arxiv: 2604.09109 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🧮 math.OC

Recognition: unknown

Portfolio Exponential Utility Maximization with Jump Signals

Lokmane Abbas Turki (SU) , Sigui Brice Dro (SU) , Idris Kharroubi (SU)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC

keywords exponential utility maximizationBSDE with jumpsPoisson measurejump signalssemimartingale portfoliomartingale optimality principleportfolio optimization

0 comments

The pith

The solution to a BSDE with jumps gives the optimal value and strategy for exponential utility maximization when portfolios can use jump signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a method to maximize exponential utility in a market where asset prices follow Brownian motion plus jumps from a Poisson process. Investors are allowed to use strategies that depend on the jump signals, which are not predictable in the usual sense. By first writing the wealth process as a semimartingale incorporating these jumps, the martingale optimality principle leads to a backward stochastic differential equation with jumps. The solution to this BSDE determines the highest achievable utility and the corresponding optimal investment rule. The authors prove that such a BSDE has a solution and illustrate through simulations how access to jump information increases the investor's utility.

Core claim

In the setting of exponential utility maximization with a risky asset driven by Brownian motion and an independent Poisson measure, and with strategies that may depend on the Poisson jumps, the optimal value and an optimal strategy are given by the solution to a derived BSDE with jumps, whose existence is established.

What carries the argument

The original BSDE with jumps obtained via the martingale optimality principle after representing the portfolio as a semimartingale process.

If this is right

The optimal strategy is explicitly constructed from the BSDE solution.
Existence of the BSDE solution ensures the optimization problem is solvable.
Numerical experiments demonstrate a quantifiable increase in utility from using jump signals.
The approach extends classical predictable strategies to include information from the Poisson measure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the BSDE can be solved numerically in real time, trading systems could react to jumps for better performance.
This framework might apply to other utility functions by adapting the derivation.
Connections could be explored with filtering problems where jump signals provide partial information.

Load-bearing premise

That the wealth process remains a semimartingale even when investment strategies incorporate direct signals from the Poisson measure.

What would settle it

A counterexample where the derived BSDE has no solution, or where the strategy from the BSDE fails to maximize utility in a specific jump-diffusion model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09109 by Idris Kharroubi (SU), Lokmane Abbas Turki (SU), Sigui Brice Dro (SU).

read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the portfolio utility maximization in the case where the risky asset is driven by a Brownian motion and an independent homogeneous Poisson measure, with strategies that may include jump signals. This means that the allowed strategies are no longer predictable but also include the information given by a process driven by the Poisson measure. Using the results of Bank and K{\"o}rber [1], we first express the considered portfolio as semi-martingale processes. We then present the martingale optimality principle for the exponential utility maximization. This allows to derive an original BSDE with jumps and to express the optimal value and an optimal strategy using the solution to this original BSDE. We then prove existence of a solution to the considered BSDE. We finally present some numerical experiments to quantify the gain of utility given by the information from the jump signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a new BSDE with jumps for exponential utility when strategies use Poisson signals, plus existence and numerics, but the semimartingale step from Bank and Körber looks insufficiently justified for non-predictable strategies.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors derive an original BSDE with jumps for exponential utility maximization in a Brownian-plus-Poisson setting where strategies can depend on jump signals. They apply the martingale optimality principle to reach the BSDE, prove existence of a solution, and run numerical experiments that quantify the utility gain from the extra information.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies exponential utility maximization for a portfolio whose risky asset is driven by Brownian motion and an independent homogeneous Poisson random measure. Strategies are enlarged to include 'jump signals' (non-predictable processes driven by the Poisson measure). Using Bank and Körber [1], the wealth process is represented as a semimartingale; the martingale optimality principle is then applied to derive a BSDE with jumps whose solution yields the optimal value and an optimal strategy. Existence of a solution to this BSDE is proved, and numerical experiments quantify the utility gain from the jump signals.

Significance. If the semimartingale representation and BSDE existence hold in the enlarged strategy class, the work would extend classical utility maximization results to settings where agents can react to jump information in real time, providing both a theoretical characterization and quantitative evidence of the value of such signals.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: The wealth process is expressed as a semimartingale by direct appeal to Bank and Körber [1]. Reference [1] is formulated for predictable integrands with respect to the background filtration generated by W and the Poisson measure. The paper explicitly enlarges admissible strategies to processes that incorporate jump signals from the Poisson measure itself, which are no longer predictable. No separate justification, modified decomposition, or extension of the representation theorem is supplied, yet this step is load-bearing for the subsequent martingale-optimality argument and the derivation of the BSDE.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the BSDE is 'original'; a brief comparison with existing BSDEs driven by Poisson measures (e.g., those appearing in the jump-diffusion utility literature) would clarify the precise novelty.
[Numerical section] Numerical experiments are mentioned but no details on discretization, parameter values, or comparison baselines are visible in the provided sections; these should be expanded for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The major concern identifies a potential gap in justifying the semimartingale representation for the enlarged (non-predictable) strategy class. We address this directly below and commit to revisions that strengthen the manuscript without changing its core results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: The wealth process is expressed as a semimartingale by direct appeal to Bank and Körber [1]. Reference [1] is formulated for predictable integrands with respect to the background filtration generated by W and the Poisson measure. The paper explicitly enlarges admissible strategies to processes that incorporate jump signals from the Poisson measure itself, which are no longer predictable. No separate justification, modified decomposition, or extension of the representation theorem is supplied, yet this step is load-bearing for the subsequent martingale-optimality argument and the derivation of the BSDE.

Authors: We agree that the direct appeal to Bank and Körber [1] requires explicit justification when strategies are enlarged to include non-predictable jump signals. In the revised manuscript we will add a short dedicated paragraph in §2 that extends the representation. The argument proceeds by first noting that any admissible jump-signal strategy can be written as the sum of a predictable component (with respect to the background filtration) and a purely discontinuous component driven by the Poisson measure. The stochastic integral against the compensated Poisson random measure remains a local martingale under the standard integrability conditions already imposed in the paper; the finite-variation part is handled by the usual compensator. Consequently the wealth process is still a semimartingale, the martingale-optimality principle applies verbatim, and the same BSDE is obtained. We will also verify that the value function and optimal strategy characterizations are unaffected. This addition directly addresses the load-bearing character of the step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external semimartingale result and proceeds to independent BSDE construction

full rationale

The paper invokes Bank and Körber [1] (external) to represent the wealth process as a semimartingale under enlarged strategies that incorporate jump signals, then applies the martingale optimality principle to derive an original BSDE with jumps, expresses the value function and optimal strategy via its solution, and separately proves existence of a solution to that BSDE. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the cited representation is treated as an input theorem rather than derived within the paper, and the subsequent steps add new content (original BSDE form, existence proof, numerical experiments) not equivalent to the inputs. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular mathematical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard stochastic process assumptions in jump-diffusion models and prior results from the cited reference for semi-martingale representation. No free parameters or new invented entities are apparent from the abstract.

axioms (3)

domain assumption The risky asset is driven by a Brownian motion and an independent homogeneous Poisson measure.
Core model setup stated in the abstract.
domain assumption Strategies may include the information given by a process driven by the Poisson measure.
Key extension allowing non-predictable strategies with jump signals.
domain assumption Results of Bank and Körber allow expressing the portfolio as semi-martingale processes.
Invoked to represent the portfolio value process.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1410 out tokens · 76464 ms · 2026-05-10T16:44:28.679604+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Optimal Merton's Problem under Multivariate Affine Volterra Models with Jumps
math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Optimal strategies for Merton's problem are derived in semi-closed form for multivariate affine Volterra models with jumps via martingale optimality and a new Riccati BSDEJ.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Merton’s optimal investment problem with jump signals.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 13(4):1302–1325, 2022

Peter Bank and Laura Körber. Merton’s optimal investment problem with jump signals.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 13(4):1302–1325, 2022

work page 2022
[2]

How much should we care about what others know? jump signals in optimal investment under relative performance concerns.arXiv:2503.16039v2, 2025

Peter Bank and Gemma Sedrakjan. How much should we care about what others know? jump signals in optimal investment under relative performance concerns.arXiv:2503.16039v2, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

Bounded solutions to backward sdes with jumps for utility optimization and indifference hedging.Ann

Dirk Becherer. Bounded solutions to backward sdes with jumps for utility optimization and indifference hedging.Ann. Appl. Probab., 16(4):2027–2054, 2006

work page 2027
[4]

Discrete-time approximation of decoupled forward–backward sde with jumps.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 118(1):53–75, 2008

Bruno Bouchard and Romuald Elie. Discrete-time approximation of decoupled forward–backward sde with jumps.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 118(1):53–75, 2008

work page 2008
[5]

Monte-carlo valorisation of american options: facts and new algorithms to improve existing methods.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, 12

Bruno Bouchard and Xavier Warin. Monte-carlo valorisation of american options: facts and new algorithms to improve existing methods.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, 12

work page
[6]

Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization.Ann

Jaksa Cvitanic and Ioani Karatzas. Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization.Ann. Appl. Probab., 2:767–818, 1992

work page 1992
[7]

Quadratic Exponential Semimartingales and Application to BSDEs with jumps.arXiv:1603.06191v1, 2016

Nicole El Karoui, Anis Matoussi, and Armand Ngoupeyou. Quadratic Exponential Semimartingales and Application to BSDEs with jumps.arXiv:1603.06191v1, 2016

work page arXiv 2016
[8]

Representation of martingales with jumps and applications to mathematical finance

Kunita Hiroshi. Representation of martingales with jumps and applications to mathematical finance. Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics in Kyoto: In honour of Kiyosi Itô, 41:209–232, 2004

work page 2004
[9]

Utility maximization in incomplete markets.Ann

Ying Hu, Peter Imkeller, and Matthias Müller. Utility maximization in incomplete markets.Ann. Appl. Probab., 15(3):1691–1712, 2005

work page 2005
[10]

Springer, A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics, 2003

Jean Jacod and Albert Shiryaev.Limit theorems for stochastic processes, volume 288. Springer, A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics, 2003

work page 2003
[11]

Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth.The annals of probability, 28(2):558–602, 2000

Magdalena Kobylanski. Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth.The annals of probability, 28(2):558–602, 2000

work page 2000
[12]

Springer-Verlag, 2013

Delong Lukasz.Backward Stochastic Differenrtial Equations with Jumps and Their Actuarial and Financial Applications. Springer-Verlag, 2013

work page 2013
[13]

Exponential quadratic bsdes with infinite activity jumps.preprint, 2020

Anis Matoussi and Rym Salhi. Exponential quadratic bsdes with infinite activity jumps.preprint, 2020

work page 2020
[14]

Robert C. Merton. Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(4):373–413, 1971

work page 1971
[15]

Robert C. Merton. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model.The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(3):373–413, 247-257

work page
[16]

Utility maximization in a jump market model.Stochastics and Stochastics Reports, 80:1–27, 2008

Marie-Amélie Morlais. Utility maximization in a jump market model.Stochastics and Stochastics Reports, 80:1–27, 2008. 37

work page 2008
[17]

Quadratic bsdes driven by a continuous martingale and application to utility maximization problem.Finance and Stochastics, 13:121–150, 2009

Marie-Amélie Morlais. Quadratic bsdes driven by a continuous martingale and application to utility maximization problem.Finance and Stochastics, 13:121–150, 2009

work page 2009
[18]

Quadratic BSDEs with jumps: a fixed-point approach

Dylan Possamai, Nabil Kazi-Tani, and Chao Zhou. Quadratic BSDEs with jumps: a fixed-point approach. Electron. J. Probab., 20:1–28, 2015

work page 2015
[19]

Backward stochastic differential equations with jumps and related non-linear expectations

Manuella Royer. Backward stochastic differential equations with jumps and related non-linear expectations. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 116(10):1358–1376, 2006. 38

work page 2006