pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06410 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Directional and correlated optical emission from a waveguide-engineered molecule with local control

Clara Henke , Thomas Wilkens Sand{\o} , Vasiliki Angelopoulou , Lena Maria Hansen , Alexey Tiranov , Oliver August Dall'Alba Sandberg , Zhe Liu , Leonardo Midolo
show 5 more authors
Nikolai Bart Arne Ludwig Anders S{\o}ndberg S{\o}rensen Peter Lodahl Cornelis Jacobus van Diepen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum dotsphotonic crystal waveguidedirectional emissioncollective statesartificial moleculephoton correlationschiral quantum opticswaveguide QED
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two quantum dots 26 wavelengths apart in a waveguide form an artificial molecule whose emission direction is switched by driving phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that two quantum dots remain radiatively coupled through a dispersive dipole-dipole interaction even when placed 13 micrometers apart in a bidirectional photonic crystal waveguide. The coupling creates collective states that behave as an artificial molecule, shifting their energies so that the direction of emitted light can be controlled by the relative phase of the driving fields. Under continuous driving the system produces directional photon statistics, sending single photons predominantly to one output port and pairs to the other. Pulsed excitation fully inverts both emitters and yields time-resolved correlated photon pairs.

Core claim

A pair of quantum dots embedded in a bidirectional photonic crystal waveguide, separated by 13 μm or 26 effective wavelengths, form an artificial molecule through a dispersive dipole-dipole interaction that shifts the energy of collective states. This interaction allows the emission direction to be switched from leftward to rightward by changing the relative phase of the collective driving fields. Under continuous driving, directional photon statistics appear, with single photons detected on one output port and photon pairs on the other. With pulsed excitation both emitters are fully inverted and correlated photon pairs are recorded in time-resolved intensity correlations. The setup realizes

What carries the argument

the artificial molecule created by two quantum dots via their dispersive dipole-dipole interaction in the waveguide, whose energy shifts enable phase-controlled switching of emission direction.

If this is right

  • Emission direction switches from left to right by adjusting the relative phase of the driving fields during collective excitation.
  • Under continuous driving, single photons appear on one output port while photon pairs appear on the other.
  • Pulsed excitation fully inverts both emitters and produces time-resolved correlated photon pairs.
  • The configuration realizes chiral quantum optics effects inside an ordinary non-chiral waveguide.
  • The platform supplies concrete steps toward scaling to multi-emitter waveguide QED systems with local control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Independent electrical tuning of each dot could enable selective addressing of individual collective states in larger arrays.
  • Persistence of the coupling over 13 micrometers suggests that similar interactions could link emitters across integrated photonic circuits.
  • The observed directional photon correlations could be used to route heralded single photons or entangled pairs to chosen outputs.
  • Extending the same phase-control principle to three or more emitters might produce more complex directional and correlation patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The two emitters remain radiatively coupled via dispersive dipole-dipole interaction despite separation of 26 effective wavelengths, permitting collective states with usable energy shifts.

What would settle it

No measurable change in the left-to-right intensity ratio when the relative driving phase is varied, or absence of direction-dependent difference in the second-order correlation function between the two ports.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06410 by Alexey Tiranov, Anders S{\o}ndberg S{\o}rensen, Arne Ludwig, Clara Henke, Cornelis Jacobus van Diepen, Lena Maria Hansen, Leonardo Midolo, Nikolai Bart, Oliver August Dall'Alba Sandberg, Peter Lodahl, Thomas Wilkens Sand{\o}, Vasiliki Angelopoulou, Zhe Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b) and (c) show the emission intensity col￾lected at the left and right port as a function of the detuning of the undriven emitter. For both ports, a modulation is observed as the undriven emitter is tuned into resonance, which demonstrates that the emitters are radiatively coupled. In addition, there is an asymme￾try between left and right ports, and between positive and negative detuning. This contrasts… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) and (b). We drive the left emitter resonantly with a weak con￾tinuous laser field, while the right emitter is not driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) shows two waveguide transmission spectra using a weak continuous wave laser. The spectra show that the photonic crystal band edge is around 317.4 THz. The two spectra are taken with either one half or the other half of the waveguide at a voltage such that QDs can be resolved based on their radiative recombination. QDs in each half are identified via transmission dips. A pair of spectrally similar QDs i… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the measured transmission as a function of both laser power and detuning for (a) QD1 and (b) QD2. The transmission values are normalized to the transmission obtained at large QD detuning. The measured minimum transmission dip as a function of excitation powers is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Both QDs have one dipole that is well coupled to the waveguide, and for both the second dipole is only weakly coupled resulting in the faint additional lines. The electrical tuning range for both QDs is close to 50 GHz. Outside this range tunneling dominates over radiative recombination. FIG. 8. Charge plateaus in transmission. (a), (b) Counts as a function of laser frequency and bias voltage for the (a) l… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: shows coincidence measurements for weak and continuous resonant driving of both emitters. For the left port, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a). (i) Calculate Poisson distributions: 𝑃!"#$(𝑁%&) for all 𝜇%& (ii) Simulate conditional probabilities: For 𝑁%&: Repeat 𝑛'() times: Distribute 𝑁%& across 𝑁'*+ For each QD: sample 𝜆 from Gaussian Sort 𝜆 Calculate min(Δ𝜆) For 𝛿𝜆: if 𝛿𝜆 ≥ min(Δ𝜆) then 𝑀 𝑁%& += 1 𝑃(𝑁$*,|𝑁%&) = 𝑀(𝑁%&)/𝑛'() (iii) Compute weighted probabilities: For 𝜇%&: 𝑃(𝑁$*,) = ∑-!" 𝑃 𝑁$*,|𝑁%& 𝑃!"#$ 𝑁%& (a) (c) (b) FIG. 16. Algorithm and wa… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: shows the simulated probabilities for a single waveguide, P1(Nset), for several values of Nset as a function of the relative tuning range, δλ/σQD, and the mean number of QDs, µQD. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: presents the trend of the probability for various set sizes and numbers of trenches. For the minimum number of regions, i.e. Nreg = Nset, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Radiative coupling between quantum emitters leads to a range of spectacular emission phenomena. Dicke studied the foundations of collectively enhanced and suppressed decay, commonly referred to as super- and subradiance. Collective effects can further result in directionality of the emission, thus offering a complimentary implementation of chiral quantum optics. Waveguide quantum electrodynamics (QED) allows coupling between spatially separated emitters, enabling selective driving. In this work, we control the emission direction for a pair of quantum dots embedded in a bidirectional photonic crystal waveguide offering independent electrical tuning. Notably the emitters are 13 \micro m apart, which corresponds to 26 effective wavelengths, but are nevertheless radiatively coupled. The directionality arises from a dispersive dipole-dipole interaction, which shifts the energy of the collective states, so that the emitter pair effectively forms an artificial molecule. We show that the emission direction can be switched from left- to rightwards by manipulating the relative driving phase while collectively exciting the emitters. In addition, we observe directional photon statistics under continuous driving, with, for example, single photons detected on one output port, and photon pairs on the other. With pulsed excitation, both emitters are fully inverted and correlated photon pairs are observed in time-resolved intensity correlation measurements. This work demonstrates a novel implementation of chiral quantum optics using quantum dots coupled via a non-chiral waveguide, and reports key steps for scaling up as a multi-emitter waveguide QED platform.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper experimentally demonstrates control over the direction of optical emission from two quantum dots in a photonic crystal waveguide separated by 13 μm (26 effective wavelengths). By adjusting the relative phase of the driving fields, the emission can be switched between left and right directions. Additionally, directional photon statistics are observed, with single photons and photon pairs detected on different output ports under continuous driving, and correlated pairs after pulsed excitation leading to full inversion. The results are attributed to the formation of an artificial molecule via long-range dispersive dipole-dipole coupling.

Significance. If validated, this represents a significant advance in chiral quantum optics and waveguide QED by achieving directional emission and correlated statistics without relying on chiral waveguides, using instead phase control and collective states in a standard bidirectional waveguide. The use of electrically tunable quantum dots with local control is a practical strength for scalability. The direct experimental signatures of phase-dependent directionality and port-specific photon correlations provide strong support for the collective coupling mechanism at unusually large separations.

major comments (1)
  1. The central interpretation relies on the dispersive dipole-dipole interaction persisting at 26 effective wavelengths to form collective states with energy shifts that enable phase-controlled directionality. The manuscript should include a quantitative estimate or measurement of the coupling strength (e.g., from observed spectral shifts in the results on collective excitation) and its comparison to theoretical expectations for the dipole-dipole interaction in the waveguide.
minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: 'complimentary' should be corrected to 'complementary'.
  2. Results section on photon statistics: full datasets with error bars and detailed fitting procedures for the directional g^(2) functions should be provided to allow verification of the reported single-photon vs. pair detection on separate ports.
  3. Methods: clarify the independent electrical tuning procedure and any calibration for the relative driving phase to ensure reproducibility of the direction switching.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive review and recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comment below and have updated the manuscript to incorporate the requested analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central interpretation relies on the dispersive dipole-dipole interaction persisting at 26 effective wavelengths to form collective states with energy shifts that enable phase-controlled directionality. The manuscript should include a quantitative estimate or measurement of the coupling strength (e.g., from observed spectral shifts in the results on collective excitation) and its comparison to theoretical expectations for the dipole-dipole interaction in the waveguide.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this constructive suggestion. Direct extraction of the coupling strength from spectral shifts in our collective excitation data is not possible, as the expected energy shifts are smaller than the inhomogeneous linewidths of the quantum dots. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph with a theoretical estimate of the dispersive dipole-dipole coupling strength. Using the measured waveguide dispersion relation, the emitter separation of 13 μm, and the known dipole moments, the calculated coupling is consistent with the observed phase-dependent directionality and the formation of collective states. We explicitly compare this value to the expected long-range 1/r form of the waveguide-mediated interaction and show that it remains sufficient to produce the reported directional single-photon and photon-pair statistics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct experimental observations

full rationale

The paper reports experimental measurements of phase-tunable directional emission and port-specific photon statistics from two quantum dots in a photonic crystal waveguide, with the emitters separated by 13 μm. These outcomes are obtained via direct detection under controlled driving phases and excitation regimes rather than from any closed mathematical derivation. The physical interpretation invoking long-range dispersive dipole-dipole coupling to form collective states draws on established waveguide QED principles without reducing to self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No step in the presented chain equates the claimed results to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard waveguide QED principles and the assumption of radiative coupling at large distance; no new free parameters are introduced beyond experimental controls, and the artificial molecule is a descriptive label rather than a new postulated entity.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Radiative coupling between spatially separated emitters produces collective states with energy shifts due to dispersive dipole-dipole interaction
    Invoked in the abstract to explain how the emitter pair forms an artificial molecule enabling directional control.
invented entities (1)
  • artificial molecule no independent evidence
    purpose: Descriptive label for the radiatively coupled emitter pair
    Used to frame the observed collective behavior; no independent evidence beyond the coupling measurements is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5619 in / 1417 out tokens · 40941 ms · 2026-05-10T19:04:52.915055+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Realization of waveguide many-body quantum optics

    quant-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Experimental demonstration of higher-order photon correlations controlled by the number of quantum emitters in a waveguide QED system, scaling to three emitters.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, 303 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Daiss, S

    S. Daiss, S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, E. Distante, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, A quantum-logic gate between distant quantum-network modules, Science 371, 614 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lu- cas, An elementary quantum network of entangled opti- cal atomic clocks, Nature609, 689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Reviews 9 of Modern Physics92, 025002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    E. M. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at ra- dio frequencies, Physical Review69, 674 (1946)

    work page 1946

  7. [7]

    Ciccarello, P

    F. Ciccarello, P. Lodahl, and D. Schneble, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Optics and Photonics News 35, 34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 015002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Pichler, T

    H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum optics of chiral spin networks, Physical Review A 91, 042116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Petersen, J

    J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit in- teraction of light, Science346, 67 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Mitsch, C

    R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide, Nature Communications5, 5713 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Joshi, F

    C. Joshi, F. Yang, and M. Mirhosseini, Resonance flu- orescence of a chiral artificial atom, Physical Review X 13, 021039 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    S¨ ollner, S

    I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, A. Javadi, G. Kirˇ sanske, T. Pregnolato, H. El-Ella, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Determin- istic photon-emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits, Nature Nanotechnology10, 775 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Gheeraert, S

    N. Gheeraert, S. Kono, and Y. Nakamura, Programmable directional emitter and receiver of itinerant microwave photons in a waveguide, Physical Review A102, 053720 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    P. O. Guimond, B. Vermersch, M. L. Juan, A. Sharafiev, G. Kirchmair, and P. Zoller, A unidirectional on-chip photonic interface for superconducting circuits, npj Quantum Information6, 32 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Kannan, D

    B. Kannan, D. L. Campbell, F. Vasconcelos, R. Winik, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Generating spatially entangled itiner- ant photons with waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Science Advances6, eabb8780 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    M. A. Aamir, C. C. Moreno, S. Sundelin, J. Bizn´ arov´ a, M. Scigliuzzo, K. E. Patel, A. Osman, D. P. Lozano, I. Strandberg, and S. Gasparinetti, Engineering symmetry-selective couplings of a superconducting artifi- cial molecule to microwave waveguides, Physical Review Letters129, 123604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    E. S. Redchenko, A. V. Poshakinskiy, R. Sett, M. ˇZemliˇ cka, A. N. Poddubny, and J. M. Fink, Tunable directional photon scattering from a pair of supercon- ducting qubits, Nature Communications14, 2998 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Physical Review93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  21. [21]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: an essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Phys. Rep.93, 301 (1982)

    work page 1982

  22. [22]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Arcari, I

    M. Arcari, I. S¨ ollner, A. Javadi, S. L. Hansen, S. Mah- moodian, J. Liu, H. Thyrrestrup, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Near-unity coupling efficiency of a quantum emitter to a photonic crystal waveguide, Physical Review Letters113, 093603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    J.-H. Kim, S. Aghaeimeibodi, C. J. K. Richardson, R. P. Leavitt, and E. Waks, Super-radiant emission from quan- tum dots in a nanophotonic waveguide, Nano Letters18, 4734 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    J. Q. Grim, A. S. Bracker, M. Zalalutdinov, S. G. Carter, A. C. Kozen, M. Kim, C. S. Kim, J. T. Mlack, M. Yakes, B. Lee, and D. Gammon, Scalable in operando strain tun- ing in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three-quantum- dot superradiance, Nature Materials18, 963 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    X.-L. Chu, C. Papon, N. Bart, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, L. Midolo, N. Rotenberg, and P. Lodahl, Independent electrical control of two quantum dots coupled through a photonic-crystal waveguide, Physical Review Letters 131, 033606 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Hallacy, D

    L. Hallacy, D. Hallett, A. Fenzl, N. J. Martin, R. Dost, A. Verma, J. Fletcher, I. Farrer, L. Antwis, M. S. Skol- nick, and L. R. Wilson, Chiral quantum optics with scal- able quantum dot dimers, arXiv:2511.07640 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Tiranov, V

    A. Tiranov, V. Angelopoulou, C. J. van Diepen, B. Schrinski, O. A. D. Sandberg, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and P. Lodahl, Col- lective super- and subradiant dynamics between distant optical quantum emitters, Science379, 389 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    D. M. Lukin, M. A. Guidry, J. Yang, M. Ghezellou, S. D. Mishra, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, J. Ul-Hassan, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Two-emitter multimode cavity quantum electrodynamics in thin-film silicon carbide photonics, Physical Review X13, 011005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Papon, Y

    C. Papon, Y. Wang, R. Uppu, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, P. Lodahl, and L. Midolo, Independent op- eration of two waveguide-integrated quantum emitters, Physical Review Applied19, L061003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    D. E. Chang, L. Jiang, A. V. Gorshkov, and H. J. Kimble, Cavity QED with atomic mirrors, New Journal of Physics 14, 063003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Z. X. Koong, M. Cygorek, E. Scerri, T. S. Santana, S. I. Park, J. D. Song, E. M. Gauger, and B. D. Ger- ardot, Coherence in cooperative photon emission from indistinguishable quantum emitters, Science Advances8, eabm8171 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Javadi, S

    A. Javadi, S. Mahmoodian, I. S¨ ollner, and P. Lodahl, Numerical modeling of the coupling efficiency of single quantum emitters in photonic-crystal waveguides, Jour- nal of the Optical Society of America B35, 514 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    X.-L. Chu, V. Angelopoulou, P. Lodahl, and N. Roten- berg, Subradiant states for two imperfect quantum emit- ters coupled by a nanophotonic waveguide, Physical Re- view A106, 053702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Photon anti- bunching in resonance fluorescence, Physical Review Let- ters39, 691 (1977)

    work page 1977

  36. [36]

    Hallett, J

    D. Hallett, J. Wiercinski, L. Hallacy, S. Sheldon, R. Dost, N. Martin, A. Fenzl, I. Farrer, A. Verma, M. Cygorek, E. M. Gauger, M. S. Skolnick, and L. R. Wilson, Con- trolling coherence between waveguide-coupled quantum dots, Physical Review Applied25, L021003 (2026)

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    Cygorek, E

    M. Cygorek, E. D. Scerri, T. S. Santana, Z. X. Koong, B. D. Gerardot, and E. M. Gauger, Signatures of coop- erative emission in photon coincidence: Superradiance 10 versus measurement-induced cooperativity, Physical Re- view A107, 023718 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    C. J. van Diepen, V. Angelopoulou, O. A. D. Sand- berg, A. Tiranov, Y. Wang, S. Scholz, A. Ludwig, A. Søndberg Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Resonant energy transfer and collectively driven emitters in waveguide QED, Physical Review Research7, 033169 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    H. L. Jeannic, A. Tiranov, J. Carolan, T. Ramos, Y. Wang, M. H. Appel, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, N. Rotenberg, L. Midolo, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Dynamical photon–photon interaction mediated by a quantum emitter, Nature Physics18, 1191 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    N. Tomm, N. O. Antoniadis, M. Janovitch, M. Brunelli, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, P. P. Potts, A. Javadi, and R. J. Warburton, Realization of a coherent and efficient one-dimensional atom, Physical Review Letters133, 083602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    S. Liu, O. A. D. Sandberg, M. L. Chan, B. Schrinski, Y. Anyfantaki, R. B. Nielsen, R. G. Larsen, A. Skalkin, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, A. Tiranov, and P. Lodahl, Violation of bell inequality by photon scattering on a two-level emit- ter, Nature Physics20, 1429–1433 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Schwartz, D

    I. Schwartz, D. Cogan, E. R. Schmidgall, Y. Don, L. Gantz, O. Kenneth, N. H. Lindner, and D. Gershoni, Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons, Science354, 434 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Y. Meng, M. L. Chan, R. B. Nielsen, M. H. Appel, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, N. Bart, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, L. Midolo, A. Tiranov, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Determinis- tic photon source of genuine three-qubit entanglement, Nature Communications15, 7774 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Paulisch, M

    V. Paulisch, M. Perarnau-Llobet, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum metrology with one- dimensional superradiant photonic states, Physical Re- view A99, 043807 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Maffei, D

    M. Maffei, D. Pomarico, P. Facchi, G. Magnifico, S. Pas- cazio, and F. V. Pepe, Directional emission and photon bunching from a qubit pair in waveguide, Physical Re- view Research6, L032017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Cardenas-Lopez, S

    S. Cardenas-Lopez, S. J. Masson, Z. Zager, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Many-body superradiance and dynam- ical mirror symmetry breaking in waveguide QED, Phys- ical Review Letters131, 033605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Qvotrup, Y

    C. Qvotrup, Y. Wang, M. Albrechtsen, R. A. Thomas, Z. Liu, S. Scholz, A. Ludwig, and L. Midolo, Integra- tion of a gaas-based nanomechanical phase shifter with quantum-dot single-photon sources, Physical Review Ap- plied24, 054016 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Kannan, A

    B. Kannan, A. Almanakly, Y. Sung, A. D. Paolo, D. A. Rower, J. Braum¨ uller, A. Melville, B. M. Niedziel- ski, A. Karamlou, K. Serniak, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, R. Winik, J. I. Wang, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, On-demand directional microwave photon emission using waveguide quantum electrodynamic...

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    T. C. Ralph, I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, A. G. White, and P. Lodahl, Photon sorting, efficient bell measure- ments, and a deterministic controlled-zgate using a pas- sive two-level nonlinearity, Physical Review Letters114, 173603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    F. Yang, M. M. Lund, T. Pohl, P. Lodahl, and K. Mølmer, Deterministic photon sorting in waveg- uide qed systems, Physical Review Letters128, 213603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Mahmoodian, P

    S. Mahmoodian, P. Lodahl, and A. S. Sørensen, Quantum networks with chiral-light–matter interaction in waveg- uides, Physical Review Letters117, 240501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    R. J. Warburton, Single spins in self-assembled quantum dots, Nature Materials12, 483 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    M. H. Appel, A. Tiranov, S. Pabst, M. L. Chan, C. Starup, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, K. Tiurev, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Entangling a hole spin with a time-bin photon: A waveg- uide approach for quantum dot sources of multipho- ton entanglement, Physical Review Letters128, 233602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Gullans, T

    M. Gullans, T. G. Tiecke, D. E. Chang, J. Feist, J. D. Thompson, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoplasmonic lattices for ultracold atoms, Physical Re- view Letters109, 235309 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Dzsotjan, A

    D. Dzsotjan, A. S. Sørensen, and M. Fleischhauer, Quan- tum emitters coupled to surface plasmons of a nanowire: A green’s function approach, Physical Review B82, 075427 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    S. E. Economou, N. Lindner, and T. Rudolph, Optically generated 2-dimensional photonic cluster state from cou- pled quantum dots, Physical Review Letters105, 093601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    O’Sullivan, K

    J. O’Sullivan, K. Reuer, A. Grigorev, X. Dai, A. Hern´ andez-Ant´ on, M. H. Mu˜ noz-Arias, C. Hellings, A. Flasby, D. C. Zanuz, J. C. Besse, A. Blais, D. Malz, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Deterministic generation of two-dimensional multi-photon cluster states, Nature Communications16, 5505 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Nogrette, H

    F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. B´ eguin, A. Vernier, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Single-atom trapping in holographic 2d arrays of micro- traps with arbitrary geometries, Physical Review X4, 021034 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Scalable Quantum Interference from Indistinguishable Quantum Dots

    S. Shaji, S. Goel, J. Wiercinski, F. B. Barnes, M. Cy- gorek, A. Borel, N. H. Valencia, E. M. Gauger, M. Ma- lik, and B. D. Gerardot, Scalable quantum interference from indistinguishable quantum dots, arXiv:2603.25684 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    C. N. Allen, J. J. Dubowski, P. G. Piva, and S. Fafard, Quantum dot intermixing with thermal and laser anneal- ing, Proc. SPIE 4087, Applications of Photonic Technol- ogy 4 (2000)

    work page 2000

  61. [61]

    Kersting, H

    E. Kersting, H. G. Babin, N. Spitzer, J. Y. Yan, F. Liu, A. D. Wieck, and A. Ludwig, Shutter-synchronized molecular beam epitaxy for wafer-scale homogeneous gaas and telecom wavelength quantum emitter growth, Nanomaterials15, 157 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    M. C. L¨ obl, I. S¨ ollner, A. Javadi, T. Pregnolato, R. Schott, L. Midolo, A. V. Kuhlmann, S. Stobbe, A. D. Wieck, P. Lodahl, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, Narrow optical linewidths and spin pumping on charge- tunable close-to-surface self-assembled quantum dots in an ultrathin diode, Physical Review B96, 165440 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    A. J. Bennett, R. B. Patel, J. Skiba-Szymanska, C. A. Nicoll, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Giant stark effect in the emission of single semiconductor quan- tum dots, Applied Physics Letters97, 031104 (2010). 11

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    L. N. McCabe and J. M. O. Zide, Techniques for epitaxial site-selective growth of quantum dots, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A39, 010802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    I. S. Han, Y. R. Wang, and M. Hopkinson, Ordered gaas quantum dots by droplet epitaxy using in situ di- rect laser interference patterning, Applied Physics Let- ters118, 142101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    K. D. J¨ ons, P. Atkinson, M. M¨ uller, M. Heldmaier, S. M. Ulrich, O. G. Schmidt, and P. Michler, Triggered in- distinguishable single photons with narrow line widths from site-controlled quantum dots, Nano Letters13, 126 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    Badolato, K

    A. Badolato, K. Hennessy, M. Atat¨ ure, J. Dreiser, E. Hu, P. M. Petroff, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Deterministic coupling of single quantum dots to single nanocavity modes, Sci- ence308, 1158 (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Pregnolato, X.-L

    T. Pregnolato, X.-L. Chu, T. Schr¨ oder, R. Schott, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, P. Lodahl, and N. Rotenberg, Deter- ministic positioning of nanophotonic waveguides around single self-assembled quantum dots, APL Photonics5, 086101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    R. B. Patel, A. J. Bennett, I. Farrer, C. A. Nicoll, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots, Nature Photonics4, 632 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    L. Zhai, G. N. Nguyen, C. Spinnler, J. Ritzmann, M. C. L¨ obl, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. Javadi, and R. J. War- burton, Quantum interference of identical photons from remote gaas quantum dots, Nature Nanotechnology17, 829 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Re- views of Modern Physics85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics - photon by photon, Nature Photonics 8, 685 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    Noh and D

    C. Noh and D. G. Angelakis, Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    R. Uppu, F. T. Pedersen, Y. Wang, C. T. Olesen, C. Pa- pon, X. Zhou, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, and P. Lodahl, Scalable integrated single-photon source, Science Advances6, eabc8268 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Thyrrestrup, G

    H. Thyrrestrup, G. Kirˇ sanske, H. L. Jeannic, T. Preg- nolato, L. Zhai, L. Raahauge, L. Midolo, N. Rotenberg, A. Javadi, R. Schott, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, M. C. L¨ obl, I. S¨ ollner, R. J. Warburton, and P. Lodahl, Quan- tum optics with near-lifetime-limited quantum-dot tran- sitions in a nanophotonic waveguide, Nano Letters18, 1801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Moreno, J

    I. Moreno, J. A. Davis, T. M. Hernandez, D. M. Cottrell, and D. Sand, Complete polarization control of light from a liquid crystal spatial light modulator, Optics Express 20, 364 (2012). 12 Appendix A: Device, setup, and quantum dot locations

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    5(a), consists of a photonic crystal waveguide with both ends connected to grating couplers via nanobeams

    Device fabrication The device, see Fig. 5(a), consists of a photonic crystal waveguide with both ends connected to grating couplers via nanobeams. The two grating couplers couple out light with opposite polarizations facilitating separation in collection afterwards. A shallow trench is etched into the middle of the photonic crystal waveguide to enable ind...

    work page

  78. [78]

    On top of the cryostat is an optical breadboard on which the spatial light modulator is mounted

    Optical setup The device is placed on a printed-circuit board which is screwed onto a piezo stack and cooled down in a closed- cycle 4K cryostat with a confocal microscope configuration. On top of the cryostat is an optical breadboard on which the spatial light modulator is mounted. The breadboard furthermore holds linear polarizers, computer-controlled s...

    work page

  79. [79]

    The beam spots were independently optimized 13 for excitation from free space on top of the waveguide in a resonant fluorescence scheme

    Emitter locations The positions of the QDs are extracted from a combination of three images: an image of the device, and two images each with an optimized beam spot location for one of the two QDs. The beam spots were independently optimized 13 for excitation from free space on top of the waveguide in a resonant fluorescence scheme. A combination of the t...

    work page

  80. [80]

    The spectra show that the photonic crystal band edge is around 317.4 THz

    T ransmission spectrum Figure 6(a) shows two waveguide transmission spectra using a weak continuous wave laser. The spectra show that the photonic crystal band edge is around 317.4 THz. The two spectra are taken with either one half or the other half of the waveguide at a voltage such that QDs can be resolved based on their radiative recombination. QDs in...

    work page

Showing first 80 references.