pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08231 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: unknown

Exploring the conventional and anomalous Josephson effects at arbitrary disorder strength in systems with spin-dependent fields

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Josephson currentarbitrary disorderspin-orbit couplinganomalous Josephson effectaltermagnetismEilenberger equationSNS junction0-pi transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

A compact expression for the Josephson current in SNS junctions holds for arbitrary disorder when spin-dependent fields are present.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a single formula for the supercurrent through a normal-metal link between two superconductors that incorporates spin-orbit coupling, Zeeman fields, or altermagnetism without restricting the amount of disorder. The derivation starts from the linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation and produces an expression that can be evaluated for any scattering strength between the ballistic and diffusive extremes. The authors then apply the formula to three concrete cases: the magnetic-field dependence of the critical current with Rashba versus Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, the persistence of the anomalous phi-zero shift under disorder, and the rounding of the zero-pi transition in altermagnetic junctions. A reader who works with real high-mobility samples would care because those samples routinely sit in the intermediate-disorder regime where standard ballistic or diffusive limits fail to give quantitative predictions.

Core claim

Using the linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation we obtain a compact expression for the Josephson current that remains valid at arbitrary disorder strength in the presence of generic spin-dependent fields. The same expression is evaluated for an applied magnetic field together with Rashba or Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, for the anomalous phi-zero effect under Rashba coupling, and for the 0-pi transition in junctions containing an altermagnet.

What carries the argument

The linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation, which yields a closed-form supercurrent once the Green's functions are integrated along trajectories at any disorder level.

If this is right

  • The magnetic-field dependence of the critical current can be used to extract the relative strength of Rashba versus Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling in a given junction.
  • The anomalous Josephson shift survives moderate disorder and can even grow with increasing scattering in sufficiently long junctions.
  • Disorder rounds and ultimately suppresses the sharp 0-pi transition that would otherwise appear in clean altermagnetic junctions.
  • The same compact expression supplies quantitative predictions for high-mobility samples that contain residual disorder and therefore fall outside the usual limiting cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trajectory-integration technique could be reused to compute differential conductance or noise in the same class of junctions.
  • Disorder might be deliberately introduced in device design to stabilize or amplify the anomalous phase shift for superconducting electronics.
  • The approach provides a practical bridge between microscopic calculations and mesoscopic experiments on hybrid structures that contain both spin-orbit and magnetic order.

Load-bearing premise

The linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation remains accurate enough to give the Josephson current when disorder is neither weak nor strong and spin-dependent fields are also present.

What would settle it

Measure the critical current versus magnetic field in an SNS wire whose mean free path is known to lie between the ballistic and diffusive limits; the data should match the new formula but deviate systematically from both the pure-ballistic and pure-diffusive limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08231 by F. Sebasti\'an Bergeret, Maryam Darvishi, Stefan Ili\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of an SNS junction with spin-dependent fields. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Josephson critical current as a function of junction length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized critical current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a–c) Anomalous phase shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Slope of the anomalous phase shift at low Zeeman fields, ∂ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Josephson critical current in an altermagnet junction as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Bulk anomalous current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Homogeneous bilayer of a normal metal with Rashba SOC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a theory of the Josephson current in superconductor-normal metal-superconductor (SNS) junctions in the presence of generic spin-dependent fields, such as spin-orbit coupling (SOC), Zeeman fields, and altermagnetism. We consider systems with arbitrary disorder strength, going beyond the usual diffusive and ballistic approximations. Using the linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation, we derive a compact expression for the Josephson current, which is then applied to various situations of experimental interest. First, we investigate the evolution of the Josephson critical current in an applied magnetic field in the presence of Rashba and Dresselhaus SOC, and discuss how this dependence can be used to probe SOC in the junction. We then study the anomalous Josephson ($\varphi_0$) effect in systems with Rashba SOC and show that it remains robust over a wide range of disorder strength, and can even be enhanced by moderate disorder in sufficiently long junctions. Finally, we investigate the Josephson current in disordered junctions with altermagnets, and show how the $0$-$\pi$ transition in such systems is suppressed by disorder. Our results may be useful for describing experimental setups with high-mobility samples, which nevertheless always contain some amount of disorder, and where neither purely ballistic nor diffusive approximations are adequate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory of the Josephson current in SNS junctions subject to generic spin-dependent fields (SOC, Zeeman, altermagnetism) at arbitrary disorder strength. It employs the linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation to obtain a compact expression for the current that interpolates between ballistic and diffusive regimes, then applies the result to the magnetic-field dependence of the critical current in the presence of Rashba and Dresselhaus SOC, the robustness of the anomalous φ₀ effect, and the disorder-induced suppression of the 0-π transition in altermagnetic junctions.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a practical, parameter-free interpolation formula for Josephson currents in moderately disordered systems that are neither purely ballistic nor diffusive; this is directly relevant to high-mobility experimental samples. The applications to SOC probing via critical-current magnetometry and to the stability of anomalous Josephson effects under disorder constitute concrete, falsifiable predictions that can guide experiments in superconducting spintronics. The derivation from the Eilenberger equation without additional fitting parameters is a clear technical strength.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive overall assessment, including the recommendation for minor revision. The referee summary accurately captures our derivation of a compact Josephson-current expression from the linearized Eilenberger equation that interpolates between ballistic and diffusive limits, together with the applications to magnetic-field dependence in the presence of Rashba/Dresselhaus SOC, robustness of the anomalous φ₀ effect, and disorder suppression of the 0-π transition in altermagnetic junctions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation from standard Eilenberger equation is self-contained

full rationale

The central step is the use of the linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation (a well-established, externally validated framework in quasiclassical superconductivity theory) to obtain a compact integral expression for the Josephson current that interpolates between ballistic and diffusive limits. No parameter is fitted to the target observable and then re-labeled as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation; the subsequent applications (magnetic-field dependence, φ₀ effect robustness, 0-π suppression in altermagnets) are direct evaluations of the derived kernel. The derivation chain therefore does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation to systems with arbitrary disorder and generic spin-dependent fields; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The linearized quasiclassical Eilenberger equation is valid for deriving the Josephson current at arbitrary disorder strength
    Invoked to obtain the compact expression for the current in the presence of spin-dependent fields.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1226 out tokens · 47531 ms · 2026-05-10T17:23:58.494000+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spin-polarized Josephson current induced by inhomogeneous altermagnetic interlayers

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An inhomogeneous altermagnetic interlayer in a Josephson junction induces a net spin-polarized Josephson current at π misorientation of Néel vectors, enhancing the critical current while suppressing 0-π transitions.

  2. Spin-polarized Josephson current induced by inhomogeneous altermagnetic interlayers

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An inhomogeneous altermagnetic interlayer in a Josephson junction produces enhanced critical current and spin-polarized supercurrent at π misorientation of Néel vectors through cancellation of pair-breaking oscillations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and the Research Council of Finland through the Finnish Quantum Flagship project 359240. S.I. is supported by the Research Council of Finland (Grant Number 355056). F. S. B. thanks financial support from the Spanish MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 through the grant PID2023-148225NB-C31, and the Eu- ropean Union’s Horizon Europe research and innova- tion pr...

  2. [2]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. Robinson, Superconducting spintron- ics, Nature Physics11, 307 (2015)

  3. [3]

    Bauer and M

    E. Bauer and M. Sigrist,Non-centrosymmetric supercon- ductors: introduction and overview, Vol. 847 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

  4. [4]

    A. I. Buzdin, Proximity effects in superconductor- ferromagnet heterostructures, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 935 (2005)

  5. [5]

    Bergeret, A

    F. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics77, 1321 (2005)

  6. [6]

    Amundsen, J

    M. Amundsen, J. Linder, J. W. Robinson, I. Žutić, and N. Banerjee, Colloquium: Spin-orbit effects in supercon- ducting hybrid structures, Reviews of Modern Physics 96, 021003 (2024)

  7. [7]

    F. S. Bergeret and I. Tokatly, Singlet-triplet conversion and the long-range proximity effect in superconductor- ferromagnet structures with generic spin-dependent fields, Physical Review Letters110, 117003 (2013)

  8. [8]

    F.BergeretandI.Tokatly,Spin-orbitcouplingasasource of long-range triplet proximity effect in superconductor- ferromagnet hybrid structures, Physical Review B89, 134517 (2014)

  9. [9]

    Bobkova, A

    I. Bobkova, A. Bobkov, and M. Silaev, Magnetoelectric effects in Josephson junctions, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter34, 353001 (2022)

  10. [10]

    D.AgterbergandR.Kaur,Magnetic-field-inducedhelical and stripe phases in Rashba superconductors, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75, 064511 (2007)

  11. [11]

    Dimitrova and M

    O. Dimitrova and M. Feigel’Man, Theory of a two- dimensional superconductor with broken inversion sym- metry, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Ma- terials Physics76, 014522 (2007)

  12. [12]

    V. M. Edelstein, Magnetoelectric effect in polar super- conductors, Physical Review Letters75, 2004 (1995)

  13. [13]

    V. M. Edelstein, Magnetoelectric effect in dirty supercon- ductors with broken mirror symmetry, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics72, 172501 (2005)

  14. [14]

    Buzdin, Direct coupling between magnetism and su- perconducting current in the Josephsonφ 0 junction, Physical Review Letters101, 107005 (2008)

    A. Buzdin, Direct coupling between magnetism and su- perconducting current in the Josephsonφ 0 junction, Physical Review Letters101, 107005 (2008)

  15. [15]

    Bergeret and I

    F. Bergeret and I. Tokatly, Theory of diffusiveφ0 Joseph- son junctions in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, Eu- 12 rophysics Letters110, 57005 (2015)

  16. [16]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The super- conducting diode effect, Nature Reviews Physics5, 558 (2023)

  17. [17]

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Physical Review B108, 054511 (2023)

  18. [18]

    Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Physical Review B108, L060508 (2023)

    M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Physical Review B108, L060508 (2023)

  19. [19]

    Beenakker and T

    C. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, Phase-shifted Andreev lev- els in an altermagnet Josephson junction, Physical Re- view B108, 075425 (2023)

  20. [20]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc Joseph- son effect in altermagnets, Physical Review Letters131, 076003 (2023)

  21. [21]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications15, 1801 (2024)

  22. [22]

    B. Lu, K. Maeda, H. Ito, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka,φ Josephson junction induced by altermagnetism, Physical Review Letters133, 226002 (2024)

  23. [23]

    H. G. Giil, B. Brekke, J. Linder, and A. Brataas, Qua- siclassical theory of superconducting spin-splitter effects and spin-filtering via altermagnets, Physical Review B 110, L140506 (2024)

  24. [24]

    Kokkeler, I

    T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets: Interplay of altermagnetism and p-wave magnetism with supercon- ductivity, SciPost Physics18, 178 (2025)

  25. [25]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Physical Review X 12, 040501 (2022)

  26. [26]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Physical Review B110, L060508 (2024)

  27. [27]

    Bergeret, A

    F. Bergeret, A. Volkov, and K. Efetov, Josephson current in superconductor-ferromagnet structures with a nonho- mogeneous magnetization, Physical Review B64, 134506 (2001)

  28. [28]

    Bergeret, A

    F. Bergeret, A. Volkov, and K. Efetov, Scattering by magnetic and spin-orbit impurities and the Josephson current in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor junctions, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75, 184510 (2007)

  29. [29]

    Kokkeler, I

    T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Nonrecipro- cal superconducting transport and the spin hall effect in gyrotropic structures, SciPost Physics16, 055 (2024)

  30. [30]

    Konschelle, I

    F. Konschelle, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the spin-galvanic effect and the anomalous phase shift φ0 in superconductors and Josephson junctions with in- trinsic spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B92, 125443 (2015)

  31. [31]

    Tokatly, Equilibrium spin currents: Non-abelian gauge invariance and color diamagnetism in condensed matter, Physical Review Letters101, 106601 (2008)

    I. Tokatly, Equilibrium spin currents: Non-abelian gauge invariance and color diamagnetism in condensed matter, Physical Review Letters101, 106601 (2008)

  32. [32]

    Gorini, P

    C. Gorini, P. Schwab, R. Raimondi, and A. L. Shelankov, Non-abelian gauge fields in the gradient expansion: Gen- eralized Boltzmann and Eilenberger equations, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 195316 (2010)

  33. [33]

    A. A. Golubov, M. Y. Kupriyanov, and E. Il’Ichev, The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions, Reviews of Modern Physics76, 411 (2004)

  34. [34]

    Belzig, F

    W. Belzig, F. K. Wilhelm, C. Bruder, G. Schön, and A. D. Zaikin, Quasiclassical Green’s function approach to mesoscopic superconductivity, Superlattices and Mi- crostructures25, 1251 (1999)

  35. [35]

    Virtanen, F

    P. Virtanen, F. Bergeret, and I. Tokatly, Nonlinearσ model for disordered systems with intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B105, 224517 (2022)

  36. [36]

    Kokkeler, F

    T. Kokkeler, F. S. Bergeret, and I. Tokatly, Univer- sal phenomenology of charge-spin interconversion and dynamics in diffusive systems with spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review Letters134, 096001 (2025)

  37. [37]

    Burkov, A

    A. Burkov, A. S. Núñez, and A. MacDonald, Theory of spin-charge-coupled transport in a two-dimensional elec- tron gas with Rashba spin-orbit interactions, Physical Review B70, 155308 (2004)

  38. [38]

    Strambini, A

    E. Strambini, A. Iorio, O. Durante, R. Citro, C. Sanz- Fernández, C. Guarcello, I. V. Tokatly, A. Braggio, M. Rocci, N. Ligato,et al., A Josephson phase battery, Nature Nanotechnology15, 656 (2020)

  39. [39]

    Fornieri, A

    A. Fornieri, A. M. Whiticar, F. Setiawan, E. Portolés, A. C. Drachmann, A. Keselman, S. Gronin, C. Thomas, T. Wang, R. Kallaher,et al., Evidence of topological su- perconductivity in planar Josephson junctions, Nature 569, 89 (2019)

  40. [40]

    Assouline, C

    A. Assouline, C. Feuillet-Palma, N. Bergeal, T. Zhang, A. Mottaghizadeh, A. Zimmers, E. Lhuillier, M. Eddrie, P. Atkinson, M. Aprili,et al., Spin-orbit induced phase- shift in bi2se3 Josephson junctions, Nature Communica- tions10, 126 (2019)

  41. [41]

    Mayer, M

    W. Mayer, M. C. Dartiailh, J. Yuan, K. S. Wickramas- inghe, E. Rossi, and J. Shabani, Gate controlled anoma- lous phase shift in al/inas Josephson junctions, Nature Communications11, 212 (2020)

  42. [42]

    M. C. Dartiailh, W. Mayer, J. Yuan, K. S. Wickra- masinghe, A. Matos-Abiague, I. Žutić, and J. Shabani, Phase signature of topological transition in Josephson junctions, Physical Review Letters126, 036802 (2021)

  43. [43]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P.E.FariaJunior, D.Kochan,et al.,Supercurrentrectifi- cation and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions, Nature Nanotechnology17, 39 (2022)

  44. [44]

    Banerjee, O

    A. Banerjee, O. Lesser, M. Rahman, H.-R. Wang, M.-R. Li, A.Kringhøj, A.Whiticar, A.Drachmann, C.Thomas, T. Wang,et al., Signatures of a topological phase transi- tion in a planar Josephson junction, Physical Review B 107, 245304 (2023)

  45. [45]

    Mandal, S

    P. Mandal, S. Mondal, M. P. Stehno, S. Ilić, F. S. Berg- eret, T. M. Klapwijk, C. Gould, and L. W. Molenkamp, Magnetically tunable supercurrent in dilute magnetic topological insulator-based Josephson junctions, Nature Physics20, 984 (2024)

  46. [46]

    Reinhardt, T

    S. Reinhardt, T. Ascherl, A. Costa, J. Berger, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, J. Fabian, D. Kochan,et al., Link between supercurrent diode and anomalous Josephson effect revealed by gate-controlled interferometry, Nature Communications15, 4413 (2024)

  47. [47]

    Yabuki, R

    N. Yabuki, R. Moriya, M. Arai, Y. Sata, S. Morikawa, S. Masubuchi, and T. Machida, Supercurrent in van der waals Josephson junction, Nature Communications7, 10616 (2016)

  48. [48]

    L. Ai, E. Zhang, J. Yang, X. Xie, Y. Yang, Z. Jia, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, Z. Li, P. Leng,et al., Van der waals ferromagnetic Josephson junctions, Nature Communica- tions12, 6580 (2021). 13

  49. [49]

    Idzuchi, F

    H. Idzuchi, F. Pientka, K.-F. Huang, K. Harada, Ö. Gül, Y.J. Shin, L. T.Nguyen, N.H. Jo, D.Shindo, R. J.Cava, et al., Unconventional supercurrent phase in ising super- conductor Josephson junction with atomically thin mag- netic insulator, Nature Communications12, 5332 (2021)

  50. [50]

    H. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, P. K. Sivakumar, C. Pasco, U. Filippozzi, S. S. Parkin, Y.-J. Zeng, T. McQueen, and M. N. Ali, The field-free Josephson diode in a van der waals heterostructure, Nature604, 653 (2022)

  51. [51]

    Hasan, K

    J. Hasan, K. N. Nesterov, S. Li, M. Houzet, J. S. Meyer, and A. Levchenko, Anomalous Josephson effect in pla- nar noncentrosymmetric superconducting devices, Phys- ical Review B106, 214518 (2022)

  52. [52]

    S. Ilić, P. Virtanen, D. Crawford, T. T. Heikkilä, and F. S. Bergeret, Superconducting diode effect in diffusive superconductors and Josephson junctions with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B110, L140501 (2024)

  53. [53]

    Konschelle, I

    F. Konschelle, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Ballis- tic Josephson junctions in the presence of generic spin- dependent fields, Physical Review B94, 014515 (2016)

  54. [54]

    Arjoranta and T

    J. Arjoranta and T. T. Heikkilä, Intrinsic spin-orbit in- teraction in diffusive normal wire Josephson weak links: supercurrent and density of states, Physical Review B 93, 024522 (2016)

  55. [55]

    B. A. Bernevig, J. Orenstein, and S.-C. Zhang, Exact SU (2) symmetry and persistent spin helix in a spin- orbitcoupledsystem,PhysicalReviewLetters97,236601 (2006)

  56. [56]

    A. V. Rodina, M. A. Semina, and E. L. Ivchenko, Elec- tron and holegfactors in semiconductors and nanostruc- tures (2025), arXiv:2511.02956 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  57. [57]

    Hasan, D

    J. Hasan, D. Shaffer, M. Khodas, and A. Levchenko, Su- perconductingdiodeefficiencyfromsinglet-tripletmixing in disordered systems, Physical Review B111, 174514 (2025)

  58. [58]

    S. Ilić, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Unified descrip- tion of spin transport, weak antilocalization, and triplet superconductivity in systems with spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B102, 235430 (2020)

  59. [59]

    R. d. l. Heras, T. Kokkeler, S. Ilić, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Interplay between superconductivity and alter- magnetism in disordered materials and heterostructures (2025), arXiv:2512.04819 [cond-mat.supr-con]

  60. [60]

    Dyakonov and V

    M. Dyakonov and V. Perel, Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors, Soviet Physics Solid State, Ussr13, 3023 (1972)