for heating
No energy absorption or local-observable dynamics is computed; heating is inferred from the density of avoided crossings in the spectrum.
domain assumption Particle-hole symmetry forces W_A = 0 in the S^z = 0 sector
Argued from the single spin-flip result W_A → -W_A under S_z → -S_z; used to interpret flat portions of N_1(φ) at half filling.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detuning the Floquet anomalous chiral spin liquid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3RWADXKQ

@misc{pith2026251223418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detuning the Floquet anomalous chiral spin liquid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3RWADXKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.23418}
}

read the original abstract

At high-frequency a periodically-driven quantum spin-1/2 system can emulate a chiral spin liquid (CSL) described by an effective static local chiral Hamiltonian. In contrast, at low-frequency these settings realize "Swap" models exhibiting {\it anomalous} CSL phases, in which one-way spin transport occurs at the edge although the bulk time-evolution operator over one period is trivial. In this work we explicitly construct a family of Floquet quantum spin-1/2 models on the square lattice implementing Swap models to investigate the stability of the anomalous CSL under frequency detuning and the transition to the high-frequency regime. We used the average-energy spectrum on finite-size torus and cylinders to unfold the Floquet quasi-energy spectrum over the whole frequency range and obtain the geometrical Berry phases. This enabled us to identify three regimes upon increasing detuning: i) a finite-size regime (with no folding of the Floquet spectrum), ii) an intermediate (narrow) regime with folding and very few resonances and iii) a regime with an increased density of resonances suggesting heating. At small detuning, edge modes are revealed by spectroscopic tools and from the Streda response of the system giving access to the anomalous winding number. The analysis of all the data suggests that the anomalous CSL is not continuously connected to the high-frequency CSL. We also discuss the possible occurrence of a long-lived prethermal anomalous CSL.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.23418 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Periodic micromotions in fine-tuned models on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (16 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy spectra on a 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left: snapshot of all interaction terms appearing in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as figure 5 for a 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Same as figure 5 but for larger detuning in the range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Same as figure 8 for a 4x4 cylinder geometry. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Edge dynamical structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Peierls phases on the nearest-neighbor bonds of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13. Same as Fig. 12 for a small detuning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. Winding number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: FIG. 15. Relative amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: FIG. 16. Floquet quasi-energy spectra in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: FIG. 17. Range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_17.png]

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: FIG. 18. Floquet unitary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_18.png]

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: FIG. 20. Floquet energy spectrum for a 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_20.png]

**Figure 21.** Figure 21: FIG. 21. Comparison of Floquet quasi-energy spectra on a 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_21.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Stroboscopic stability of a Floquet chiral spin liquid beyond the folding frequency
cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

On a 16-site spin-lattice torus, a periodically driven chiral spin liquid stays stable down to a drive frequency about half the folding scale, with exponentially suppressed heating.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[28]

D. J. Moore, Floquet theory and the non-adiabatic Berry phase, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 23, L665 (1990)

1990
[1]

Note that|ϕ n(t)⟩are also, up to a phase irrelevant in Eq

Average-energy spectrum The average-energies are defined as æn = 1 T Z T 0 ⟨ϕn(t)|H(t)|ϕ n(t)⟩dt .(B1) Here|ϕ n(t)⟩are the micromotion Floquet eigenstates given byU(t,0)|ϕ n⟩. Note that|ϕ n(t)⟩are also, up to a phase irrelevant in Eq. (B1), the eigenstates of the uni- tary evolution operatorU(t+T, t). In the general case of an arbitrary drive Hamiltonian,...
[2]

(8) and (9))

Expansion near a swap point Floquet Hamiltonian –We now turn to the problem of computing the Floquet Hamiltonian in the vicinityω= ωs +δωof a Swap model characterized by a pair (ω s,∆ s) (see Eqs. (8) and (9)). Up to the first order inδω, each termU ∆ α=a,...,d( π 2ω ) of Eq. (2) takes the form Uα =U s α e iπδω 2ω2s Hα =U s α 1−δω iπ 2ω2s Hα ,(B6) where w...
[3]

Static” sites are represented as (solid or shaded) black dots and “active

Floquet Hamiltonian on the torus Let us consider a system with no boundary (either in- finite or a finite cluster on a torus). In this case, using the identityU s F =1, equation (B8) takes the form UF =1−iδω π 2ω2s Ha +H d +U s a †HbU s a +U s d HcU s d † +O(δω 2) =e iπδω 2ω2s H s abcd +O(δω 2).(B11) FIG. 17. Range √ 5 interactions generated under unitary...
[4]

compressed

Floquet and average-energy spectra in the presence of a boundary On a cylinder,U s F no longer reduces to1but is given by (see Section III A) : U s F =T A,left −2a ⊗1 bulk ⊗T B,right 2a (B15) which now involves, as shown if figure 18, the translations by two lattice spacings of half the sites of each boundaries (belonging to opposite sublattices). Eigenst...
[5]

Karch, P

J. Karch, P. Olbrich, M. Schmalzbauer, C. Zoth, C. Brin- steiner, M. Fehrenbacher, U. Wurstbauer, M. M. Glazov, S. A. Tarasenko, E. L. Ivchenko, D. Weiss, J. Eroms, R. Yakimova, S. Lara-Avila, S. Kubatkin, and S. D. Ganichev, Dynamic Hall effect driven by circularly po- larized light in a graphene layer, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 227402 (2010)

2010
[6]

Kitagawa, E

T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topo- logical characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B82, 235114 (2010)

2010
[7]

M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

2013

Show all 34 references

[8]

G. Chen, K. R. A. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, and M. Her- mele, Synthetic-gauge-field stabilization of the chiral- spin-liquid phase, Phys. Rev. A93, 061601 (2016)

2016
[9]

I. C. Fulga, M. Maksymenko, M. T. Rieder, N. H. Lind- ner, and E. Berg, Topology and localization of a peri- odically driven kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B99, 235408 (2019)

2019
[10]

B.-Y. Sun, N. Goldman, M. Aidelsburger, and M. Bukov, Engineering and probing non-abelian chiral spin liquids using periodically driven ultracold atoms, PRX Quantum 4, 020329 (2023)

2023
[11]

Kalinowski, N

M. Kalinowski, N. Maskara, and M. D. Lukin, Non- abelian Floquet spin liquids in a digital Rydberg sim- ulator, Phys. Rev. X13, 031008 (2023)

2023
[12]

H. C. Po, L. Fidkowski, T. Morimoto, A. C. Potter, and A. Vishwanath, Chiral Floquet phases of many-body lo- calized bosons, Phys. Rev. X6, 041070 (2016)

2016
[13]

Zhang and M

C. Zhang and M. Levin, Classification of interacting Flo- quet phases withu(1) symmetry in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B103, 064302 (2021)

2021
[14]

Khemani, R

V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, A brief history of time crystals (2019), arXiv:1910.10745 [cond- mat.str-el]

2019 arXiv
[15]

D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. m. c. Huveneers, Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many- body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 256803 (2015)

2015
[16]

D. J. Luitz, R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, Prethermalization without temperature, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021046 (2020)

2020
[17]

P. M. Schindler and M. Bukov, Counterdiabatic driving for periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 123402 (2024)

2024
[18]

Mambrini and D

M. Mambrini and D. Poilblanc, Quantum state prepara- tion of topological chiral spin liquids via Floquet engi- neering, SciPost Phys.17, 011 (2024)

2024
[19]

Poilblanc, M

D. Poilblanc, M. Mambrini, and N. Goldman, Floquet dynamical chiral spin liquid at finite frequency, Phys. Rev. B110, 224408 (2024). 24

2024
[20]

P. W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Materials Research Bulletin8, 153 (1973)

1973
[21]

Poilblanc, N

D. Poilblanc, N. Schuch, D. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, and J. I. Cirac, Topological and entanglement properties of resonating valence bond wave functions, Phys. Rev. B86, 014404 (2012)

2012
[22]

Poilblanc, Investigation of the chiral antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model using projected entangled pair states, Phys

D. Poilblanc, Investigation of the chiral antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model using projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B96, 121118 (2017)

2017
[23]

J.-Y. Chen, L. Vanderstraeten, S. Capponi, and D. Poil- blanc, Non-abelian chiral spin liquid in a quantum anti- ferromagnet revealed by an iPEPS study, Phys. Rev. B 98, 184409 (2018)

2018
[24]

Chen, J.-W

J.-Y. Chen, J.-W. Li, P. Nataf, S. Capponi, M. Mambrini, K. Totsuka, H.-H. Tu, A. Weichselbaum, J. von Delft, and D. Poilblanc, Abelian su(n) 1 chiral spin liquids on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B104, 235104 (2021)

2021
[25]

Hasik, M

J. Hasik, M. Van Damme, D. Poilblanc, and L. Vander- straeten, Simulating chiral spin liquids with projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 177201 (2022)

2022
[26]

P. M. Schindler and M. Bukov, Geometric Floquet the- ory, Phys. Rev. X15, 031037 (2025)

2025
[27]

Aharonov and J

Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1593 (1987)

1987
[29]

Moore, The calculation of nonadiabatic Berry phases, Physics Reports210, 1 (1991)

D. Moore, The calculation of nonadiabatic Berry phases, Physics Reports210, 1 (1991)

1991
[30]

Goldman, J

N. Goldman, J. Beugnon, and F. Gerbier, Detecting chi- ral edge states in the hofstadter optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 255303 (2012)

2012
[31]

Binanti, N

F. Binanti, N. Goldman, and C. Repellin, Spectroscopy of edge and bulk collective modes in fractional chern in- sulators, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012054 (2024)

2024
[32]

L. P. Gavensky, G. Usaj, and N. Goldman, The Streda formula for Floquet systems: Topological invariants and quantized anomalies from Cesaro summation (2025), arXiv:2408.13576 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2025 arXiv
[33]

Poilblanc, J

D. Poilblanc, J. I. Cirac, and N. Schuch, Chiral topo- logical spin liquids with projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B91, 224431 (2015)

2015
[34]

Goldman and J

N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically driven quan- tum systems: Effective hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [28]

D. J. Moore, Floquet theory and the non-adiabatic Berry phase, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 23, L665 (1990)

1990

[2] [1]

Note that|ϕ n(t)⟩are also, up to a phase irrelevant in Eq

Average-energy spectrum The average-energies are defined as æn = 1 T Z T 0 ⟨ϕn(t)|H(t)|ϕ n(t)⟩dt .(B1) Here|ϕ n(t)⟩are the micromotion Floquet eigenstates given byU(t,0)|ϕ n⟩. Note that|ϕ n(t)⟩are also, up to a phase irrelevant in Eq. (B1), the eigenstates of the uni- tary evolution operatorU(t+T, t). In the general case of an arbitrary drive Hamiltonian,...

[3] [2]

(8) and (9))

Expansion near a swap point Floquet Hamiltonian –We now turn to the problem of computing the Floquet Hamiltonian in the vicinityω= ωs +δωof a Swap model characterized by a pair (ω s,∆ s) (see Eqs. (8) and (9)). Up to the first order inδω, each termU ∆ α=a,...,d( π 2ω ) of Eq. (2) takes the form Uα =U s α e iπδω 2ω2s Hα =U s α 1−δω iπ 2ω2s Hα ,(B6) where w...

[4] [3]

Static” sites are represented as (solid or shaded) black dots and “active

Floquet Hamiltonian on the torus Let us consider a system with no boundary (either in- finite or a finite cluster on a torus). In this case, using the identityU s F =1, equation (B8) takes the form UF =1−iδω π 2ω2s Ha +H d +U s a †HbU s a +U s d HcU s d † +O(δω 2) =e iπδω 2ω2s H s abcd +O(δω 2).(B11) FIG. 17. Range √ 5 interactions generated under unitary...

[5] [4]

compressed

Floquet and average-energy spectra in the presence of a boundary On a cylinder,U s F no longer reduces to1but is given by (see Section III A) : U s F =T A,left −2a ⊗1 bulk ⊗T B,right 2a (B15) which now involves, as shown if figure 18, the translations by two lattice spacings of half the sites of each boundaries (belonging to opposite sublattices). Eigenst...

[6] [5]

Karch, P

J. Karch, P. Olbrich, M. Schmalzbauer, C. Zoth, C. Brin- steiner, M. Fehrenbacher, U. Wurstbauer, M. M. Glazov, S. A. Tarasenko, E. L. Ivchenko, D. Weiss, J. Eroms, R. Yakimova, S. Lara-Avila, S. Kubatkin, and S. D. Ganichev, Dynamic Hall effect driven by circularly po- larized light in a graphene layer, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 227402 (2010)

2010

[7] [6]

Kitagawa, E

T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topo- logical characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B82, 235114 (2010)

2010

[8] [7]

M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

2013