pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.15889 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-22 · 📡 eess.AS · cs.SD

A Stabilized Hybrid Active Noise Control Algorithm of GFANC and FxNLMS with Online Clustering

Zhengding Luo , Haozhe Ma , Boxiang Wang , Ziyi Yang , Dongyuan Shi , Woon-Seng Gan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS cs.SD
keywords active noise controlhybrid algorithmGFANCFxNLMSonline clusteringstabilityconvergence speed
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid GFANC-FxNLMS algorithm uses online clustering to deliver fast noise cancellation with low steady-state error and high stability from a single pre-trained filter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes combining Generative Fixed-Filter Active Noise Control (GFANC) with Filtered-x Normalized Least Mean Square (FxNLMS) in a hybrid system. GFANC supplies a frame-level control filter to initialize FxNLMS, which then adapts at the sampling rate for continuous refinement. Small changes in the GFANC output can repeatedly reset FxNLMS and cause instability, so an online clustering module groups similar filters to limit unnecessary re-initializations. The result is a system that starts quickly, settles to low error, and remains stable while needing only one broadband pre-trained filter.

Core claim

The hybrid GFANC-FxNLMS algorithm, augmented by an online clustering module, achieves fast response, very low steady-state error, and high stability by using GFANC to initialize FxNLMS at the frame level while FxNLMS performs continuous adaptation at the sample rate, with clustering preventing repeated resets from minor filter variations.

What carries the argument

The online clustering module, which identifies and groups similar GFANC-generated filters in real time to suppress unnecessary re-initializations of the FxNLMS adapter.

If this is right

  • The combined system responds rapidly to changing noise conditions while converging to very low residual error.
  • Stability improves because clustering avoids repeated interruptions of the FxNLMS adaptation.
  • Only a single pre-trained broadband filter is required instead of multiple specialized filters.
  • The approach merges the complementary strengths of frame-level fast initialization and sample-level fine adaptation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended to other hybrid adaptive systems that pair generative initialization with continuous gradient descent.
  • Real-world acoustic tests would be needed to check whether clustering latency remains negligible under varying noise statistics.
  • Computational savings may arise in embedded implementations by reducing the frequency of full filter resets.

Load-bearing premise

The online clustering module can reliably group similar filters without adding delays, missing key adaptations, or introducing new instability into the FxNLMS process.

What would settle it

A simulation or real-time test in which the clustering module either triggers repeated FxNLMS resets or produces higher steady-state error than standalone FxNLMS after initial convergence.

read the original abstract

The Filtered-x Normalized Least Mean Square (FxNLMS) algorithm suffers from slow convergence and a risk of divergence, although it can achieve low steady-state errors after sufficient adaptation. In contrast, the Generative Fixed-Filter Active Noise Control (GFANC) method offers fast response speed, but its lack of adaptability may lead to large steady-state errors. This paper proposes a hybrid GFANC-FxNLMS algorithm to leverage the complementary advantages of both approaches. In the hybrid GFANC-FxNLMS algorithm, GFANC provides a frame-level control filter as an initialization for FxNLMS, while FxNLMS performs continuous adaptation at the sampling rate. Small variations in the GFANC-generated filter may repeatedly reinitialize FxNLMS, interrupting its adaptation process and destabilizing the system. An online clustering module is introduced to avoid unnecessary re-initializations and improve system stability. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm achieves fast response, very low steady-state error, and high stability, requiring only one pre-trained broadband filter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a hybrid GFANC-FxNLMS active noise control algorithm in which GFANC supplies a frame-level control filter to initialize FxNLMS (which then adapts continuously at the sample rate), with an online clustering module added to suppress repeated FxNLMS re-initializations caused by small GFANC variations. The central claim is that this combination yields fast response, very low steady-state error, and high stability while requiring only a single pre-trained broadband filter, as demonstrated by simulation results.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated with quantitative evidence, the work would be of moderate significance for the active noise control community. It addresses a known practical tension between the rapid but non-adaptive response of fixed-filter methods and the slow but accurate adaptation of FxNLMS, and the clustering stabilization idea is a plausible engineering contribution. However, the absence of numerical metrics, baseline comparisons, and implementation details in the reported simulations limits the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and Simulation Results section: the performance claims are stated only qualitatively ('fast response, very low steady-state error, and high stability') with no reported numerical values for convergence iterations, steady-state MSE, or stability margins, and no direct comparisons to standalone GFANC or FxNLMS under identical test conditions.
  2. [Proposed Algorithm] Proposed Algorithm section: the online clustering module is described only at the functional level; no distance metric, update rule, grouping threshold, or latency bound is supplied, leaving open whether clustering decisions can be executed at frame rate without destabilizing the sample-rate FxNLMS adaptation or missing genuine filter changes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation for major revision. We agree that adding quantitative metrics and implementation details will strengthen the manuscript and address the identified limitations. We respond to each major comment below and will incorporate the revisions in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Simulation Results section: the performance claims are stated only qualitatively ('fast response, very low steady-state error, and high stability') with no reported numerical values for convergence iterations, steady-state MSE, or stability margins, and no direct comparisons to standalone GFANC or FxNLMS under identical test conditions.

    Authors: We agree that the performance claims are presented only qualitatively. In the revised manuscript we will report specific numerical values for convergence iterations, steady-state MSE, and stability margins (e.g., error variance). We will also add direct side-by-side comparisons with standalone GFANC and FxNLMS under identical test conditions, including tabulated results and additional figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Proposed Algorithm] Proposed Algorithm section: the online clustering module is described only at the functional level; no distance metric, update rule, grouping threshold, or latency bound is supplied, leaving open whether clustering decisions can be executed at frame rate without destabilizing the sample-rate FxNLMS adaptation or missing genuine filter changes.

    Authors: We acknowledge the description is functional only. The revised section will specify the Euclidean distance metric on filter coefficients, the cluster-center update rule, the exact grouping threshold, and a latency bound confirming frame-rate execution. We will also add a short analysis demonstrating that the module suppresses minor GFANC variations without interrupting genuine filter changes or destabilizing the sample-rate FxNLMS loop. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in algorithmic proposal

full rationale

The paper describes a hybrid GFANC-FxNLMS algorithm augmented by an online clustering module to stabilize re-initializations. No equations are presented that reduce any claimed performance metric (fast response, low steady-state error, stability) to quantities defined solely by the inputs or by self-referential fitting. The central claims rest on simulation results rather than a closed mathematical derivation that collapses by construction. Self-citations to prior GFANC work are present but not load-bearing for a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the hybrid result. This is a standard engineering proposal whose validity is testable externally via the reported simulations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard adaptive filtering assumptions plus the effectiveness of the newly introduced clustering module; no explicit free parameters or invented physical entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption FxNLMS and GFANC operate under typical assumptions of linear time-invariant secondary paths and stationary noise statistics in active noise control.
    The hybrid inherits these background conditions from the referenced base algorithms.
invented entities (1)
  • Online clustering module no independent evidence
    purpose: Group similar GFANC-generated filters to prevent repeated FxNLMS re-initializations and improve stability.
    New component introduced to address the stability issue identified in the hybrid setup.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1205 out tokens · 43656 ms · 2026-05-16T12:17:16.796261+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A Stabilized Hybrid Active Noise Control Algorithm of GFANC and FxNLMS with Online Clustering

    INTRODUCTION With the rapid advancement of technology and industry, acoustic noise problems have become increasingly severe. It is well recognized that common noise in daily life, especially in vehicle cabins, aircraft cabins, and household appliances, is predominantly low-frequency [1]. For low-frequency noises, passive methods (e.g., earmuffs) are eithe...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  2. [2]

    THE HYBRID GFANC-FXNLMS ALGORITHM WITH ONLINE CLUSTERING The block diagram of the GFANC-FxNLMS algorithm is shown in Fig. 1. The method adopts a dual-rate architecture: at the frame rate, a CNN together with an online cluster- ing module (Fig. 2) provides the weight vector to generate the control filter, while at the sampling rate, the FxNLMS algorithm co...

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    The pre- trained broadband control filter covering the frequency range of 20–2,000 Hz is decomposed into 8 sub control filters

    NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS This section evaluates the effectiveness of the CNN and on- line clustering in GFANC–FxNLMS and compares its noise control performance with related ANC algorithms. The pre- trained broadband control filter covering the frequency range of 20–2,000 Hz is decomposed into 8 sub control filters. The control filter length and sampling rate...

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    In this approach, the control filter generated by GFANC is continuously refined using FxNLMS with the feedback error signal

    CONCLUSION To effectively integrate the strengths of GFANC and FxNLMS, this paper proposes a hybrid GFANC–FxNLMS algorithm with online clustering. In this approach, the control filter generated by GFANC is continuously refined using FxNLMS with the feedback error signal. The GFANC–FxNLMS algo- rithm achieves both fast response and low steady-state errors,...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Colin N Hansen,Understanding active noise cancellation, CRC Press, 2002

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Active noise control system for headphone applications,

    Sen M Kuo, Sohini Mitra, and Woon-Seng Gan, “Active noise control system for headphone applications,”IEEE Transac- tions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 331– 335, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Advances in microphone array processing and multichannel speech enhancement,

    Gongping Huang, Jesper R Jensen, Jingdong Chen, Jacob Ben- esty, Mads G Christensen, Akihiko Sugiyama, Gary Elko, and Tomas Gaensler, “Advances in microphone array processing and multichannel speech enhancement,” inICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Sig- nal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Robustness and regularization of personal audio sys- tems,

    Stephen J. Elliott, Jordan Cheer, Jung-Woo Choi, and Youngtae Kim, “Robustness and regularization of personal audio sys- tems,”IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2123–2133, 2012

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Optimization of a fixed virtual sensing feedback anc controller for in-ear headphones with multiple loudspeak- ers,

    Piero Rivera Benois, Reinhild Roden, Matthias Blau, and Si- mon Doclo, “Optimization of a fixed virtual sensing feedback anc controller for in-ear headphones with multiple loudspeak- ers,” inICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2022, pp. 8717–8721

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Process of silencing sound oscillations,

    Paul Lueg, “Process of silencing sound oscillations,”US patent No US2043416A, 1936

    work page 1936

  11. [11]

    Coherence-based performance analysis on noise reduction in multichannel active noise control systems,

    Jihui Aimee Zhang, Naoki Murata, Yu Maeno, Prasanga N Samarasinghe, Thushara D Abhayapala, and Yuki Mitsufuji, “Coherence-based performance analysis on noise reduction in multichannel active noise control systems,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 1519–1528, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Active noise control in headsets: A new approach for broadband feedback anc,

    Thomas Schumacher, Hauke Kr ¨uger, Marco Jeub, Peter Vary, and Christophe Beaugeant, “Active noise control in headsets: A new approach for broadband feedback anc,” in2011 IEEE International conference on acoustics, speech and signal pro- cessing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2011, pp. 417–420

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    An optimum nlms al- gorithm: Performance improvement over lms,

    Scott C Douglas and TH-Y Meng, “An optimum nlms al- gorithm: Performance improvement over lms,” inAcoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE International Conference on. IEEE Computer Society, 1991, pp. 2125–2126

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    A simplified subband anc algorithm without secondary path modeling,

    Min Gao, Jing Lu, and Xiaojun Qiu, “A simplified subband anc algorithm without secondary path modeling,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1164–1174, 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    A recursive least m-estimate adaptive al- gorithm with low complexity for active control of impulsive noises,

    Miaomiao Wang, Hongsen He, Jingdong Chen, Jacob Ben- esty, and Yi Yu, “A recursive least m-estimate adaptive al- gorithm with low complexity for active control of impulsive noises,” in2023 31st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2023, pp. 371–375

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Distributed active noise control based on an augmented diffusion fxlms algorithm,

    Tianyou Li, Siyuan Lian, Sipei Zhao, Jing Lu, and Ian S Bur- nett, “Distributed active noise control based on an augmented diffusion fxlms algorithm,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 31, pp. 1449–1463, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    A stepwise simulta- neous perturbation stochastic approximation algorithm for sta- bility improvement of active noise control systems,

    Chao Liang, Francesco Ripamonti, Hamid Reza Karimi, Stanisław Wrona, and Marek Pawełczyk, “A stepwise simulta- neous perturbation stochastic approximation algorithm for sta- bility improvement of active noise control systems,”Mechani- cal Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 237, pp. 112915, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Transferable selective virtual sensing active noise control technique based on metric learn- ing,

    Boxiang Wang, Dongyuan Shi, Zhengding Luo, Xiaoyi Shen, Junwei Ji, and Woon-Seng Gan, “Transferable selective virtual sensing active noise control technique based on metric learn- ing,” inICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Selective fixed-filter ac- tive noise control based on frequency response matching in headphones,

    Lan Yin, Zeqiang Zhang, Ming Wu, Shuang Zhou, Jianfeng Guo, Jun Yang, and Jianing Zhang, “Selective fixed-filter ac- tive noise control based on frequency response matching in headphones,”Applied Acoustics, vol. 211, pp. 109505, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [21]

    Selective fixed-filter active noise control based on convolutional neural network,

    Dongyuan Shi, Bhan Lam, Kenneth Ooi, Xiaoyi Shen, and Woon-Seng Gan, “Selective fixed-filter active noise control based on convolutional neural network,”Signal Processing, vol. 190, pp. 108317, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [22]

    Real-time implementation and explainable ai analysis of delayless cnn-based selective fixed-filter active noise control,

    Zhengding Luo, Dongyuan Shi, Junwei Ji, Xiaoyi Shen, and Woon-Seng Gan, “Real-time implementation and explainable ai analysis of delayless cnn-based selective fixed-filter active noise control,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 214, pp. 111364, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [23]

    Subjective perception analysis of active noise con- trol algorithms in an encapsulated structure: An experimental study,

    Alkahf Aboutiman, Zulfi Rachman, Tin Oberman, Francesco Alletta, Jian Kang, Hamid Reza Karimi, and Francesco Ripa- monti, “Subjective perception analysis of active noise con- trol algorithms in an encapsulated structure: An experimental study,”Applied Acoustics, vol. 239, pp. 110823, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [24]

    Sfanc with compen- sation filter based on mefxdctlms algorithm,

    Kenya Doi and Yoshinobu Kajikawa, “Sfanc with compen- sation filter based on mefxdctlms algorithm,” in2023 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1240– 1244

    work page 2023

  24. [25]

    Delayless generative fixed-filter active noise control based on deep learning and bayesian filter,

    Zhengding Luo, Dongyuan Shi, Woon-Seng Gan, and Qirui Huang, “Delayless generative fixed-filter active noise control based on deep learning and bayesian filter,”IEEE/ACM Trans- actions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 32, pp. 1048–1060, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [26]

    Deep learning-based gen- erative fixed-filter active noise control: Transferability and im- plementation,

    Zhengding Luo, Junwei Ji, Boxiang Wang, Dongyuan Shi, Haozhe Ma, and Woon-Seng Gan, “Deep learning-based gen- erative fixed-filter active noise control: Transferability and im- plementation,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 238, pp. 113207, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [27]

    A hy- brid sfanc-fxnlms algorithm for active noise control based on deep learning,

    Zhengding Luo, Dongyuan Shi, and Woon-Seng Gan, “A hy- brid sfanc-fxnlms algorithm for active noise control based on deep learning,”IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 29, pp. 1102–1106, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [28]

    Online clustering algo- rithms,

    Wesam Barbakh and Colin Fyfe, “Online clustering algo- rithms,”International journal of neural systems, vol. 18, no. 03, pp. 185–194, 2008

    work page 2008