Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 23 references

Stroboscopic stability of a Floquet chiral spin liquid beyond the folding frequency

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a periodically driven chiral spin liquid survives far beyond the frequency at which its quasienergy spectrum folds, because the folding crossings are parametrically weak and stability is governed by local energy scale

desk verdict A convincing 16-site exact-diagonalization result that Floquet CSL stability is set by local scales, with the thermodynamic-limit step clearly labeled a conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16515 v1 pith:LQE4EN2H submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Didier Poilblanc This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords Floquetprethermalizationchiralspinliquidtopologicalorderperiodicdrivingquasienergyfoldingtime-averagedenergyJ1-J2-Kmodelexactdiagonalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a two-step periodic drive on the 4×4 torus that alternates the non-chiral exchange part H_AF and the chiral plaquette part H_K of the J1-J2-K model, whose static limit hosts a topological chiral-spin-liquid doublet (a gapped, fractionalized spin state with two degenerate ground states on the torus). It tries to establish that this doublet is not destroyed when the Floquet spectrum folds—at ω_res ≈ 11.5 J1—but persists as the isolated bottom of the average-energy spectrum down to ω ≈ 6 J1. The reason, it argues, is that folded high-energy states cross the doublet only through exponentially weak avoided crossings, while real destruction requires low-order resonances with local matrix elements. If correct, a prethermal Floquet chiral spin liquid should exist in the thermodynamic limit for frequencies above a few J1, with heating times exponentially long in ω/J1—so Floquet engineering of topological spin liquids does not require frequencies above the many-body bandwidth.

What carries the argument

The two central mechanisms are the split-step Floquet propagator U_F(T) = exp(−iT H_K/2) exp(−iT H_AF/2), whose exact eigenstates are the Floquet modes, and the time-averaged energy Ē_n = (1/T)∫₀ᵀ ⟨φ_n(t)|H(t)|φ_n(t)⟩ dt, a folding-free ordering of the Floquet spectrum. The average energy is the diagnostic that exposes the prethermal ordering: it separates the harmless comb of quasienergy crossings from the few low-order resonances that finally destroy the doublet. A D=3 chiral PEPS ansatz (a tensor-network wavefunction with bond dimension 3), optimized against the Floquet doublet states and evaluated through its transfer operator, independently confirms that the chiral edge structure—an SU

What would settle it

Compute the time-averaged-energy ordering and doublet isolation on a second, larger cluster (for instance a 4×6 or tilted 20-site torus): if the threshold ω* drifts upward markedly with system size, or if any fixed frequency below ω_res shows resonances with order-one hybridization widths, the prethermal-Floquet-CSL claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the topological chiral-spin-liquid doublet of the static model survives the two-step drive at frequencies far below the first folding resonance. Using an exact one-period propagator on the 16-site torus, the paper shows that although folded states cross the doublet in quasienergy starting at ω_res ≈ 11.5 J1, the time-averaged energy of the Floquet eigenstates keeps the doublet as the isolated bottom of the spectrum until ω ≈ 6 J1. These quasienergy resonances leave no trace in the average energy, identifying them as parametrically narrow avoided crossings. The paper concludes that stability is controlled by local energy scales, not by the extensive many-body bandwid

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 16-site destruction threshold—set by local energy scales—stays around 5–6 J1 in the thermodynamic limit, with the dense resonance comb remaining exponentially weak rather than developing order-one avoided crossings at any fixed frequency.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the folded window between ω_res and the destruction threshold, the topological doublet remains the absolute bottom of the average-energy spectrum and shows no heating over thousands of periods.
  • The drive can tune the doublet to an exact average-energy degeneracy at ω ≈ 13.0 J1, inside the folded-but-stable window—something the static model does not achieve at this parameter point.
  • Diagonal-ensemble energy absorption is exponentially suppressed in frequency, ΔE_DE ∝ exp(−0.37 ω/J1), with no feature at the folding resonance, matching prethermalization bounds.
  • In the thermodynamic limit, for ω above a few J1, the stroboscopic dynamics should be governed for exponentially long times by a prethermal Floquet Hamiltonian that hosts the same gapped chiral spin liquid.
  • The destruction of the doublet at ω ≈ 5–6 J1 occurs through identifiable low-order resonances with O(1) matrix elements, not through a broad continuum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct way to test the central claim is to repeat the average-energy ordering on larger clusters: if ω* tracks the local scale it should stay near a few J1 while the folding frequency grows with system size.
  • The same folding-free ordering via time-averaged energy could serve as a general finite-size diagnostic for prethermal regimes in any driven model where quasienergy folding blurs the distinction between low-energy and high-energy states.
  • If the prethermal scenario holds, Floquet engineering of chiral spin liquids becomes much easier in practice: the drive frequency needs to exceed only local exchange scales, not the entire many-body bandwidth, widening the accessible parameter range for experiments and state preparation.
  • The observed exponential heating law implies that heating times scale as exp(c ω/J1); extracting the heating rate from the widths of individual avoided crossings would give a microscopic measure of the prethermal lifetime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-step Floquet drive of the J1-J2-K Heisenberg model on the 4×4 torus, alternating the non-chiral Heisenberg part H_AF and the chiral plaquette part H_K at the static 'sweet spot' where the undriven model hosts a chiral-spin-liquid (CSL) doublet. The one-period propagator is built exactly from sector-diagonalized exponentials, and four diagnostics are followed versus the period T: quasienergy splitting/isolation on the circle, the time-averaged energy Ē_n of Eq. (10), D=3 chiral PEPS overlaps and entanglement spectra, and stroboscopic dynamics over thousands of periods. The main finite-size result is that the doublet remains the isolated bottom of the average-energy spectrum down to ω ≃ 6.1 J1, well below the first folding resonance at ω_res ≃ 11.5 J1; quasienergy resonances in the folded regime are claimed to be parametrically weak, and the eventual destruction near ω ≃ 5–6 J1 is attributed to local energy scales. On this basis the paper argues that a prethermal Floquet CSL should persist in the thermodynamic limit for ω above a few J1. The thermodynamic-limit extrapolation is explicitly labeled as an expectation and is supported by three predictions that are not tested here.

Significance. If the central finite-size result is taken as established, the paper makes a valuable conceptual point: spectral folding alone does not destroy a Floquet topological doublet, and the stability scale can be set by local energies rather than by the extensive many-body bandwidth. The exact construction of the one-period propagator, the unitarity/symmetry checks, the T→0 benchmark, and the public code are genuine strengths; the average-energy diagnostic of Eq. (10) is evaluated exactly for the piecewise-constant drive and is not fitted. The four diagnostics are mutually consistent, and the paper is careful to label the exponential heating law and the thermodynamic predictions as such. The main limitation is that the thermodynamic-limit claim rests on a single 16-site cluster; the paper itself identifies the missing finite-size scaling via prediction (i), so the manuscript's scope is more that of a controlled finite-size study plus a clearly stated conjecture than a demonstrated thermodynamic-limit result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 7 and Abstract] The thermodynamic-limit claim—that a prethermal Floquet CSL survives for ω above a few J1 with ω* set by local, size-independent scales—is tested at N=16 only. On the 4×4 torus the average-energy isolation gap (Δ_iso≈0.315) is large compared with finite-size level spacings, so the persistence of the isolated doublet down to T_iso≈1.04 could in principle be a small-cluster artifact. Rigorous prethermalization bounds guarantee exponentially slow heating for local drives, but they do not by themselves guarantee that the prethermal Floquet Hamiltonian remains in the CSL phase (gap and topological degeneracy) at ω≈6J1. Because the abstract and title promote this extrapolation, the paper should either add a second system size (4×6 or tilted 20/26-site tori, as in the paper's own prediction (i)) or explicitly downgrade the thermodynamic statement from an expectation to a conjecture. As written,
  2. [Sec. 5, Table 1 and Fig. 4] The topological-order diagnostic is indirect. The entanglement spectrum in Fig. 4 is computed from the optimized chiral PEPS tensor, not from the reduced density matrix of the Floquet eigenstates; the 'driven' label refers to a tensor re-optimized against |u_A,B(T)⟩, with squared overlaps that drop to 0.71–0.74 at T=1. A quasi-degenerate, isolated singlet doublet at k=0 with C4=±1 is necessary but not sufficient for a CSL. To support the statement in Sec. 7 that the prethermal Floquet Hamiltonian 'hosts the same gapped CSL phase', the paper should either provide a more direct topological diagnostic of the driven eigenstates or carefully qualify the phase identification as inherited from the static PEPS ansatz.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eq. (10) and Figs. 2–3] The claim that quasienergy resonances are 'parametrically weak avoided crossings' because they leave no trace in the average energy is plausible but not quantitatively established. Absence of a feature in Ē_n is consistent with weak hybridization, but it does not by itself measure the avoided-crossing width. A fine T-scan around one representative resonance—which is the paper's own prediction (iii)—would convert this inference into a direct measurement. Without such a scan, the statement that the resonance comb remains 'exponentially weak' in the thermodynamic limit is an extrapolation from the absence of a signal in a single finite-size diagnostic.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5] Typo: 'correspondance' should be 'correspondence'.
  2. [Fig. 6] The exponential fit ΔE_DE ∝ e^{-cω/J1} is mentioned with c≃0.37, but the fit range and residuals are not given; please state them. Also, the right panel x-axis begins at ω=4 while the left panel covers periods up to T=2.0; clarify the mapping.
  3. [Eq. (13)] The symbol H in Eq. (13) is the total static Hamiltonian, while earlier in the paper H denotes H_AF+H_K. This is understandable but should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion with the Floquet Hamiltonian H_F.
  4. [References] Ref. [7] contains a DOI string '10.1103/z86g-mcc1' that does not look like a standard CrossRef DOI in the form given; please verify and provide the canonical DOI if available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: exact Floquet diagonalization, externally grounded average-energy diagnostic, and openly conjectural thermodynamic extrapolation.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained: U_F(T) is assembled exactly in each symmetry sector (Sec. 2), and doublet survival is read off directly from the exact one-period propagator and from the exact average-energy expression (Eq. 10). No parameter is fitted to the target quantity. The exponential absorption law in Sec. 6 is explicitly labeled a fit, and the Sec. 7 predictions are framed as verifiable conjectures. The average-energy diagnostic comes from Refs. [7,11]; Ref. [7] overlaps with the author, but its foundation is the independent geometric Floquet theory of Schindler and Bukov [11], so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The PEPS and entanglement-spectrum checks are fresh diagnostics, not inputs to the claim. The thermodynamic-limit extrapolation of omega* from N=16 is explicitly labeled an expectation and untested at a larger size; that is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's contribution is exact Floquet numerics plus an interpretive argument. Its interpretive load rests on the average-energy principle (from Refs [7,11], partially same-group), the prethermalization framework [8–10], and the static sweet-spot input; two fitted quantities (c, ω*) and one hand-chosen parameter point are used. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Static sweet-spot parameters (θ/π, K, J2) = (0.325, 0.20, 0.40)
    Chosen in Appendix A via an ED grid search over (K, θ) at J2=0.4 to minimize static doublet splitting Δ_AB and maximize isolation Δ_iso. The entire Floquet study is pinned to this one point; the paper notes J2 must be fine-tuned for the static CSL pocket.
  • Exponential heating-rate constant c = c ≃ 0.37 in ΔE_DE ∝ e^{-cω/J1}
    Fit to diagonal-ensemble absorption data (Fig. 6 right) on the 16-site cluster over ω/J1 ∈ [3, 12.6]; no uncertainty quoted; used to support the prethermal interpretation and to locate the heating threshold.
  • Heating threshold ω* = ≃ 5–6 J1 (equiv. T_iso ≃ 1.04)
    Read off from the average-energy isolation breakdown and diag-ensemble absorption; used as the central local-scale input in the thermodynamic-limit argument of Sec. 7.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The static J1-J2-K model at the sweet spot (θ/π=0.325, K=0.20, J2=0.40) hosts a gapped topological CSL doublet on the 4×4 torus (Δ_AB=0.025, Δ_iso=0.315).
    Input from Appendix A (ED study building on the tensor classification of Refs [12,13] and prior static work by the author). The driven study inherits this; the CSL interpretation is corroborated in-body by the PEPS overlap and the SU(2)_1 entanglement spectrum.
  • domain assumption The time-averaged energy Ē_n = (1/T)∫⟨ϕ_n(t)|H(t)|ϕ_n(t)⟩dt is the correct folding-free ordering of Floquet eigenstates.
    Taken from geometric Floquet theory (Ref [11], Schindler–Bukov) and applied in Ref [7] (same research group). The paper uses it as the primary diagnostic (Eqs. 9–10) without re-deriving the principle.
  • domain assumption Prethermalization bounds [8–10] apply to this drive: for ω above local scales the heating rate is exponentially small.
    Invoked in Secs. 6–7 to interpret the exponential absorption law and to extrapolate to the thermodynamic limit; requires standard locality/commutator-growth conditions on H(t), which hold for this local spin model but are not verified explicitly.
  • ad hoc to paper The two-step protocol e^{-i(T/2)H_K} e^{-i(T/2)H_AF}, with the chiral term present half of each period, is the right probe of 'folding' stability.
    The drive is constructed (Sec. 2) so the CSL exists in the infinite-frequency limit with no 1/ω coupling trade-off; the paper contrasts this with Refs [3,4]. It defines the protocol under test rather than a physical input.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stroboscopic stability of a Floquet chiral spin liquid beyond the folding frequency." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQE4EN2H

@misc{pith2026260716515,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stroboscopic stability of a Floquet chiral spin liquid beyond the folding frequency},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQE4EN2H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16515}
}
abstract

We study the two-step Floquet dynamics of the chiral $J_1$-$J_2$-$K$ Heisenberg model on the $4\times4$ torus, alternating its non-chiral Heisenberg part $H_{\rm AF}$ and its chiral plaquette part $H_K$, at the parameter point where the static model (recovered in the infinite frequency limit) hosts a quasi-degenerate, spectrally isolated chiral-spin-liquid (CSL) topological doublet. The one-period propagator is computed exactly in all momentum/rotation symmetry sectors. It is shown that, decreasing the frequency, the topological doublet survives the drive far beyond the frequency $\omega_{\mathrm{res}}\simeq 11.5 J_1$ at which folded states first cross it in quasienergy: the time-averaged energy of the Floquet eigenstates, which orders the folded Floquet spectrum, shows that the doublet remains the isolated bottom of the spectrum down to $\omega\simeq6J_1$, while stroboscopic time evolution over thousands of periods shows no heating for $\omega\gtrsim \omega_{\mathrm{res}}$ and only slow absorption below. The quasienergy resonances that occur in the folded regime are invisible in the average energy, identifying them as parametrically weak avoided crossings. We argue that this mechanism -- stability controlled by local energy scales rather than by the extensive many-body bandwidth -- is precisely the one expected to survive in the thermodynamic limit, where a prethermal Floquet CSL should persist for $\omega$ above a threshold set by local scales, with heating times exponentially long in $\omega/J_1$. Consistently, the optimal $D=3$ chiral PEPS of the static problem still describes the driven doublet deep in the folded regime, with an essentially unchanged local tensor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16515 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: doublet splitting ∆F AB and isolation ∆F iso measured on the quasienergy circle, versus the drive period T. Dotted lines: static values rescaled by 1/2 (high-frequency limit HF → H/2). Right: squared overlaps of the Floquet doublet eigenstates with the static CSL doublet. lie (that separation being the splitting ∆F AB). Two remarkable features emerge at high frequency. First, the drive reduces the doublet spli… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Average-energy spectrum versus T (grey: all 12870 levels; red: lowest eight; blue/green: the topological doublet followed by overlap). The key periods Tfold, Tdeg, Tres, Tiso are marked. The doublet remains the isolated bottom of the average-energy spectrum far beyond Tres, up to Tiso ≃ 1.04. with |ϕn(t)⟩ the micromotion of |un⟩. For the two-step drive Eq. (4) (or any piecewise￾constant driving) the integral is exac… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: doublet splitting and signed isolation in average energy (negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spin-resolved entanglement spectrum of the optimal chiral PEPS on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stroboscopic evolution |ψ(nT)⟩ = U n F |ψ stat A ⟩ up to n = 2000 periods, for several drive periods T. Left: fidelity to the initial state. Right: absorbed energy normalized to the full many-body bandwidth. The salient result is the T=0 vs T=1 comparison: the two spec…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diagonal-ensemble diagnostics of the driven state. Left: participation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Static optimization at J2 = 0.4 in the (K, θ/π) plane. Left: doublet splitting |∆AB|; middle: doublet isolation ∆iso (negative where an intruder lies below the doublet top); right: trade-off between the two diagnostics for all grid points at J2 = 0, 0.2, 0.4. The green…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Full Floquet quasienergy spectrum εn (all 12870 levels of the S z = 0 sector, dots) versus the drive period T, at the sweet spot (θ/π, K, J2) = (0.325, 0.20, 0.40). Dashed lines: the Floquet-zone edges ±π/T. The topolog￾ical doublet is highlighted: εA (blue) and εB (re…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kalmeyer and R

    V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin,Equivalence of the resonating-valence- bond and fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2095 (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2095. 14 SciPost Physics Submission

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2095

  2. [2]

    X. G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee,Chiral spin states and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B39, 11413 (1989), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.39.11413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.39.11413 1989

  3. [3]

    Mambrini and D

    M. Mambrini and D. Poilblanc,Quantum state preparation of topological chiral spin liquids via Floquet engineering, SciPost Phys.17, 011 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.011

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.17.1.011 2024

  4. [4]

    Poilblanc, M

    D. Poilblanc, M. Mambrini, and N. Goldman,Floquet dynamical chiral spin liquid at finite frequency, Phys. Rev. B110, 224408 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.224408

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.224408 2024

  5. [5]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin,Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.3.031005

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.3.031005 2013

  6. [6]

    H. C. Po, L. Fidkowski, T. Morimoto, A. C. Potter, and A. Vishwanath,Chi- ral Floquet phases of many-body localized bosons, Phys. Rev. X6, 041070 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041070

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.041070 2016

  7. [7]

    Mambrini, N

    M. Mambrini, N. Goldman, and D. Poilblanc,Detuning the Floquet anomalous chiral spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B (2026), doi:10.1103/z86g-mcc1; arXiv:2512.23418

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    T. Mori, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito,Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic relaxation in periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120401 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.120401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.120401 2016

Show all 23 references
  1. [9]

    Kuwahara, T

    T. Kuwahara, T. Mori, and K. Saito,Floquet–Magnus theory and generic transient dynamics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems, Ann. Phys.367, 96 (2016), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.01.012

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Huveneers,Effective Hamiltoni- ans, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B95, 014112 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014112;A rigor- ous theory of many-body prethermalizat...

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    P. M. Schindler and M. Bukov,Geometric Floquet theory, Phys. Rev. X15, 031037 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.031037; arXiv:2410.07029

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Poilblanc, J

    D. Poilblanc, J. I. Cirac, and N. Schuch,Chiral topological spin liq- uids with projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B91, 224431 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.224431

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    Mambrini, R

    M. Mambrini, R. Or´ us, and D. Poilblanc,Systematic construction of spin liquids on the square lattice from tensor networks with SU(2) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B94, 205124 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.205124

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane,Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: identification of topological order in non-Abelian frac- tional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504

    2008 doi

  7. [15]

    Poilblanc, N

    D. Poilblanc, N. Schuch, and I. Affleck,SU(2) 1 chiral edge modes of a criti- cal spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B93, 174414 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174414; arXiv:1602.05969. 15 SciPost Physics Submission

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Mallayya and M

    K. Mallayya and M. Rigol,Heating rates in periodically driven strongly in- teracting quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 240603 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.240603

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol,Long-time behavior of isolated periodically driven interact- ing lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041048

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner,Equilibrium states of generic quan- tum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 012110 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012110

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Ponte, A

    P. Ponte, A. Chandran, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin,Periodically driven er- godic and many-body localized quantum systems, Ann. Phys.353, 196 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.11.008

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov,Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Adv. Phys.64, 139 (2015), doi:10.1080/00018732.2015.1055918

    2015

  13. [21]

    Machado, D

    F. Machado, D. V. Else, G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao,Long- range prethermal phases of nonequilibrium matter, Phys. Rev. X10, 011043 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011043

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Rubio-Abadal, M

    A. Rubio-Abadal, M. Ippoliti, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, J. Rui, S. L. Sondhi, V. Khemani, C. Gross, and I. Bloch,Floquet prethermalization in a Bose–Hubbard system, Phys. Rev. X10, 021044 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021044

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Beatrez, O

    W. Beatrez, O. Janes, A. Akkiraju, A. Pillai, A. Oddo, P. Reshetikhin, E. Druga, M. McAllister, M. Elo, B. Gilbert, D. Suter, and A. Ajoy,Floquet prethermalization with lifetime exceeding 90 s in a bulk hyperpolarized solid, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 170603 (2021), doi:10.1103/Phys...

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.