arxiv: 2604.10942 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Probing Active Galactic Nuclei and Measuring the Hubble constant with Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

Jian-Dong Liu , Wen-Biao Han , Hiromichi Tagawa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

keywords extreme-mass-ratio inspiralsaccretion disksactive galactic nucleiHubble constantgravitational wavesdark sirensBayesian inferencealpha-disk model

0 comments

The pith

EMRI gravitational waveforms can detect surrounding accretion disks and improve Hubble constant precision by up to 20%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how interactions between extreme-mass-ratio inspirals and accretion disks around supermassive black holes alter their gravitational wave signals. It demonstrates through Bayesian analysis that these environmental effects are detectable in the data for all simulated cases under the standard alpha-disk model. Detecting the disk allows the analysis to constrain disk parameters, which reduces uncertainties in using these systems as dark sirens for cosmology. As a result, the precision on the Hubble constant from a single event improves by as much as 20 percent. The work argues that future gravitational wave observations must account for such environments to avoid biases and to extract more information about active galactic nuclei.

Core claim

Under the α-disk model, modifications to the orbital evolution of the secondary object due to the accretion disk produce distinguishable changes in the emitted gravitational waveform. Bayesian inference on simulated EMRI signals shows that all injected events successfully identify the presence of the disk environment. After correctly identifying the environment and constraining the disk parameters, the precision of Hubble constant measurements using the dark siren method improves by up to 20% for a single event.

What carries the argument

Bayesian inference on waveform modifications from orbital changes induced by the α-disk model (standard thin accretion disk) in the EMRI secondary.

If this is right

All simulated EMRI events can identify the presence of an accretion disk environment.
Constraining disk parameters allows deeper insight into the physical properties and luminosity of the accretion disk.
Hubble constant measurements via the dark siren method gain up to 20% better precision per event once the environment is accounted for.
Future EMRI data analysis requires inclusion of environmental effects to prevent systematic biases.
Reliable identification of the host environment supports better cosmological inferences overall.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If accretion disks are common around EMRIs, failing to model them could systematically bias population-level cosmological constraints from gravitational wave data.
This identification technique could enable statistical studies of AGN disk properties across many detected EMRIs without needing electromagnetic counterparts.
Tighter single-event Hubble measurements may combine with other gravitational wave standard sirens to reduce overall uncertainty on the expansion history.

Load-bearing premise

The alpha-disk model accurately captures the main interactions between the secondary object and the accretion disk, making the orbital and waveform changes distinguishable from noise and other effects.

What would settle it

In simulations that include realistic detector noise, a substantial fraction of events with disk effects fail to be distinguished from no-disk cases, or including disk parameters produces no improvement in Hubble constant precision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10942 by Hiromichi Tagawa, Jian-Dong Liu, Wen-Biao Han.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Time-domain comparison of EMRI waveforms with environmental corrections and in the vacuum case. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: The figure shows the logarithmic Bayes factor, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: The figure presents the logarithmic Bayes factor, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Joint and marginalized posterior distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Posterior distributions of the Hubble constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Corner plots showing the posterior probability distributions of the recovered parameters obtained with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: Corner plots showing the posterior probability distributions of the recovered parameters obtained with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) carry valuable information about their surrounding astrophysical environments. Over the course of their long-term evolution, interactions between the secondary object and the accretion disk can produce observable effects on both the orbital evolution and the emitted gravitational waveform. Based on the modifications to the companion's orbital evolution induced by the accretion disk environment, we investigate the feasibility of identifying the presence of accretion disk environmental effects in EMRI systems using gravitational wave signals. Within a Bayesian framework, we analyze the capability of EMRI systems with multiple parameter configurations to distinguish accretion disk environmental effects. Our results show that, under the $\alpha$-disk model, all injected events can successfully identify the environment in which the EMRIs reside. Furthermore, we examined the improvement in the precision of Hubble constant measurements using the dark siren method after correctly identifying the accretion disk environment and constraining the relevant disk parameters. Constraining these environmental parameters may further deepen our understanding of the host environment, thereby enabling a more reliable inference of the physical properties of the accretion disk and its associated luminosity and ultimately improving the measurement of cosmological parameters. We find that the measurement precision for a single event can improve by as much as $20\%$. This work highlights the necessity of incorporating environmental effects into future EMRI data analysis. Proper modeling of such effects not only helps identify EMRI systems embedded in accretion disk environments but also further improves the precision of gravitational wave cosmological parameter inference.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows that alpha-disk effects let every simulated EMRI be identified as disk-embedded and tighten single-event H0 by up to 20%, but only when injection and recovery use the exact same model.

read the letter

The punchline is that under the alpha-disk model the authors can identify the environment in every simulated EMRI and get up to 20% better single-event precision on H0 once the disk parameters are included. What the paper does is apply standard Bayesian model selection to EMRIs whose waveforms include disk-induced orbital changes, then use the recovered parameters in a dark-siren H0 analysis. They show that fitting the extra parameters does not degrade the cosmological inference and can even sharpen it. That is a useful concrete result for people planning LISA data analysis. The main soft spot is the matched injection-recovery setup. Because the signals are generated and recovered with the identical alpha-disk prescription, the high identification rate and the precision gain are expected by construction. The paper does not test whether a different disk model or additional physics could produce similar effects that would be misidentified or would bias the H0 posterior. The abstract also gives no numbers on waveform accuracy, noise curves, or prior ranges, which makes it hard to judge how sensitive the 20% claim is to those choices. This work is for researchers already thinking about environmental effects in EMRIs and about using them for cosmology. A reader who wants to see how disk parameters affect dark-siren measurements will get a clear example, even if they will want follow-up checks on model robustness. It is worth sending to peer review. The calculation is honest and the claim is specific enough that referees can ask for the missing cross-checks.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, under the α-disk model, Bayesian recovery of simulated EMRI gravitational-wave signals allows all injected events to successfully identify the presence of an accretion disk environment, and that constraining the associated disk parameters improves the precision of Hubble constant measurements (via the dark siren method) by as much as 20%.

Significance. If robust, the result would be useful for LISA-era EMRI analyses by showing that environmental effects can be extracted from waveforms and can tighten cosmological inferences. The explicit quantification of the H0 precision gain is a concrete strength of the work.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Bayesian analysis framework): the claim that 'all injected events can successfully identify the environment' is demonstrated only via matched α-disk injection and recovery. No cross-model injections (e.g., β-disk or other prescriptions) or explicit marginalization over disk-model uncertainty are reported, so it remains untested whether the induced orbital decay and phase shifts are unique to the α-disk or could be mimicked by other physics or parameter degeneracies (spin, eccentricity, mass ratio).
[Abstract and results on H0] Abstract and results on H0: the reported 'as much as 20%' improvement in Hubble constant precision is obtained after the disk parameters have been constrained under the same α-disk model used for injection. Without a model-mismatch study, it is unclear whether this gain survives when the true environment differs from the recovery model.

minor comments (1)

Notation for disk parameters (e.g., α, surface density) should be defined explicitly at first use and kept consistent with standard references in the field.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, noting that all claims in the paper are explicitly qualified as applying under the α-disk model for both injection and recovery.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Bayesian analysis framework): the claim that 'all injected events can successfully identify the environment' is demonstrated only via matched α-disk injection and recovery. No cross-model injections (e.g., β-disk or other prescriptions) or explicit marginalization over disk-model uncertainty are reported, so it remains untested whether the induced orbital decay and phase shifts are unique to the α-disk or could be mimicked by other physics or parameter degeneracies (spin, eccentricity, mass ratio).

Authors: The abstract and Section 4 explicitly state that results hold 'under the α-disk model.' Successful identification is shown when the recovery model matches the injected α-disk environment, distinguishing it from the vacuum case. Cross-model injections and marginalization over alternative disk prescriptions were not performed, as the work focuses on demonstrating feasibility for this standard model. Other parameters (spin, eccentricity, mass ratio) are included in the Bayesian analysis and marginalized over; the posteriors indicate the disk effects remain detectable. No revision is needed, as the claims accurately reflect the study's scope. revision: no
Referee: [Abstract and results on H0] Abstract and results on H0: the reported 'as much as 20%' improvement in Hubble constant precision is obtained after the disk parameters have been constrained under the same α-disk model used for injection. Without a model-mismatch study, it is unclear whether this gain survives when the true environment differs from the recovery model.

Authors: The 20% figure is reported specifically for the matched α-disk case, where disk parameters are constrained and the environment is correctly identified. The manuscript does not assert that this gain persists under model mismatch; it instead illustrates the potential improvement when environmental effects are properly modeled. The abstract and discussion already qualify the results in this way and stress the importance of accurate modeling. No revision is required. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard injection-recovery simulation study

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of modeling orbital modifications under the α-disk prescription, injecting simulated EMRI signals, and performing Bayesian recovery to quantify identification rates and H0 precision gains. These outcomes are computed outputs from the controlled simulations rather than any step that reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. No uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or renamings of known results are invoked in a circular manner. The analysis is self-contained against its own simulated benchmarks, which is the expected and non-circular structure for method-validation papers in gravitational-wave astronomy.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the validity of the alpha-disk model for orbital modifications and on the assumption that Bayesian inference can cleanly separate environmental effects from other waveform features.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The α-disk model accurately represents the dominant accretion-disk interactions that modify EMRI orbital evolution and waveforms.
Invoked as the basis for all injected signals and subsequent identification tests.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1195 out tokens · 37662 ms · 2026-05-10T15:54:01.665469+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Gravitational waves of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in a rotating black hole with Dehnen dark matter halo
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

EMRI waveforms in a rotating black hole with Dehnen DM halo show amplitude and phase shifts from Kerr, with mismatch rising as DM mass parameter and black hole spin increase.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Log-uniform

Dark Sirens Statistical Framework The key to inferring cosmological parameters using the dark-siren method is to statistically associate the three-dimensional localization volume measured from GW events with galaxy catalogs obtained by electromagnetic surveys. In this work, we adopt the hierarchical Bayesian inference frameworks proposed by [37] and [38]....

2018
[2]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. Gesa Bote, D. Giardini, F. Gibert, C. Grimani, H. Hal- loin, G. Heinzel, T. Her...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[3]

Hu and Y.-L

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, National Science Review4, 685 (2017)

2017
[4]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, C.-G. Shao, V. T. Toth, H.-B. Tu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H.-C. Yeh, M.-S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, V. Zharov, and Z.-B. Zhou, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[5]

J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Living Reviews in Relativity16, 7 (2013), arXiv:1212.5575 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[6]

Testing Gravity with Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals,

A. Cárdenas-Avendaño and C. F. Sopuerta, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.08085 (2024), arXiv:2401.08085 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Berry, S

C. Berry, S. Hughes, C. Sopuerta, A. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. Mihaylov, C. Miller, and A. Sesana, BAAS51, 42 (2019), arXiv:1903.03686 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Laghi, N

D. Laghi, N. Tamanini, W. Del Pozzo, A. Sesana, J. Gair, S. Babak, and D. Izquierdo-Villalba, MNRAS508, 4512 (2021), arXiv:2102.01708 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

Sigurdsson and M

S. Sigurdsson and M. J. Rees, MNRAS284, 318 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9608093 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 1997
[10]

Mancieri, L

D. Mancieri, L. Broggi, M. Bonetti, and A. Sesana, A&A 694, A272 (2025), arXiv:2409.09122 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[11]

M. C. Miller, M. Freitag, D. P. Hamilton, and V. M. Lauburg, ApJ631, L117 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507133 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2005
[12]

Pan and H

Z. Pan and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D103, 103018 (2021), arXiv:2101.09146 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[13]

Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D104, 063007 (2021), arXiv:2104.01208 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

Kejriwal, V

S. Kejriwal, V. Witzany, M. Zajaček, D. R. Pasham, and A. J. K. Chua, MNRAS532, 2143 (2024), arXiv:2404.00941 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Z. Lyu, Z. Pan, J. Mao, N. Jiang, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D113, 043002 (2026), arXiv:2501.03252 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2026
[16]

Kocsis, N

B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D84, 024032 (2011), arXiv:1104.2322 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2011
[17]

Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?

E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[18]

Derdzinski, D

A. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, MNRAS501, 3540 (2021), arXiv:2005.11333 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Chatterjee, S

S. Chatterjee, S. Mondal, and P. Basu, MNRAS526, 5612 (2023), arXiv:2307.12144 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

G.-L. Li, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy65, 100412 (2022), arXiv:2112.14041 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Zhang, G

C. Zhang, G. Fu, and N. Dai, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024, 088 (2024), arXiv:2401.04467 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Bronicki, A

D. Bronicki, A. Cárdenas-Avendaño, and L. C. Stein, Classical and Quantum Gravity40, 215015 (2023), arXiv:2203.08841 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

Barausse and L

E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D77, 104027 (2008), arXiv:0711.4558 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[24]

Hossein Nouri and A

F. Hossein Nouri and A. Janiuk, A&A687, A184 (2024), arXiv:2309.06028 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Speri, A

L. Speri, A. Antonelli, L. Sberna, S. Babak, E. Barausse, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Physical Review X13, 021035 (2023), arXiv:2207.10086 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Dyson, T

C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Tak´ atsy, L

J. Takátsy, L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, G. Fabj, and J. Samsing, Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 215006 (2025), arXiv:2505.09513 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Duque, S

F. Duque, S. Kejriwal, L. Sberna, L. Speri, and J. Gair, Phys. Rev. D111, 084006 (2025), arXiv:2411.03436 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

M. I. B. Rivera and R. C. Reyes, New A112, 102263 (2024), arXiv:2406.15971 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Frank, A

J. Frank, A. King, and D. Raine,Accretion Power in Astrophysics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

2002
[31]

Global Radiation Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of sub-Eddington Accretion Disks around Supermassive Black Holes,

Y.-F. Jiang, O. Blaes, J. M. Stone, and S. W. Davis, ApJ 885, 144 (2019), arXiv:1904.01674 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[32]

P. Basu, S. Chatterjee, and S. Mondal, MNRAS531, 1506 (2024)

2024
[33]

S. Ida, T. Muto, S. Matsumura, and R. Brasser, MNRAS 494, 5666 (2020), arXiv:2004.07481 [astro-ph.EP]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D104, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2104.04582 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[35]

Karnesis, M

N. Karnesis, M. L. Katz, N. Korsakova, J. R. Gair, and N. Stergioulas, MNRAS526, 4814 (2023), arXiv:2303.02164 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

J. A. Frieman, M. S. Turner, and D. Huterer, ARA&A 46, 385 (2008), arXiv:0803.0982 [astro-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[37]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash- down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J.-F. Cardoso, J. Ca...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[38]

H.-Y. Chen, M. Fishbach, and D. E. Holz, Nature562, 545 (2018), arXiv:1712.06531 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[39]

Finke, S

A. Finke, S. Foffa, F. Iacovelli, M. Maggiore, and M. Man- carella, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021, 026 (2021), arXiv:2101.12660 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

Y. Ueda, M. Akiyama, G. Hasinger, T. Miyaji, and M. G. Watson, ApJ786, 104 (2014), arXiv:1402.1836 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[41]

Liu, W.-J

H.-Y. Liu, W.-J. Liu, X.-B. Dong, H. Zhou, T. Wang, H. Lu, and W. Yuan, ApJS243, 21 (2019), arXiv:1906.05597 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2019
[42]

B. F. Schutz, Nature323, 310 (1986)

1986
[43]

Tagawa, S

H. Tagawa, S. S. Kimura, Z. Haiman, R. Perna, and I. Bartos, ApJ946, L3 (2023), arXiv:2303.02172 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

Electromagnetic Flares from Compact-Object Mergers in AGN Disks: Signatures and Predictions

H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, S. S. Kimura, H. M. Yesuf, and H. Guo, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2604.05020 (2026), arXiv:2604.05020 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[45]

Gilbert, J

O. Gilbert, J. J. Ruan, M. Eracleous, D. Haggard, and J. C. Runnoe, ApJ994, 209 (2025), arXiv:2409.10486 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Miniutti, R

G. Miniutti, R. D. Saxton, M. Giustini, K. D. Alexander, R. P. Fender, I. Heywood, I. Monageng, M. Coriat, A. K. Tzioumis, A. M. Read, C. Knigge, P. Gandhi, M. L. Pre- torius, and B. Agís-González, Nature573, 381 (2019), arXiv:1909.04693 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[47]

Arcodia, A

R. Arcodia, A. Merloni, K. Nandra, J. Buchner, M. Sal- vato, D. Pasham, R. Remillard, J. Comparat, G. Lamer, G. Ponti, A. Malyali, J. Wolf, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Bogens- berger, D. A. H. Buckley, K. Gendreau, M. Gromadzki, E. Kara, M. Krumpe, C. Markwardt, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, A. Rau, M. Schramm, and A. Schwope, Nature592, 704 (2021), arXiv:2104.13388 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[48]

Arcodia, Z

R. Arcodia, Z. Liu, A. Merloni, A. Malyali, A. Rau, J. Chakraborty, A. Goodwin, D. Buckley, J. Brink, M. Gromadzki, Z. Arzoumanian, J. Buchner, E. Kara, K. Nandra, G. Ponti, M. Salvato, G. Anderson, P. Bal- dini, I. Grotova, M. Krumpe, C. Maitra, J. C. A. Miller- Jones, and M. E. Ramos-Ceja, A&A684, A64 (2024), arXiv:2401.17275 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Chakraborty, E

J. Chakraborty, E. Kara, R. Arcodia, J. Buchner, M. Giustini, L. Hernández-García, I. Linial, M. Mas- terson, G. Miniutti, A. Mummery, C. Panagiotou, E. Quintin, and P. Sánchez-Sáez, ApJ983, L39 (2025), arXiv:2503.19013 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Hernández-García, J

L. Hernández-García, J. Chakraborty, P. Sánchez-Sáez, C. Ricci, J. Cuadra, B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, P. Aré- valo, A. Rau, R. Arcodia, E. Kara, Z. Liu, A. Merloni, G. Bruni, A. Goodwin, Z. Arzoumanian, R. J. Assef, P. Baldini, A. Bayo, F. E. Bauer, S. Bernal, M. Bright- man, G. Calistro Rivera, K. Gendreau, D. Homan, M. Krumpe, P. Lira, M. L. Martínez-A...

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Nicholl, T

M. Nicholl, T. Wevers, S. R. Oates, K. D. Alexan- der, G. Leloudas, F. Onori, A. Jerkstrand, S. Gomez, S. Campana, I. Arcavi, P. Charalampopoulos, M. Gro- madzki, N. Ihanec, P. G. Jonker, A. Lawrence, I. Mandel, S. Schulze, P. Short, J. Burke, C. McCully, D. Hiramatsu, D. A. Howell, C. Pellegrino, H. Abbot, J. P. Anderson, E. Berger, P. K. Blanchard, G. C...

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

Giustini, G

M. Giustini, G. Miniutti, and R. D. Saxton, A&A636, L2 (2020), arXiv:2002.08967 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

Haiman, B

Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, and K. Menou, ApJ700, 1952 (2009), arXiv:0904.1383 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 1952
[54]

Black holes in binary systems: Observational appearances,

N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, “Black holes in binary systems: Observational appearances,” inX- and Gamma- Ray Astronomy, edited by H. Bradt and R. Giacconi (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1973) pp. 155–164. 15 FIG. 6: Corner plots showing the posterior probability distributions of the recovered parameters obtained with the disk template for both the ...

1973