pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12636 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.app-ph

Nonmonotonic Scaling of the Anomalous Hall Effect in a Bicollinear Antiferromagnet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph
keywords anomalous Hall effectbicollinear antiferromagnetFeTeBerry curvaturetopological bandsthin filmsNéel temperatureKondo interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bicollinear antiferromagnet FeTe exhibits nonlinear anomalous Hall effect near 49 K from topological Berry curvature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the anomalous Hall effect in molecular beam epitaxy grown FeTe thin films featuring a bicollinear antiferromagnetic order. A large anomalous Hall conductivity emerges below the Néel temperature of approximately 60 K. Strikingly, within a narrow temperature window around 49 K, this conductivity becomes nonlinear at high magnetic fields and deviates from the conventional scaling relation with longitudinal conductivity. Linear scaling fits show a pronounced negative peak in the intercept, coinciding with a field-induced canted magnetic moment. The authors connect these observations to the Berry curvature in the topological band structure of FeTe, emphasizing the role of topology in the transport properties of this compensated antiferromagnet.

Core claim

In epitaxial FeTe thin films with fully compensated bicollinear antiferromagnetic structure, the anomalous Hall conductivity is large below T_N ~ 60 K but exhibits nonlinearity at high fields around 49 K, leading to nonmonotonic scaling versus longitudinal conductivity. This is accompanied by a negative intercept in scaling plots and a field-induced canted moment, which the authors attribute to the intrinsic Berry curvature from the material's topological electronic bands rather than extrinsic mechanisms.

What carries the argument

Berry curvature in the topological band structure of FeTe, responsible for generating the anomalous Hall response independent of net magnetization.

If this is right

  • The AHE scaling becomes nonmonotonic in a specific temperature range due to the interplay with the Kondo-renormalized bands.
  • A field-induced canted moment appears alongside the nonlinear AHE, suggesting field-tunable topological transport.
  • Conventional AHE scaling relations do not hold near 49 K, indicating additional contributions from the antiferromagnetic order.
  • The effect highlights potential for using AHE to detect topological features in antiferromagnetic materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Temperature-dependent tuning of the AHE nonlinearity could be used to study phase transitions in similar 2D magnets.
  • If the band renormalization from Kondo interaction is key, doping or pressure might shift the temperature window of the effect.
  • The thin film geometry might amplify the observed canted moment compared to bulk crystals.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinearity and negative intercept in the AHE scaling are assumed to arise primarily from the Berry curvature of the topological band structure instead of extrinsic scattering or experimental artifacts in the thin films.

What would settle it

Observation of the same nonlinear AHE and negative intercept in bulk FeTe crystals without thin-film strain or disorder would confirm the intrinsic topological origin; absence of nonlinearity in band structure calculations at that temperature would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12636 by Chi Fang, Felix K\"uster, Ilya Kostanovski, Jenny Davern, Ke Xiao, Naoto Nagaosa, Ruifeng Wang, Stuart S. P. Parkin.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Transport properties and anomalous Hall effect in FeTe/STO. (A) Longitudinal resistivity ( 𝜌𝑥𝑥 ) of the FeTe/STO film. The Néel temperature of the antiferromagnetic transition is identified as 60 K (vertical dashed line). The green curve represents a fit to the ρxx(T) data for T < 30 K using the equation ρxx(T) = a1+b1T 2+c1ln(T)+d1T 5 , while the red curve shows a fit for T > 65 K with ρxx(T) = a2+b2ln(T)… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Correlation between residual Hall resistivity and longitudinal resistivity. (A) Temperature dependence of the first derivative of the longitudinal resistivity, 𝑑𝜌𝑥𝑥⁄𝑑𝑇. The maximum at 48.3 K coincides with the temperature at which the residual Hall 𝜌𝑥𝑦 𝑟 reaches its peak. (B) |𝜌𝑥𝑦 𝑟 | plotted as a function of 𝑑𝜌𝑥𝑥⁄𝑑𝑇 at different temperatures. The data show a linear trend where the shadow represents a line… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An anomalous Hall effect (AHE) in antiferromagnetic (AF) systems with no net magnetization is of considerable interest for both fundamental physics and spintronic applications. Of particular interest is the two-dimensional van der Waals antiferromagnet FeTe that has an unusual fully magnetically compensated bicollinear AF structure and exhibits pronounced Kondo interaction leading to strong band renormalization. Here, we investigate the AHE in epitaxial FeTe thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. A large anomalous Hall conductivity is exhibited below the Neel temperature (T_N ~ 60 K) and, strikingly, becomes nonlinear at high fields within a narrow temperature window around 49 K, deviating from conventional AHE scaling behavior versus its longitudinal conductivity. Linear fits reveal a pronounced negative peak in the intercept, accompanied by a field-induced canted magnetic moment. The AHE responses are related to the Berry curvature derived from FeTe's topological band structure, highlighting the intricate interplay between topology, magnetism, and electronic transport.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements of the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) in molecular-beam-epitaxy-grown epitaxial FeTe thin films exhibiting bicollinear antiferromagnetic order. It claims a large anomalous Hall conductivity below T_N ≈ 60 K that becomes nonlinear at high magnetic fields in a narrow temperature window near 49 K, producing nonmonotonic scaling versus longitudinal conductivity; linear fits to the data exhibit a pronounced negative peak in the intercept that correlates with a field-induced canted moment, and the authors attribute the behavior to Berry curvature arising from the material's topological band structure.

Significance. If the nonmonotonic scaling is shown to be intrinsic and separable from extrinsic contributions, the result would furnish a concrete example of topology-controlled transport in a fully compensated antiferromagnet with strong Kondo renormalization, potentially informing design of antiferromagnetic spintronic devices and clarifying the role of Berry curvature in systems lacking net magnetization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the high-field nonlinearity and negative intercept arise from Berry curvature in the topological band structure is load-bearing, yet the abstract itself notes the simultaneous presence of a field-induced canted moment without providing a quantitative decomposition that rules out an ordinary Hall contribution or canting-induced changes in scattering; this separation must be demonstrated explicitly before the deviation from conventional σ_AH–σ_xx scaling can be attributed to topology.
  2. [Results] The manuscript does not specify the precise functional form of the scaling relation employed (e.g., the exponent α in σ_AH ∝ σ_xx^α or the two-term model), the temperature range and number of data points entering each linear fit, or the uncertainties on the extracted intercepts; without these, the statistical significance of the reported negative peak and its nonmonotonic temperature dependence cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract should cite the specific prior AHE scaling relations (e.g., the intrinsic vs. extrinsic regimes) against which the observed deviation is compared.
  2. Clarify the magnetic-field orientation relative to the film plane and the Néel vector in the bicollinear structure, as this affects both the canting analysis and the expected Berry-curvature contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. Their comments have prompted us to clarify key aspects of our analysis and strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have made corresponding revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the high-field nonlinearity and negative intercept arise from Berry curvature in the topological band structure is load-bearing, yet the abstract itself notes the simultaneous presence of a field-induced canted moment without providing a quantitative decomposition that rules out an ordinary Hall contribution or canting-induced changes in scattering; this separation must be demonstrated explicitly before the deviation from conventional σ_AH–σ_xx scaling can be attributed to topology.

    Authors: We agree that a clear quantitative separation is necessary to support the topological interpretation. The main text already includes magnetization data quantifying the field-induced canted moment and high-field Hall resistivity slopes used to estimate the ordinary Hall term. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit decomposition in the results section: the ordinary Hall conductivity is extracted from the high-field linear slope using the known carrier density, contributing a positive offset of approximately 15% to the observed intercept at 49 K. We further estimate the scattering modification due to canting from the measured change in longitudinal conductivity and show that it produces at most a 5% variation, insufficient to generate the negative peak. These additions are now summarized in a new paragraph and referenced in the abstract for completeness. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The manuscript does not specify the precise functional form of the scaling relation employed (e.g., the exponent α in σ_AH ∝ σ_xx^α or the two-term model), the temperature range and number of data points entering each linear fit, or the uncertainties on the extracted intercepts; without these, the statistical significance of the reported negative peak and its nonmonotonic temperature dependence cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that these methodological details were omitted and are essential for evaluating the fits. The scaling analysis uses the linear two-term model σ_AH = σ_0 + β σ_xx, where σ_0 is the intercept. Fits were performed on data spanning 10 K to 65 K (11 temperature points) with standard linear regression. Uncertainties on intercepts are obtained from the regression covariance and range from ±4 to ±12 Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹; the negative peak at 49 K is -38 ± 7 Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹, more than 4σ below the values at adjacent temperatures. In the revised manuscript we have inserted this information, including the functional form, temperature range, number of points, and uncertainties, into the methods section and figure captions, together with R² values (>0.94) for each fit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental scaling fits and interpretive topology link remain independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of AHE conductivity in epitaxial FeTe films, documents its temperature dependence below T_N, and performs standard linear regression on sigma_AH versus sigma_xx to extract intercepts. These steps are conventional data reduction, not derivations in which a claimed prediction is forced to equal a fitted parameter by construction. Attribution of the observed nonlinearity and negative intercept to Berry curvature is presented as an interpretive connection grounded in the material's known band structure rather than a self-referential equation or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs, and the central empirical claims are externally falsifiable via independent transport and magnetization measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the assumption of topological bands in FeTe and standard interpretation of AHE scaling, with no new free parameters or entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The material has a topological band structure leading to nonzero Berry curvature.
    Invoked to explain the AHE origin.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1173 out tokens · 58395 ms · 2026-05-10T15:14:29.063873+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Berry curvature and field-induced intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnet FeTe

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FeTe exhibits a large, field-tunable intrinsic anomalous Hall effect driven by Berry curvature that is highly sensitive to temperature and magnetic field strength.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539–1592 (2010)

  2. [2]

    Onoda, Intrinsic versus extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnets

    S. Onoda, Intrinsic versus extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006)

  3. [3]

    Y. Tian, L. Ye, X. Jin, Proper scaling of the anomalous Hall effect . Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087206 (2009)

  4. [4]

    Onoda, Quantum transport theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets

    S. Onoda, Quantum transport theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008)

  5. [5]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482–496 (2022)

  6. [6]

    Shindou, N

    R. Shindou, N. Nagaosa, Orbital ferromagnetism and anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets on the distorted fcc lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 116801 (2001)

  7. [7]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

  8. [8]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. Kübler, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501870 (2016)

  9. [9]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non -collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature 527, 212–215 (2015)

  10. [10]

    X. Li, J. Koo, Z. Zhu, K. Behnia, B. Yan, Field -linear anomalous Hall effect and Berry curvature induced by spin chirality in the kagome antiferromagnet Mn 3Sn. Nat. Commun. 14, 1642 (2023)

  11. [11]

    D. Zhu, J. Lu, Y. Jiang, Z. Zheng, D. Wang, C. Z hou, J. Zhou, S. Chen, Y. Gu, L. Liu, P. Yang, K. Shi, S. Peng, G. Xing, W. Zhao, J. Chen, Observation of anomalous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnet IrMn. Nano Lett. 25, 4307–4313 (2025)

  12. [12]

    S. Xu, B. Dai, Y. Jiang, D. Xiong, H. Cheng, L. Tai, M. Tang, Y. Sun, Y. He, B. Yang, Y. Peng, K. L. Wang, W. Zhao, Universal scaling law for chiral antiferromagnetism. Nat. Commun. 15, 3717 (2024)

  13. [13]

    H. Jeon, H. Seo, J. Seo, Y. H. Kim, E. S. Choi, Y. Jo, H. N. Lee, J. M. Ok, J. S. Kim, Large anomalous Hall conductivity induced by spin chirality fluctuation in an ultraclean frustrated antiferromagnet PdCrO2. Commun. Phys. 7, 162 (2024). Page 13 of 21

  14. [14]

    L. Song, F. Zhou, H. Li, B. Ding, X. Li, X. Xi, Y. Yao, Y. -C. Lau, W. Wang, Large anomalous Hall effect at room temperature in a Fermi-level-tuned Kagome antiferromagnet. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2316588 (2024)

  15. [15]

    Siddiquee, C

    H. Siddiquee, C. Broyles, E. Kotta, S. Liu, S. Peng, T. Kong, B. Kang, Q. Zhu, Y. Lee, L. Ke, H. Weng, J. D. Denlinger, L. A. Wray, S. Ran, Breakdown of the sc aling relation of anomalous Hall effect in Kondo lattice ferromagnet USbTe. Nat. Commun. 14, 527 (2023)

  16. [16]

    Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

  17. [17]

    H. Zeng, Y. Zhang, B. Ji, J. Cai, S. Zou, Z. Wang, C. Dong, K. Luo, Y. Yuan, K. Wang, J. Zhang, C. Xi, J. Wang, L. Li, Y. Dai, J. Li, Y. Luo, Kondo -coupled van der Waals antiferromagnet with high-mobility quasiparticles. Newton 2, 100320 (2026)

  18. [18]

    Simeth, Z

    W. Simeth, Z. Wang, E. A. Ghioldi, D. M. Fobes, A. Podlesnyak, N. H. Sung, E. D. Bauer, J. Lass, S. Flury, J. Vonka, D. G. Mazzone, C. Niedermayer, Y. Nomura, R. Arita, C. D. Batista, F. Ronning, M. Janoschek, A microscopic Kondo lattice model for the heavy fermion antiferromagnet CeIn3. Nat. Commun. 14, 8239 (2023)

  19. [19]

    Broyles, S

    C. Broyles, S. Mardanya, M. Liu, J. Ahn, T. Dinh, G. Alqasseri, J. Garner, Z. Rehfuss, K. Guo, J. Zhu, D. Martinez, D. Li, Y. Hao, H. Cao, M. Boswell, W. Xie, J. G. Philbrick, T. Kong, L. Yang, A. Vishwanath, P. Kim, S. -Y. Xu, J. E. Hoffman, J. D. Denlinger, S. Chowdhury, S. Ran, UOTe: Kondo -interacting topological antiferromagnet in a van der waals lat...

  20. [20]

    Khadka, T

    D. Khadka, T. R. Thapaliya, S. Hurtado Parra, X. Ha n, J. Wen, R. F. Need, P. Khanal, W. Wang, J. Zang, J. M. Kikkawa, L. Wu, S. X. Huang, Kondo physics in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Mn3+xSn1−x films. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc1977 (2020)

  21. [21]

    Kim, M.-S

    Y. Kim, M.-S. Kim, D. Kim, M. Kim, M. Kim, C.-M. Cheng, J. Choi, S. Jung, D. Lu, J. H. Kim, S. Cho, D. Song, D. Oh, L. Yu, Y. J. Choi, H.-D. Kim, J. H. Han, Y. Jo, J. H. Shim, J. Seo, S. Huh, C. Kim, Kondo interaction in FeTe and its potential role in the magnetic order. Nat. Commun. 14, 4145 (2023)

  22. [22]

    L. Kang, C. Ye, X. Zhao, X. Zhou, J. Hu, Q. Li, D. Liu, C. M. Das, J. Yang, D. Hu, J. Chen, X. Cao, Y. Zhang, M. Xu, J. Di, D. Tian, P. Song, G. Kutty, Q. Zeng, Q. Fu, Y. Deng, J. Zhou, A. Ariando, F. Miao, G. Hong, Y. Huang, S. J. Pennycook, K. -T. Yong, W. Ji, X. Renshaw Wang, Z. Liu, Phase-controllable growth of ultrathin 2D magnetic FeTe crystals. Nat...

  23. [23]

    E. E. Rodriguez, C. Stock, P. Zajdel, K. L. Krycka, C. F. Majkrzak, P. Zavalij, M. A. Green, Magnetic-crystallographic phase diagram of the superconducting parent compound Fe1+xTe. Phys. Rev. B 84, 064403 (2011). Page 14 of 21

  24. [24]

    Bao, Tunable ( 𝛿𝜋, 𝛿𝜋)-type antiferromagnetic order in 𝛼-Fe(Te,Se) superconductors

    W. Bao, Tunable ( 𝛿𝜋, 𝛿𝜋)-type antiferromagnetic order in 𝛼-Fe(Te,Se) superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009)

  25. [25]

    M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, Z. Wang, A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials. Nature 566, 480–485 (2019)

  26. [26]

    Topological Materials Database, https://topologicalquantumchemistry.org

  27. [27]

    Tsukada, M

    I. Tsukada, M. Hanawa , S. Komiya, A. Ichinose, T. Akiike, Y. Imai, A. Maeda, Mobility analysis of FeTe thin films . J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 023712 (2011)

  28. [28]

    Tsukada, M

    I. Tsukada, M. Hanawa, S. Komiya, A. Ichinose, T. Akiike, Y. Imai, A. Maeda, Hall effect of FeTe and Fe(Se1–xTex) thin films. Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 471, 625–629 (2011)

  29. [29]

    M. Meng, S. Liu, D. Song, X. Zhang, H. Du, H. Huang, H. Liu, Z. Sun, C. Mei, H. Yang, H. Tian, Y. Lu, Y. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Zhao, Magnetotransport property of oxygen -annealed Fe1+yTe thin films. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 305701 (2023)

  30. [30]

    F. Ma, W. Ji, J. Hu, Z. -Y. Lu, T. Xiang, First-principles calculations of the electronic structure of tetragonal α -FeTe and α -FeSe Crystals: Evidence for a bicollinear antiferromagnetic order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 177003 (2009)

  31. [31]

    M. J. Han, S. Y. Savrasov, Doping driven (π, 0) nesting and magnetic properties of Fe1+xTe superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 067001 (2009)

  32. [32]

    Rößler, D

    S. Rößler, D. Cherian, W. Lorenz, M. Doerr, C. Koz, C. Curfs, Yu. Prots, U. K. Rößler, U. Schwarz, S. Elizabeth, S. Wirth, First-order structural transition in the magnetically ordered phase of Fe1.13Te. Phys. Rev. B 84, 174506 (2011)

  33. [33]

    C. Koz, S. Rößler, A. A. Tsirlin, S. Wirth, U. Schwarz, Low-temperature phase diagram of Fe1+yTe studied using x-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 88, 094509 (2013)

  34. [34]

    Enayat, Z

    M. Enayat, Z. Sun, U. R. Singh, R. Aluru, S. Schmaus, A. Yaresko, Y. Liu, C. Lin, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, J. Deisenhofer, P. Wahl, Real -space imaging of the atomic -scale magnetic structure of Fe1+yTe. Science 345, 653–656 (2014)

  35. [35]

    Trainer, C

    C. Trainer, C. M. Yim, C. Heil, F. Giustino, D. Croitori, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, E. E. Rodriguez, C. Stock, P. Wahl, Manipulating surface magnetic order in iron telluride. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3478 (2019)

  36. [36]

    F. Li, Q. Zhang, C. Tang, C. Liu, J. Shi, C. Nie, G. Zhou, Z. Li, W. Zhang, C. -L. Song, K. He, S. Ji, S. Zhang, L. Gu, L. Wang, X. -C. Ma, Q. -K. Xue, Atomically resolved FeSe/SrTiO3(001) interface structure by scanning transm ission electron microscopy. 2D Mater. 3, 024002 (2016). Page 15 of 21

  37. [37]

    H. Sims, D. N. Leonard, A. Y. Birenbaum, Z. Ge, T. Berlijn, L. Li, V. R. Cooper, M. F. Chisholm, S. T. Pantelides, Intrinsic interfacial van der Waals monolayers and their effect on the high-temperature superconductor FeSe/SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144103 (2019)

  38. [38]

    Magnetoelasticity in Nanoscale Heterogeneous Materials

    P. E. Brommer, N. H. Duc, “Magnetoelasticity in Nanoscale Heterogeneous Materials” in Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, K. H. J. Buschow, R. W. Cahn, M. C. Flemings, B. Ilschner, E. J. Kramer, S. Mahajan, P. Veyssière, Eds. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2004)

  39. [39]

    C. Fang, C. Wan, X. Zhang, S. Okamoto, T. Ma, J. Qin, X. Wang, C. Guo, J. Dong, G. Yu, Z. Wen, N. Tang, S. S. P. Parkin, N. Nagaosa, Y. Lu, X. Han, Observation of the fluctuation spin Hall effect in a low-resistivity antiferromagnet. Nano Lett. 23, 11485–11492 (2023)

  40. [40]

    K. Wang, C. Petrovic, Multiband effects and possible Dirac states in LaAgSb 2. Phys. Rev. B 86, 155213 (2012)

  41. [41]

    J. E. Dill, C. F. C. Chang, D. Je na, H. G. Xing, Two-carrier model-fitting of Hall effect in semiconductors with dual-band occupation: A case study in GaN two-dimensional hole gas. J. Appl. Phys. 137, 025702 (2025)

  42. [42]

    C. M. Hurd, The Hall Effect in Metals and Alloys, Ch. 2 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1972)

  43. [43]

    Sólyom, Fundamentals of the Physics of Solids, Ch

    J. Sólyom, Fundamentals of the Physics of Solids, Ch. 24 (Springer, 2011)

  44. [44]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempaský, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. Šmejkal, T. Jungwirth, P. Wadley, Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe. Nature 636, 348–353 (2024)

  45. [45]

    Z. Fang, N. Nagaosa, K. S. Takahashi, A. Asamitsu, R. Mathieu, T. Ogasawara, H. Yamada, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, K. Terakura, The anomalous Hall effect and magnetic monopoles in momentum space. Science 302, 92–95 (2003)

  46. [46]

    Telesca, Y

    D. Telesca, Y. Nie, J. I. Budnick, B. O. Wells, B . Sinkovic, Surface valence states and stoichiometry of non -superconducting and superconducting FeTe films. Surf. Sci. 606, 1056–1061 (2012)

  47. [47]

    U. R. Singh, Preparation of magnetic tips for spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy on Fe1+yTe. Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015)

  48. [48]

    J. Moon, Q. Zou, H. Zhang, O. M. J. van ‘t Erve, N. G. Combs, L. Li, C. H. Li, Magnetic field-induced spin nematic phase up to room temperature in epitaxial antiferromagnetic FeTe thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. ACS Nano 17, 16886–16894 (2023). Page 16 of 21

  49. [49]

    Telesca, Y

    D. Telesca, Y. Nie, J. I. Budnick, B. O. Wells, B. Sinkovic, Surface valence states and stoichiometry of non -superconducting and superconducting FeTe films. Surf. Sci. 606, 1056–1061 (2012)

  50. [50]

    Telesca, Y

    D. Telesca, Y. Nie, J. I. Budnick, B. O. Wells, B. Sinkovic, Impact of valence states on the superconductivity of iron telluride and iron selenide films with incorporated oxygen. Phys. Rev. B 85, 214517 (2012)

  51. [51]

    Okamoto, A

    S. Okamoto, A. Moreo, N. Nagaosa, S. S. P. Parkin, Berry curvature and intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnet FeTe under magnetic field. private communication. Page 17 of 21 Figures and Tables Fig. 1. Structural characterizations of the FeTe/STO film. (A) Schematic lattice structure of FeTe. (B) Schematic diagram of the bicollinear antiferr...