Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremPrecise measurement of the CKM angle γ with a novel approach
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:51 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Combined electron-positron and proton-proton collision data measure the CKM angle gamma to 71.3 degrees with 5 degree uncertainty.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The CKM angle gamma is measured by applying a novel, unbinned, model-independent approach to datasets of electron-positron collisions and proton-proton collisions. The CP-violating phase gamma is determined from B to D to KS0 h prime plus h prime minus h decays, while the corresponding strong-phase parameters are measured using doubly tagged D to KS or L0 h prime plus h prime minus decays in the quantum-correlated D Dbar system. A joint fit to both datasets yields gamma equal to 71.3 degrees plus or minus 5.0 degrees. The result is the most precise to date and consistent with previous measurements and world averages.
What carries the argument
The joint unbinned fit that simultaneously extracts CP-violating observables from B meson decays and strong-phase parameters from quantum-correlated charm decays.
Load-bearing premise
The strong-phase parameters extracted from quantum-correlated charm decays can be transferred directly to the B meson decay analysis without additional model-dependent corrections.
What would settle it
An independent determination of the strong-phase parameters in D to KS h plus h minus decays that differs from those used in the joint fit would shift the extracted value of gamma outside the reported uncertainty.
Figures
read the original abstract
A measurement of the CKM angle $\gamma$ is performed by applying a novel, unbinned, model-independent approach to datasets of electron-positron collisions collected by the BESIII experiment and proton-proton collisions by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 8 fb$^{-1}$ and 9 fb$^{-1}$, respectively. The $C\!P$-violating phase $\gamma$ is determined from ${B^{\pm}\rightarrow D(\rightarrow K_{\rm S}^{0} h^{\prime+}h^{\prime-}) h^{\pm}}$ decays in LHCb data, where $h^{(\prime)}$ is either a pion or kaon, while the corresponding strong-phase parameters are measured using doubly tagged ${D\rightarrow K_{\rm S/L}^0 h^{\prime+} h^{\prime-}}$ decays in the quantum-correlated $D\overline{D}$ system present in BESIII data. A joint fit to both datasets, which allows for a simultaneous determination of the associated $C\!P$-violating observables and strong-phase parameters, yields ${\gamma = (71.3\pm 5.0)^{\circ}}$. The result is the most precise to date and consistent with previous measurements and world averages.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents a novel unbinned model-independent measurement of the CKM angle γ via a joint fit combining BESIII quantum-correlated D Dbar → K_S/L^0 h'+ h'- decays (for strong-phase parameters) with LHCb B± → D(→ K_S^0 h'+ h'-) h± decays (for CP-violating observables), using 8 fb^{-1} and 9 fb^{-1} respectively. The fit yields γ = (71.3 ± 5.0)°, reported as the most precise to date and consistent with prior measurements and world averages.
Significance. If the transferability assumption holds, the result would meaningfully advance precision on γ, strengthening tests of CKM unitarity and new-physics searches. The joint unbinned fit is a genuine methodological advance that simultaneously constrains strong phases and CP observables without additional model dependence.
major comments (1)
- Abstract: the central claim that strong-phase parameters extracted from BESIII e+e- data can be directly transferred to the LHCb pp analysis with no additional model-dependent corrections or environment-specific biases is load-bearing for an unbiased γ. No cross-checks (separate vs. joint fits, or residual Dalitz-plot discrepancies) are described to confirm the shared parameters absorb all differences in production, boosts, acceptances, or efficiencies.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the methodological advance represented by the joint unbinned fit. We address the major comment on the transferability of strong-phase parameters below. We agree that additional explicit validation would strengthen the presentation and will incorporate the requested cross-checks in the revised version.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Abstract: the central claim that strong-phase parameters extracted from BESIII e+e- data can be directly transferred to the LHCb pp analysis with no additional model-dependent corrections or environment-specific biases is load-bearing for an unbiased γ. No cross-checks (separate vs. joint fits, or residual Dalitz-plot discrepancies) are described to confirm the shared parameters absorb all differences in production, boosts, acceptances, or efficiencies.
Authors: The strong-phase parameters are intrinsic properties of the D → K_S^0 h^+ h^- decay amplitudes and are therefore independent of the production mechanism (e^+e^- at BESIII versus pp at LHCb), the boost, or detector-specific acceptances and efficiencies. These differences are handled through experiment-specific efficiency maps and the unbinned likelihood, which directly incorporates the observed Dalitz-plot distributions from each dataset. The joint fit determines the strong-phase parameters simultaneously with the CP-violating observables, allowing the LHCb data to contribute directly to their constraint and ensuring internal consistency without external model-dependent corrections. We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not include explicit cross-checks such as a comparison of strong-phase parameters from a BESIII-only fit versus the joint fit, or an examination of residual Dalitz-plot discrepancies after efficiency correction. These will be added to the revised manuscript to demonstrate that the shared parameters describe both datasets adequately and that no significant environment-specific biases remain. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in the joint unbinned fit derivation
full rationale
The paper reports an experimental measurement of gamma via a joint unbinned fit to independent BESIII quantum-correlated D Dbar data (for strong-phase parameters) and LHCb B decay data (for CP observables). The abstract and description state that the fit simultaneously determines both sets of parameters from the combined datasets without pre-fixing one from the other or invoking self-citations that reduce the output to an input by construction. No equations are presented that equate the reported gamma value to a fitted input or rename a known result; the derivation remains data-driven and self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- gamma
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Quantum correlations in the D Dbar system at the psi(3770) resonance allow model-independent extraction of strong phases.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.leanLogicNat recovery and orbit embedding unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
For a Fourier expansion truncating at the order of M, a total of 2 × (2M + 1) weight functions are defined as wn(z) ≡ wopt(z) cos[k ϕ(z)] or sin[k ϕ(z)].
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Measurement of $\gamma$ using $B^{\pm}\rightarrow DK^{\pm}$ and $B^{\pm}\rightarrow D\pi^{\pm}$ decays with $D\rightarrow K_{\rm S}^{0}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ and $D\rightarrow K_{\rm S}^{0}K^{+}K^{-}$
The CKM angle γ is measured to be (68.1 ± 6.7)° from CP violation observed in the Dalitz plots of B± → DK± and B± → Dπ± decays with D → KS0π+π− and KS0K+K−.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A. D. Sakharov,Violation of CP invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pis’ma v ZhETF5(1967) 32
1967
-
[2]
Cabibbo,Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys
N. Cabibbo,Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.10(1963) 531; M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, C P-violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys.49(1973) 652
1963
-
[3]
J. Brod and J. Zupan,The ultimate theoretical error on γ from B→DK decays, JHEP01(2014) 051,arXiv:1308.5663
-
[4]
Brod,Electroweak effects in the extraction of the CKM angleγfrom B→Dπdecays,Phys
J. Brod,Electroweak effects in the extraction of the CKM angle γ from B→Dπ decays, Phys. Lett.B743(2015) 56,arXiv:1412.3173
-
[5]
Fleischer,New strategies to extract β and γ from Bd →π +π− and Bs →K +K −, Phys
R. Fleischer,New strategies to extract β and γ from Bd →π +π− and Bs →K +K −, Phys. Lett.B459(1999) 306,arXiv:hep-ph/9903456
-
[6]
Fleischer, Bs,d →ππ, πK, KK : Status and prospects, Eur
R. Fleischer, Bs,d →ππ, πK, KK : status and prospects, Eur. Phys. J.C52(2007) 267,arXiv:0705.1121
-
[7]
R. Fleischer and R. Knegjens,In pursuit of new physics with B0 s →K +K −, Eur. Phys. J.C71(2011) 1532,arXiv:1011.1096
-
[8]
R. Fleischer, R. Jaarsma, and K. K. Vos,Zooming into CP violation in B (s)→hh decays, JHEP02(2023) 081,arXiv:2211.08346
-
[9]
N. Rey-Le Lorier and D. London,Measuring γ with B→Kππ and B→KK K decays, Phys. Rev.D85(2012) 016010,arXiv:1109.0881
-
[10]
Bhattacharyaet al.,Charmless B→P P P decays: The fully-symmetric final state, Phys
B. Bhattacharyaet al.,Charmless B→P P P decays: The fully-symmetric final state, Phys. Rev.D89(2014) 074043,arXiv:1402.2909
-
[11]
Bhattacharyaet al.,Charmless B→P P P decays: The fully antisymmetric final state, Phys
B. Bhattacharyaet al.,Charmless B→P P P decays: The fully antisymmetric final state, Phys. Rev.D109(2024) 013001,arXiv:2308.16240
-
[12]
LHCb collaboration,Simultaneous determination of the CKM angle γ and parameters related to mixing and C P violation in the charm sector, LHCb-CONF-2025-003, 2025
2025
-
[13]
CKMfitter group, J. Charleset al., C P violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the impact of the asymmetric B factories, Eur. Phys. J.C41 (2005) 1, arXiv:hep-ph/0406184, updated results and plots available at http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/
-
[14]
CKMfitter group, J. Charleset al.,Current status of the standard model CKM fit and constraints on ∆F= 2 new physics, Phys. Rev.D91 (2015) 073007, arXiv:1501.05013, updated results and plots available at http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/. 10
-
[15]
UTfit collaboration, M. Bonaet al.,The unitarity triangle fit in the standard model and hadronic parameters from lattice QCD: A reappraisal after the measurements of∆ ms and BR(B→τ ν τ), JHEP10(2006) 081, arXiv:hep-ph/0606167, updated results and plots available athttp://www.utfit.org/
-
[16]
R. H. Dalitz,On the analysis of τ-meson data and the nature of the τ-meson, Phil. Mag. Ser. 744(1953) 1068
1953
-
[17]
Fabri,A study ofτ-meson decay, Nuovo Cim.11(1954) 479
E. Fabri,A study ofτ-meson decay, Nuovo Cim.11(1954) 479
1954
-
[18]
Bondar,Proceedings of BINP special analysis meeting on Dalitz analysis, unpub- lished, 2002
A. Bondar,Proceedings of BINP special analysis meeting on Dalitz analysis, unpub- lished, 2002
2002
-
[19]
Giriet al.,Determining γ using B± →DK ± with multibody D decays, Phys
A. Giriet al.,Determining γ using B± →DK ± with multibody D decays, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 054018,arXiv:hep-ph/0303187
-
[20]
A. Bondar and A. Poluektov,The use of quantum-correlated D0 decays for ϕ3 measurement, Eur. Phys. J.C55(2008) 51,arXiv:0801.0840
-
[21]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement of the CKM angle γ in B± →DK ± andB ± →Dπ ± decays with D→K 0 Sh+h−, JHEP02(2021) 0169, arXiv:2010.08483
-
[22]
CLEO collaboration, J. Libbyet al.,Model-independent determination of the strong-phase difference between D0 and D0 →K 0 S,Lh+h−(h = π, K)and its im- pact on the measurement of the CKM angle γ/ϕ3, Phys. Rev.D82(2010) 112006, arXiv:1010.2817
-
[23]
Ablikimet al.,Determination of strong-phase parameters inD→K 0 S,Lπ+π−, Phys
BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Determination of strong-phase parameters inD→K 0 S,Lπ+π−, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 241802,arXiv:2002.12791
-
[24]
BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Model-independent determination of the relative strong-phase difference between D0 and D0 →K 0 S,Lπ+π− and its impact on the measurement of the CKM angle γ/ϕ3, Phys. Rev.D101(2020) 112002, arXiv:2003.00091
-
[25]
BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Improved model-independent determination of the strong-phase difference between D0 and D0 →K 0 S,LK +K − decays, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 052008,arXiv:2007.07959
-
[26]
A. Poluektov,Unbinned model-independent measurements with coherent admixtures of multibody neutral D meson decays, Eur. Phys. J.C78(2018) 121, arXiv:1712.08326
-
[27]
Ablikimet al.,Measurement of the CKM angle γ in B± →D(→K 0 Sh′+h′−)h± decays with a novel approach, LHCb-PAPER-2025-063, CERN-EP-2026-067, in preparation, to be submitted to Phys
LHCb collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Measurement of the CKM angle γ in B± →D(→K 0 Sh′+h′−)h± decays with a novel approach, LHCb-PAPER-2025-063, CERN-EP-2026-067, in preparation, to be submitted to Phys. Rev. D
2025
-
[28]
BaBar collaboration, P. del Amo Sanchezet al.,Measurement of D0 − D0 mixing parameters using D0 →K 0 Sπ+π− and D0 →K 0 SK +K − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 081803,arXiv:1004.5053. 11
-
[29]
BaBar and Belle collaborations, I. Adachiet al.,First evidence for cos2β > 0 and resolution of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa quark-mixing unitarity triangle ambiguity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 261801,arXiv:1804.06152
-
[30]
BaBar and Belle collaborations, I. Adachiet al.,Measurement of cos 2β in B0 → D(∗)h0 with D→K 0 Sπ+π− decays by a combined time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of BaBar and Belle data, Phys. Rev.D98(2018) 112012,arXiv:1804.06153
-
[31]
R. M. Baltrusaitiset al.,Direct measurements of charmed- D-meson hadronic branch- ing fractions, Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 2140
1986
-
[32]
BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Design and construction of the BESIII detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A614(2010) 345,arXiv:0911.4960
-
[33]
Yuet al.,BEPCII performance and beam dynamics studies on luminosity, in Proceeding of the 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference, TUYA01, 2016
C. Yuet al.,BEPCII performance and beam dynamics studies on luminosity, in Proceeding of the 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference, TUYA01, 2016
2016
-
[34]
Agostinelliet al.,Geant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl
Geant4 collaboration, S. Agostinelliet al.,Geant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A506(2003) 250
2003
-
[35]
Coherent Exclusive Exponentiation For Precision Monte Carlo Calculations
S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. Was,Coherent exclusive exponentiation for precision Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev.D63(2001) 113009,arXiv:hep-ph/0006359
work page Pith review arXiv 2001
- [36]
-
[37]
LHCb collaboration, A. A. Alves Jr.et al.,The LHCb detector at the LHC, JINST3 (2008) S08005
2008
-
[38]
Aaijet al.,LHCb detector performance, Int
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,LHCb detector performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30(2015) 1530022,arXiv:1412.6352
-
[39]
A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1
T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820; T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP05(2006) 026, arXiv:hep-ph/0603175
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2008
-
[40]
Belyaevet al.,Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J
I. Belyaevet al.,Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331(2011) 032047
2011
-
[41]
D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152
2001
-
[42]
N. Davidson, T. Przedzinski, and Z. Was,PHOTOS interface in C++: Technical and physics documentation, Comput. Phys. Commun.199(2016) 86, arXiv:1011.0937
-
[43]
Allisonet al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans
Geant4 collaboration, J. Allisonet al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.53(2006) 270
2006
-
[44]
Clemencicet al.,The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J
M. Clemencicet al.,The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331(2011) 032023. 12
2011
-
[45]
BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Updated model-independent measurement of the strong-phase differences between D0 and D0 →K 0 S/Lπ+π− decays, JHEP06 (2025) 086,arXiv:2503.22126
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[46]
M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder,sPlot: A statistical tool to unfold data distributions, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A555(2005) 356,arXiv:physics/0402083
-
[47]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement of the CKM angle γ from a combi- nation of LHCb results, JHEP12(2016) 087,arXiv:1611.03076
-
[48]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Simultaneous determination of CKM angle γ and charm mixing parameters, JHEP12(2021) 141,arXiv:2110.02350
-
[49]
M. Bjørn and S. Malde,CP violation and material interaction of neutral kaons in measurements of the CKM angle γ using B± →DK ± decays where D→K 0 Sπ+π−, JHEP07(2019) 106,arXiv:1904.01129
- [50]
-
[51]
Banerjeeet al.(Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV)), Phys
Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, S. Banerjeeet al.,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2023, Phys. Rev.D113(2026) 012008, arXiv:2411.18639, updated results and plots available athttps://hflav.web.cern.ch
-
[52]
BESIII collaboration, M. Ablikimet al.,Measurement of integrated luminosity of data collected at 3.773 GeV by BESIII from 2021 to 2024, Chin. Phys.C48(2024) 123001,arXiv:2406.05827
-
[53]
LHCb collaboration,Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II — Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era,arXiv:1808.08865. 13 BESIII collaboration M. Ablikim 1 , M. N. Achasov 4,d , P. Adlarson 83 , X. C. Ai 89 , C. S. Akondi 31A,31B , R. Aliberti 39 , A. Amoroso 82A,82C , Q. An 79,65,†, Y. H. An 89 , Y. Bai 63 , O. Bakina 40 , H. R. Bao 7...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.