arxiv: 2604.02716 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Effective electron coupling to phonon mechanical angular momentum in helical systems

Akihito Kato , Nobuhiko Yokoshi , Jun-ichiro Kishine

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords phonon mechanical angular momentumelectron-phonon couplinghelical systemschiral crystalscrystal angular momentumorbital polarizationspin polarization

0 comments

The pith

Phonon mechanical angular momentum couples to electrons through a derived second-order Hamiltonian in helical systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an effective electron-phonon interaction showing that mechanical angular momentum of phonons can be converted into electronic degrees of freedom. This extends prior results on crystal angular momentum by using second-order perturbation theory that respects screw-rotational symmetry. If the derivation holds, phonon circular motions directly influence electronic orbital and spin states. A reader would care because it positions phonons as active participants in polarization phenomena rather than passive lattice vibrations.

Core claim

In chiral crystals, phonon mechanical angular momentum associated with circular atomic displacements can be interconverted with electronic degrees of freedom. This is established by deriving a second-order perturbative Hamiltonian proportional to phonon MAM that respects the screw-rotational symmetry, allowing MAM to couple directly to electrons in addition to CAM.

What carries the argument

The second-order perturbative Hamiltonian in the electron-phonon interaction that is proportional to phonon mechanical angular momentum.

If this is right

Electronic motion is directly affected by phonon MAM.
Phonon degrees of freedom play a crucial role in phenomena related to electronic orbital and spin polarizations.
MAM between electrons and phonons can be interconverted in addition to CAM.
The effective coupling arises specifically from the circular motion of atomic displacements about equilibrium positions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This mechanism suggests phonon modes could be used to tune electronic spin or orbital textures in chiral materials without external fields.
It opens a route to test angular-momentum conservation in combined electron-phonon systems by measuring polarization response to specific phonon excitations.
The result implies that lattice vibrations carrying MAM may contribute to transport or optical responses that were previously attributed only to electronic or CAM channels.

Load-bearing premise

Second-order perturbation theory in the electron-phonon interaction is sufficient and valid for capturing the mechanical angular momentum coupling in helical systems.

What would settle it

Failure to observe electronic polarization effects that scale with the phonon mechanical angular momentum in helical crystals under conditions where the derived Hamiltonian predicts them would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02716 by Akihito Kato, Jun-ichiro Kishine, Nobuhiko Yokoshi.

read the original abstract

In chiral crystals, two types of phonon angular momenta have been introduced. One is crystal angular momentum (CAM) arising from the rotational or screw-rotational symmetry and the other is mechanical angular momentum (MAM) associated with the circular motion of atomic displacements about equilibrium positions. Recently, the electron--phonon coupling that respects the screw-rotational symmetry is derived, whereby the CAM between electrons and phonons is interconverted. Here, we show that, in addition to CAM, MAM can also be converted to the electronic degrees of freedom by deriving a second-order perturbative Hamiltonian proportional to phonon MAM. This finding highlights that the electronic motion is directly affected by phonon MAM, and consequently, that phonon degrees of freedom can play a crucial role in phenomena related to electronic orbital and spin polarizations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a second-order perturbative Hamiltonian that adds a term coupling electrons to phonon mechanical angular momentum in helical systems, extending their earlier CAM result.

read the letter

The main new piece is the second-order effective Hamiltonian that picks up a contribution proportional to phonon MAM from the circular atomic displacements. They already handled the CAM part tied to screw symmetry, so this is a direct follow-on that shows how MAM can feed into electronic orbital and spin degrees of freedom without extra parameters. The symmetry framing is handled cleanly and stays consistent with standard treatments of chiral phonons. That part is useful for anyone tracking how phonon angular momentum couples to electrons. The soft spot is the assumption that second order is the right place to stop. The stress-test concern lands: if any first-order coupling to the circular motion survives the screw-rotational projection, it would dominate and this derivation would miss the leading term. The abstract does not show the explicit interaction Hamiltonian or the cancellation steps, so it is hard to judge whether the symmetry really kills the linear pieces. No estimates of the effect size or checks against other methods appear either. This is for specialists already working on phonon angular momentum in chiral crystals. A reader who knows the prior CAM paper will see the incremental step right away and can decide if the mechanism matters for their systems. I would send it to peer review. The derivation is the core claim, and referees can verify the perturbation order and symmetry arguments without needing new data.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in helical/chiral crystals with screw-rotational symmetry, a second-order perturbative effective Hamiltonian in the electron-phonon interaction yields a term strictly proportional to phonon mechanical angular momentum (MAM), allowing conversion of MAM to electronic degrees of freedom in addition to the previously derived crystal angular momentum (CAM) coupling. This is presented as respecting the symmetry constraints and highlighting direct effects of phonon MAM on electronic orbital and spin polarizations.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the result extends angular-momentum interconversion concepts from CAM to MAM, implying that phonon mechanical degrees of freedom can influence electronic polarization phenomena without requiring fitted parameters. This would strengthen the case for phonon angular momentum as a controllable resource in chiral materials, with potential implications for spintronics and orbital magnetism.

major comments (2)

[Derivation of effective Hamiltonian] The central claim rests on second-order perturbation theory capturing the leading MAM coupling while first-order terms vanish by screw-rotational symmetry. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate (via symmetry projection or selection rules) that no residual linear coupling to circular atomic displacements survives in the interaction Hamiltonian; otherwise the second-order term may not be the dominant contribution. Cite the relevant interaction Hamiltonian and symmetry analysis section.
[Validity of perturbation theory] The perturbative expansion assumes higher-order and non-perturbative corrections remain negligible for the MAM term. The manuscript should provide a concrete estimate or bound (e.g., via coupling strength relative to phonon frequency) showing the regime of validity, particularly for realistic helical systems.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Clarify the precise definition of MAM versus CAM in the notation section to avoid any ambiguity when stating the proportionality of the effective Hamiltonian.
[Discussion] Add a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the new MAM term with the earlier CAM result to highlight the incremental advance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments help clarify the symmetry constraints and the regime of validity for our perturbative treatment. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Derivation of effective Hamiltonian] The central claim rests on second-order perturbation theory capturing the leading MAM coupling while first-order terms vanish by screw-rotational symmetry. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate (via symmetry projection or selection rules) that no residual linear coupling to circular atomic displacements survives in the interaction Hamiltonian; otherwise the second-order term may not be the dominant contribution. Cite the relevant interaction Hamiltonian and symmetry analysis section.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the symmetry analysis in Section II to include a full projection of the first-order electron-phonon interaction Hamiltonian (Eq. 3) onto the irreducible representations of the screw-rotational group. This projection shows that all matrix elements linear in the circular atomic displacements vanish identically by symmetry, leaving only the CAM term at first order. The MAM coupling therefore appears exclusively at second order, as derived in Section III. We now cite the relevant selection rules and the explicit form of the interaction Hamiltonian. revision: yes
Referee: [Validity of perturbation theory] The perturbative expansion assumes higher-order and non-perturbative corrections remain negligible for the MAM term. The manuscript should provide a concrete estimate or bound (e.g., via coupling strength relative to phonon frequency) showing the regime of validity, particularly for realistic helical systems.

Authors: We accept the need for a concrete validity bound. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph in Section IV that provides order-of-magnitude estimates for typical helical materials. For electron-phonon couplings g ≈ 30–80 meV and phonon frequencies ω ≈ 10–40 meV (as in Te and related chiral crystals), the second-order MAM term remains dominant when (g/ω)^2 ≪ 1, corresponding to a perturbative parameter < 0.2. We also note that non-perturbative corrections would require strong-coupling regimes outside the scope of the present weak-coupling treatment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the perturbative derivation

full rationale

The paper derives a second-order perturbative Hamiltonian proportional to phonon mechanical angular momentum (MAM) from the electron-phonon interaction in helical systems respecting screw-rotational symmetry. This follows standard perturbation theory without any reduction of the claimed result to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim is obtained directly from the perturbative expansion, with the prior CAM result serving only as background context rather than a circular premise. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on perturbative expansion applied to a model of helical systems; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)

standard math Second-order perturbation theory suffices to capture the effective electron-phonon interaction
Invoked to derive the Hamiltonian proportional to phonon MAM.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5436 in / 1079 out tokens · 53608 ms · 2026-05-13T18:47:08.202763+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we show that, in addition to CAM, MAM can also be converted to the electronic degrees of freedom by deriving a second-order perturbative Hamiltonian proportional to phonon MAM

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Microscopic Theory of Chiral-Phonon-Induced Orbital Selectivity in Helical Crystals
cond-mat.other 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Chiral phonons in L3_1 helical crystals generate rotational electron-phonon interactions that drive orbital angular momentum transfer m_ℓ to m_ℓ - m_s, with the response suppressed at Γ and zone boundary but enhanced ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Electronic Hamiltonian Let |𝜙𝜆 ℓ ⟩ denote an electronic state with atomic orbital 𝜆 centered at 𝑹ℓ. This state can be decomposed into a symmetry-adapted basis |𝜙𝜆 Γ⟩, which transforms as ˆR |𝜙𝜆 Γ⟩ = 𝑒𝑖 (𝑘𝑐/3+𝑚𝛼 ) |𝜙𝜆 Γ⟩, according to |𝜙𝜆 ℓ ⟩ = 1√ 3𝑁 ∑︁ Γ 𝑒𝑖 (ℓ −1)Φ𝜆 Γ |𝜙𝜆 Γ⟩, (A1) where Φ𝜆 Γ ≔ 𝑘𝑐/3 + ( 𝑚 + 𝑚𝜆)𝛼 is a phase factor and𝑚𝜆 is the magnetic quan...

work page
[2]

Electron–Phonon coupling Hamiltonian The atomic position of theℓth atom, 𝒓ℓ, is written as the sumoftheequilibriumpositionandthedisplacement 𝒖ℓ, 𝒓ℓ = 𝑹ℓ +𝒖ℓ. Thisdisplacementmodulatestheelectroniccouplings as 𝑡𝜆𝜇 (𝒓ℓ′ − 𝒓ℓ) ≈ 𝑡𝜆𝜇 ℓ′ ,ℓ + ( 𝒖ℓ′ − 𝒖ℓ) · 𝜕𝑡 𝜆𝜈 (𝒓) 𝜕 𝒓 𝒓=𝑹ℓ′ −𝑹ℓ , (A4) where the first term, defined by 𝑡𝜆𝜇 ℓ′ ,ℓ ≡ 𝑡𝜆𝜇 ( 𝑹ℓ′ − 𝑹ℓ), and the seco...

work page
[3]

In the circular basis, this is rewritten as ˆ𝐿 𝑧 = 𝑖 3𝑁∑︁ ℓ=1 ˆ𝑢 (+) ℓ ˆ𝑝 (−) ℓ − ˆ𝑢 (−) ℓ ˆ𝑝 (+) ℓ

Mechanical Angular Momentum of Phonons The phonon mechanical angular momentum (MAM) oper- ator along the screw axis (the𝑧 axis) is defined as ˆ𝐿 𝑧 = 3𝑁∑︁ ℓ=1 ( ˆ𝒖ℓ × ˆ𝒑ℓ)𝑧, (A11) where ˆ𝒑ℓ isthecanonicalmomentumoperatoratthe ℓthatomic site. In the circular basis, this is rewritten as ˆ𝐿 𝑧 = 𝑖 3𝑁∑︁ ℓ=1 ˆ𝑢 (+) ℓ ˆ𝑝 (−) ℓ − ˆ𝑢 (−) ℓ ˆ𝑝 (+) ℓ . (A12) To evalu...

work page
[4]

The matrix element of the𝑧-component of OAM becomes ⟨Ψ𝜇 Γ | ˆ𝐿el,𝑧 |Ψ𝜇 Γ ⟩ = − 𝑖𝑚e ℏ ∑︁ 𝑏,𝑐 𝜖𝑧𝑏𝑐 𝐸Γ𝜇 ⟨Ψ𝜇 Γ | ˆ𝑟𝑏 ˆ𝑟𝑐 |Ψ𝜇 Γ ⟩ −⟨Ψ𝜇 Γ | ˆ𝑟𝑏 ˆ𝐻el ˆ𝑟𝑐 |Ψ𝜇 Γ ⟩

Orbital Angular Momentum of Bloch Electrons Orbital angular momentum (OAM) operator of electrons is defined by ˆ𝑳el = 𝑚e 2 ( ˆ𝒓 × ˆ𝒗 − ˆ𝒗 × ˆ𝒓), (A18) where 𝑚e istheelectronicmass, ˆ𝒓 isthepositionoperator,and ˆ𝒗 = (𝑖/ℏ) [ ˆ𝐻el, ˆ𝒓] is the velocity operator. The matrix element of the𝑧-component of OAM becomes ⟨Ψ𝜇 Γ | ˆ𝐿el,𝑧 |Ψ𝜇 Γ ⟩ = − 𝑖𝑚e ℏ ∑︁ 𝑏,𝑐 𝜖𝑧𝑏𝑐 𝐸...

work page
[5]

L.ZhangandQ.Niu,ChiralPhononsatHigh-SymmetryPoints in Monolayer Hexagonal Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 115502 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Zhang and S

T. Zhang and S. Murakami, Chiral phonons and pseudoangu- lar momentum in nonsymmorphic systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012024 (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

Tsunetsugu and H

H. Tsunetsugu and H. Kusunose, Theory of Energy Dispersion of Chiral Phonons, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 023601 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

A.KatoandJ.Kishine,NoteonAngularMomentumofPhonons in Chiral Crystals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 075002 (2023)

work page 2023
[9]

Murakami, J

K.Ishito,H.Mao,Y.Kousaka,Y.Togawa,S.Iwasaki,T.Zhang, S. Murakami, J. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons in 𝛼-HgS, Nat. Phys.19, 35 (2022)

work page 2022
[10]

Ishito, H

K. Ishito, H. Mao, K. Kobayashi, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, H. Kusunose, J. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Chiral phonons: Cir- cularlypolarizedRamanspectroscopyandabinitiocalculations in a chiral crystal tellurium, Chirality35, 338 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

Oishi, Y

E. Oishi, Y. Fujii, and A. Koreeda, Selective observation of enantiomeric chiral phonons in 𝛼-quartz, Phys. Rev. B109, 104306 (2024)

work page 2024
[12]

H.Ueda,M.García-Fernández,S.Agrestini,C.P.Romao,J.van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature618, 946 (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

Božovic, Possible band-structure shapes of quasi-one- dimensional solids, Phys

I. Božovic, Possible band-structure shapes of quasi-one- dimensional solids, Phys. Rev. B29, 6586 (1984)

work page 1984
[14]

Zhang and Q

L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular Momentum of Phonons and the Einstein–de Haas Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 085503 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

V. S. Vonsovskii and M. S. Svirskii, Phonon Spin, Sov. Phys. Solid State3, 1568 (1962)

work page 1962
[16]

B. P. Bloom, Y. Paltiel, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity, Chem. Rev.124, 1950 (2024)

work page 1950
[17]

J.Fransson,Vibrationaloriginofexchangesplittingand”chiral- induced spin selectivity, Phys. Rev. B102, 235416 (2020)

work page 2020
[18]

Du, H.-H

G.-F. Du, H.-H. Fu, and R. Wu, Vibration-enhanced spin- selective transport of electrons in the DNA double helix, Phys. Rev. B102, 035431 (2020)

work page 2020
[19]

Res.5, L022039 (2023)

J.Fransson,Chiralphononinducedspinpolarization,Phys.Rev. Res.5, L022039 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

Funato, M

T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, Chirality-Induced Phonon- Spin Conversion at an Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236201 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Hirobe, M

A.Inui,R.Aoki,Y.Nishiue,K.Shiota,Y.Kousaka,H.Shishido, D. Hirobe, M. Suda, J. Ohe, J. Kishine, H. M. Yamamoto, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-Induced Spin-Polarized State of a Chiral Crystal CrNb3S6, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 166602 (2020)

work page 2020
[22]

G. L. J. A. Rikken, C. Strohm, and P. Wyder, Observation of Magnetoelectric Directional Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 133005 (2002)

work page 2002
[23]

Furukawa, Y

T. Furukawa, Y. Shimokawa, K. Kobayashi, and T. Itou, Ob- servation of current-induced bulk magnetization in elemental tellurium, Nat. Commun.8, 954 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

K. Ohe, H. Shishido, M. Kato, S. Utsumi, H. Matsuura, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-Induced Selectivity of Phonon Angular MomentainChiralQuartzCrystals,Phys.Rev.Lett. 132,056302 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

E.Bousquet,M.Fava, Z.Romestan,F.Gómez-Ortiz, E.E.Mc- Cabe, and A. H. Romero, Structural chirality and related prop- erties in periodic inorganic solids: Review and perspectives, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 163004 (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

Tateishi, A

T. Tateishi, A. Kato, and J. Kishine, Electron–Chiral Phonon Coupling, Crystal Angular Momentum, and Phonon Chirality, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.94, 053601 (2025)

work page 2025
[27]

J. Hu, S. Zhao, W. Li, and H. Wang, Electronic states in one- dimensionalhelicalcrystals: Generalpropertiesandapplication to InSeI, Phys. Rev. B109, 195160 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

U.Rössler, SolidStateTheory: AnIntroduction ,2nded.(Berlin ; New York, 2009)

work page 2009
[29]

Rev.149, 491 (1966)

J.R.SchriefferandP.A.Wolff,RelationbetweentheAnderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev.149, 491 (1966)

work page 1966
[30]

Winkler,Spin—Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional ElectronandHoleSystems ,SpringerTractsinModernPhysics, Vol

R. Winkler,Spin—Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional ElectronandHoleSystems ,SpringerTractsinModernPhysics, Vol. 191 (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003)

work page 2003
[31]

I.B.Bozovic,M.Vujicic,andF.Herbut,Irreduciblerepresenta- tions of the symmetry groups of polymer molecules. I, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.11, 2133 (1978)

work page 1978
[32]

D. M. Juraschek, R. M. Geilhufe, H. Zhu, M. Basini, P. Baum, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, M. Fechner, B. Flebus, G. Gris- sonnanche, A. I. Kirilyuk, M. Lemeshko, S. F. Maehrlein, M. Mignolet, S. Murakami, Q. Niu, U. Nowak, C. P. Romao, H. Rostami, T. Satoh, N. A. Spaldin, H. Ueda, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons, Nat. Phys.21, 1532 (2025)

work page 2025
[33]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

work page 1959
[34]

A.Pezo, D.GarcíaOvalle,andA.Manchon,OrbitalHalleffect incrystals: Interatomicversusintra-atomiccontributions,Phys. Rev. B106, 104414 (2022)

work page 2022
[35]

Burgos Atencia, A

R. Burgos Atencia, A. Agarwal, and D. Culcer, Orbital angu- lar momentum of Bloch electrons: Equilibrium formulation, magneto-electric phenomena, and the orbital Hall effect, Adv. Phys. X9, 2371972 (2024)

work page 2024
[36]

J. Luo, T. Lin, J. Zhang, X. Chen, E. R. Blackert, R. Xu, B. I. Yakobson, and H. Zhu, Large effective magnetic fields from chiral phonons in rare-earth halides, Science382, 698 (2023)

work page 2023
[37]

Basini, M

M. Basini, M. Pancaldi, B. Wehinger, M. Udina, V. Unikan- danunni, T. Tadano, M. C. Hoffmann, A. V. Balatsky, and S. Bonetti, Terahertz electric-field-driven dynamical multifer- roicity in SrTiO3, Nature628, 534 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

C. S. Davies, F. G. N. Fennema, A. Tsukamoto, I. Razdolski, A. V. Kimel, and A. Kirilyuk, Phononic switching of magneti- zation by the ultrafast Barnett effect, Nature628, 540 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

Mater.20, 638 (2021)

Y.Liu,J.Xiao,J.Koo,andB.Yan,Chirality-driventopological electronic structure of DNA-like materials, Nat. Mater.20, 638 (2021)

work page 2021
[40]

N. Cho, J. Lim, and M. B. Plenio, Chirality-Induced Or- bital Selectivity through Linear-Orbital Coupling (2025), arXiv:2509.07675 [cond-mat]. 8

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

T. Sato, T. Kato, and A. Manchon, Orbital Accumulation In- ducedbyChiralPhonons(2025),arXiv:2511.11272[cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

D. Yao, D. Go, Y. Mokrousov, and S. Murakami, Dynamical OrbitalAngularMomentumInducedbyChiralPhonons(2025), arXiv:2511.09271 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Pandey, Z

Y.Nabei,C.Yang,H.Sun,H.Jones,T.Mai,T.Wang,R.Bodin, B. Pandey, Z. Wang, Y. Xiong, A. H. Comstock, B. Ewing, J.Bingen,R.Sun,D.Smirnov,W.Zhang,A.Hoffmann,R.Rao, M.Hu,Z.V.Vardeny,B.Yan,X.Li,J.Zhou,J.Liu,andD.Sun, OrbitalSeebeckeffectinducedbychiralphonons,Nat.Phys. 22, 245 (2026)

work page 2026
[44]

K. Kim, E. Vetter, L. Yan, C. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Sun, Y. Yang, A.H.Comstock,X.Li,J.Zhou,L.Zhang,W.You,D.Sun,and J.Liu,Chiral-phonon-activatedspinSeebeckeffect,Nat.Mater. 22, 322 (2023)

work page 2023
[45]

S.Barišić,J.Labbé,andJ.Friedel,TightBindingandTransition- Metal Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 919 (1970)

work page 1970