pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12796 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Entanglement concentration via measurement:- role of imaginarity

Indranil Biswas , Subrata Bera , Ujjwal Sen , Indrani Chattopadhyay , Debasis Sarkar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords entanglement concentrationimaginaritycomplex measurementsentanglement swappingquantum networkspercolationthree-qubit systemsresource theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Complex three-qubit measurement bases improve entanglement concentration beyond the standard GHZ basis.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that three-qubit measurement bases using complex numbers with specific symmetries deliver better results than real-valued or standard GHZ bases when concentrating bipartite entanglement with the help of a third party. This holds for both the entanglement of assistance protocol and a modified entanglement swapping protocol, where a non-maximally entangled complex basis even surpasses a maximally entangled one. The advantage carries over to a quantum network percolation model on a honeycomb lattice, where the required bond occupation probability drops by 22.7 percent and the entanglement needed per bond drops by 10.6 percent. A reader would care because the work turns the resource theory of imaginarity into a concrete operational gain that lowers the physical resources needed for quantum communication tasks.

Core claim

Employing three-qubit complex measurement bases with certain symmetries outperforms the standard GHZ-basis in generating bipartite entanglement, both in the entanglement of assistance protocol and in a modified entanglement swapping protocol, while also addressing open problems on basis construction; this yields measurable resource reductions when applied to quantum network percolation on a honeycomb lattice.

What carries the argument

Symmetric three-qubit complex-valued measurement bases that incorporate imaginarity to assist in entanglement concentration protocols.

If this is right

  • The complex bases produce a significant improvement in the concentration of bipartite entanglement with third-party assistance.
  • A three-qubit non-maximally entangled complex basis surpasses the maximally entangled GHZ basis in modified swapping.
  • The approach reduces the required bond occupation probability by 22.7 percent in honeycomb-lattice quantum network percolation.
  • The approach reduces the entanglement required in each bond by 10.6 percent in the same percolation model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetric complex bases could be tested in other multi-party protocols such as quantum teleportation networks to check for similar efficiency gains.
  • If the bases can be built with current photonic technology, the resource savings might scale to larger networks beyond the honeycomb case.
  • The construction that solves the prior open problems points toward a general method for designing non-maximal bases that trade entanglement for operational advantage.

Load-bearing premise

The specific symmetric complex bases can be physically realized in optical setups with the claimed operational advantage and that the percolation model accurately captures the resource savings without extra implementation costs or noise.

What would settle it

An optical experiment implementing the proposed complex bases in a three-qubit system that shows no improvement in bipartite entanglement yield compared with the GHZ basis, or a recalculation of the honeycomb lattice percolation thresholds that finds no reduction in bond occupation probability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12796 by Debasis Sarkar, Indrani Chattopadhyay, Indranil Biswas, Subrata Bera, Ujjwal Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (Color online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (Color online) (a) The green vertical line incident upon the horizontal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (Color online) The circles on the alternating nodes of the honeycomb lattice in left figure denotes the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The role of complex numbers in quantum theory extends beyond mathematical convenience, having recently been formalized as a resource under the framework of the resource theory of imaginarity. Operationally, imaginarity translates into using fewer resources in optical setups. In this work, we investigate the operational advantage offered by complex-valued measurements in the entanglement of assistance protocol for three-qubit systems. We demonstrate that employing such measurement bases leads to a significant improvement in the concentration of bipartite entanglement with the aid of the third party. We further analyze a modified entanglement swapping protocol and show that a three-qubit complex measurement bases with certain symmetries outperform the standard GHZ-basis. This is also one example where a three-qubit non-maximally entangled basis surpasses a maximally entangled one in generating entanglement. Construction of the basis also addresses the open problems raised in [Phys. Rev. A. \textbf{108}, 022220 (2023)]. As an intriguing application, we show that using this approach in quantum network percolation on a honeycomb lattice reduces the required bond occupation probability by $22.7\%$ and, requirement of entanglement by $10.6\%$ in each bond.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the operational advantages of complex-valued measurements, framed through the resource theory of imaginarity, in entanglement concentration protocols for three-qubit systems. It shows that symmetric three-qubit complex measurement bases improve bipartite entanglement concentration in the entanglement-of-assistance protocol and outperform the standard GHZ basis in a modified entanglement-swapping protocol. The work also constructs such bases to address open problems from prior literature and applies the approach to quantum network percolation on a honeycomb lattice, claiming reductions of 22.7% in required bond occupation probability and 10.6% in entanglement per bond.

Significance. If the protocol improvements and quantitative savings hold under detailed verification, the paper provides concrete evidence that imaginarity offers operational advantages in entanglement distribution tasks and quantum networks. The demonstration that certain non-maximally entangled three-qubit bases can surpass maximally entangled ones in generating entanglement is a notable result that may influence resource-theoretic approaches to quantum information.

major comments (1)
  1. [Quantum network percolation application] In the quantum network percolation application, the reported 22.7% reduction in bond occupation probability and 10.6% reduction in entanglement per bond are derived by substituting the improved average concurrence (or equivalent figure of merit) from the symmetric complex bases into a standard bond-percolation threshold calculation for the honeycomb lattice. This mapping assumes uniform applicability to every bond, local three-qubit measurements without additional classical communication or synchronization overhead, and preservation of the lattice's universality class. No explicit network simulation incorporating the actual measurement outcomes, symmetry constraints, or implementation costs is provided to cross-check these assumptions, which directly affects the reliability of the quantitative claims.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title] The title contains an unconventional punctuation ('measurement:- role') that may be a typographical artifact; consider revising to 'Entanglement concentration via measurement: the role of imaginarity' for improved readability.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states the percentage improvements without cross-referencing the specific section, equation, or figure in the main text where the percolation thresholds and concurrence values are calculated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and the encouraging assessment of our manuscript. We address the major comment on the quantum network percolation application in detail below. We maintain that the quantitative claims are rigorously derived from the improved entanglement concentration and standard percolation theory, but we will revise the manuscript to provide additional clarifications on the assumptions and the calculation method.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the quantum network percolation application, the reported 22.7% reduction in bond occupation probability and 10.6% reduction in entanglement per bond are derived by substituting the improved average concurrence (or equivalent figure of merit) from the symmetric complex bases into a standard bond-percolation threshold calculation for the honeycomb lattice. This mapping assumes uniform applicability to every bond, local three-qubit measurements without additional classical communication or synchronization overhead, and preservation of the lattice's universality class. No explicit network simulation incorporating the actual measurement outcomes, symmetry constraints, or implementation costs is provided to cross-check these assumptions, which directly affects the reliability of the quantitative claims.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for clarity in this application. The 22.7% and 10.6% figures are calculated analytically by using the higher average concurrence achieved with the symmetric complex bases in the standard formula for the bond percolation threshold on the honeycomb lattice. In the quantum network percolation model, each bond's effective transmissivity or success probability is proportional to the bipartite entanglement (concurrence) that can be concentrated from the three-qubit resource. The complex bases improve this average concurrence, thereby lowering the critical occupation probability p_c required for percolation. The assumptions are standard in this context: the protocol is applied uniformly and locally at each lattice site using the three-qubit measurements on the qubits associated with the bonds meeting at a vertex. No extra classical communication is needed beyond what is already assumed in the entanglement distribution, as the measurement is local. The universality class is unchanged since the lattice and the probabilistic nature of bonds are the same. While we acknowledge that a full Monte Carlo simulation of the network dynamics including specific measurement outcomes could provide additional numerical confirmation, our results pertain to the exact threshold in the infinite lattice limit, where the analytical mapping is precise. To enhance the manuscript, we will expand the relevant section with an explicit step-by-step derivation of the percentage reductions and a discussion of these assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on new protocol analysis and standard percolation mapping

full rationale

The paper introduces new symmetric three-qubit complex measurement bases, derives their advantage in entanglement concentration and swapping protocols (outperforming GHZ), and substitutes the resulting figures of merit into a standard bond-percolation model on the honeycomb lattice to obtain the 22.7% and 10.6% savings. No step reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the cited prior work addresses open problems but is not invoked to justify the new bases or percentages. The percolation application is an independent numerical substitution under stated assumptions, not a re-derivation of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only access yields no identifiable free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities; the work rests on standard quantum mechanics and the established resource theory of imaginarity.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard postulates of quantum mechanics and the resource theory of imaginarity
    The paper invokes these frameworks to define complex measurements as a resource.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1248 out tokens · 59533 ms · 2026-05-10T16:22:34.873439+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Catalytic Enhancement of Coherence Fraction in Noisy Quantum Channels and Characterization of Strictly Incoherent Operations

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Catalysis can improve the coherence fraction of states after noisy quantum channels under specific conditions, and a new necessary and sufficient condition characterizes strictly incoherent operations among incoherent...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Thus the average entanglement yield is given by: E A|B 2,GW = 1−ϕ 2 0 ϕ 1 − p (ϕ 3 0 +ϕ 3 1 + 3ϕ 0 ϕ 2 1 ) 2 −4ϕ 2 0 ϕ 2 1 (2−3ϕ 0 ϕ 1 ) (13) In the FIG

    Observe that using the complex roots of unity has resulted inSCPthat is party- permutation invariant . Thus the average entanglement yield is given by: E A|B 2,GW = 1−ϕ 2 0 ϕ 1 − p (ϕ 3 0 +ϕ 3 1 + 3ϕ 0 ϕ 2 1 ) 2 −4ϕ 2 0 ϕ 2 1 (2−3ϕ 0 ϕ 1 ) (13) In the FIG. (2a), we plot the entanglement yield from both GHZ and GW-basis. Clearly for 0⩽ϕ 1 ⩽0.39493, the yie...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The other GHZ SLOCC class states can be generated in a similar way. VI. QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT PERCOLATION In this section we show an application of the entanglement swapping protocol with imaginary basis in ‘quantum entanglement percolation’ (QEP) protocols [47]. Bipartite entanglement swapping protocols lies at the heart of distributing entanglement throu...

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    provided a strong argument in favor of the use of complex numbers. However recent arguments [53–56] indicates 12 Entanglement vs Imaginarity Measurement basis Entanglem- ent Imaginarity Bond occupa- tion probabil- ity GHZ basis [39] 1 0 pGHZ = pCEP GW basis 0.6↓ 0.75↑ pGW ↓ TABLE I: The table compares the two types resource employed in the three-qubit mea...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Chitambar and G

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Gour,Quantum Resource Theories, Cambridge University Press (2025)

    G. Gour,Quantum Resource Theories, Cambridge University Press (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 865 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1895 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2881 (1992)

    work page 1992

  9. [9]

    Gisin, G

    N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 145 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Chitambar, D

    E. Chitambar, D. Leung, L. Manˇ cinska, M. Ozols, and A. Winter, Everything You Always Wanted to Know About LOCC (But Were Afraid to Ask), Commun. Math. Phys.328, 303 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Gheorghiu and R

    V. Gheorghiu and R. B. Griffiths, Entanglement transformations using separable operations, Phys. Rev. A76, 032310 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Gheorghiu and R

    V. Gheorghiu and R. B. Griffiths, Separable operations on pure states, Phys. Rev. A78, 020304 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    E. M. Rains, Bound on distillable entanglement, Phys. Rev. A60, 179 (1999)

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    Winter and D

    A. Winter and D. Yang, Operational Resource Theory of Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120404 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Gisin, Entanglement 25 Years after Quantum Teleportation: Testing Joint Measurements in Quantum Networks, En- tropy21, 325 (2019)

    N. Gisin, Entanglement 25 Years after Quantum Teleportation: Testing Joint Measurements in Quantum Networks, En- tropy21, 325 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Yurke and D

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen effects from independent particle sources, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1251 (1992)

    work page 1992

  18. [18]

    ˙Zukowski, A

    M. ˙Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, and A. K. Ekert, Event-ready-detectors Bell experiment via entanglement swap- ping, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 4287 (1993)

    work page 1993

  19. [19]

    Kundu and D

    A. Kundu and D. Sarkar, Nature of Nonlocality in Triangle Network based on Elegant Joint Measurement, Annalen der Physik536, 2300297 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Kundu and D

    A. Kundu and D. Sarkar, Influence of joint measurement bases on sharing network nonlocality, Quantum Inf. Process.24, 103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Kundu and D

    A. Kundu and D. Sarkar, Nature of Nonlocality in a triangle network based on EJM, arXiv:2310.04619 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Tavakoli, N

    A. Tavakoli, N. Gisin, and C. Branciard, Bilocal Bell Inequalities Violated by the Quantum Elegant Joint Measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 220401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Pozas-Kerstjens, N

    A. Pozas-Kerstjens, N. Gisin, and A. Tavakoli, Full Network Nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010403 (2022). 14

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Huang, X.-M

    C.-X. Huang, X.-M. Hu, Y. Guo, C. Zhang, B.-H. Liu, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, N. Gisin, C. Branciard, and A. Tavakoli, Entanglement Swapping and Quantum Correlations via Symmetric Joint Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 030502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Del Santo, J

    F. Del Santo, J. Czartowski, K. ˙Zyczkowski, and N. Gisin, Iso-entangled bases and joint measurements, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023085 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    A. Wei, G. Cobucci, and A. Tavakoli, Nonprojective Bell-state measurements, Phys. Rev. A110, 042206 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    K.-D. Wu, T. V. Kondra, S. Rana, C. M. Scandolo, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and A. Streltsov, Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 090401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, H. Mabuchi, J. A. Smolin, A. Thapliyal, and A. Uhlmann, Entanglement of Assistance, inQuantum Computing and Quantum Communications, edited by C. P. Williams (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999), pp. 247–257

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    C. Wang, X. Hu, and G. Dong, Exploring the Percolation Phenomena in Quantum Networks, Mathematics12, 3568 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Pollock, G

    K. Pollock, G. Wang, and E. Chitambar, Entanglement of assistance in three-qubit systems, Phys. Rev. A103, 032428 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Vidal, Entanglement of Pure States for a Single Copy, Phys

    G. Vidal, Entanglement of Pure States for a Single Copy, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1046 (1999)

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Hickey and G

    A. Hickey and G. Gour, Quantifying the imaginarity of quantum mechanics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical51, 414009 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    K.-D. Wu, T. V. Kondra, S. Rana, C. M. Scandolo, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and A. Streltsov, Resource theory of imaginarity: Quantification and state conversion, Phys. Rev. A103, 032401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Ac´ ın, A

    A. Ac´ ın, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jan´ e, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Generalized Schmidt Decomposition and Classi- fication of Three-Quantum-Bit States, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1560 (2000)

    work page 2000

  35. [35]

    Torun and A

    G. Torun and A. Yildiz, Deterministic transformations of three-qubit entangled pure states, Phys. Rev. A100, 022320 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    D ¨ur, G

    W. D ¨ur, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A62, 062314 (2000)

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Coffman, J

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A61, 052306 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    H. A. Carteret and A. Sudbery, Local symmetry properties of pure three-qubit states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General33, 4981 (2000)

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Ghose, N

    S. Ghose, N. Sinclair, S. Debnath, P. Rungta, and R. Stock, Tripartite Entanglement versus Tripartite Nonlocality in Three-Qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-Class States, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 250404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    S. E. Ahnert and M. C. Payne, General implementation of all possible positive-operator-value measurements of single- photon polarization states, Phys. Rev. A71, 012330 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger,Bell’s theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1989)

    work page 1989

  42. [42]

    Khanna, S

    S. Khanna, S. Halder, and U. Sen, Quantum entanglement percolation under a realistic restriction, Phys. Rev. A109, 012419 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Zhong, Y

    H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, W. Li, L.-C. Peng, Z.-E. Su, Y. Hu, Y.-M. He, X. Ding, W. Zhang, H. Li, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. You, X.-L. Wang, X. Jiang, L. Li, Y.-A. Chen, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, 12-Photon Entanglement and Scalable Scattershot Boson Sampling, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250505 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Sch ¨on, E

    C. Sch ¨on, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, Sequential Generation of Entangled Multiqubit States, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 110503 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    N. H. Lindner and T. Rudolph, Proposal for Pulsed On-Demand Sources of Photonic Cluster State Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 113602 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    M. V. Larsen, X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deterministic generation of a two- dimensional cluster state, Science366, 369 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Thomas, L

    P. Thomas, L. Ruscio, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom, Nature608, 677 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Omran, H

    A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, A. S. Zibrov, H. Pichler, S. Choi, J. Cui, M. Rossignolo, P. Rembold, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Generation and manipulation of Schr ¨odinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays, Science365, 570 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Besse, K

    J.-C. Besse, K. Reuer, M. C. Collodo, A. Wulff, L. Wernli, A. Copetudo, D. Malz, P. Magnard, A. Akin, M. Gabureac, G. J. Norris, J. I. Cirac, A. Wallraff, and C. Eichler, Realizing a deterministic source of multipartite-entangled photonic qubits, Nat. Commun.11, 4877 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Ac´ ın, J

    A. Ac´ ın, J. I. Cirac, and M. Lewenstein, Entanglement percolation in quantum networks, Nature Phys.3, 256 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Miller, M

    M. Miller, M. Scalici, M. Fellous-Asiani, and A. Streltsov, Power of noisy quantum states and the advantage of resource dilution, Phys. Rev. A109, 022404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Perseguers, D

    S. Perseguers, D. Cavalcanti, G. J. Lapeyre, M. Lewenstein, and A. Ac´ ın, Multipartite entanglement percolation, Phys. Rev. A81, 032327 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    Stauffer and A

    D. Stauffer and A. Aharony,Introduction to percolation theory, (Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 1992), 2nd ed

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    Renou, D

    M.-O. Renou, D. Trillo, M. Weilenmann, T. P. Le, A. Tavakoli, N. Gisin, A. Ac´ ın, and M. Navascu´ es, Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified, Nature600, 625 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    P. B. Hita, A. Trushechkin, H. Kampermann, M. Epping, and D. Bruß, Quantum mechanics based on real numbers: A 15 consistent description, arXiv:2503.17307 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    & Woods, M

    T. Hoffreumon and M. P. Woods, Quantum theory does not need complex numbers, arXiv:2504.02808 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    & Woods, M

    T. Hoffreumon and M. P. Woods, Quantum theory based on real numbers cannot be experimentally falsified, arXiv:2603.19208 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Comment on "Quantum theory based on real numbers cannot be experimentally falsified": On the compatibility of physical principles with information theory for fermions

    F. M. Kalarde, X. Xu, and M.-O. Renou, Comment on “Quantum theory based on real numbers cannot be experimentally falsified”: On the compatibility of physical principles with information theory for fermions, arXiv:2604.07425 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Pimpel, M

    F. Pimpel, M. J. Renner, and A. Tavakoli, Correspondence between entangled states and entangled bases under local transformations, Phys. Rev. A108, 022220 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Ghosal, J

    A. Ghosal, J. Ghai, T. Saha, S. Ghosh, and M. Alimuddin, Repeater-Based Quantum Communication Protocol: Maximizing Teleportation Fidelity with Minimal Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 160803 (2025)

    work page 2025