Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

A sequential, online particle system approximating the McKean–Vlasov diffusion achieves the same N^{−1/2} statistical accuracy as the exchangeable system, with a factor-2 feedback in its Gaussian fluctuation limit.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 05:36 UTC pith:RGZ5TH4I

load-bearing objection Theorems 1–2 on incremental entropy and N^{-1/2} empirical convergence look solid; the Gaussian fluctuation theorem has a genuine gap at the a_j→a identification step, so the paper needs a serious referee rather than acceptance as is. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.01641 v2 pith:RGZ5TH4I submitted 2026-02-02 math.PR

Quantitative Convergence for Sequential Interacting Diffusions via Incremental Relative Entropy

Zhenfu Wang , Xianliang Zhao This is my paper
classification math.PR MSC 60H1060F0560H15
keywords sequential interacting diffusionsMcKean–Vlasovincremental relative entropypropagation of chaosGaussian fluctuationsnegative Sobolev normsGirsanov identitynon-exchangeable mean field
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a lower-triangular particle system where particle i interacts only with the empirical measure of its predecessors. It proves that the incremental path-space relative entropy of particle i decays as 1/(i−1), which is the sharp sampling barrier, and that summing these increments gives a global entropy of order log N. From this, the empirical measure converges at the canonical N^{−1/2} scale in negative Sobolev norms, and the fluctuation field converges to a linear SPDE with an explicit factor-2 feedback term absent in exchangeable systems. If correct, this shows that the computationally attractive online/sequential architecture does not sacrifice Monte Carlo accuracy.

Core claim

The central claim is that the incremental relative entropy, which measures how far particle i's path law deviates from an independent McKean–Vlasov copy given the predecessors, decays as (i−1)^{−1}. This rate is optimal: even with i.i.d. inputs drawn from the limit law, the sampling variance of the interaction field forces exactly this scale. Summing the increments yields a global path-space entropy of order log N, and the same mechanism yields N^{−1/2} convergence of the empirical measure in H^{−β} and a Gaussian limit whose linear feedback term carries a factor 2, originating from the weighted sum ∑_{i=2}^N 1/√(i−1) ~ 2√N.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the incremental path-space relative entropy R_i(t), computed through a Girsanov identity as the quadratic energy of the drift mismatch between the conditional law of particle i and an independent limit copy. The predecessor empirical measure is replaced by an average of conditional laws, producing a martingale-difference term (handled by sub-Gaussian concentration under a decoupled reference law) and a predictable bias term (handled by Pinsker's inequality). An upper-envelope closure and a discrete Hardy inequality yield the sharp decay; a negative Sobolev energy estimate then converts the entropy control into the N^{−1/2} empirical-measure rate.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaussian fluctuation limit depends on the limit SPDE being well-posed in the weighted Sobolev space and on the asserted convergence a_j→a in the identification step; neither is proved in this paper.

What would settle it

Compute directly, for a one-dimensional linear example with explicit solvable kernel and initial density, the limiting variance of ∫φ dη_N at a fixed time; if the prefactor differs from 2, or if the asserted convergence a_j→a fails for a non-smooth initial density, the identification of the SPDE limit collapses. Alternatively, simulate the sequential system with i.i.d. initial data and compare the empirical covariance with the prediction of the factor-2 SPDE.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Sequential particle simulation with online refinement achieves the same N^{−1/2} empirical-measure accuracy as fully-coupled mean-field Monte Carlo, despite its O(N) marginal cost for adding particles.
  • Tail blocks of m particles are chaotic with total-variation error O(√(m/N)); in particular, the terminal particle's path law is within O(N^{−1/2}) of the McKean–Vlasov law.
  • The factor-2 feedback in the limiting SPDE is a testable signature of the directed architecture, distinguishing it from exchangeable and independent-copy systems.
  • For general step-size sequences, the method predicts incremental entropy decay governed by the effective sample size θ_{i−1}^{−1}, with a phase transition at the divergence of ∑α_i.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The factor-2 accumulation mechanism likely persists in streaming and random-batch variants of sequential samplers, wherever predecessor averages contribute at the 1/√(i−1) fluctuation scale; a testable extension is to measure the feedback coefficient in such variants.
  • The sharp incremental entropy bound suggests an analogous 1/(i−1) decay for time-marginal Fisher information, which could open a route to uniform-in-time and singular-kernel sequential propagation of chaos, a direction the paper sketches but does not fully develop.
  • The Gaussian limit is the least settled part of the paper: the identification step relies on an unproved convergence a_j→a and on imported well-posedness of the limit SPDE, so a direct proof of uniqueness in the weighted Sobolev space would close the main remaining gap.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sequential (lower-triangular) interacting diffusion system (1.4), in which particle i interacts only with the empirical measure of its predecessors. It introduces an incremental path-space relative entropy R_i(t) and proves Theorem 1: R_i(t) ≤ C_T (i−1)^{-1}(1+M_{0,i}), with the consequences S_N(T) ≲ log N and quantitative tail propagation of chaos. Theorem 2 establishes the canonical N^{-1/2} rate for the empirical measure in negative Sobolev norms, E[sup_t ||μ^N_t−ρ_t||_{H^{-β}}^2] + E∫||μ^N_t−ρ_t||_{H^{-β+1}}^2 dt ≤ C_T/N, under b≡0 and a regularity condition on K⋆ρ. Theorem 3 states a Gaussian fluctuation limit in C([0,T];H^{-β',-m}) for η^N=√N(μ^N−ρ), with the limiting SPDE (1.10) containing a factor-2 feedback term. Section 6 extends the incremental entropy method to general sequential weights and states a threshold phenomenon. The main technical machinery is a Girsanov identity, a martingale-difference replacement of predecessor empirical measures by averaged conditional measures, an upper-envelope closure, and a negative Sobolev energy estimate.

Significance. Theorems 1 and 2 are substantial and, as far as I can verify, correctly proven. The sharp (i−1)^{-1} decay for a directed non-exchangeable system and the logarithmic global entropy are genuinely new and well motivated by the online/streaming interpretation. The negative-Sobolev N^{-1/2} bound is also an honest improvement over what global entropy arguments would give. The factor-2 feedback in the fluctuation SPDE is an interesting and potentially important structural effect of the sequential architecture. However, the identification step in Theorem 3 currently contains a load-bearing gap, and the regularity assumptions for Theorem 3 are not sufficient as stated. The paper's proofs are largely transparent and the estimates are explicit, which is a strength; with a complete proof of the fluctuation limit the contribution would be significant.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Step 2] The identification of the factor-2 term rests on the assertion 'We have a_j→a as j→∞', where a_j = ∫_s^t ⟨ρ_r,(K*η^j_r)·∇φ⟩ dr and a = ∫_s^t ⟨ρ_r,(K*η_r)·∇φ⟩ dr. This is not proved and does not follow from the preceding tightness argument. Tightness gives at most subsequential convergence of the global fields η^N to some η; the prefix fields η^j = √j(μ^j−ρ) are not shown to converge to the same η, and no estimate controlling ||η^j−η|| is supplied. The Stolz–Cesàro passage requires convergence of the entire sequence a_j, not of a subsequence. This is the load-bearing step for the factor-2 term in (1.10). Without a proof of a_j→a, the martingale-problem identification of Theorem 3 is incomplete.
  2. [§5.1, first paragraph] The claim that ρ_0∈S(R^d) and 'standard parabolic bootstrapping' imply ρ∈C([0,T];S(R^d)) is not justified for bounded measurable K. In general K⋆ρ_t is only bounded measurable; it need not lie in W^{m,∞}, so high-order Sobolev bounds on ρ_t do not follow solely from smoothness of ρ_0. Consequently the well-definedness of the product ρ_t(K⋆η_t) in (1.10) and the estimates such as ||L_r φ||_{H^β} ≲ ||φ||_{H^{β'}} are not established. Theorem 3 should either impose an explicit regularity condition on K⋆ρ_t, as Theorem 2 does in (1.8), or assume smoothness of K. This is a second load-bearing gap for Theorem 3.
  3. [§6, Theorem 4] The general-weight result is stated as a theorem, but the proof is only a 'Sketch of proof.' The weighted upper-envelope closure is not written out, and the threshold phenomenon for r>1 relies on unproved assertions about θ_{i−1} and non-convergence of R_i. If Theorem 4 is to be part of the paper's formal results, it needs a complete proof; otherwise it should be presented as a conjecture or heuristic extension.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2 and §3] There are frequent typos: 'Propsition', 'postive integer', 'inequlaity', 'concerntration', 'defintions', 'sup|b|<∞' in Section 6, etc. The paper would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
  2. [§4, Theorem 2] Theorem 2 and the whole negative-Sobolev section assume b≡0, while the introduction and Theorem 1 allow a bounded drift b. This restriction is fine if stated clearly at the start of Section 4, but the presentation could make it more prominent.
  3. [§5.1, Step 3] Uniqueness is asserted via a one-line energy estimate and then attributed to [31, Section 4]. Please state precisely which theorem or proposition of [31] is being invoked, since the factor-2 drift and the weighted spaces are not literally the exchangeable setting of [31].
  4. [§5.1, Step 1] The tightness argument imports the martingale modulus bound from [31, Lemmas 3.1–3.2] without checking that the sequential drift decompositions verify the same hypotheses. At least the relevant verifications should be indicated.
  5. [§1.2, Remark 1.7] The comparison of the three SPDE limits is useful, but the 'add–subtract trick' displaying the decomposition of the sequential interaction term contains a typo: the index in the last sum should be 1/√(i−1)δ_{X^i}(K⋆η^{i−1}), which is later written correctly in Section 5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: Theorems 1 and 2 are proved from the dynamics; Theorem 3 has an unproved convergence assertion (a_j→a) that is a correctness gap, not a constructional circularity.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1 follows from the Girsanov identity (3.2), which is not an identity in the target quantities alone: the drift mismatch Δ^i_s is estimated through conditional-measure replacement, martingale-difference sub-Gaussian bounds, and an upper-envelope closure. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the 1/(i−1) bound is an honest estimate rather than a restatement of the definition of R_i. Corollaries 1.1–1.2 and Theorem 2 are derived consequences of these bounds together with the energy identity (4.4) and the negative-Sobolev estimates; they do not presuppose the conclusions. The self-citations to [30] and [31] are methodological and technical borrowings from prior published work, and the central quantitative estimates are derived here from stated assumptions rather than imported. The only load-bearing issue I see is in Theorem 3, Step 2: the text asserts "We have a_j → a as j→∞" for the prefix fluctuation fields η^j without proof and without an estimate relating η^j to the subsequential limit η; this convergence is needed for the Stolz–Cesàro factor 2. This is a genuine omitted justification / correctness gap, but it is not a definitional equivalence or a fitted-input-called-prediction reduction, so it does not make the derivation circular in the sense of this review. The score 2 reflects minor self-citation and reliance on prior machinery, not circularity of the central proofs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on bounded-coefficient/non-degenerate-diffusion assumptions, a regularity assumption on the limit drift field, a Schwartz initial condition, and imported well-posedness of the limit SPDE. No numerical parameters are fitted to data.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption σ is constant invertible; b and K are bounded measurable.
    Throughout Theorems 1–4; needed for Girsanov identity and martingale-difference sub-Gaussianity.
  • domain assumption V_T = sup_{t≤T} ||K⋆ρ_t||_{W^{m,∞}} < ∞ with m=⌈β⌉.
    Assumption (1.8) for the negative-Sobolev energy estimate in Theorem 2 and the tightness in Theorem 3.
  • ad hoc to paper ρ_0 is a Schwartz function.
    Imposed in Theorem 3 to guarantee regularity of ρ_t; Remark 1.6 acknowledges it is a simplifying assumption.
  • domain assumption Well-posedness (uniqueness) of the limit SPDE (1.10) in H^{-β',-m}.
    Used in Step 3 of Theorem 3; cited to [31] rather than proved in detail.
  • standard math Girsanov theorem, Itô formula, Azuma–Hoeffding inequality, discrete Hardy inequality, Sobolev embedding.
    Standard background results used in Sections 2–5.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 39301 in / 21880 out tokens · 197445 ms · 2026-08-03T05:36:10.390693+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a lower-triangular system of interacting diffusions in which particle \(i\) interacts only with its predecessors through the empirical measure \(\mu^{i-1}_t\). This gives a directed, non-exchangeable approximation of the same McKean--Vlasov diffusion as the classical exchangeable particle system. We introduce an incremental path-space relative entropy adapted to the causal structure, $$ R_i(T) = H \left(P^{1:i}_{[0,T]}\,\middle|\,P^{1:i-1}_{[0,T]}\otimes \bar P_{[0,T]}\right), $$ and prove the sharp estimate \(R_i(T)\lesssim (i-1)^{-1}\). Furthermore, we obtain convergence of the empirical measure to the McKean--Vlasov law at the canonical \(N^{-1/2}\) scale in negative Sobolev norms. The proof combines a Girsanov representation, a martingale-difference replacement of predecessor empirical measures by averaged conditional measures, an upper-envelope closure, and a negative Sobolev energy estimate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.01641 by Xianliang Zhao, Zhenfu Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: The classical fully-coupled system where every particle pair interacts, scaling as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Logarithmic Fluctuation Hierarchy for Sequential Interacting Diffusions

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    For lower-triangular interacting diffusions, the N^{-1/2} fluctuation field converges to an infinite logarithmic hierarchy that couples Y^n to Y^{n+1}, not to the closed fluctuation SPDE of exchangeable mean-field systems.

  2. Quantitative Propagation of Chaos and Fluctuations for Kinetic McKean--Vlasov SDEs with Singular Interaction Kernels

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Kinetic McKean–Vlasov systems with singular Kato-class kernels enjoy path-space entropy chaos at rate k/N and a Gaussian fluctuation CLT with N^{-1/6} Berry–Esseen projections.

  3. Universal Central Limit Theorem for non-exchangeable interacting diffusions

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    The global fluctuation field of non-exchangeable interacting diffusions converges to the universal mean field SPDE limit under deterministic denseness conditions on the interaction matrix, with a sharp n^{-1/2} threshold.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2016

    Noga Alon and Joel H Spencer.The probabilistic method. John Wiley & Sons, 2016

    2016

  2. [2]

    New particle repre- sentations for ergodic McKean–Vlasov SDEs.ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 65:145–185, 2019

    Houssam AlRachid, Mireille Bossy, Cristiano Ricci, and Lukasz Szpruch. New particle repre- sentations for ergodic McKean–Vlasov SDEs.ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 65:145–185, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savar´ e.Gradient flows: in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

    2008

  4. [4]

    Graphon mean field systems.The Annals of Applied Probability, 33(5):3587–3619, 2023

    Erhan Bayraktar, Suman Chakraborty, and Ruoyu Wu. Graphon mean field systems.The Annals of Applied Probability, 33(5):3587–3619, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Self-interacting diffusions.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 122(1):1–41, 2002

    Michel Bena ¨ ım, Michel Ledoux, and Olivier Raimond. Self-interacting diffusions.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 122(1):1–41, 2002. 46

    2002

  6. [6]

    A stochastic particle method for the McKean–Vlasov and the Burgers equation.Mathematics of Computation, 66(217):157–192, 1997

    Mireille Bossy and Denis Talay. A stochastic particle method for the McKean–Vlasov and the Burgers equation.Mathematics of Computation, 66(217):157–192, 1997

    1997

  7. [7]

    Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent

    L´ eon Bottou. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. InProceedings of COMPSTAT’2010: 19th International Conference on Computational StatisticsParis France, August 22-27, 2010 Keynote, Invited and Contributed Papers, pages 177–186. Springer, 2010

    2010

  8. [8]

    Mean field limit and quantitative estimates with singular attractive kernels.Duke Mathematical Journal, 172(13):2591–2641, 2023

    Didier Bresch, Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin, and Zhenfu Wang. Mean field limit and quantitative estimates with singular attractive kernels.Duke Mathematical Journal, 172(13):2591–2641, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Sequentially interacting Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.The Annals of Statistics, 38(6):3387–3411, 2010

    Anthony Brockwell, Pierre Del Moral, and Arnaud Doucet. Sequentially interacting Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.The Annals of Statistics, 38(6):3387–3411, 2010

    2010

  10. [10]

    Interacting Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for solving nonlinear measure-valued equations

    Pierre Del Moral and Arnaud Doucet. Interacting Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for solving nonlinear measure-valued equations. 2010

    2010

  11. [11]

    Sequential propagation of chaos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09913, 2023

    Kai Du, Yifan Jiang, and Xiaochen Li. Sequential propagation of chaos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09913, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    Paul Dupuis and Richard S Ellis.A weak convergence approach to the theory of large deviations, volume 902. John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    2011

  13. [13]

    Propagation of chaos for the 2d viscous vortex model.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 16(7):1423–1466, 2014

    Nicolas Fournier, Maxime Hauray, and St´ ephane Mischler. Propagation of chaos for the 2d viscous vortex model.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 16(7):1423–1466, 2014

    2014

  14. [14]

    Uniform in time propagation of chaos for the 2d vortex model and other singular stochastic systems.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, pages 1–28, 2024

    Arnaud Guillin, Pierre Le Bris, and Pierre Monmarch´ e. Uniform in time propagation of chaos for the 2d vortex model and other singular stochastic systems.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, pages 1–28, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Strong convergence of propagation of chaos for mckean–vlasov sdes with singular interactions.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 56(2):2661–2713, 2024

    Zimo Hao, Michael R¨ ockner, and Xicheng Zhang. Strong convergence of propagation of chaos for mckean–vlasov sdes with singular interactions.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 56(2):2661–2713, 2024

    2024

  16. [16]

    Cambridge university press, 1952

    Godfrey Harold Hardy, John Edensor Littlewood, and George P´ olya.Inequalities. Cambridge university press, 1952

    1952

  17. [17]

    A review of the mean field limits for vlasov equations.Kinetic & Related Models, 7(4):661, 2014

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin. A review of the mean field limits for vlasov equations.Kinetic & Related Models, 7(4):661, 2014

    2014

  18. [18]

    Quantitative estimates of propagation of chaos for stochastic systems withw −1,∞ kernels.Inventiones mathematicae, 214(1):523–591, 2018

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu Wang. Quantitative estimates of propagation of chaos for stochastic systems withw −1,∞ kernels.Inventiones mathematicae, 214(1):523–591, 2018

    2018

  19. [19]

    The mean-field limit of sparse networks of integrate- and-fire neurons.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, 2025

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Datong Zhou. The mean-field limit of sparse networks of integrate- and-fire neurons.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Random Batch Methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems.Journal of Computational Physics, 400:108877, 2020

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Jian-Guo Liu. Random Batch Methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems.Journal of Computational Physics, 400:108877, 2020

    2020

  21. [21]

    Strong solutions of stochastic equations with singular time dependent drift.Probability theory and related fields, 131(2):154–196, 2005

    Nicolai V Krylov and Michael R¨ ockner. Strong solutions of stochastic equations with singular time dependent drift.Probability theory and related fields, 131(2):154–196, 2005. 47

    2005

  22. [22]

    Springer, 2003

    Harold J Kushner and G George Yin.Stochastic approximation and recursive algorithms and applications. Springer, 2003

    2003

  23. [23]

    Hierarchies, entropy, and quantitative propagation of chaos for mean field diffusions.Probability and mathematical physics, 4(2):377–432, 2023

    Daniel Lacker. Hierarchies, entropy, and quantitative propagation of chaos for mean field diffusions.Probability and mathematical physics, 4(2):377–432, 2023

    2023

  24. [24]

    Quantitative propagation of chaos for non-exchangeable diffusions via first-passage percolation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08882, 2024

    Daniel Lacker, Lane Chun Yeung, and Fuzhong Zhou. Quantitative propagation of chaos for non-exchangeable diffusions via first-passage percolation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08882, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Henry P McKean. Propagation of chaos for a class of non-linear parabolic equations.Stochastic Differential Equations (Lecture Series in Differential Equations, Session 7, Catholic Univ., 1967), pages 41–57, 1967

    1967

  26. [26]

    A stochastic approximation method.The annals of mathematical statistics, pages 400–407, 1951

    Herbert Robbins and Sutton Monro. A stochastic approximation method.The annals of mathematical statistics, pages 400–407, 1951

    1951

  27. [27]

    Mean field limit for coulomb-type flows.Duke Mathematical Journal, 169(15):2887–2935, 2020

    Sylvia Serfaty. Mean field limit for coulomb-type flows.Duke Mathematical Journal, 169(15):2887–2935, 2020

    2020

  28. [28]

    Topics in propagation of chaos

    Alain-Sol Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos. InEcole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint- Flour XIX—1989, pages 165–251. Springer, 1991

    1989

  29. [29]

    Theory of function spaces

    Hans Triebel. Theory of function spaces. iii,.Monographs in Mathematics, 2006

    2006

  30. [30]

    Mean-field limit of non-exchangeable interacting diffusions with singular kernels.To appear in SIAM J

    Zhenfu Wang, Xianliang Zhao, and Rongchan Zhu. Mean-field limit of non-exchangeable interacting diffusions with singular kernels.To appear in SIAM J. Math. Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14002, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Gaussian fluctuations for interacting par- ticle systems with singular kernels.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 247(5):101, 2023

    Zhenfu Wang, Xianliang Zhao, and Rongchan Zhu. Gaussian fluctuations for interacting par- ticle systems with singular kernels.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 247(5):101, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Non-exchangeable mean-field theory for adaptive weights: propagation of chaos and graphon sampling lemma.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13587, 2025

    Datong Zhou. Non-exchangeable mean-field theory for adaptive weights: propagation of chaos and graphon sampling lemma.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13587, 2025. 48

    arXiv 2025