pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.06267 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sizes of Ferroelectricity Appearance and Disappearence in Nanosized Hafnia-Zirconia:Landau-type Theory

Anna N. Morozovska , Eugene A. Eliseev , Sergei V. Kalinin , Maksym V. Strikha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hafnia-zirconiaferroelectricitycritical thicknessLandau-Ginzburg-Devonshiremismatch straindepolarization fieldnano-islandsepitaxial films
0
0 comments X

The pith

In nanosized hafnia-zirconia, out-of-plane ferroelectric polarization appears at thicknesses set by mismatch strain relaxation and disappears at thicknesses set by depolarization fields and correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire model with higher-order terms, trilinear and biquadratic couplings, the paper derives analytical expressions for the critical thicknesses where ferroelectricity appears and disappears in epitaxial HfO2 thin films and nano-islands. Polarization disappearance occurs when the depolarization field and correlation effects grow strong enough with shrinking size. Polarization appearance occurs when effective mismatch strain relaxes sufficiently, including via misfit dislocations and lateral strain relief. These size limits matter for silicon-compatible ferroelectric memories because they set the practical dimensions at which stable out-of-plane polarization can be maintained or lost.

Core claim

The critical thickness or height of out-of-plane spontaneous polarization disappearance is determined by the size dependence of the depolarization field and correlation effects. The critical thickness or height of the ferroelectricity appearance is determined by the size dependence of the effective mismatch strain considering possible appearance of misfit dislocations and lateral relaxation of strains.

What carries the argument

Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire free energy functional with higher powers, trilinear and biquadratic couplings of polar, nonpolar and antipolar order parameters

If this is right

  • Analytical expressions for critical sizes can be generalized to HfxZr1-xO2 solid solutions once the corresponding free energy parameters are known from first principles calculations.
  • Size effects and mismatch strains shape the phase diagrams and polarization switching barriers in epitaxial HfO2 thin films and nano-islands.
  • The two critical sizes arise from distinct mechanisms, one dominated by electrostatic and correlation terms and the other by mechanical strain relaxation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device engineers could plug the derived expressions into design rules to pick film thicknesses that keep stable ferroelectricity in nanoscale capacitors.
  • The same size-dependent logic could be tested in related hafnium or zirconium oxide compositions by swapping the coupling coefficients.
  • High-resolution thickness-series experiments on epitaxial samples would directly test the separate roles of depolarization versus strain relaxation.

Load-bearing premise

The free energy parameters can be accurately obtained from first principles calculations and the model with trilinear and biquadratic couplings sufficiently captures the physics of nanosized hafnia-zirconia without additional effects.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of out-of-plane polarization versus thickness in epitaxial hafnia films, checking whether the predicted critical points for appearance and disappearance match the calculated size dependence of depolarization field and strain relaxation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.06267 by Anna N. Morozovska, Eugene A. Eliseev, Maksym V. Strikha, Sergei V. Kalinin.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIGURE 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nanosized hafnia-zirconia HfxZr1-xO2 in the form of thin films, multilayers and heterostructures are indispensable silicon-compatible ferroelectric materials for advanced electronic memories and logic devices. The distinctive feature of nanoscale hafnia-zirconia are the critical sizes of ferroelectricity appearance, whereas the critical sizes of ferroelectricity disappearance exist in other ferroelectrics. Using the Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire free energy functional with higher powers, trilinear and biquadratic couplings of polar, nonpolar and antipolar order parameters, we calculated analytically the strain-dependent critical sizes of the ferroelectricity appearance and disappearance, analyzed how the size effect and mismatch strains influence the phase diagrams and polarization switching barrier in epitaxial HfO2 thin films and nano-islands with the out-of-plane spontaneous polarization. We have shown that the critical thickness/height of out-of-plane spontaneous polarization disappearance is determined by the size dependence of the depolarization field and correlation effects. The critical thickness/height of the ferroelectricity appearance is determined by the size dependence of the effective mismatch strain considering possible appearance of misfit dislocations and lateral relaxion of strains. Derived analytical expressions can be generalized for HfxZr1-xO2 solid solutions, providing that corresponding parameters of the free energy are known from the first principles calculations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire (LGD) phenomenological theory for nanosized hafnia-zirconia (Hf_x Zr_{1-x} O_2) ferroelectrics. It derives analytical expressions for the critical thicknesses/heights at which out-of-plane spontaneous polarization appears and disappears in epitaxial thin films and nano-islands, accounting for depolarization fields, correlation effects, higher-order terms in the free energy, trilinear and biquadratic couplings between polar, nonpolar, and antipolar order parameters, and size-dependent effective mismatch strains including misfit dislocations and lateral strain relaxation.

Significance. If the derived expressions hold with accurate parameters, the work offers a useful analytical tool for predicting size-dependent ferroelectric behavior in silicon-compatible HfO2-based materials, which is relevant for memory and logic devices. The explicit dependence on strain and depolarization provides insights into phase diagrams and switching barriers. The analytical nature of the derivations is a strength, but the significance is limited by the absence of any validation against data or simulations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and theoretical framework] Abstract and § on critical sizes: The quantitative predictions for critical thickness/height rest on the transfer of LGD coefficients from first-principles calculations to the nanoscale regime; no comparison to experimental critical sizes or atomistic simulations is provided to test whether surface/interface effects invalidate this transfer at few-nm scales.
  2. [Results on critical sizes] Section on strain relaxation: The effective mismatch strain is modeled via a phenomenological rule for misfit-dislocation formation and lateral relaxation; this assumption is load-bearing for the ferroelectricity-appearance critical size but lacks independent verification against atomistic or experimental strain profiles.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title] Title: 'Disappearence' is misspelled; should be 'Disappearance'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: Notation for Hf_x Zr_{1-x} O_2 is inconsistent (missing subscripts in places); ensure uniform formatting throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional discussion where the points identify genuine limitations of the current presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and theoretical framework] Abstract and § on critical sizes: The quantitative predictions for critical thickness/height rest on the transfer of LGD coefficients from first-principles calculations to the nanoscale regime; no comparison to experimental critical sizes or atomistic simulations is provided to test whether surface/interface effects invalidate this transfer at few-nm scales.

    Authors: We agree that the quantitative predictions rely on transferring LGD coefficients obtained from first-principles calculations into the nanoscale regime and that no direct comparison with experimental critical sizes or atomistic simulations is provided. Surface and interface effects can indeed become important at few-nanometer thicknesses. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the section on critical sizes that explicitly states this limitation, notes that the present analytical expressions assume the validity of the transferred coefficients, and suggests that future atomistic or experimental validation would be valuable. This addition clarifies the scope of the work without changing the derivations themselves. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on critical sizes] Section on strain relaxation: The effective mismatch strain is modeled via a phenomenological rule for misfit-dislocation formation and lateral relaxation; this assumption is load-bearing for the ferroelectricity-appearance critical size but lacks independent verification against atomistic or experimental strain profiles.

    Authors: The effective mismatch strain is described by a standard phenomenological rule for misfit-dislocation onset and lateral relaxation, which is load-bearing for the predicted critical thickness of ferroelectricity appearance. We acknowledge that this rule is an approximation and that the manuscript does not contain independent verification against atomistic simulations or experimental strain profiles. In the revision we have inserted additional references to existing atomistic studies of strain relaxation in HfO2 films and added a clarifying sentence in the strain-relaxation section that identifies the rule as a model assumption. Performing new atomistic calculations to verify the strain profiles lies outside the scope of the present analytical theory paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytical results follow from LGD minimization with externally supplied first-principles parameters

full rationale

The derivation minimizes the stated Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire functional (including higher-order, trilinear and biquadratic terms) to obtain closed-form expressions for critical thicknesses. All coefficients are explicitly declared to be taken from independent first-principles calculations; no fitting to the target critical-size data occurs inside the paper. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The algebra is therefore self-contained once the external parameters are accepted, satisfying the criterion for a non-circular theoretical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theory builds on standard assumptions of phenomenological ferroelectric modeling, with no new entities introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Coefficients of the LGD free energy expansion
    These are to be taken from first principles calculations as stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system can be described by a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire free energy with higher-order terms, trilinear and biquadratic couplings between polar, nonpolar and antipolar order parameters.
    This is the basis for all calculations of critical sizes and phase diagrams.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5562 in / 1373 out tokens · 47103 ms · 2026-05-16T15:40:39.807775+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Role of Oxygen Vacancies in Stabilizing the Orthorhombic Phases of Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 Nanoparticles

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Oxygen vacancies stabilize the ferroelectric orthorhombic phase o-III in small Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 nanoparticles via chemical strain and reduced depolarization fields.

  2. Role of Oxygen Vacancies in Stabilizing the Orthorhombic Phases of Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 Nanoparticles

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Oxygen vacancies stabilize the ferroelectric orthorhombic o-III phase in small Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 nanoparticles through chemical strain, as shown by experiments and Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire modeling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    11, 089201 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148068

    Roadmap on ferroelectric hafnia and zirconia-based materials and devices, APL Mater. 11, 089201 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148068

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0148068 2023

  2. [2]

    K.-H. Kim, I. Karpov, R. H. Olsson III, D. Jariwala. Wurtzite and fluorite ferroelectric materials for electronic memory, Nature Nanotechnology 18, 422 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023- 01361-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-023- 2023

  3. [3]

    X. Tao, L. Liu, L. Yang and J.-P. Xu, Impacts of HfZrO2 thickness and anneal temperature on performance of MoS2 negative-capacitance field-effect transistors. Nanotechnology, 32, 445201 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac197a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ac197a 2021

  4. [4]

    A. Paul, G. Kumar, A. Das, G. Larrieu, and S. De. Hafnium oxide-based ferroelectric field effect transistors: From materials and reliability to applications in storage-class memory and in-memory computing. J. Appl. Phys. 138, 010701 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0278057

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0278057 2025

  5. [6]

    Afroze, H

    N. Afroze, H. Fahrvandi, G. Ren, P. Kumar, C. Nelson, S. Lombardo, M. Tian, et al. Atomic- scale confinement of strongly charged 180° domain wall pairs in ZrO2. arXiv.2507.18920 (2025); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.18920

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.18920 2025

  6. [7]

    Mukherjee, N

    B. Mukherjee, N. S. Fedorova, Jorge Íñiguez-González. Extrinsic nature of the polarization in hafnia ferroelectrics, arXiv.2508.00372 (2025); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.00372

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.00372 2025

  7. [8]

    Delodovici, P

    F. Delodovici, P. Barone, and S. Picozzi. Finite-size effects on ferroelectricity in rhombohedral HfO2. Phys. Rev. B 106, 115438 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115438

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.115438 2022

  8. [10]

    Jung and T

    S. Jung and T. Birol, Triggered ferroelectricity in HfO2 from hybrid phonons, arXiv:2502.08633 (2025); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08633 37

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08633 2025

  9. [11]

    Jung and T

    S. Jung and T. Birol, Electric Polarization from Nonpolar Phonons, arXiv: 2512.00628 (2025); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.00628

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.00628 2025

  10. [12]

    Holakovsky, A new type of the ferroelectric phase transition

    J. Holakovsky, A new type of the ferroelectric phase transition. Physica status solidi (b), 56, 615 (1973); https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2220560224

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.2220560224 1973

  11. [14]

    Estandìa, N

    S. Estandìa, N. Dix, J. Gazquez, I. Fina, J. Lyu, M. F. Chisholm, J. Fontcuberta, and F. Sánchez, Engineering ferroelectric f0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films by epitaxial stress, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 1, 1449 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.9b00256

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaelm.9b00256 2019

  12. [15]

    Estandìa, N

    S. Estandìa, N. Dix, M. F. Chisholm, I. Fina, and F. Sánchez, Domain-matching epitaxy of ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2(111) on La2/3Sr1/3MnO3(001), Cryst. Growth Des. 20, 3801 (2020); https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00095

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00095 2020

  13. [17]

    S. Zhou, J. Zhang, and A. M. Rappe. Strain-induced antipolar phase in hafnia stabilizes robust thin-film ferroelectricity. Science Advances 8 (47), eadd5953 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add5953

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.add5953 2022

  14. [18]

    Tamura, K

    Y. Tamura, K. Masuda, and Y. Kumagai. On-demand phase-field modeling: Three-dimensional Landau energy for HfO2 through machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16207 (2025); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.16207

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.16207 2025

  15. [19]

    Y. Qi, K. M. Rabe, Competing phases of HfO2 from multiple unstable flat phonon bands of an unconventional high-symmetry phase (2024); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.16792

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.16792 2024

  16. [20]

    Y. Qi, S. Singh, and K. M. Rabe. Polarization switching in ferroelectric HfO2 from first- principles lattice mode analysis. Phys. Rev. B 111, 134106 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.134106

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.134106 2025

  17. [21]

    K. Ooe, Y. Shen, K. Shitara, S. Kobayashi. Y. Shimakawa. D. Kan, J. Etheridge. Direct observation of cation-dependent polarisation switching dynamics in fluorite ferroelectrics, (2025); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.15682

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15682 2025

  18. [22]

    Fujimoto, Y

    K. Fujimoto, Y. Sato, Y. Fuchikami, R. Teranishi, and Kenji Kaneko. Orthorhombic‐like atomic arrangement in hafnium‐oxide‐based nanoparticles. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 105, 2823 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.18242 38

    work page doi:10.1111/jace.18242 2022

  19. [23]

    Kang, W.-S

    S. Kang, W.-S. Jang, A. N. Morozovska, O. Kwon, Y. Jin, Y.H. Kim, H. Bae, C. Wang, S.H. Yang, A. Belianinov, and S. Randolph, Highly enhanced ferroelectricity in HfO2-based ferroelectric thin film by light ion bombardment. Science, 376, 731 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk3195

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abk3195 2022

  20. [24]

    K. P. Kelley, A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, Y. Liu, S. S. Fields, S. T. Jaszewski, T. Mimura, J. F. Ihlefeld, S. V. Kalinin. Ferroelectricity in Hafnia Controlled via Surface Electrochemical State. Nature Materials 22, 1144 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01619-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01619-9 2023

  21. [25]

    Glinchuk, A.N

    M.D. Glinchuk, A.N. Morozovska, A. Lukowiak, W. Stręk, M.V. Silibin, D.V. Karpinsky, Y.Kim, and S.V. Kalinin. Possible Electrochemical Origin of Ferroelectricity in HfO2 Thin Films. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 830, 153628 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153628

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153628 2020

  22. [26]

    Ma and S

    L.-Y. Ma and S. Liu. Structural Polymorphism Kinetics Promoted by Charged Oxygen Vacancies in HfO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 096801 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.096801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.096801 2023

  23. [27]

    Paul, A.K

    T.K. Paul, A.K. Saha, and S.K. Gupta, Oxygen vacancy-induced monoclinic dead layers in ferroelectric HfO2 with metal electrodes. J. Appl. Phys. 137, 144102 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0252663

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0252663 2025

  24. [28]

    Zhang, H

    G. Zhang, H. Wu, X. Xu, S. Lin, Z. Zhang, Z. Yan, X. Lu, G. Yuan, and J.-M. Liu. Enhanced reliability of Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 ferroelectric memory through WOx buffer layer to minimize oxygen vacancies. Appl. Phys. Lett. 127, 112102 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0284623

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0284623 2025

  25. [29]

    O. S. Pylypchuk, V. V. Vainberg, V. N. Poroshin, O. V. Leshchenko, V. N. Pavlikov, I. V. Kondakova, S. E. Ivanchenko, L. P. Yurchenko, L. Demchenko, A. O. Diachenko, M. V. Karpets, M. P. Trubitsyn, E. A. Eliseev, and A. N. Morozovska. A colossal dielectric response of HfxZr1-xO2 nanoparticles. Physical Review Materials 9, 114412 (2025); https://doi.org/10...

    work page doi:10.1103/y2pb-5g5w 2025

  26. [30]

    O. S. Pylypchuk, I. V. Fesych, V. V. Vainberg, Y. O. Zagorodniy, V. I. Styopkin, J. M. Gudenko, I. V. Kondakova, L. P. Yurchenko, V. N. Pavlikov, A. O. Diachenko, M. M. Koptiev, M. D. Volnyanskii, V. V. Laguta, E. A. Eliseev, M. P. Trubitsyn, and A. N. Morozovska. Resistive switching and charge accumulation in Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 nanoparticles. Journal of Physic...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c04140 2025

  27. [31]

    A. N. Morozovska, M. V. Strikha, K. P. Kelley, S. V. Kalinin, and E. A. Eliseev. Effective Landau-type model of a HfxZr1-xO2-graphene nanostructure, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 054007 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.054007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.054007 2023

  28. [32]

    E. A. Eliseev, Y. O. Zagorodniy, V. N. Pavlikov, O. V. Leshchenko, H. V. Shevilakova, M. V. Karpec, A. D. Yaremkevych, O. M. Fesenko, S. V. Kalinin, and A. N. Morozovska. Phase diagrams and polarization reversal in nanosized HfxZr1-xO2-y, AIP Advances, 14, 055224 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0209123 39

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0209123 2024

  29. [33]

    Blinc, B

    R. Blinc, B. Zeks, Soft Mode in Ferroelectrics and Antiferroelectrics; North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Oxford, 1974

    work page 1974

  30. [34]

    Rabe, Antiferroelectricity in Oxides: A Reexamination

    K.M. Rabe, Antiferroelectricity in Oxides: A Reexamination. In Functional Metal Oxides; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; pp 221–244 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527654864.ch7

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527654864.ch7 2013

  31. [35]

    Hlinka, T

    J. Hlinka, T. Ostapchuk, E. Buixaderas, C. Kadlec, P. Kuzel, I. Gregora, J. Kroupa, M. Savinov, A. Klic, J. Drahokoupil, et al. Multiple Soft-Mode Vibrations of Lead Zirconate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 197601 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.197601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.197601 2014

  32. [36]

    M. H. Park, Y. H. Lee, H. J. Kim, T. Schenk, W. Lee, K. Do Kim, F. P. G. Fengler, T. Mikolajick, U. Schroeder, and C. S. Hwang. Surface and grain boundary energy as the key enabler of ferroelectricity in nanoscale hafnia-zirconia: a comparison of model and experiment. Nanoscale 9, 9973 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR02121F

    work page doi:10.1039/c7nr02121f 2017

  33. [37]

    Tagantsev, L.E

    A. Tagantsev, L.E. Cross, J. Fousek, Domains in Ferroic Crystals and Thin Films; Springer: New York, 2010

    work page 2010

  34. [38]

    E. A. Eliseev, S. V. Kalinin, A. N. Morozovska. Ferro-ionic States and Domains Morphology in HfxZr1-xO2 Nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Physics, 137, 034103 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0243067

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0243067 2025

  35. [39]

    G. B. Stephenson, M. J. Highland, Equilibrium and Stability of Polarization in Ultrathin Ferroelectric Films with Ionic Surface Compensation. Phys. Rev. B, 84, 064107 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.064107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.064107 2011

  36. [40]

    Highland, T.T

    M.J. Highland, T.T. Fister, D.D. Fong, P. . Fuoss, C. Thompson, J. A. Eastman, S. K. Streiffer, G. B. Stephenson, Equilibrium Polarization of Ultrathin PbTiO3 with Surface Compensation Controlled by Oxygen Partial Pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 187602 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.187602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.187602 2011

  37. [41]

    E. A. Eliseev, I. V. Kondakova, Y. O. Zagorodniy, H. V. Shevliakova, O. V. Leshchenko, V. N. Pavlikov, M. V. Karpets, L. P. Yurchenko, and A. N. Morozovska, The origin of the ferroelectric-like orthorhombic phase in oxygen-deficient HfO2-y nanoparticles. Semiconductor Physics, Optoelectronics and Quantum Electronics, 28, 134 (2025); https://doi.org/10.154...

    work page doi:10.15407/spqeo28.02.134 2025

  38. [42]

    See Supplementary Materials for material parameters and calculation details, URL will be provided by Publisher

    work page

  39. [43]

    Eliseev, A.N

    E.A. Eliseev, A.N. Morozovska. General approach to the description of the size effect in ferroelectric nanosystems. The Journal of Materials Science 44, 5149 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3473-0 40

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-009-3473-0 2009

  40. [44]

    A. K. Tagantsev, G. Gerra, Interface-Induced Phenomena in Polarization Response of Ferroelectric Thin Films. Journal of Applied Physics, 100, 051607 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2337009

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2337009 2006

  41. [45]

    Stolichnov, A

    I. Stolichnov, A. K. Tagantsev, E. Colla, N. Setter, and J. S. Cross, Physical model of retention and temperature-dependent polarization reversal in ferroelectric films, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 084106 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2112174

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2112174 2005

  42. [46]

    A. K. Tagantsev, G. Gerra, and N. Setter, Short-range and long-range contributions to the size effect in metal-ferroelectric-metal heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 77, 174111 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.174111

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.174111 2008

  43. [47]

    Pertsev, A.G

    N.A. Pertsev, A.G. Zembilgotov, A. K. Tagantsev, Effect of Mechanical Boundary Conditions on Phase Diagrams of Epitaxial Ferroelectric Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1988

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1988 1988

  44. [48]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, A. Ghosh, M. E. Yelisieiev, Yu. M. Vysochanskii, and S. V. Kalinin. Anomalous Polarization Reversal in Strained Thin Films of CuInP2S6, Phys. Rev. B, 108, 054107 (2023) https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.054107 2023

  45. [49]

    J. S. Speck, and W. Pompe. Domain configurations due to multiple misfit relaxation mechanisms in epitaxial ferroelectric thin films. I. Theory. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 466-476 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.357097

    work page doi:10.1063/1.357097 1994

  46. [50]

    Morozovska, M.D

    A.N. Morozovska, M.D. Glinchuk, E.A. Eliseev. Phase transitions induced by confinement of ferroic nanoparticles. Physical Review B 76, 014102 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.014102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.014102 2007

  47. [51]

    C.L. Jia, V. Nagarajan, J.Q. He, L. Houben, T. Zhao, R. Ramesh, K. Urban, R. Waser, Unit-cell scale mapping of ferroelectricity and tetragonality in epitaxial ultrathin ferroelectric films, Nature materials 6, 64 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1808

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat1808 2007

  48. [52]

    H. S. Park, J. C. Shin, K. Do Kim, S. Jae Shin, J. Hee Song, S. Kyu Ryoo, I. Soo Lee, S. Hyun Lee, H. Nam, C. Seong Hwang. Enhancing ferroelectric properties of Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films using the HfN/TiN and W/TiN bi-layer bottom electrodes. Journal of Materiomics, 11 (6), 101109 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2025.101109

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmat.2025.101109 2025

  49. [53]

    Ye, and B.Chen, Elastic relaxation in 3D epitaxial nanoisland with strain-dependent surface stress effect

    W. Ye, and B.Chen, Elastic relaxation in 3D epitaxial nanoisland with strain-dependent surface stress effect. Journal of Crystal Growth, 410, 59-62 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.036 2015

  50. [54]

    Chiu, and C

    C-H. Chiu, and C. T. Poh. Strain energy of nanoislands on strained film–substrate systems. Physical Review B 71, 045406 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.045406 2005

  51. [55]

    Mitin, V

    V. Mitin, V. Kochelap, M. Stroscio. Introduction to Nanoelectronics: Science, Nanotechnology, Engineering, and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 346 (2012), P.129 41

    work page 2012

  52. [56]

    Luth, Solid Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films, Springer, 2010

    H. Luth, Solid Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films, Springer, 2010

    work page 2010

  53. [57]

    Lifshits, Alexender A

    Kenjiro Oura, Victor G. Lifshits, Alexender A. Saranin, Andrey V. Zotov, Mitsuhiro Katayama. Surface Science – An Introduction. Springer, 2004

    work page 2004

  54. [58]

    Venables, Introduction to Surface and Thin Film Processes, Cambridge University Press, 2003

    J.A. Venables, Introduction to Surface and Thin Film Processes, Cambridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  55. [59]

    Kolasinski, Surface Science, Wiley, 2008

    K.W. Kolasinski, Surface Science, Wiley, 2008

    work page 2008

  56. [60]

    J. Shin, H. Seo, K. Hee Ye, Y. Ho Jang, D. Seon Kwon, J. Lim, T. Kyun Kim et al. Understanding phase evolution of ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films with Al2O3 and Y2O3 inserted layers. J. Mater. Chem. C, 12, 5035 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TC00061G

    work page doi:10.1039/d4tc00061g 2024

  57. [61]

    Y. Qi, X. Xu, I. Krylov, and M. Eizenberg. Ferroelectricity of as-deposited HZO fabricated by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition at 300° C by inserting TiO2 interlayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 032906 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037887

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037887 2021

  58. [62]

    https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica

    work page

  59. [63]

    Delodovici, P

    F. Delodovici, P. Barone, and S. Picozzi, Trilinear-coupling-driven ferroelectricity in HfO2, Physical Review Materials 5, 064405 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.064405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.064405 2021

  60. [64]

    Materlik, C

    R. Materlik, C. Künneth, and A. Kersch. The origin of ferroelectricity in Hf1−xZrxO2: A computational investigation and a surface energy model, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 134109 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4916707

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4916707 2015

  61. [65]

    Dutta, P

    S. Dutta, P. Buragohain, S. Glinsek, C. Richter, H. Aramberri, H. Lu, U. Schroeder, E. Defay, A. Gruverman, J. Íñiguez. Piezoelectricity in hafnia. Nature Communications 12, 7301 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27480-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27480-5 2021

  62. [66]

    Zhao and D

    X. Zhao and D. Vanderbilt. First-principles Study of Electronic and Dielectric Properties of ZrO2 and HfO2. MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 747: Symposia T/V – Crystalline Oxides on Semiconductors – Interfacial Issues for Oxide-Based Electronics , 2002 , T5.2/N7.2; https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-747-T5.2/N7.2

    work page doi:10.1557/proc-747-t5.2/n7.2 2002