Same World, Differently Given: History-Dependent Perceptual Reorganization in Artificial Agents

Hongju Pae

arxiv: 2604.04637 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.AI

Same World, Differently Given: History-Dependent Perceptual Reorganization in Artificial Agents

Hongju Pae This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI

keywords perspective latentperceptual reorganizationhistory-dependent encodingartificial agentsgridworldadaptive self-modulationplasticity residueperceptual feedback

0 comments

The pith

A slow perspective latent reorganizes perception so that identical observations are encoded differently depending on an agent's accumulated experience.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a minimal architecture in which a slow perspective latent feeds back into perception and is updated by perceptual processing. This setup lets an artificial agent sustain a history-sensitive stance on its world, so the same sensory input receives different internal representations based on prior perturbations. In gridworld tests with fixed spatial structure and controlled sensory changes, perturbation history leaves measurable traces in plasticity after conditions normalize, the latent drives reorganization of encodings, and only adaptive self-modulation produces the expected growth-then-stabilization pattern. Overall behavior stays stable, indicating the main effect is internal and perceptual rather than a shift in actions. A sympathetic reader would care because the architecture supplies a concrete, minimal mechanism for agents to develop perspectives that persist across experiences without requiring constant behavioral retraining.

Core claim

The author shows that a slow perspective latent g, which provides feedback to perceptual encoding and is itself updated through that encoding, allows identical observations to be represented differently depending on the agent's accumulated stance. In a minimal gridworld with a fixed spatial scaffold and sensory perturbations, three results follow: perturbation history leaves residue in adaptive plasticity after nominal conditions return, the latent reorganizes perceptual encodings accordingly, and only adaptive self-modulation produces the characteristic growth-then-stabilization dynamic, unlike rigid or always-open regimes. Gross behavior remains stable throughout, showing that the dominant

What carries the argument

The perspective latent g, a slowly evolving internal variable that modulates incoming perception and is updated by it, carrying accumulated stance to make current encodings history-dependent.

If this is right

Perturbation history leaves measurable residue in adaptive plasticity after nominal conditions are restored.
The perspective latent reorganizes perceptual encoding so identical observations are represented differently depending on prior experience.
Only adaptive self-modulation yields the characteristic growth-then-stabilization dynamic, unlike rigid or always-open update regimes.
Gross behavior remains stable throughout, indicating reorganization occurs primarily at the perceptual level rather than through behavioral change.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The separation of perceptual reorganization from behavioral stability suggests agents could maintain coherent internal perspectives across ambiguous inputs without retraining actions.
Embedding such a latent in larger architectures might support consistent world models that accumulate experience without overwriting earlier encodings.
The mechanism points to a possible route for artificial agents to exhibit perspectival continuity similar to how biological systems retain history in perceptual biases.

Load-bearing premise

Results obtained in a minimal gridworld with fixed spatial scaffold and controlled sensory perturbations generalize to history-dependent perspectival organization in artificial agents more broadly.

What would settle it

If the same observation after different perturbation histories produces statistically identical perceptual encodings, or if rigid and always-open update regimes produce the same growth-then-stabilization dynamic as the adaptive regime, the claimed mechanism would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04637 by Hongju Pae.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Schematic overview of the extended agent architecture. Gray, green, purple, and orange denote the environment, perceptual encoding, perspective dynamics, and action pathway. The main additions are the feedback links between perception and perspective: salience gating (purple arrow), in which gt−1 modulates perceptual encoding through the FiLM gate, and self-modulating plasticity (green arrow), in which gat… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Gridworld environment visualization. This Pygame-based simulator renders a fixed 23 × 7 gridworld with a left-to-right observation noise gradient: left-side cells are noisier and right-side cells are more reliable. For analysis, the 23 columns are divided into five reporting zones (vertical white lines). Background color indicates noise level, from red (high) to teal (low). The agent (white circle) starts … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Plasticity residue under matched three-block histories. Mean adaptive plasticity α is compared between the first and second no-perturbation blocks across three schedules matched in total duration: Baseline (nP = 0 → 0 → 0), Mixed perturbation (nP = 0 → 4 → 0), and Persistent perturbation (nP = 4 → 4 → 4). Bars show hierarchical medians, points show individual seed run values, and error bars indicate IQR.… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Perspective reorganizes perception of the same input. The comparison perspective g was obtained from a mixed perturbation run (nP = 0 → 4 → 0). (a) PCA projection of probe encodings under the late post-perturbation perspective state g2 and the null condition g = 0, shown with covariance ellipses. Cluster centroids are marked with crosses. (b) Signed per-dimension difference zt(g2) − zt(g = 0) averaged acro… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Ablation analysis of self-modulating plasticity. (a) Episode-wise adaptive plasticity α with perturbation (nP = 4) and without perturbation (nP = 0). In both conditions, α rises rapidly early in training, but only the perturbed condition later declines below baseline. (b) Perspective magnitude ∥g∥ across four update regimes: Adaptive with perturbation, Adaptive baseline, Rigid (α = 0.05), and Open (α =… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

What kind of internal organization would allow an artificial agent not only to adapt its behavior, but to sustain a history-sensitive perspective on its world? I present a minimal architecture in which a slow perspective latent $g$ feeds back into perception and is itself updated through perceptual processing. This allows identical observations to be encoded differently depending on the agent's accumulated stance. The model is evaluated in a minimal gridworld with a fixed spatial scaffold and sensory perturbations. Across analyses, three results emerge: first, perturbation history leaves measurable residue in adaptive plasticity after nominal conditions are restored. Second, the perspective latent reorganizes perceptual encoding, such that identical observations are represented differently depending on prior experience. Third, only adaptive self-modulation yields the characteristic growth-then-stabilization dynamic, unlike rigid or always-open update regimes. Gross behavior remains stable throughout, suggesting that the dominant reorganization is perceptual rather than behavioral. Together, these findings identify a minimal mechanism for history-dependent perspectival organization in artificial agents.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper offers a minimal self-modulating latent for history-dependent perception in agents, but the results stay confined to one fixed gridworld without checks on other structures or scales.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work describes a simple feedback loop where a slow perspective latent g both shapes perceptual encoding and gets updated by it. This produces the effect that identical inputs get represented differently based on prior experience, and only the adaptive version of the loop creates the growth-then-stabilization pattern in plasticity while behavior stays steady. The three reported outcomes line up with that picture: leftover effects from past perturbations, reorganization of encodings, and the contrast with rigid or always-open rules. That contrast is the clearest part of the contribution, because it isolates what the self-modulation actually adds over simpler alternatives. The architecture itself is lightweight enough that someone could code it up quickly to test the idea further. The gridworld keeps the spatial layout fixed and the perturbations controlled, which lets the authors focus on the internal dynamics without extra noise. That choice makes the residue in plasticity and the encoding shift easier to measure. At the same time, the same choice limits how far the results travel. The central claim is about history-dependent perspectival organization in artificial agents in general, yet everything shown comes from this one scaffold. Without runs on environments where the agent has to discover spatial relations or where the layout itself changes, it is hard to tell whether the reorganization is a general property or something that appears only when the world structure is handed to the agent. The abstract does not give equations or numbers, so the quantitative strength of the reorganization effect and the statistical controls remain unclear until the full details are checked. This kind of minimal mechanism is worth discussing with people who work on internal models and adaptive perception in agents. It could fit into a reading group as a concrete example of how to add history sensitivity without heavy machinery. The thinking is straightforward and the comparison across update regimes is useful, even if the evidence base is narrow. A serious editor should send it for review rather than desk reject, with the expectation that the authors add environment variations and explicit model equations.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a minimal architecture in which a slow perspective latent g feeds back into perceptual encoding and is updated through perceptual processing. This enables identical observations to be represented differently depending on the agent's accumulated history. The model is tested in a single minimal gridworld with fixed spatial scaffold and controlled sensory perturbations. Three main results are reported: (1) perturbation history leaves measurable residue in adaptive plasticity after conditions are restored; (2) the perspective latent reorganizes perceptual encodings in a history-dependent manner; (3) only adaptive self-modulation produces the characteristic growth-then-stabilization dynamic, unlike rigid or always-open regimes. Gross behavior remains stable, indicating that reorganization is primarily perceptual.

Significance. If the results hold under broader testing, the work identifies a minimal, self-contained mechanism for history-dependent perspectival organization in artificial agents. It distinguishes adaptive self-modulation from rigid or always-open update rules and shows that perceptual reorganization can occur without altering observable behavior. This provides a concrete, falsifiable starting point for modeling perspective in agents and could inform research on continual adaptation and internal state in reinforcement learning or cognitive architectures.

major comments (3)

[Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (Experiments): All three reported results derive from a single minimal gridworld whose spatial scaffold is fixed and whose sensory perturbations are controlled and reversible. No additional environments, no scaling of state-space size, and no ablation removing the fixed spatial structure are described. This makes the generalization to 'history-dependent perspectival organization in artificial agents' load-bearing on an untested assumption that the observed plasticity residue and reorganization effect are not artifacts of the specific scaffold or perturbation schedule.
[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'only adaptive self-modulation yields the characteristic growth-then-stabilization dynamic' is presented without quantitative comparison to the rigid and always-open regimes (no error bars, no statistical tests, no effect sizes). Because the central distinction among update regimes is load-bearing for the third result, the absence of these details prevents verification that the dynamic is uniquely produced by adaptive self-modulation rather than by other implementation choices.
[Abstract] Abstract: No equations or pseudocode are supplied for the perspective latent g, its feedback into perception, or the self-modulation rule. Without these definitions it is impossible to determine whether the reported reorganization is a non-trivial emergent property or follows directly from the model's construction (e.g., whether g is defined in a way that forces history dependence by fiat).

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'gross behavior remains stable throughout' but provides no quantitative measure (e.g., reward curves, action entropy) to support this claim. Adding a brief behavioral metric would strengthen the assertion that reorganization is perceptual rather than behavioral.
[Abstract] The phrase 'slow perspective latent g' is introduced without prior definition or reference to related work on slow feature analysis or latent dynamics; a short sentence situating g relative to existing concepts would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. The points raised help clarify the scope, quantitative support, and formal presentation of our minimal architecture. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (Experiments): All three reported results derive from a single minimal gridworld whose spatial scaffold is fixed and whose sensory perturbations are controlled and reversible. No additional environments, no scaling of state-space size, and no ablation removing the fixed spatial structure are described. This makes the generalization to 'history-dependent perspectival organization in artificial agents' load-bearing on an untested assumption that the observed plasticity residue and reorganization effect are not artifacts of the specific scaffold or perturbation schedule.

Authors: The single minimal gridworld with fixed scaffold and reversible perturbations was deliberately chosen to isolate the history-dependent effects of the perspective latent without confounding behavioral changes or uncontrolled variables. This setup enables precise measurement of plasticity residue and perceptual reorganization. We agree, however, that the current scope limits broad generalization claims. In revision we will (i) temper the abstract language to read 'in a minimal gridworld agent' rather than the more general phrasing, (ii) add an explicit limitations subsection in the discussion that states the results are demonstrated under this controlled scaffold, and (iii) outline concrete directions for future scaling and ablation studies. No new experiments are added at this stage, but the text revisions directly address the concern about untested assumptions. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'only adaptive self-modulation yields the characteristic growth-then-stabilization dynamic' is presented without quantitative comparison to the rigid and always-open regimes (no error bars, no statistical tests, no effect sizes). Because the central distinction among update regimes is load-bearing for the third result, the absence of these details prevents verification that the dynamic is uniquely produced by adaptive self-modulation rather than by other implementation choices.

Authors: The main-text figures already display the growth-then-stabilization pattern across regimes, but the abstract summary omits the supporting quantitative details. We will revise the manuscript to add error bars to the relevant plots, report statistical comparisons (e.g., paired t-tests or ANOVA with p-values) between the three update regimes, and include effect-size measures for the stabilization phase. The abstract will be updated to reference these quantitative distinctions or to qualify the claim as supported by the statistical evidence presented in the results section. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No equations or pseudocode are supplied for the perspective latent g, its feedback into perception, or the self-modulation rule. Without these definitions it is impossible to determine whether the reported reorganization is a non-trivial emergent property or follows directly from the model's construction (e.g., whether g is defined in a way that forces history dependence by fiat).

Authors: Section 2 of the manuscript defines the perspective latent g, its feedback into the perceptual encoder, and the adaptive self-modulation rule. To make these definitions immediately accessible and to demonstrate that history dependence emerges from the closed-loop dynamics rather than being imposed by fiat, we will add a short appendix containing the core equations together with pseudocode for the perceptual update loop. This addition will allow readers to verify the non-trivial nature of the reorganization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical results from proposed architecture do not reduce to definitional inputs

full rationale

The paper proposes a minimal architecture with a slow perspective latent g that feeds back into perception and is updated through it, then reports three empirical results from simulations in a single minimal gridworld: residue in plasticity, reorganization of identical observations by prior experience, and growth-then-stabilization only under adaptive self-modulation. No equations, formal derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that could make any claim equivalent to its inputs by construction. The claims rest on observed simulation outcomes rather than tautological redefinitions or load-bearing self-references, rendering the chain self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Ledger is populated from abstract description only. The central claim rests on the existence and dynamics of the invented perspective latent and on the assumption that the chosen gridworld perturbations are representative.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A minimal gridworld with fixed spatial scaffold and sensory perturbations is sufficient to demonstrate general history-dependent perceptual reorganization.
Invoked when the author states the model is evaluated in this environment and draws general conclusions.

invented entities (1)

slow perspective latent g no independent evidence
purpose: To feed back into perception and be updated by it, enabling history-dependent encoding of identical observations.
New internal variable introduced to produce the reported reorganization effect.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1349 out tokens · 36461 ms · 2026-05-10T19:19:52.805039+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

a slow perspective latent g feeds back into perception and is itself updated through perceptual processing... salience gating... self-modulating plasticity... growth-then-stabilization dynamic
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

fixed 23×7 gridworld with... 8-dimensional local patch

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Body-Grounded Perspective Formation and Conative Attunement in Artificial Agents
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Proposes a body-grounded perspective model for AI agents using interoceptive viability signals, a Fisher-style metric on fused states, and conative alignment to produce stable body-directed behavior in a reward-free g...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

4 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent.Adaptive Behavior, 11(4):209–

work page 2003
[2]

(2014).The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind

Colombetti, G. (2014).The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. MIT Press. Di Paolo, E. A. (2006). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4:429–452. Dreyfus, H. L. (2008). Why heideggerian ai failed and how fixing it would require making it more heideggerian. InThe Me- chanical Mind in Hist...

work page 2014
[3]

P., Littman, M

Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., and Cassandra, A. R. (1998). Plan- ning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1-2):99–134. Kegan, R. (1982).The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Harvard University Press. Kirchhoff, M. D. and Froese, T. (2017). Where there is life there is mind: In supp...

work page 1998
[4]

(2013).Phenomenology of Perception

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013).Phenomenology of Perception. Rout- ledge. Translated fromPh ´enom´enologie de la perception. Miconi, T., Rawal, A., Clune, J., and Stanley, K. O. (2019). Back- propamine: training self-modifying neural networks with dif- ferentiable neuromodulated plasticity. InInternational Con- ference on Learning Representations. Murray, T., Mc...

work page 2013

[1] [1]

Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent.Adaptive Behavior, 11(4):209–

work page 2003

[2] [2]

(2014).The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind

Colombetti, G. (2014).The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. MIT Press. Di Paolo, E. A. (2006). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4:429–452. Dreyfus, H. L. (2008). Why heideggerian ai failed and how fixing it would require making it more heideggerian. InThe Me- chanical Mind in Hist...

work page 2014

[3] [3]

P., Littman, M

Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., and Cassandra, A. R. (1998). Plan- ning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1-2):99–134. Kegan, R. (1982).The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Harvard University Press. Kirchhoff, M. D. and Froese, T. (2017). Where there is life there is mind: In supp...

work page 1998

[4] [4]

(2013).Phenomenology of Perception

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013).Phenomenology of Perception. Rout- ledge. Translated fromPh ´enom´enologie de la perception. Miconi, T., Rawal, A., Clune, J., and Stanley, K. O. (2019). Back- propamine: training self-modifying neural networks with dif- ferentiable neuromodulated plasticity. InInternational Con- ference on Learning Representations. Murray, T., Mc...

work page 2013